Since there are multiple fronts of attacks occurring that are leading us to destruction, none any more or less important than another, it is easier to provide a quick snapshot of issues of which to be aware.
Censorship will advance even further as the World Economic Forum (WEF) has declared disinformation at the top of the list for global risks in 2024, actually superseding environmental threats. What that means is there will be an intensified effort to eliminate, refute, and/or censor any information that does not fit its narrative. In short, the WEF is clearly threatened by the backlash against its narrative that is occurring across the world. Cleverly, it is blaming AI for this spread of misinformation while at the same time touting its benefit for mankind. Keeping in mind that top media corporations are members of the WEF, such as Google, Meta (Facebook), Comcast, NBCUniversal, and News Corp to name just a few, a full smorgasbord of information can, and will be more severely controlled. A classic example of this is the recent refusal to show former President Trump's victory speech in Iowa. Or when he said he would be a dictator on day one was conveniently altered to exclude the full statement. Oh, and don't forget to start preparing for the next plandemic, Disease X. Depending on one's perspective, good news may or may not be on the horizon. WEF pharmaceutical giants are working on a vaccine for the fentanyl crisis. Basically, this vaccine blocks the effects of fentanyl on the brain so the individual can't get the high. So far, it has only been tested on rats, with "no side effects"...in rats that is. Interestingly, it doesn't work for other types of opioids such as percodan, codeine, or heroin, which could prompt a vaccinated individual to swap over from fentanyl to another opioid. Sounds like a move that may add to a higher profit margin for pharmaceutical companies just as the Covid-19 vaccine did, more vaccines for all, just a prophylactic measure for everyone to deter them from ever using. Naturally, the survey says, approval. And no, so far, these vaccines are not made with mRNA technology. Hmm, create synthetic fentanyl, use Covid-19 to exacerbate its lethality, so a vaccine could be developed to stop its effects? What about China? Then there is the border. The reality is that we do not have a border crisis, we are not being invaded, although that idea may be contested by some. It is actually migration by invitation via the government. Acting as a welcoming committee, the government will provide photo ID cards for easy access to other benefits, maybe even voting eventually. Or migrants could just print their own ballot and mail it in. As a result of the Global Refugee Forum held in 2023, the U.S. Department of State pledged 26 commitments towards 8 pledges "in meeting the needs of refugees and host communities" to help address the "forced displacements" across the globe. The State Department also made a "commitment to the Global Compact on Refugees...and...dedication to championing refugee protection and solutions", an international cooperation effort. Other pledges include deliberately bringing in refugees from Rohingya, and joining the Global Alliance to End Statelessness. Of course, funding is included in these pledges for refugee self reliance programs including WEF; working with the private sector for economic refugee inclusion, and assistance with finding work, attending school, and finding housing. So far, Idaho isn't on this government WelcomeCorps program that accepts refugees, but there are plenty of other avenues for "refugees". It is known that this border issue is really about destroying America, but there is also some thought that there is intent to de-Christianize America, and decimate the white culture, at least according to Joe starting at the 10:24" mark. Not once, as he blathers on, does he ever mention the privilege and responsibility of being an American. The border issue is a deliberate orchestration by countries, in which the United States is involved, to redistribute populations for economic reasons. This Department of Homeland Security website and report have some interesting information on immigration. Speaking of the WEF, which most don't give a tinker's cuss about, just finished its annual meeting at Davos, having convened under the theme, Building Trust, while remaining ignorant in understanding why nobody trusts them. However, there was a panel on "What to Expect from a Possible Republican Administration?" Panel members included former Senator Rob Portman, The Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, and what might be described as some other dolts. The panel discussion primarily centered around former President Trump, his previous presidency, and speculation about what he would do if he won the next election. Kevin Roberts gave some surprising statements at the 9" mark, chastising WEF by saying the political elites and unelected technocrats grasp over people should be destroyed; the next administration should make a list of every WEF agenda and object to all of them; upon Trump's inauguration every unelected bureaucrat should be fired, that climate change policies should be confronted, and Trump should spend less money (39:30" mark). Revitalizing self-governance was also mentioned (49:27 mark). The whole panel discussion is worth listening to regarding thoughts on another Trump presidency. WEF also took a hit of criticism from Argentine President Javier Milei about its collectivist and socialism agenda, why the freedom of capitalism provides prosperity, and why social justice does not work. The full speech can be viewed starting at the 2:09" mark. Bringing in confrontational speakers? Is it part of its Building Trust theme, to gaslight those who detest the WEF? Meanwhile, attacks on agriculture and ranching are worldwide from Environment, Social Governance (ESG) policies in America, to banning nitrogen in the Netherlands, slashing fuel subsidies in Germany, enforcing climate policies and higher costs in France, and culling cattle in Ireland. All of these tactics are intended to bring devastation to the agricultural and ranching sectors in the world, and corporations involved in this are all WEF members. Bring on the insects. See those folks in the streets in Germany and France? That is what we should be doing on every destructive issue that has been brought into America's soul. One last thought for the day. If anatomical parts do not define gender, how does adding/removing them affirm it?
0 Comments
If not following or familiar with the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty negotiations, Children's Health Defense has a good video explaining just how dangerous this is to our sovereignty. Valerie Borek, James Roguski, Aimee Villella McBride, and Meryl Nass talk about what information is being discussed at the negotiations. For a frightening example of what is being discussed go to the 42:23 minute mark.
This is a really good video about creating a local county ordinance, similar to what was done in Florida, that protects citizens from vaccine mandates and interference from WHO and any other third party entity wanting to force its vaccine agenda onto citizens.
In 2021, Governor Little signed an Executive Order (EO) "banning any State of Idaho governmental entity from requiring so-called “vaccine passports” – or proof of COVID-19 vaccination for citizens to receive public services or access facilities", but other than state services there is no protection. HB 155 intends to reinforce this EO into law but again does not provide protection from "any requirement Imposed by the federal government" and other circumstances.
While this is just great when it comes to government facilities, what about non-government facilities like stores or travel? One great bill that is happening is HB 154, introduced by Sen. Tammy Nichols and Rep. Judy Boyle, that would charge any medical provider with a misdemeanor for giving mRNA injections to an individual. This is a great step by our legislators in protecting Idahoans. Given the backlash by the public, vaccine passport threats have diminished. Several states have also prohibited this requirement along with any vaccine mandate. However, one should not be fooled by the waning agenda for vaccine passports, it is a fight that still requires attention. New virus threats will be thrown at us in the future which will renew the vaccine and passport mandates. One reason for the effort behind these passports is that they are a stepping stone for the much desired Digital ID agenda, which will lock us into a world of being controlled. Mandating vaccine passports are part of the World Health Organization (WHO) international pandemic treaty discussions as well. Not to be outdone, the government even plans to track your vaccination status through billing codes (9") used by providers and medical facilities, just another avenue for the federal government to identify who is complying and who is not. As recent as November 2022, "proof of vaccination" and "digital COVID-19 certificates" were still being discussed by the White House as part of G20 (#23). The whole declaration was about advancing the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. It is up to Idahoans to protect themselves and go on the offensive now and build in necessary protections that will prevent everyone from being sucked into this vacuum of control. Whitney Webb is a investigative journalist who has developed 22 Ways To Stop Vaccine ID Passports. Following are some of her suggestions and there is no reason why anyone cannot participate in at least one of them. Top of the list, Do Not Comply, and boycott any businesses that require them. Because of his close relationship with the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI), Governor Little will not extend his vaccine passport ban to Idaho businesses, it is up to Idahoans to boycott them. While he claims his reasoning is due to wanting a "limited government", the truth is IACI follows the dictates of global corporations, and Governor Little supports them. Avoid using QR codes as well. Engage with your legislator in drafting a bill to prohibit vaccine passports, here is an example to get you started. While you're at it include a ban on all digital identity applications. Because vaccine passports are part of the wider issue of Digital ID and technocratic control, measures to stop Central Bank Digital Currency are needed as well. Use only cash or checks for purchasing, avoid online financial activity, go to hard wired internet instead of WiFi, and use only local banks or credit unions. Each of the businesses listed in this article are World Economic Forum partners. Boycott them. If you have investments in any of them, pull your money out of them. The goal is to minimize a digital identity as much as possible. While it may be difficult to ascertain, find out if the local bank or credit union you use ascribes to the Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics. If they do, let them know of your opposition, this was very successful in Boise last year. If they refuse, find one that does not participate. Webb has some other information that can be used to fight this agenda. Take the time to read it and look at the links. Create a plan for yourself and your family. Become part of the resistance, there are many ways to resist. And the time is now. Idahoans can be very creative with solutions so share what you have done to resist. All problems have a potential solution and it is time to start implementing them. On January 19 at Davos a panel convened to speak on "100 Days to Outrace the Next Pandemic". The general focus of this panel was the disease pandemics to come and the amount of vaccines that will be needed. There was also some slights towards the "political" issues that came with Covid-19 like whether or not to wear a mask, and a complete avoidance of it really being a matter of freedom and choice, and any vaccine safety issues. One strong suggestion was the draconian need for a digital infrastructure (of course) to share data. Just overall really disgusting but a good insight into what they are planning in the future. Start at the 5:45 mark to skip the mood music. The current White House administration is doing its part for this endeavor, preparing a report, American Pandemic Preparedness: Transforming Our Capabilities, and a Strategy to Strengthen Health Security and Prepare for Biothreats. By all appearances there is a plan in the works to bring more disease upon us.
Just like Event 201, the corona virus exercise held two months prior to the corona virus pandemic, another exercise held October 23, 2022, again sponsored by Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins, was held in Brussels, Belgium, called the "Catastrophic Contagion". This exercise is the fifth in creating a ruthless plan to bring fear and tyranny upon the world with the threat of disease. Labeled Event 201 2.0, caution should be applied that this foretells what is going to be done next to the world. So successful was the strategic move to take over the world with masks, lock downs, economic shutdowns, and mandatory injections, one can only assume each contagion thrown at the world will become even more threatening with more tyrannical dictates. This new disease is called Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS) 2025. Perhaps the world will be given a break for another year or two. In planning the next disease catastrophe, the same traitors to the world have picked an enterovirus that in certain cases can be particularly more lethal, with the potential for causing a wide variety of illness, a perfect set-up for more vaccines. One already being tracked, Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), can be especially devastating for children causing flaccid myelitis. How coincidental is that? To make the picture more confusing there are over 300 enterovirus serotypes, EV-D68 is just one. From a video on the website, several curious points are raised. Regional solidarity, and communication from scientists, social, religious and political leaders will be needed for this new pandemic. Tom Frieden, associated with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and New York Mayor Bloomberg, and a fine upstanding citizen who should be trusted, brought up the issue of broken "trust" between populations, health care systems, and the government. One could speculate this will prompt an even greater propaganda machine than was done for Covid-19. From this exercise, based on the Covid-19 pandemic results, the question arose, "If future pandemics have a much higher lethality than COVID-19, or for example, if they affect predominantly children, would or should countries take different, stronger, earlier measures to contain it, and what are those measures?" Three factors on this are more lethality, greater effect on children, and stronger measures for containment. Translated does this mean more fear mongering and dictatorial measures to get society to respond appropriately?
As the predictions from Event 201 came to fruition, there is little reason to not think that this exercise is the foretelling of what is to come with the next planned pandemic. The World Economic Forum has already created the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to profit from every pandemic they promote. The world has once again been warned of what is to come. As part of Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3, Target 3.8 includes "vaccines for all" through its universal health care coverage agenda. The World Health Organization (WHO), whose dictates are followed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Global Health Strategy program, has a handy website "Explaining the Immunization Agenda 2030". The plan is to immunize for every disease, and future diseases, to make the world population "healthy". The World Economic Forum has the same agenda for its corporate partners profits but primarily to initiate the vaccine passport system to start the digital identity agenda that will put a traceable mark on everyone.
This is why mandated vaccines are needed, it is the new discriminatory marking of humans. It will not end with just the Covid vaccine, other markers will be added over time. The closest activity Idaho currently has to gene editing is potatoes and strawberries. However, Simplot previously obtained gene editing licensing rights in an agreement with DowDuPont. Just this year Simplot entered into another alliance with Plant Sciences Inc., a plant breeding company, for the same purposes. Technology for this gene editing in agriculture is the same as being used on humans. A video from 2015 has surfaced with Klaus Schwab talking about gene editing. He openly admits the 4th Industrial Revolution "changes you" with an impact "on your identity". It isn't possible to determine if this is a manipulated video or not, but the World Economic Forum (WEF) website certainly has no qualms about discussing gene editing, identifying it as part of its 4th Industrial Revolution, and it likely taking over biological evolution. Short for "Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats", CRISPR-Cas9 is a genome editing tool used for editing genes. It can remove, add, or alter sections of a DNA sequence for changing human characteristics or disease. This mechanism is also used in bacteria to change the DNA in viruses to disable them. Currently, the Covid vaccine is being described as a form of gene therapy which can involve replacing a gene, adding genes, or turning genes off. With the Covid vaccine, mRNA is the technique being used and is described as "the DNA for one gene, can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein.", in this case, instructing them to create a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for an immune response. Even the Bayer President admits that the Covid-19 vaccine is gene therapy. TALENs is another gene editing technology. According to the WEF, gene editing is "changing the world". CRISPR is not without risks, the editing tools can cut in the wrong spot with unknown consequences to the person. Along with this new technology there are "ethical" concerns, mostly centering around safety issues, but without any forethought on the evil of experimenting on human life.
Currently, two types of gene editing exist, "germline therapy and somatic therapy. Germline therapies change DNA in reproductive cells (like sperm and eggs). Changes to the DNA of reproductive cells are passed down from generation to generation. Somatic therapies, on the other hand, target non-reproductive cells, and changes made in these cells affect only the person who receives the gene therapy." So much for concern about ethics, the somatic therapy has been conducted on children. There are a couple of nice short videos in this WEF article. As stated in the Mammoth Biosciences video, this gene editing will expand to agriculture, food, environment, bioterrorism, and of course healthcare. But it is already being done in the agricultural and food sector. Jennifer Doudna, the narrator from Mammoth Biosciences, a WEF member, describes this revolution and the Mammoth website lead even states it's "Reading and writing the code of life." And it does raise the question, just who gets to decide on what will be written on the code of life? The one who controls the technology? Now the second video by Haoyi Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, People's Republic of China, is more detailed in how both Talens and CRISPR work and introduces another gene editing technique, Zinc Finger. More frightening is his discussion on how this gene editing has been experimented with by injecting it directly into a mouse embryo. He appropriately labels this as a "genetically modified animal" then moves his discussion about the ethical concerns for humans, giving an example of how it could work. There is active experimentation of the insertion of human DNA into a mouse. Both videos are worth listening to, and are short. According to another WEF article, From DIY editing to matchmaking by DNA: how human genomics is changing society, the business of human genomics is growing, some companies sell genetic information for research, and overlaps with other technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. As usual this new field of technology will bring massive profits to those who participate. The European Commission released a report in 2019 on the Social, Legal and Ethical aspects of Human Genomics. Among other issues it discusses who buys and sells genetic data, anonymity and ownership of the data, use of artificial intelligence, and regulation of the industry. Then there is that pesky issue of ethics which is discussed. MITRE is heavily involved in the Covid response, but it is also involved in CRISPR. And in the interest of an emphasis on enhancing public health for safety, effectiveness and ethics, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends gene editing. If there was ever a reason to reject gene editing it would be the WHO recommending it and a military non-profit experiementing with it. All of this is a scary arena that certain technocrats and corporations have decided to force us into. For some with devastating diseases it might be a blessing. However, given how the world is operating now, any trust that this technology will only be used for treating disease is unlikely. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|