Carbon Markets Oh joy, in this video we are privileged with listening to the rantings of Bill Gates who just doesn't understand why people don't like or trust him. But this is a pretty serious issue that he plans to impose upon us. A carbon market is a market in which carbon emission allowances are traded and aims to encourage companies and countries to limit their emissions of CO2. While touting it is to help the environment it is actually another created financial market system for profits. These markets aim to "reduce greenhouse gas (GHG, or “carbon”) emissions cost-effectively by setting limits on emissions and enabling the trading of emission units...". Those who emit more carbon pay more, or so the theory goes. A voluntary task force, launched in the fall of 2020, was created for scaling voluntary carbon markets and its recommendations are discussed. It was tasked with answering the questions, how can we build well functioning, voluntary carbon markets that can support net zero and carbon negative climate goals. Starting the discussion was the role of offsets, which is basically changing one's behavior to reduce its carbon footprint, whether a business or person. Another quisling spoke on this issue, Annette L. Nazareth, a former U. S. Securities and Exchange Commissioner, appointed by President GW Bush. She reports there are already carbon markets that have made "strides" in their work. Six topics for action includes twenty recommendations that will enhance the market for carbon credit use. One of the principles identified by the task force is "core carbon principles, or CCP, which is nothing more than creation of a set of standards, as if an inanimate object possesses the ability for a principle. Don't get this confused with the China CCP. Governance is another "critical" principle, an oversight body, embedding transparency, ensuring results while respecting "community and land rights", yeah right to that statement. Legitimacy is another principle for offsetting and driving demand. What would be better than getting a banker in on the discussion to get this market "properly scaled up", meaning building the market more. Businesses must commit to net zero emissions. Gates is up next. He explains companies committed to this scam will "stay away from investments that are generating carbon". "The next step will be getting people to monetize those things". This activity automatically "generates an increase in price." That's right Bill, this market scam is going to fall heavily on the consumer paying the price for it. He didn't mention that he believes a carbon tax is needed for zero carbon emissions by 2050 The quisling again mentioned "reference contracts" which is a "standardised “liquid” contract, available for both spot and futures." Another recommendation, the "Taskforce considers it is important to establish an active secondary market and create access to participants who have not traditionally been present in financial markets." Yes, create another market for expanding profits. According to the banker transferring the wealth from developed countries to developing countries economies will be part of the implementation and advancement of these markets. Of course Mr. banker, everyone can see what is being done. Inclusive interactions which he speaks to will not include those whose lives will be the most severely impacted by what these globalists are doing. A surprising revelation was non-governmental organizations (NGO) refusing the use of offsets to get to net zero. The UN panel member took a stab at answering this, but really didn't, other than to say this market they are creating will be solid in its integrity and legitimacy. What does that have to do with reducing a carbon footprint and changing behavior? Being fair and inclusive, what are the NGO issues with offsetting? This ScienceDirect article outlines six barriers: (1) deficiencies of carbon markets, (2) limited economic benefits, (3) uncertain climate effectiveness, (4) negative public opinion, (5) limited and uncertain property rights, and (6) governance issues. Apparently, there are also concerns about human rights. No wonder the UN panel member avoided honesty about this. That shows the boasting of transparency does not exist, there is no transparency in any of this. Mr. banker explained that things are different now because people, including NGOs, are "watching". "Lot's of eyes on the process" helps prevent "cheating" with "complete transparency." Ok, Mr. banker, whatever you say. There is always someone who can figure out how to cheat a system, just look in your own backyard with your fellow panel members to get a hint. Gates added his two cents worth that costs will eventually go down once everyone is forced to use green products such as green cement. In other words, those type of products will be the only ones available to use. Always focused on money, Mr. banker reports three trillion dollars is needed per year in developing economies, meaning countries, to get them "on track to meet the commitments for net zero." This means "cross border" transfers of funds. Pre-pandemic there is a history of this being done that were "botched" without identifying what happened. Fifty trillion dollars over the next ten years will need to be "deployed" to meet the sustainable development goals. This cannot possibly mean anything less than every human will need to be put into an equal poverty status, no wealth can be achieved with all that money being shared for some obscure, ideological goal. This money will be available from risk return markets and "governments". Where does governments get money, from citizens. References to nature based solutions were made several times, basically putting money into land resources. As seen, money is being directed to non-human issues. So ends this discussion. Behind the scenes this is what the WEF and global corporations are plotting, building a new financial market that will benefit them but leave people in the dust, forcing them into a new type of economy in which they will have no choice but to participate. Imploding the current free market economy is of no consequence to them, focusing only on what profits they can gain from this new green economy they are creating. At some point in time they will engage in fights with each other for more power and money and engage in fights with each other. How much time that will take is unknown but this economy they are creating, like all previous attempts to put a new system in place has failed, will fail.
0 Comments
Mobilizing Action on Climate Change (Option 1) John Kerry, former Secretary of State, was appointed as "climate envoy" by Joe Biden. He is a panel member on this discussion regarding action on climate change. Kerry has stated the Great Reset "will happen" and confirms Biden support for it. Start at the 2:10" mark to skip the mood music in this video. Naturally it starts out with the "crisis unlike we never have experienced in the last 75 years", then goes throughout several Great Reset objectives to change everything. China plays an "important leadership role" in action against climate change, one of the worst polluters in the world. The China panel member references our one planet and "shared future" and as one community. Statistics on emission reduction in China was revealed along with what plans are for the future to continue those reductions. China has already launched a 'carbon market". Naturally, this saving the environment agenda is attached to profit making and which doesn't necessarily associate itself with success for the environment. "Protectionism is not the way". "Developed countries need to act first", hint, hint, the United States. Spain gave its rendition of what it has been doing for action on climate change which includes shifting to renewable energy; Switzerland discusses the corporate sector, the in which they all operate differently and how this is shifting to action on climate change and will leave those that don't follow along "behind"; Japan encourages focusing on "cities' to help with climate change with the slogan "time to act"; and South Korea is up next talks about climate change from the manufacturing perspective and how it has reduced carbon including planting trees and carbon capturing, while providing a framework to start from. Concrete examples from these panel members are requested with Japan offering up acceleration of reduction of emissions through vehicles and investment in ESG, and investment through their Green Finance market, again making sure this forced shift makes money for someone, except those who it is being forced upon. South Korea describes engagement of stakeholders by leverage cooperation along with full deployment of AI technology. Spain offers up needing a good atmosphere and ensuring nobody is left behind. Switzerland sees this dramatic shift as not that expensive, after all that pair of jeans will only cost one dollar more. Extracting carbon from the air must also be included in this process. Mobilizing Action on Climate Change (Option 2) To skip the mood music start at the 5:40" mark in this video. John Kerry, former Secretary of State, was appointed as presidential envoy for climate by Joe Biden. He is a panel member on this discussion regarding action on climate change. Kerry has stated the Great Reset "will happen" and confirms Biden support for it. In this video, Kerry leads the way. He is applauded as being one of the "key architects" of the Paris Climate Accord and for his co-founding of World War Zero in 2019. Scientists, Governors, youth activists, CEOs, and global leaders are recruited in this effort. Not citizens who are suppose to have elected representation. Mugshots of these individuals are posted and which also includes celebrities. The host is a friend of Kerry. Kerry reports we only have nine years left to take action. A frightening description of what is happening in space related to climate change is relayed by Kerry, even animals going extinct. It is also now a "moral issue" and Biden is "totally committed to this fight" that will continue to "sign another series of executive orders that continue to advance his climate agenda" that in reality completely bypasses Congress. Citizen representation is out. Kerry then lists out what those executive orders will entail. Apparently, Biden will also create an international strategy. He goes on to say that green energy is going to create new jobs. A whole gamut of information is left out in this statement. With all of the unemployment occurring as a result of the Covid-19 virus being used as an excuse to lock down local businesses, or the Keystone Pipeline being shut down, this is deliberate in order to execute the Great Reset objective of "reskilling" those unemployed to their agenda of renewable energy. Coal must be phased out, renewable energy has to be ramped up, the plant must be "treed", transition to electric vehicles, these are just a few of the items that will now be forced onto Americans. The private sector must be mobilized for the "trillions" of dollars this will cost. New York Times editor served as the moderator and asked for reactions to Kerry's statements from other panel members. The UN Deputy Secretary General spoke and basically validated his statements, that COP really matters, and looks forward to states (countries) and their enhanced NDSs. She verified Covid-19 as an opportunity and now a "global local handshake" will be galvanizing. A Royal Dutch Shell CEO also responded by saying "nobody in their right mind denies this issue" and his company has pledged to net zero emissions. COP26 President stated we are in a fight for the life of our planet. Somewhere, somehow $100 billion continues to be referenced. A Royal DSM NV panel member believes the private sector must be on board. Several panel members have also mentioned businesses should be transparent. There will never be transparency about what is really being done. Following technical difficulties IKEA was able to speak and stated more companies "need to step up". His claims of a company being sustainable costs less is a lie. Just as an example, how much more expensive is an organically grown vegetable than one that is not. How much more expensive is a piece of lumber from a tree grown sustainably? It's not less expensive, it costs more. Kerry was asked what the United States was going to commit to the Paris Climate Agreement especially since it has fallen so short. He said an announcement would be made about executive orders that would be put in place, clmate task force involving every secretary of every agency. Countries were allowed to do what they wanted when it was originally written up but didn't do what it needed to do. Knowing more now, better plans can be made at Glasgow to do what is needed. The UN has identified a finance gap and the private sector is important for the solution such as banks. "We need trillions" for changing transportation modalities, putting out more charging stations, see where this is going? Companies won't need to be forced to make these changes. Companies know how much money can be made. Drilling can continue until other alternatives are in place, or until we know it makes us sick. The Royal Dutch Shell member made the most sense, you can't stop using these fuels until others are in place. There must be a weaning off of these. Kerry wants to spend money into exploring other options just as Bill Gates has done. Then the truth falls out, "transition to a green global economy". Yes, it isn't about saving the planet, it is about profit making at the expense of humans. Investors were protected with wind farms which is the bait for companies to engage in this scam. Carbon pricing can influence the behavior of companies. Economic warfare. At what point will this economic warfare turn into a fight between all of them, and it will eventually. Royal Dutch Shell made a rather startling statement, "We had to completely disrupt the global economy to get a temporary dip of 7% of emissions". This was deliberate? He then stated mandates are going to be necessary. Kerry basically said the same thing, regulatory control to force these changes. There you have it, a complete and total takeover of how we live through the forced changes to renewable energy being accomplished with private sector money which everyone will pay for through the purchase of products. Companies aren't going to pay for any of this, that cost will be passed onto all of us.
Harnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Option 1) Here is the true guts of the Great Reset, the 4th Industrial Revolution (4thIR). Right off the bat the World Economic Forum (WEF) website states, "The Fourth Industrial Revolution represents a fundamental change in the way we live, work and relate to one another." In a nutshell, the 4thIR is using 5G technology to interconnect all devices, called Internet of Things (IoT), in order to collect data that is sent back to platforms for analysis by Artificial Intelligence (AI), then algorithms will be created to solve all issues. Those platforms will be controlled by corporate technology and ultimately all lives. 5G also gives the ability to these technocrats to control all production, consumption, and distribution. Understanding the 4thIR is critical to understanding how the world will be run from now on. Interestingly, this video begins with the Republic of China which is the model of a technocratic society. Since the Great Reset is only for the transform the economy, those words spill out of her mouth right away. Another Republic of China member reported China is working to expand the 4thIR into new technologies such as biology and cars. The use of AI is discussed throughout this video. An India speaker discussed the use of AI in the "corporate community". This is changing business models and workforce dynamics. But for sure, "AI is going to transform businesses", which explains why the federal government has been frantically getting 5G installed everything under the lie that it is good for us because it gives us faster internet. That is a bold face lie. He also used banking as an example and for good reason. Digital currency is another Great Reset plan and with 5G all financial transaction will be tracked, what is bought and spent. No more hidden assets with cash. Republic of China also reported on how AI has helped advance efficiency with human tests providing rapid results and faster trucks resulting in "positive social impact" and help people "get ready for the future". A brief discussion on how all of this impacts "humans" follows. The Republic of China recognizes the need for "international cooperation" in this agenda. Concerns over the handling of data is discussed along with the control over the data and making sure it is not racist as humans. Now the interesting aspect of that comment is that humans are controlling the data and the AI algorithms. Does that not take out the supposed intelligence factor of AI? That briefly came up as a question, the control and bias of the data, with the solution A "global common charter" with a set of guidelines. Data "must be shared" but also protected. Part of protecting data is by having "more data" to enhance algorithms to let AI (as if it were a human) prove itself. The hope is "creating more jobs". Human capital, labor force, it is easy to see where this is going. Harnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Option 2) Starting off this gentleman speaks to how AI has grown and led to innovation "during the pandemic". Other topics are public-private-partnerships (P3) and climate change. The Columbia president, speaking only on Columbia, believes technology is needed to "build back better" and provide "human capital'. Government money is used to incentivize participation and developing regulations to support technologies. Human talent was also "trained" and "fast speed" internet access. The ethical framework is just now being put into place for alignment of managing information and algorithms. He also wants to open "data analytic centers". The Microsoft panel member stated work is needed on weaving together new AI based technologies with cloud based services and data analytics because this is the "key to solving almost every problem". He cites one major problem is getting vaccines made and distributed then spelling out the details. Real time data analytics will keep the government informed. What a scary proposition. "You can't have good AI without good data" states the Accenture panel member, you have to have government and private sectors "together". That is why 5G is so critical to the Great Reset, it has the capability of collecting huge swaths of data, on you. Being forced to stay in our homes allowed more collection of data for analysis because of the increased online use. One piece of the scam revealed. Access to broadband and skills will be broadened, a reference to the millions of dollars being spent for the installation of 5G, especially into rural areas. More banks are moving to "digital wallets". A word was mentioned but unclear as to what it is. Digital wallets are the foundation of digital currency, another Great Reset objective. Telehealth is brought up again, under the guise of improving health care but it is a marvelous way to collect more data on people. Just think how your personal health data is shared with some technocrat, analyzed by AI, then an algorithm created to tell your doctor what he has to do for your treatment. Education will be moved to virtual learning but for mental health reasons there also has to be personal education. Virtual education can change the "habits" of parents also. Another issue to remember here, all the technology companies will be feeding that education material to children, and it will include saving the planet, living sustainably, and how one should conduct themselves and their lives. No freedom to choose here. Speaking of sustainability, the Accenture panel member announced, "sustainability is the new digital". "People are building back sustainably" and those individuals will be "two and one half times more likely to be tomorrows leaders". A good example of why we have been lead down this path more and more, people are being sucked into believing this scam, not understanding the true ramification of it. I is "driving different behavior", and that is true. Also, "every business will be a sustainable business". More freedom lost. Technologies that will matter the most in the future include a new market for carbon removal. A global objective accepted standard for carbon measurement and reduction in emissions is also needed. Planting trees, solar, smart vehicles, and wind will help with carbon removal! More ethical standards was mentioned again. How can this even be a topic when the very ethics of the intention to manipulated people's lives is in question? Companies will be scrutinized for their sustainability performance. That pressure will be applied to employees. In conclusion, massive data gathering will continue with 5G, this will markedly enhance the information governments and corporations will have on you, it will be analyzed with AI for algorithms, and those algorithms will decide how you live. Pressure from all directions will be put upon everyone to think, behave, act, and believe a certain way, sustainably. There is no way out of this.
Delivering Social Justice in the Recovery The Washington Post is the host of this next video, It starts out with the reminder of "compounding crisis", "deep and systemic inequities", and "need for greater racial justice." "Equality must be at the heart of social justice", and "crucial to fighting the climate breakdown". A breakdown into gender and race inequality progressed from there, and how the wealthy are the ones who have the most benefit. Oddly, the speaker on this subject represented Tiffany & Co, how many can afford its jewelry? Different voices "must be listened to". What will happen to those voices if different than those who profess this equality need? As everyone one has seen, it means censorship, loss of jobs, and economic ruin. The tiresome "stakeholder" piece is brought up. This has been nothing more than a way to hide who is involved, a breakdown of jurisdictional boundaries, and eliminating the rule of law. Stakeholder groups are often weighed heavily with individuals from this type of ideology and those who are not of the same are just patsies in the scheme, only placed in the group for a phony presence of kum ba yah. George Floyd was brought up as exposing the "deep historical wound being resurfaced in America." Now it becomes a "post George Floyd world". Although claiming to be a capitalist, a Ford foundation speaker declared businesses "must put a nail in the coffin of the ideology of the last fifty years propagated first by first and foremost Milton Friedman...who used ideology as scaffolding to allow the kind of...and propel the inequality...". He then spoke to white supremacy as being "real". "That world is over". What he is saying is that corporations will now invoke the expectation of how one behaves at least at work, but this will eventually invade every aspect of our lives. A complete restructuring of how a business conducts its financial affairs was also discussed by him. Tiffany's speaker jumped in on this by saying an "inclusive set of voices" must be part of this restructuring. Brexit was mentioned which brought George Floyd back into the conversation for the purposes of racism and inequality. The Mayor of London went on to say the Black Lives Matter movement "is really important in exposing race and inequality", eventually this leading back to the "self-inflicted trauma of Brexit". Ok, that run around makes sense? The London Recovery Board will lead the way with nine missions for its recovery, assuming this in in relation to Brexit. Resistance to populism was also discussed. According to the Mayor, the best answer to this was the election of Biden. Interconnectedness (her word) was shown in this panel by listening to each other and polarization needs to end. Polarization will never end because all of those involved in the Great Reset have a diametrically opposed ideology to those who believe in God given rights and freedom. All those involved in this scam do not believe that and why polarization and division will never end. According to her, she has everything figured out, for you. Some of the components for social justice have been described in this video. It will start with corporate demands on its employees to think, believe, and act a certain way, and even interfere into corporate financial strategies.
Transforming Food Systems and Land Use (Option 1) This is perhaps one of the more frightening issues with the World Economic Forum (WEF). As can already be seen, the media is being controlled through partners Facebook and Google, but there are a couple of areas that will be heavily targeted. One is the food supply and land use, and eventually health care and education will be taken over completely. How the food system will be taken over starts with this video. The host started out basically confirming the reason for control over food, "Food is about everybody", claiming the current system is "unsustainable". Of course, another crisis which is an old theme for decades starting with Malthus, overpopulation and starvation will come, this in spite of rising obesity rates across the world and billions of people not having access to food. Moving on, a "hunger pandemic" now exists and food production is a major contributor to greenhouse gases, land degradation, and loss of forests. Population growth is also responsible for this catastrophe. Thus justifies the excuses for transforming the food system. Not to be forgotten is the multiple food system partners in the WEF such as BASF, Cargill, and Syngenta to name a few. But on the United Nations side there is also Kellogg's, Nestle, and others. Technological, behavior, and policy transformations will be needed. The United Nations (UN) Food Systems Summit was a "turning point" for transformation, science a data are crucial in improving policy, and of course businesses should be "stimulated" to create solutions. WEF is already working on changing the food system with its Food Innovation Hubs. Why the information gives the appearance of farmer involvement the truth is the intention is to completely change how they farm by forcing them into technological farming and will require "reskilling" them. These hubs will also be changed to regional hubs, destroying jurisdictional boundaries and sovereignty. While this technological change is claimed to be part of new innovation, those practices have already been in existence for some time. Consumers need more "choice" in what they eat, that is, eating only food that is good for the planet and that does not include those methane creating cows. The UN World Food Programme director discussed how the private sector can work together more on this problem. Yes, let's not allow a sovereign country such as the United States have control over their own food production, let's have businesses work with the UN, so much smarter. Integration of farmers into this plot would also be needed. Scaling up the efforts to transform the system has been a problem but thanks to Covid-19 the problem has been exposed as a crisis. Climate change is still there however to bring about a "collapse" of the food system and biodiversity. Water was also mentioned as an issue that needs to be considered, how it's used in agriculture, and this is a scary subject as the UN has made it very clear the intent to control all water and supports transboundary sharing. The gentleman from Japan whose industry is milk production spoke to the ways in which cows are monitored, down to the last detail which somehow reduces the feed and less CO2 emission in milk production. Leadership for this initiative is lacking and without funding, mass starvation will occur, destabilization of nations will occur, and mass migration. Leaders have recognized this because of the virus. What is missing? A collective belief that we can do this. It is the farmer left in the dust, non-governmental organizations and businesses should take charge to not only control the quantity, sharing, and distribution, but also the type of food grown and the nutritional content. Recommendation is to start growing your own food supply, plant a garden and fruit trees, learn how to can and dehydrate, develop relationships with those who raise some form of meat or raise your own if able, and beef up those cooking skills. Look to our ancestors, they knew how to create many things out of small amounts of food. Granted, the nutritional part may not be quite as good but one thing is for sure, it has to be better than what fast food provides with all the questionable additives. Transforming Food Systems and Land Use (Option 2) The destruction and takeover of food systems and land use continues in this video. To skip the mood music start at the 5:12" mark. It starts out with pictures of meat free foods, mung beans because unlike pork it is halal, algae, and duckweed, all of which can be used as sources of protein rather than meat. Most of these foods are from Asian and other country diets. The host is from CNBC. The standard threat of its urgency is at the top of the list, "billions are at risk of extinction". Personally picked "experts" make up the panel, mostly from the UN. There was a lengthy talk about the need for funding to grow enough food for billions of people. More taxation and regulatory reform is needed changes made because it is unjust and places a burden on women. Reshaping land use is another essential component. Now the oceans need protection for its food production for future generations. Reducing fresh water consumption is also on the table. Populism was attacked again as a problem, "it is just speech". Somehow "abundant capital" is available to fund all of this transformation. Banks and farmers need the necessary time to make all of these transitions, which sounds like they are just going to go ahead and do it. A "carbon bank" is also needed to make this work, something which Biden supports and can do without Congress, while at the same time working with the WEF to create the "carbon trading platform". The claim is that these changes should not be from the top down but from the bottom up. How insane is that when they are designing a new food production system from the top down that they want farmers to adopt? Demonstration farms are set up to show farmers these brilliant changes to suck them in. Those Food Innovation hubs were also mentioned again. To manipulate the public, they are going to create more demand for what they end up growing. Hmmm, does that mean all other options for food will be gradually removed so there is no choice? An "environmental footprint" will be on every ingredient in food, how, when, where its transported. This is all thanks to 5G which carries the ability to track everything. Just imagine what can be done for allocation of food to what they think is the most in need. Another woman talked about how nutrition is contributing to obesity. Wait, didn't they just say previously millions were starving? Weight loss is the usual outcome of starvation. Why can't they make up their minds? It isn't important, the agenda, no matter what lie has to be told, is the means to the end. In a nutshell, they will force farmers to adapt to their version of what agriculture should be through technology. Since this can be a horrifically expensive venture, it may well put many farmers out of business, just in time for big agriculture corporations to step in and buy it all up. Meanwhile, the farmer, with no income, will be "reskilled" to work on agricultural technology, computers, robots, machinery, etc., some of which is already happening. As the technology takes hold the technocrats will be analyzing every scrap of food, who needs food, making sure that there is equal allocation to the world. As the beginning of the video reflects, the world will also be forced into a more meatless world but what they deem is more planet friendly and nutritious.
Enjoy that steak while you can. Implementing Stakeholder Capitalism (Option 1) The World Economic Forum (WEF) is dead on serious about moving from capitalism as it is known to stakeholder capitalism. How it has been done so far and what will be done is in this video, with Klaus Schwab himself participating. CNN is the host. ESG is the acronym for "investment approach that incorporates environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) criteria throughout the investment process". Biden has already ordered a review of the Labor Department's 2020 ruling on ESG investments. Admittedly, the host called stakeholder governance an "ideological framework" but is now going into action. Klaus announces 2021 will be a historical year for changing the philosophy of business moving to stakeholder capitalism, accelerated by Covid-19. Sixty one companies will announce their implementing the ESG metrics which is a painstaking assessment of risks in various ESG categories. Here is an example but later on the host states there are 21 "core" metrics and 34 "broader ones". Notice one category is human capital. Your pocketbook will pay for this, it won't cost businesses a dime. The purpose is to achieve the Agenda 2030 objectives. Next subject, the role of government. Hint, crony capitalism, or another word Public-Private Partnerships (P3). A member of the United Arab Emirates proclaims governments alone cannot accomplish the necessary tasks such as vaccinating the world, it will require a global government and must work the private sector and will have to reinvent themselves. A conversation ensued about how governments can help. A "new norm" is needed with possible "social unrest". "It is a triangle between government, company, and society", the government will need to change their policy. Klaus proclaimed that unless everyone is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Hint, mandatory vaccinations and failure to comply will cost you economically and socially. Klaus brought up impact investment which "aims to generate specific beneficial social or environmental effects in addition to financial gains...The point of impact investing is to use money and investment capital for positive social results." He used the example of his daughter who won't buy from a company that does not follow these objectives. News flash Schwab, the reverse is true, boycotting stores that do have these objectives and that is already happening. Again, there was reinforcement of requiring businesses to be diverse and inclusive, those practices already invading many facets of organizations, including government. Five future trends corporations must adopt include the problem of reversed globalization over the last couple of years and Covid-19 "speed" up anti-globalization; trust in government is important so it must act fast and be flexible, "they can do what ever they want to do"; national data is very important to track Covid-19 (which means tracking us); governments need new models; and it is very important governments partner with the private sector. Uncertainty about all of this progressing was expressed, will have to monitor progress over the next year in meeting these requirements. Mention was made of the Rise Fund which is a "$2 billion global fund committed to achieving measurable, positive social and environmental outcomes alongside competitive financial returns." and the prediction was made that by 2022 there will be a huge increase in the number of companies that "sign up". How these metrics fit into the Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030 SDG), will depend on the financial market, but the need to work faster to achieve this is necessary and should be a priority for regulators. According to Klaus, it is important to "shape the post corona era". This was already decided when Covid-19 was barely out of the gate. Businesses are already integrating the SDGs. Implementing Stakeholder Capitalism (Option 2) In this second video of implementation to destroy capitalism and institute a global takeover of all resources by calling it stakeholder capitalism, the Covid-19 virus is being used as justification to do it. Klaus Schwab starts out by even stating, "Stakeholder capitalism, a global economy that works for globalists, people, and the planet"! No hiding the truth of what is going on here. The purpose of this discussion is to define how this destruction it will be done. Already the IMF director can claim 2021 will be "brighter". How could she possibly know this, unless it is already rigged to go that way. Corporations will also be responsible for making the necessary transformations as described in Klaus's book. Nice way to get some advertising in for Klaus. This future will be green. Revitalizing global cooperation is also essential, and a divergence between rich and poor countries, that is, sharing the wealth, should be part of this. We are back to more money being sucked out of the United States, and off of you. Not enough attention was paid to being green in the first rounds of stimulus but this will change for the "climate economy", boosting growth and creating jobs. Now, there is some concern about "social backlash". Canada spent quite a bit of time talking about its commitment to a green economy, however, not all Canadians are real happy about the costs to them. One gentleman claimed that "business replaced government" as far as trust, based on the case for sustainability. References to Klaus as some sort of idol to worship are constantly made. Plugs for corporations doing so much to help during the pandemic was made. Of course they are going to help and continue to play their part, it results in massive profits for them, millions of dollars from governments has poured in as a result. Corporations didn't do this out of the good of its heart, it is a profit making machine from personal protective equipment to vaccines. WEF partners, such as Walmart, were allowed to stay open for that reason, while forcing the smaller retail stores to close, and why corporations have increased their worth, which has only widened the wealth gap that so many complain about. The Bank of America individual spilled out an astonishing statistic. He was talking about how everyone wants to implement the SDGs, and the cost is, drum roll, an astonishing "6 Trillion dollars a year". The only way to do this is by private companies, they are "driving it". And where will some of that money come from? Your pocketbook because the only items they will sell will be sustainable, there will be no other option. There it is, the U.S. government no longer represents citizens, corporations are in control of the narrative and making it happen. That is the essence of the Great Reset, corporate control. The end of the video was almost too nauseating to listen to, these individuals have no capability of seeing humans in any other way than as a number, GDP, wealth, no wealth. Decided for you, especially if female, is that you need the opportunity to open your own business, or start a career, ching, ching, ching. Right now, the plans are being laid to economically break you so you will own nothing, and be happy about it. If you don't own anything, then who owns everything?
How has COVID impacted the way we handle mental health? To bypass the mood music start at the 4:45" mark in this video. Perhaps one of the most frightening aspects of this whole Great Reset coup is the amount of psychological manipulation upon the world. Climate change was not fast enough in scaring people to change the way they live but the Covid-19 virus has given new hope in accelerating everyone's fear into changing. By its own admission, World Economic Forum (WEF) players have openly admitted this virus has given them a "window of opportunity" to rush through its Great Reset Initiative. As this host begins talking about mental health, the first issue he keeps bringing up is this "crisis', the "mental health crisis that we all have". Everything now is considered a crisis, no news can be watched without everyone being told it is a crisis, emergency, or other adjective of the same nature, and that an urgency exists to get it resolved. Using crisis as the adjective is a deliberate manipulation, playing into people's fear. with the goal of more easily controlling them. One of the individuals who spoke was a comedian, another with a book to sell, and another entrepreneur with products to sell. Of course these are the individuals one wants to speak to about their personal mental health. One participant linked everyone in the world together because of their sharing of mental health issues as a result of the virus. In true form, another touted the benefit of technology in addressing these issues with telehealth, another 4th Industrial Revolution foundation to execute its agenda. What this lady doesn't understand is providing mental health over a monitor removes the ability to fully assess someone who is having mental health difficulties. And naturally businesses are intruding on employee private lives with assistance for mental health issues. Maybe its the job driving them to despair. What has happened to the support that has traditionally derived from families or through one's faith? This drive on mental health can be seen from a perspective of diminishing those roles as well. Finding comradery with strangers over a monitor rather than through a grandmother or aunt, a father or grandfather, holds more importance according to these...hmmm, individuals. It is certainly also lacking the physical embrace that a family member can provide. However, that is the technocratic world the Great Reset finds so endearing. System change recommendations include through the workplace; citizen movement for change has been lacking and needs to change for more investment; governments need to respond which WHO (World Health Organization) can help with; start with the youngest in school (indoctrinating them which is happening, social emotional learning (SEL); schools need more funding for counselors and those individuals should be allowed to work across states. Breaking down barriers for social stigma must be addressed, because there are so many affected by mental health and talking about issues like abuse is needed. There will be a new re-commitment for mental health support as called for by the United Nations (UN), Lady Gaga's mother is the ambassador. Working with celebrities is also a good approach, those drug addicted, suicidal individuals who live in a fantasy world of film. Of course, there will be long term effects on mental health from Covid-19. Access to mental health interventions is a problem, but using a "mobile" is one solution; workplaces have responsibility to address this issue; availability of "trained non-professionals" have been found to be effective; incarcerations are really mental health issues, apparently not criminal; and mental health licensing needs to be broader. Drawbacks to building this agenda include the cancel culture and trolls online; and the need to make sure people believe in science (which can often be manipulated into a predetermined conclusion). For the future, business leaders should put money where their mouth is; use of telehealth because of internet access but will need to be HIPPPA compliant; physical exercise and health has always been emphasized but now mental health should do the same. While the Covid-19 virus has been exploited as a major crisis, there are far greater events that have occurred over time that levy much greater devastation. That should be the focus, life as being portrayed by these globalists and evil doers is just one crisis and threat after another. Moving the world away from the strength of a family, church, and community is the goal, which the tearing down of these traditional institutions has led to people struggling more. Why should these individuals even be listened to with their technological, human isolating, methods? How is everyone suppose to respond to the constant harassment of a crisis and threats when those are specifically being designed for the purposes of getting everyone to adopt this new Great Reset regime? That is the purpose, manipulating everyone to go for its solutions. The only threat we currently have right now is the WEF Great Reset initiative, it is now a crisis because of our federal government involvement, and the only solution is to object to, resist, and reject the Great Reset.
Within this article are videos that tell you how to fight back, it now starts at the local level. Delivering Social Justice in the New Economy To skip the mood music go to the 5:45" mark to start the presentation in this video. This video isn't just about inclusion of those with disabilities and LGBTQ groups for more diversity, it is also about "racial justice". Described as a year of "disruption", it is time for everything to be done "differently", and the "agenda has to be introduced very fast". Included is the agenda for women which for Mexico is advancing to put women at work. At times it was difficult to understand one of the speakers so it isn't clear what she thought but she was talking about social equity. Reading her lips as she spoke made it easier to understand. DNI refers to Director of National Intelligence agency, and its diversity and inclusion component. The Bloomberg individual announced his company's ability as a global provider of news, data, and analytics with multiple platforms and use that to "influence people's thinking", and "focus on these areas". Yes, all news outlets are being used to manipulate you to believe something that isn't necessarily factual. The conversation cut to members only so what they discuss is a secret. It seems this presentation was about again changing the workforce to include diversity and inclusion of all which many corporations, and even the government, are indoctrinating its workers to accept. Without commenting about how this should or should not be done, it is pretty clear that the United States has been working on this issue for some time. But forcing an employee to accept a co-worker who may have some characteristics that are offensive or intolerable to them is unacceptable. But that is the world being built for us by the WEF, a world where individualism will not be tolerated.
And what would the Davos Great Reset be without a special message from Greta Thunberg chastising the world? Stakeholder Capitalism: Building the Future is the third video to watch. Klaus Schwab has been touting the destruction of capitalism as we understand it as a free market, then rebuilding with a stakeholder capitalism concept. Some sort of delusion he dreamed up in his mind. Stakeholder capitalism is "a form of capitalism in which companies seek long-term value creation by taking into account the needs of all their stakeholders, and society at large." Translated this means a global economy run by global corporations in which they will utilize human capital (you & your labor) for expanding their power and profits. The benefit to human capital will be a more inclusive world, with equality for all, no injustices towards anyone, and quality living with equal distribution of resources. In other words, what those corporate leaders decide to dish out to you. Anyway, here is a summary of this video. Klaus Schwab himself describes how corporations "should establish a framework of metrics according to ESG criteria". ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria. He mentioned the US Business "roundtable", assuming he is referring to the Council, issuing a statement of "embracing the stakeholder concept". Here is a list of those members, many of which are also World Economic Forum (WEF) partners. Naturally this website is restricted in getting information on what they are doing. Unbeknownst to us, Schwab claims we are now demanding more from governments and businesses. Bringing in the "experts" was discussed, that is, listening to only those who are smarter than you, for example to get vaccinated. Interestingly, one presenter spoke to the bail outs given to different industries such as airlines by different countries being "conditional" on reducing carbon emissions. France's Macron apparently told businesses that the bailout was intended to "help them transform". Isn't this a form of bribery? In Denmark the condition was to not use tax havens. In the US, the Cares Act had a "seed" that was discussed so businesses could not buy back shares. What one can see from this discussion, there clearly was a scheme to bribe businesses to join in the agenda. That is how it will go, bribery until such time every business has been ensnared in this coup, and it is a coup over sovereignty and capitalism. One woman speaking on this had a hideous smile the whole time as if it were wonderful, but then again she was plugging her book. She also pondered the appearance of this as akin to "holding a stick over their head", that message needing changed. Well, a spade is a spade lady. Health is mentioned as one particular target in this scheme. According to one panel member, a musician, nothing can work at a global economy level without consideration of Africa as it is the most influential. Her rationale is on thin ice, although her point about there being no trust in anything and the level of corruption is accurate. It boils down to racism on her part. A Paypal officer labeled people as struggling all the time and anger towards enough not being done for them. This is a complete dichotomy from an American citizen's belief in independence. It is also a very blatant statement on why dependence on government, and even a business, should never, ever be considered. What those entities give can just as easily be taken away, a good example of what the threat is in this whole initiative. He also went on to describe how it is the company's responsibility to address social causes such as racism and inequity. This is the new church to worship, not the Ten Commandments or the Bible. The Belgium Prime Minister mentioned that "there is no activity that is sustainable that is not profitable". What? In other words, the reason for the push to sustainability is for profit. That is one big huge cat out of the bag, yes, the sustainability scam is about nothing more than profit, and a profit not meant for you. Klaus threw in his two cents worth about it not just being financial capital but how a company uses other forms of capital, including people. The smiling lady jumped in to counter Klaus, that "wealth is collectively created". Hmmm, so all of your hard work was a collective effort towards your wealth. That smiling woman is Mariana Mazzucato, an author and professor who is indoctrinating young minds on this propaganda. She should be asked who collectively contributed to her words in her books and if she is collectively sharing those book profits with them for their contributions. Not likely. "We have to stop talking about wealth creation as just business". Klaus agreed, "It is shared wealth creation". These are the individuals who are designing how our economy will be driven by stakeholder capitalism, a dramatic shift from our current capitalism structure. The other point being missed is that corporations, businesses, and government are objects, those are not the ones making decisions. It is people that make those decisions and all human dynamics will play into creating and using this changed system. There is no reason to believe that this system will be any less corrupt as capitalism for that reason. If anything it will be more corrupt. They are fools to think this way.
|
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|