Transforming Food Systems and Land Use (Option 1) This is perhaps one of the more frightening issues with the World Economic Forum (WEF). As can already be seen, the media is being controlled through partners Facebook and Google, but there are a couple of areas that will be heavily targeted. One is the food supply and land use, and eventually health care and education will be taken over completely. How the food system will be taken over starts with this video. The host started out basically confirming the reason for control over food, "Food is about everybody", claiming the current system is "unsustainable". Of course, another crisis which is an old theme for decades starting with Malthus, overpopulation and starvation will come, this in spite of rising obesity rates across the world and billions of people not having access to food. Moving on, a "hunger pandemic" now exists and food production is a major contributor to greenhouse gases, land degradation, and loss of forests. Population growth is also responsible for this catastrophe. Thus justifies the excuses for transforming the food system. Not to be forgotten is the multiple food system partners in the WEF such as BASF, Cargill, and Syngenta to name a few. But on the United Nations side there is also Kellogg's, Nestle, and others. Technological, behavior, and policy transformations will be needed. The United Nations (UN) Food Systems Summit was a "turning point" for transformation, science a data are crucial in improving policy, and of course businesses should be "stimulated" to create solutions. WEF is already working on changing the food system with its Food Innovation Hubs. Why the information gives the appearance of farmer involvement the truth is the intention is to completely change how they farm by forcing them into technological farming and will require "reskilling" them. These hubs will also be changed to regional hubs, destroying jurisdictional boundaries and sovereignty. While this technological change is claimed to be part of new innovation, those practices have already been in existence for some time. Consumers need more "choice" in what they eat, that is, eating only food that is good for the planet and that does not include those methane creating cows. The UN World Food Programme director discussed how the private sector can work together more on this problem. Yes, let's not allow a sovereign country such as the United States have control over their own food production, let's have businesses work with the UN, so much smarter. Integration of farmers into this plot would also be needed. Scaling up the efforts to transform the system has been a problem but thanks to Covid-19 the problem has been exposed as a crisis. Climate change is still there however to bring about a "collapse" of the food system and biodiversity. Water was also mentioned as an issue that needs to be considered, how it's used in agriculture, and this is a scary subject as the UN has made it very clear the intent to control all water and supports transboundary sharing. The gentleman from Japan whose industry is milk production spoke to the ways in which cows are monitored, down to the last detail which somehow reduces the feed and less CO2 emission in milk production. Leadership for this initiative is lacking and without funding, mass starvation will occur, destabilization of nations will occur, and mass migration. Leaders have recognized this because of the virus. What is missing? A collective belief that we can do this. It is the farmer left in the dust, non-governmental organizations and businesses should take charge to not only control the quantity, sharing, and distribution, but also the type of food grown and the nutritional content. Recommendation is to start growing your own food supply, plant a garden and fruit trees, learn how to can and dehydrate, develop relationships with those who raise some form of meat or raise your own if able, and beef up those cooking skills. Look to our ancestors, they knew how to create many things out of small amounts of food. Granted, the nutritional part may not be quite as good but one thing is for sure, it has to be better than what fast food provides with all the questionable additives. Transforming Food Systems and Land Use (Option 2) The destruction and takeover of food systems and land use continues in this video. To skip the mood music start at the 5:12" mark. It starts out with pictures of meat free foods, mung beans because unlike pork it is halal, algae, and duckweed, all of which can be used as sources of protein rather than meat. Most of these foods are from Asian and other country diets. The host is from CNBC. The standard threat of its urgency is at the top of the list, "billions are at risk of extinction". Personally picked "experts" make up the panel, mostly from the UN. There was a lengthy talk about the need for funding to grow enough food for billions of people. More taxation and regulatory reform is needed changes made because it is unjust and places a burden on women. Reshaping land use is another essential component. Now the oceans need protection for its food production for future generations. Reducing fresh water consumption is also on the table. Populism was attacked again as a problem, "it is just speech". Somehow "abundant capital" is available to fund all of this transformation. Banks and farmers need the necessary time to make all of these transitions, which sounds like they are just going to go ahead and do it. A "carbon bank" is also needed to make this work, something which Biden supports and can do without Congress, while at the same time working with the WEF to create the "carbon trading platform". The claim is that these changes should not be from the top down but from the bottom up. How insane is that when they are designing a new food production system from the top down that they want farmers to adopt? Demonstration farms are set up to show farmers these brilliant changes to suck them in. Those Food Innovation hubs were also mentioned again. To manipulate the public, they are going to create more demand for what they end up growing. Hmmm, does that mean all other options for food will be gradually removed so there is no choice? An "environmental footprint" will be on every ingredient in food, how, when, where its transported. This is all thanks to 5G which carries the ability to track everything. Just imagine what can be done for allocation of food to what they think is the most in need. Another woman talked about how nutrition is contributing to obesity. Wait, didn't they just say previously millions were starving? Weight loss is the usual outcome of starvation. Why can't they make up their minds? It isn't important, the agenda, no matter what lie has to be told, is the means to the end. In a nutshell, they will force farmers to adapt to their version of what agriculture should be through technology. Since this can be a horrifically expensive venture, it may well put many farmers out of business, just in time for big agriculture corporations to step in and buy it all up. Meanwhile, the farmer, with no income, will be "reskilled" to work on agricultural technology, computers, robots, machinery, etc., some of which is already happening. As the technology takes hold the technocrats will be analyzing every scrap of food, who needs food, making sure that there is equal allocation to the world. As the beginning of the video reflects, the world will also be forced into a more meatless world but what they deem is more planet friendly and nutritious.
Enjoy that steak while you can.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
April 2024
|