Part of the Western Governors Association (WGA) new Western Prosperity Roundtable (WPR) platform is to completely reorient how one receives care for their health. Webinars were previously released on WPRs agenda for education and workforce training, and now the video on Improving Health Care Access in the West is available. In reality the primary goal is accelerating access to high-speed internet (5G) for telehealth which is falsely presented as improving healthcare. None of the presenters know anything about medical care. Serving as the moderator is lawyer Mei Wa Kwong, who is the Executive Director of the Center for Connected Health Policy. She assists in driving policy on telehealth and it is coming from the government. Laura Arcibal is the telehealth and health care access coordinator for the Hawaii Department of Health. She works to "increase the adoption of telehealth in Hawaii" and create partnerships across jurisdictional boundaries. Providing access to broadband and making sure providers are adequately reimbursed to encourage their use of telehealth are reiterated by her. Ensuring everyone has education in "digital literacy and AI technologies" to "work and learn from home and access to government services" are emphasized. Finally, Ms. Arcibal highlights the need for a "centralized data system" to track telehealth utilization. Now this is just for Hawaii but it is in line with the WGA. She also noted a generation of providers that will be retiring soon and with provider demographics changing new providers will be more digitally inclined and use telehealth. Yes, replacing experienced providers with a machine is really smart Ms. Arcibal. William England, also a lawyer, works for the federal Health Resources and Service Administration and is Director for the Office for the Advancement of Telehealth. Mr. England envisions telehealth growth over the years with mental health being a primary focus. As a result of Covid, implementation has begun with Medicaid reimbursement for telehealth and even phone visits allowed! Idaho belongs to the Northwest Regional Telehealth Resource Center that promotes this agenda. He notes the federal partnerships, which include the entire "federal space", are so exciting. Later on, he almost described this whole transition as an experiment, not knowing what would work, what modalities were best, and the need for gathering information to determine what worked best. But he did state creating policies must precede figuring it all out. Kind of like this vaccine experiment we are under. Naturally, he reminds us that federal grants are available to fund this agenda, especially for non-profits. More fiat money being used against us. David Pryor MD, Regional Vice President Medical Director for Anthem Commercial Accounts, is the only individual in this group with a medical background. Anthem has ties to the WEF and a shady history. Mr. Pryor reports a "digital first" strategy for his company. According to him, the percentage of increase in the use of telehealth with the pandemic was 60% (This is not by the design of providers, it was forced upon them). The misleading claim that 69% of providers want to increase the use of telehealth came from the Covid-19 Health Care Coalition, a conglomerate of healthcare organizations, technology firms, nonprofits, academia, and startups, not by actual providers. Digital Kiosks are being promoted as well, for eliminating language barriers and improving "culturally appropriate" care. Telehealth kits for rural areas will be used for post Covid-19 care and eventually chronic care. There are eight telehealth initiatives underway to dramatically change healthcare to "build a telehealth system for the future". Again, the mistaken belief is that this will provide better quality care. Lastly, Mr. Pryor claims the behavioral health populations were best served but he could not possibly be more wrong. Telehealth removes the ability of the provider to evaluate a mental health problem. The ability to assess personal hygiene, general health, motor activity, movement disorders associated with psychotropic medication, and other subtle observations are removed. Often patients with mental health issues isolate, telehealth enhances isolation by removing the need to come to an appointment and interact with others. How does the paranoid patient deal with being on camera? These are only a few facets of how telehealth removes a complete assessment. The same with medical conditions, it will never replace what can be assessed with an in person visit. No Mr. Pryor, telehealth fails in all areas. Shannon Sainer, MSW, represents the Nurse-Family Partnership and Childcare First and is Impact and Learning National Service Office Director, who can't wait to get into your home. Ms. Sainer's work involves in-home visits for two years with first time low income mothers, with mental health and employment part of the package. She reinforces that because of the pandemic there was increased telehealth use. No internet? No problem, in partnership with Verizon they provided it to mothers along with smart phones. However, she reports telehealth provides cost reduction, saving time, and adding more patients to the caseload, basically exchanging quality for quantity. As she stated, actions by the government on Covid forced providers to use telehealth, and that is what this is all about, forcing a change to the healthcare system. Even though nurses prefer person to person contact with patients, Ms. Sainer explained that with education and training (indoctrination and propaganda) nurses became more comfortable with telehealth. Policies have forced that switch as well. There was also a higher use of "audio only", translated that means phone. Yeah, let's keep changing the language. This WGA platform aligns with the World Economic Forum (WEF) digital health plan utilizing 5G for its 4th Industrial Revolution agenda. It is about getting 5G into every home for connectivity and gathering data, eventually providing the ability to control how you live, it has nothing to do with your health. The intention was never to end telehealth once the pandemic ended, it was to fully implement it to change how we receive healthcare. Mental health care by telehealth is a WEF goal and overall transformation of the healthcare system. All health information will be collected, shared, and through artificial intelligence, algorithms will be created that medical professionals will be forced to use. As a result reimbursement will change to "Value-Based Payments" where providers will be not be paid for a service but will be "incentivized to use evidence-based medicine...upgrade health information technology, and use data analytics to get paid for their services." Through the National Governors Association (NGA), in partnership with the WEF and in which Gov. Little participates, the goal is pushing value based care, another WEF goal. Basically it is a false premise that costs will be cut for the misnomer of better health outcomes by using algorithms, rather than using a medical provider's expertise of clinical experience, and restructuring payment systems for better healthcare outcomes. Changing a payment system does not improve health care. The federal and state governments are now a machine of tyranny with no regard for their responsibility of representing people. What Idahoan requested medical visits via a computer? With educational data being collected from cradle to grave to create a workforce, the government will now be collecting data to determine health outcomes and if one is complying with the algorithm, punishing the provider if health doesn't improve. Government is out of control and our Republic has been lost.
0 Comments
Transhumanism is described as "a philosophical movement, the proponents of which advocate and predict the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies able to greatly enhance longevity, mood and cognitive abilities", at least according to Wikipedia. For the World Economic Forum (WEF), a softer description is given, brain enhancement. Klaus Schwab, WEF founder, has a great interest in transhumanism. He was born in 1938 and his early years were exposed to the Nazi regime. How much influence it had on his formative years could easily be questioned with some of his beliefs for a perfect world, rather than a perfect Germany. In this short video, his vision for the world is a frightening exposure of how his mind perceives the future of humanity, a "fusion of the physical, digital, and biological world." He wrote a book about this 4th Industrial Revolution, which includes this fusion, and in which Joe Biden has participated along with other U.S. leaders. By 2025 many of these technologies will be forced onto us, and can even be seen now. The Western Governors Association (WGA) previously created its Reimagining the Rural West Initiative (RRW) in order to implement the United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). This initiative is also "connected" to the World Economic Forum (WEF) Great Reset agenda as it also promotes implementation of the SDG. As the WGA uses the pretext of Covid-19 to justify its actions, so does the WEF. Apparently the RRW Initiative wasn't enough, or perhaps not moving fast enough, to destroy the western states. WGA has created a new policy platform, the Western Prosperity Roundtable (WPR), to further the damage. Keeping in mind this will produce major impacts on half the United States, it also contributes to the ongoing strategy of removing jurisdictional boundaries and representation with its "cross pollination of ideas among states". As usual, there is always some pending crisis that mandates "The Imperative For Action" as discussed in this introductory video to the WPR. Oregon Governor Kate Brown, who has run her state into the ground with more than half the citizens wanting to secede, reminds us there are more disasters to come. Speaking last, Governor Brad Little is very much a part of this initiative with a short blurb advising us of the opportunity to hear from "experts" on our prosperity with a focus on broadband which is the foundation to the Great Reset, guaranteeing we will never go back to the way we were. It's almost as if the economic shutdown needed to reach a certain point of damage in order for this to move forward. He ends with healthcare and telehealth changes that will become permanent. Each issue is covered in several videos. First is Connectivity and Closing the Digital Divide, another Great Reset focus, with federal dollars flowing to the states for installing broadband. The Education and Training for a Changing Economy video, which includes speakers from the education, state workforce, and union sectors, covers how the education system is used, from kindergarten up, to train the future workforce for the changing industries such as renewable energy. As of yet the Disaster and Resilience Recovery, State and Local Data in Evidence Based Decision Making, and Improving Healthcare Access Across the West videos have not been posted.
A representative government is no longer needed. This group, along with their crony non-profits, corporations, and experts, have our future all figured out for us from childhood up, determining how life will be lived and our place in the workforce as "human capital". Representation is now through these groups and it has been made very clear that we will not be allowed to continue life as we did before. The bottom line is we are being forced into this new world. One caveat, the rest of the globe is adopting the Great Reset objectives, is there any way we cannot be part of it also? Can the United States keep its liberty foundations that have contributed to our prosperity and live in a world that is based on data collection and sharing for the Internet of Things, corporations demanding that education is geared towards serving its needs, global citizenry, and a complete shift in how the economy works? Perhaps a new global governance model is needed. Freedom and individualism are the only sacrifices to be made. Very recently there has been a massive push towards creating the myth, or what is really a theory without any scientific proof, that racism is a public health crisis, and if not already in your city or county, may be coming to your local government soon with a resolution to adopt it. It is Critical Race Theory (CRT) on steroids. Several Democratic Senators have reintroduced a resolution, S.Res. 172, Declaring Racism A Public Health Crisis, with the House of Representatives creating companion legislation. Somehow, a virus has accelerated racial disparities that pervade public health which is a direct result of systemic racism. Say what? Included groups are Blacks, Latinos, Alaska Natives and American Indians with higher infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates. This is described as "racial disparities", as explained by the National Center for Health Statistics and Center for Disease Control, expanding the general idea that all matters related to health have been racist. A resolution on this matter will chart "a path to greater equity in health care." However, the resolution itself goes far beyond just the above identified groups, including LGBTQIA, Pacific Islanders, and Asians. "Health" encompasses everything including certain states not providing Medicaid CHIP funding to lawfully residing immigrant children; inequality in mental health, foster care placements, and welfare numbers; discriminatory housing; toxic waste exposure and poor air quality; access to healthy food, safe water, and neighborhoods; education, transportation, and job security; disproportionate impacts by the criminal justice and immigration enforcement systems; and police brutality and death by police. Public health is used as the catch phrase that includes every aspect over our lives and is why so many topics are included in the resolution. But it also provides the excuse to completely overall us and society for the sake of racial equity. Now here is an offensive statement, the resolution declares "that the United States stands firmly in honoring its moral purpose of advancing the self-evident truths that all people are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Not mentioned is that it is not the job of the government, through its limited enumerated powers, to take over and control every aspect of our lives. What a distortion. Efforts to get the ball rolling on this have already started with the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE). On the Federal Register is a proposal for an American History and Civics Education program in grants with a comment period that ends 5/19/21. While the proposal claims it is intended to educate students about the history and principles of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and traditional American history, Priority 1 quickly outlines the real intent is addressing systemic racism and urgency to improve "racial equity" in society. Citing Ibram X. Kendi, who has declared "we must fight discrimination with discrimination, and that it’s racist to disagree", the proposal states "schools across the country are working to incorporate anti-racist practices into teaching and learning". Kendi has even written a book on CRT for babies. Since this is a proposal for grants, applicants applying for a proposed project must incorporate teaching and learning practices that "take into account systemic marginalization, biases, inequities, and discriminatory policy", and incorporate racial, ethnic, and cultural perspectives. Students must also be taught how to understand "their own bias". Rather boldly, the proposal also requires students "Understanding how inaccurate information may be used to manipulate individuals, and developing strategies to recognize accurate and inaccurate information." If there were ever a pot calling the kettle black this would be it. Although this report by Dan Titus, Racism &Health Equity: Subsidizing Minority and Undocumented Populations, is primarily about California, it provides deep insight into what should be scrutinized in local governments and public health departments. Racism public health resolutions have shown up in cities such as Ohio, Utah, Virginia, and Minnesota. So far, no cities in Idaho have been identified as adopting this type of resolution, however a vigilant eye must be kept on the way in which city planning and public health departments are directed. Starting on page 37 the report has suggestions on what to look for and starting on page 40 are critical questions that should be asked of local officials if such a resolution should be proposed. His report shows how easily this impacts the local level and how to challenge it in your local city or county. For Idaho, the most critical issue coming up is S1193, to be voted on when the legislature reconvenes on May 12th. This six-million-dollar federal grant, if authorized, would be given to a non-profit for expanding early childhood learning centers, with another six million per year for two more years. If the USDOE grant proposal is approved, it means that the future grants would include the requirement to integrate critical race theory into its work. While the non-profit, Idaho Association for Education of Young Children (IAEYC) claims it does not include this in its work, it would be required with future grants. It is critical that this bill is defeated in the House.
This Imprimis article on critical race theory explains its origin and how it has been implemented in our education system. Idaho cannot let our youngest children be exposed to this indoctrination. As Idahoans continue to sleep, these issues are marching on rapidly, advancing the destruction of our nation. How much longer will it take for Idahoans to realize what is being done? It is time for citizens at a local level to organize and challenge all public officials with any decision that destroys our Republic, and demand no participation in any federal program or direction that advances that destruction, regardless of how much money is dangled in their face. If the agenda continues, it is only our fault. At issue is using racism in the public health system as the driver of change in all aspects of our lives, and that is the goal, redefining life and liberty into one that is defined and controlled. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|