Everyone might not be aware that there are four principles every journalist is encouraged to use in their practice: Seek Truth and Report It, Minimize Harm, Act Independently, and Be Accountable and Transparent. Journalist Code of Ethics often include truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness, and public accountability. However, it seems these principles are only attributed to journalists who promote an accepted narrative. All others who report outside of the accepted narrative are assigned derogatory labels and thrown into a basket for endless targeting, shaming, and slandering. Perhaps it is time to call out and confront those journalists who promote the accepted narrative but in doing so are violating every aspect of the principles and ethics of which they are encouraged to uphold.
Audrey Dutton is a Senior Investigative reporter for the Idaho Capital Sun, having won several awards for her work. She recently wrote some articles about Covid-19 and vaccines. Along the way she had no problem using insulting, and what could possibly be considered derogatory, language towards those who don't align with her biases, while at the same time promoting misinformation herself. In her article, "Idaho's history and anti-government subculture set the stage for a health crisis", many of the claims she made are offensive, derogatory, or just down right inaccurate. Let's start with her disparaging remarks about Idahoans. She cited a statement by Dr. Ted Epperly, "People who migrated here (in the 1800s) wanted to get away from the government.” In reality, had Ms. Dutton investigated it properly, people came out west for a multitude of reasons. Somehow, Ms. Dutton gleaned from this the impression that Idaho has an "anti-government streak" that contributes to misinformation. What Ms. Dutton doesn't understand is the Founders believed in citizen self-governance and America should be governed by the rule of law (now hijacked by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and their corporate cronies), concepts that have long been abandoned by the government. These so called anti-government folks also understand government can only derive its just powers from the consent of the governed and they are exercising their duty to hold the government accountable, especially when it becomes destructive, which is where we are at now. Perhaps Ms. Dutton doesn't understand any of this or the enumerated powers delegated to the government in Article 1 Section 8. She also declared the statement that the COVID-19 vaccine “reprograms your immune system” is a false claim. However, it is not false, a recent study does suggest the Pfizer vaccine "induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses" requiring further investigation. In an attempt to meet the journalistic principle of being impartial and fair, Ms. Dutton mentions the 1955 rollout of the polio vaccine causing the disease and how it contributes to "vaccine hesitancy". That was 66 years ago. In reality it is the more current problems with vaccines that persist, and documented cases of vaccine injuries that contribute to concerns about receiving vaccines. In all fairness, it should be acknowledged that in spite of these problems, traditional vaccines, not the current technology being used, have been very effective in disease reduction. But that is of little solace to those who have been injured. In another article Ms. Dutton wrote, "Health misinformation was an Idaho-grown product for years. Now it has a body count", her misinformation becomes even more egregious. While this article includes multiple errors, there is one particular statement regarding Covid-19 vaccines, "However, the material never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.”, that can only be counted as a lie. Ms. Dutton fails to mention that there are several different types of Covid-19 vaccines, choosing instead to mislead the reader and lump all vaccines into one pile. One type of vaccine is the DNA vaccine. In this scientific literature article, under the Misconceptions of mRNA Vaccines section, it clearly states, "DNA vaccines are transported into the nucleus of the cell..." and "Since DNA vaccines enter the nucleus of the cell, there is a risk of permanently altering the genetic makeup of the host cell". The Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca are DNA vaccines. While Ms. Dutton minimizes the "rare" risk of myocarditis from the Pfizer vaccine, there are other cardiac complications that have occurred with other vaccines, resulting in a death in Korea. Ms. Dutton should be questioned on her stance why citizens shouldn't have the right to be protected from a vaccine mandate that may include this type of technology. It seems Ms. Dutton relies heavily on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for most of her information rather than investigating other sources as her title of investigative reporter implies. As a result, Ms. Dutton herself is guilty of spreading misinformation from sources with the most misinformation. It would be advisable for Ms. Dutton to expand her research beyond the CDC as there are studies that dispute what the CDC chooses to publish. Perhaps Ms. Dutton owes an apology to Dr. Cole, the legislators, and all the others she named for her claims of them bringing false information to the public, when indeed, as shown, the information was true. It is she that has brought forth false information, with subtle hints of prosecution for those who she doesn't deem is up to her standards. But her source of information, the CDC misinformation factory, is her only truth, while failing to investigate before writing these hit pieces. Oh, a side note and for the record Ms. Dutton, a study has shown evidence of a connection between 5G and Covid-19 but she is correct that the vaccine has no live virus, it is engineered and synthesized. While Ms. Dutton makes sure she highlights Dr. Cole's language, she herself is as guilty with inflammatory language. And just who are those fact checkers cited by Ms. Dutton, other journalists such as herself? No, it is a two-bit website called Health Feedback which itself spreads lies, such as Covid-19 vaccines are not gene therapy. Oh yes, Covid-19 vaccines are gene therapy, which the President of Bayer even admits. As for Health Feedback claims that Ivermectin isn't effective in treating Covid-19, there have actually been several studies demonstrating its effectiveness, and supporting its use in Covid-19, as well as Hydrochloroquine. Health Feedback is a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) established Vaccine Safety Net. That pretty much answers why the misinformation and propaganda persist, and why Ms. Dutton adheres to it. As it turns out, Ms. Dutton is the spreader of misinformation and not the "anti-government" people she so diligently targeted. Perhaps she should consider taking refresher courses in investigative journalism, principles, and ethics that journalists are expected to follow. By all accounts she failed in seeking the truth, did not minimize harm because of her failure to do adequate research on her subject, nor has she been accurate, impartial, objective, or fair in her reporting. She did not act independently but rather depended on misinformation sources to support her bias. To be accountable to the public she should be transparent in her lack of journalistic integrity and serve the public with an apology. It might also be suggested that she be removed from reporting on her "favorite topic" health care. If Ms. Dutton had spent as much time responsibly researching the subject as she did in targeting and degrading specific individuals, perhaps there would be more truth to what she wrote. Whatever information is presented, research it. Check the source for validity and accuracy. Regardless of what one believes or thinks about these vaccines, or Covid-19 itself, it will always remain the right of a self-governing individual to choose their own medical treatment. And that should be respected, not mocked or ridiculed as it was in Ms. Dutton's articles. It is ethical to provide all information so each individual can make a decision for themselves. Shame on you Ms. Dutton for your lack of investigative work and spreading information that is false.
0 Comments
As the federal government continues to pour money into states building the infrastructure for the internet, guaranteeing "access" to the internet for all, we are being edged closer to the foundation for the 4th Industrial Revolution (4thIR) that is heavily dependent on everyone being "connected" via the internet. This connection is called the Internet of Things (IoT). It is literally the world of technological devices talking to each other, sharing data on all of us, and providing the means for corporate control over our world. This video gives a short overview of what it means. As pointed out in the video these devices share the data that is collected. The "platform" is where that data is shared and stored, and as such can be analyzed. This is critical to the success of IoT and to the corporations wishing to run the world.
Just one example. Vaccine passports will contain data from laboratories that are confirmed as approved sites for Covid-19 testing, and clinics that are approved for vaccination. This information is shared through a platform. But that data can also show where low vaccination rates are, demographics of the vaccinated, which vaccinations are taken, and the list goes on of the possibilities of data that can be extracted. Apply this to all walks of life, especially when it is connected to our banking. How easy it will be to flip a switch and turn off one's ability to spend because the analytics show poor food choices, or failure to get a booster shot. There is no end to the control IoT will have over our lives. Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, commands that the United States places 30% of its land into conservation by 2030. There is no Congressional authorization for this action. However, the Western Governors Association (WGA) has jumped right in to define how it will work with the federal government on this unconstitutional decree. And Governor Little is right on top of it. On May 6, 2021 Governor's Little, and Kate Brown signed a letter to The Honorable Gina McCarthy, National Climate Advisor, requesting that western governors be "consulted" on these matters for an "effective partnership", and that the "30 by 30 endeavor will require close coordination between all levels of government and private landowners." The remainder of the letter is just as insulting to our Republic. In this video by a farmer, he talks some about the history of farming and the impacts that have affected that market so drastically. The discussion on this 30 x 30 scam and how it will further decimate private land ownership begins around the 26" mark. It is the World Economic Forum (WEF) that has all of these corporate members he is talking about, especially in the agricultural sector. 30 x 30 is just another method by which to boost the global corporate world at our expense.
Klaus Schwab, founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), gave this talk on "Global Leadership needed in the Era of Fourth Industrial Revolution at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in 2016. He doesn't actually start speaking until the 6:55" mark so all the admiration by the host can be skipped. Schwab announced his three biggest influences in were Nelson Mandela, a Marxist and Communist; Henry Kissinger, a globalist; and oddly Lee Kuan Yew, viewed by some as a Nationalist. He describes how he came up with the corporate stakeholder concept, that businesses should not answer to just to shareholders but also to employees and government. While he professes at that time that global government won't occur for "many years to come", and he doesn't "wish to have such a government", he might just be ahead of schedule. As such, he sees the WEF as "having to prepare the world for the future". He later describes "global governance" as having two major deficiencies. One is governments being involved in "crisis management', using the Brexit chaos as an example, which the concept of a country taking its sovereignty which he later stated depressed him. Two is the need to look at these problems from a systemic approach. This systemic approach will be "shaping the future" of digital industries, financial and monetary systems, health systems, socially inclusive countries, and education, he could go on but stopped there. Sounds like just five years later he has been very successful in disrupting just the few he mentioned. We are a world "that must work together". Claiming to have fifteen initiatives a the time, the WEF now has twenty platforms that literally invade upon every aspect of life. Mr. pseudo-psychologist Schwab has decided that we poor souls are "unable to cope with all the changes" with the vast amounts of information, considering himself "one of the most informed people". Us poor souls develop a "bunker mentality", one of which is "nationalism" and wanting "to go back to the old world". He attributes President Trump's success in winning to people being afraid of losing their jobs to robotics and other technology. You have no clue do you Schwab? He has broken us poor souls down into the proletariat and the middle class which is in constant fear of falling down to the proletariat level. Why were the wealthy and elite left out of this labeling? In discussing Brexit again later he describes Boris Johnson's problem with immigration as "emotional" and that most "elections are based on emotions" rather than on "rational ground". Thanks for the further insults Schwab. The remaining few minutes of the video is just as nauseating. It sounds like, from his early youth (1938) growing up under the Nazi regime, he has substituted the corporate world for the new dictatorship that enforces control over how humans live, and the corporate world has become his SS. Vaccine technology has dramatically shifted from the manipulation of a virus to foster immunity, to now what is called gene therapy. Much concern has been expressed about this new technology, does it change one's genetic code, what are the long term effects given no long term studies have been done, and since a vaccinated individual can become infected with Covid-19, what is the purpose of getting one? Even though this is new technology we are assured it is safe and can be given repeatedly. Are technocrats and scientists just messing with God's creation of humans?
While there are claims that the Covid-19 vaccine is not gene therapy, in looking at the scientific literature it is described as just that. Even this article describes one vaccine as using "double-stranded DNA inserted into a common, but inert virus called an adenovirus. This DNA also contains the instructions for building the spike protein. Once inside the cell, these instructions are read and translated into mRNA (messenger RNA)." It goes on, "The mRNA chains are basically work orders that spell out the instructions for making the spike proteins that stud the outside of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19." Ok, both genetic materials, DNA and mRNA, are being used. In the case of one Covid-19 vaccine, the spike protein of the Covid-19 virus is used to drive "into the host cell the genetic information needed to express the recombinant antigen" which evokes an immune response. It just leaves out one detail, that mRNA genetic material is synthetic. Being a highly technical and very complicated process, most of the nuances are not discussed here. The focus will be just on the issue of this vaccine actually being an engineered and synthetically produced product. Links to the scientific information discussing this are provided for those who want to do a deeper dive. Historically, it takes years to create a vaccine with many stages in the process. In the case of the Covid-19 vaccine it took less than one year. The virus is inactivated or weakened in traditional vaccines, and is called an antigen because it evokes an immune response. However, the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is a Nucleic acid vaccine where a strand of a corona virus DNA is used to make a template that is engineered for the mRNA, which does the same, evokes an immune response. The complete process in this is far more complicated than what is explained here but through an engineering technique called a reverse genetic system, it is "genetically engineering specific nucleic acid sequences (within DNA or RNA)." More simply, a DNA sequence from a Covid-19 virus strand is used. DNA sequence information is readily available to technocrats through GenBank among many other available genome data sources. As of May, 2020 "more than 200 complete and partial genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2" were decoded and deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data. Scientists can easily pick and choose from these sources for vaccine experimentation. Through a process called In vitro transcription (IVT), encoded information in the spike protein DNA is taken and encoded into mRNA, synthetically creating the spike protein, which produces the viral antigen. Using IVT to make the genetic copy for a Nucleic acid vaccine, mRNA "can be manufactured rapidly at large scale" using a "synthetic mRNA format". "Synthetic mRNA" vaccines are considered "safer" than the more traditional attenuated virus vaccines while even claiming it will "bring a halt to the coronavirus pandemic." Because it is synthetic it is easy to design, and can be manufactured at great speed for vaccine development. In these engineered vaccines the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, called the "spike protein" and found in corona viruses, is targeted as the one which causes Covid-19. It "is an important target site for neutralizing antibodies and a key target for vaccine design." 1286 amino acids make up the spike protein sequence while genomic data of the virus is shared worldwide. This amino acid sequence was aligned with other coronavirus structural proteins, with concern about how this would work in future mutations. There continues to be controversy as to whether or not an actual Covid-19 virus has been isolated, however the SARS-CoV-2 proteins share high similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV which contributed to the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design. Interestingly, through Covid-19 DNA protein manipulation several vaccines were tested. Once the DNA or RNA sequence of a virus is known it becomes a rapid way in which to engineer a synthetic vaccine. Being a messenger RNA, this engineered vaccine alerts our immune system to produce a specific antibody to the virus, just as the virus itself would do. Post injection the mRNA material itself hangs around long enough to evoke an immune response then disintegrates. By all reports this occurs within just a few days. These "computer-driven strategies" create "a synthetic vaccine...consisting mainly of synthetic peptides". These vaccines produced by "chemical synthesis" are considered safer "because they do not involve cell-derived material or biological processes for production. Their purity can be controlled". "Creating vaccines synthetically...has the ability to increase the speed of production and to retune and fine tune the solution to combat new variations in pathogens." "Synthetic vaccines also have the advantage that they can be seen as cartridge vaccines, meaning that they contain bits and pieces that can readily be replaced by others to update the vaccine in order to combat new strains of pathogen." In other words, DNA strands can easily be manipulated with different protein structures, an advantage to created vaccines for future mutations. Without going into the specifics on vectors, Johnson & Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca are DNA/Viral-vector vaccines which deliver the spike protein DNA material into the cells. Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines. The introduction of these genetic materials causes the cell to create the viral antigen. Regardless, both are gene therapy in that engineered, synthetic genetic viral material is introduced into the human cell to make the viral spike protein. This video is short, explains the immune system, traditional vaccines, and this new gene therapy. Rather than the virus injecting its RNA into a cell to make copies of it, through mRNA vaccines this viral process is replaced synthetically to create an immune response as explained in this video. The synthetically created Covid-19 RNA is telling the cell genetically to produce the spike protein, clearly a form of gene therapy. Up to this point, it is now understood that selected DNA from the virus is used to make synthetic mRNA that is carried into the cell, evoking an immune response. But the beauty in all of this, since the viral genetic component can be picked over, copied, and manufactured, it is possible to "tweak' the genetic sequence in any new mutation. As a result, new vaccines can be made just as rapidly by altering the protein sequence to match the mutated variant. Regardless, these technocrats conclude that vaccine development will continue until more clinical trials are completed and that "the first round of vaccines will have waning immunity and require boosting using improved second-generation COVID-19 vaccines"...with those who have recovered from COVID-19 with poor or waning immunity may also require vaccination". As the second concerning mutation has emerged, Omicron, the reality is that there are "thousands of mutations" that have accumulated. Even a local doctor predicts this virus will continue with mutations. Is this the cart before the horse or the other way around? Are these mRNA vaccines created because of the ability to manipulate them for any virus thus creating more experimentation and unending profit, or are the viruses being used to create more vaccines that come to the same end? The major pharmaceutical companies making these vaccines, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson are all World Economic Forum (WEF) members. WEF is thrilled to see this new technology as part of its 4th Industrial Revolution to change our healthcare but doesn't see it replacing other vaccines, yet, in its ongoing move towards genomics. After all, the "ability to manipulate genes is in its infancy." Even the WEF recognizes "These instructions teach our cells to become their own vaccine manufacturing plants." Does that not imply this is a genetic restructuring of our cells? As part of its corporatism plan, one could conjecture that someday the only option for vaccination provided to the masses will be these gene therapy experiments, whether wanted or not. As explained in the video in this WEF article within the first ten minutes, synthetic biology, which includes mRNA vaccines, is bringing together individuals with expertise in biology, engineering, computer science, social sciences, and humanities to collectively trying to make biology easier to engineer, enabling the design and re-design of systems using the building blocks (DNA) of life. It is also programming functions in DNA and using new engineering tools in learning to engineer life. And mRNA vaccines are part of that engineering. The WEF has put together a Global Future Council on Synthetic Biology just for the purpose of engineering life. If it is too unbelievable, keep in mind it is currently being done through vaccines and will soon invade other aspects of life. Corporations are entering a dangerous area here, using humans and nature as lab rats, perhaps falsely believing help is on the way for mankind. As the old saying goes, It's not nice to fool Mother Nature, she is smarter than you think. As a society based on the foundation of Christian principles attention needs to be paid to the direction we are being taken, starting with these vaccines. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|