Children's Health Defense posted an interview between James Corbett and Meryl Nass with an update on the ever evolving World Health Organization pandemic treaty. It continues to have frightening aspects to it. There are also links to the information discussed in the video underneath the video.
Another point that Dr. Nass raised was a graphic created by one of her followers that really helps condense the chaos that is being created in different areas for justification of a new system to be brought in. The graphic can also be viewed on her substack account.
0 Comments
Apparently Senate President Pro Tem Chuck Winder tighty-whities are in a wad.
Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld wrote a post that clearly, and accurately, revealed the truth about the sad state of affairs in our government by exposing the relationships of some government officials to the corporate world. There isn't one iota of misrepresentation in what she wrote. In response, Mr. Winder has chosen to remove her as vice chair of the Health and Welfare Committee, claiming she was attacking people, defaming them, and was degrading and disrespectful to them. How does stating the truth defame anyone? Even a court of law would uphold her statements as being nothing more than factual. He even included in his comments the possibility of future threats towards her. It is no secret the deep ties that the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) has with elected officials and the legislative decisions being influenced based on those relationships. Mr. Winder was probably lucky that Sen. Zuiderveld didn't go farther in exposing how all of this is tied to the more global agendas, his tighty-whities might no longer have remained white. Instead, his idea of being a responsible and ethical elected official is to punish those who address the truth and point fingers at other groups, just a mere tactic of distraction. He has previously called these groups a "threat" to democracy, clearly not understanding we are a Republic. Mr. Winder needs to quit projecting his own fears onto others, and abusing his role over them. By removing Sen. Zuiderveld as vice chair, Mr. Winder has basically committed the same sin he has laid upon his accused by degrading, defaming, and being disrespectful to a member of the Senate body. Maybe the truth is that Sen. Zuiderveld was getting a little too close to home by not exposing his own involvements with outside groups that are supported by huge global corporations, making decisions, along with all his other legislative minions, that are not representative of constituents but with other countries and states. Or maybe he is too threatened in knowing he may get exposed for his activities that enmesh the government with corporations, advancing crony capitalism. Who pays for these trips? Mr. Winder's corporate buddies? Or the taxpayer? Yes, Mr. Winder should be scared and his retaliatory actions are indicative of just that. He fails to see his responsibility as an elected official to represent the people, and is more than guilty of the same offenses that were brought to light by Sen. Zuiderveld. Maybe it would be helpful for him to have a come to Jesus moment where all of his transgressions are confessed, maybe that would turn the legislature around to a body that represents the people, not the corporate world. One confession should be that he, himself, is an IACT pet as an endorsed candidate. and that his voting record shows his loyalty to IACI (pg 22). IACI tracking elected officials is not any different from any other group that he points fingers at. Mr. Winder has clearly made himself look like a fool. His actions are retaliatory and he doesn't understand that he is acting like nothing more than a schoolyard bully standing up for his friends. By doing so he has validated the very issue brought up by Sen. Zuiderveld. Winder should exit his position and be voted out of office by his constituents as he is nothing more than a hypocritical leader. The United Nations (UN) released its "Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of the United States of America" on November 3, 2023. It is a scathing report on the United States. These are some highlights on the issues the UN thinks America has done correctly and areas that America needs to improve. All of them relate to the sustainable development goals.
The CCPR stands for the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, however the "International" language is left out of the title. It is from this document that the UN is making its accusations that the U.S. has not met its obligations. Essentially, the U.S. is no longer honoring the Bill of Rights, but instead is honoring an international document. Positive 1. "he Respect for Marriage Act, Executive Orders 14075 “Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals”, and 13988 “Preventing and combating discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation”. There are a few others, but the majority is negative. Principal matters of concern and recommendations "The Committee remains concerned at the lack of measures to effectively incorporate the Covenant in the domestic legal order." "The State party should take all measures necessary to ensure that all rights protected under the Covenant are incorporated and given full effect in its domestic legal order at the federal, state, local and territorial levels." What this is saying is that the federal government has not forced these policies into states. National human rights institution "...the State party should establish an independent national human rights institution in accordance with the Paris Principles as a matter of priority, with a mandate to ensure implementation of the Covenant and monitor compliance with its provisions at the federal, state, local and territorial levels." Again, force states to adopt this and ignore the Bill of Rights. Hate crimes and hate speech Essentially, this section has dictates that the U.S. should "prevent and publicly condemn hate speech, particularly those by politicians and high-level officials"; "provide effective training to law enforcement officials, judges and prosecutors to investigate hate crimes"; and "Investigate hate crimes thoroughly, ensure that perpetrators are prosecuted and, if convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions, and provide access to victims and their families to full reparation." Racial profiling 13.b "Investigate and prosecute all allegations of racial profiling and provide effective remedies to the victims"; d. "Train federal, state, local and territorial law enforcement officials on ethnic and cultural awareness and the unacceptability of racial profiling". Discrimination on the basis of nationality Calling Proclamation 9645 of 24 September 2017 a "Muslim ban" when it was primarily about prohibiting the entry of terrorists into the U.S., the UN lauded Proclamation 10141 that ended it. Gender equality Here the UN is again telling the United States to amend its Constitution, "The State party should redouble its efforts to guarantee protection against sex and gender-based discrimination in its Constitution". Violence against women "The State party should intensify its efforts to prevent, combat and eradicate all forms of violence against women and girls, including domestic violence and sexual violence" The UN should probably look at its own agency and its violent and sexual acts against women. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity Again, the UN doesn't understand how the Republic of the United States works, thinking that the government has dictatorial power over the states. "The State party should adopt all measures necessary to ensure that state laws that discriminate against persons based on their sexual orientation and gender identity are repealed". Maternal mortality, voluntary termination of pregnancy and sexual and reproductive rights "the State party should take all the necessary measures at the federal, state, local and territorial levels to ensure that women and girls do not have to resort to unsafe abortions that may endanger their lives and health. The State party should, in particular: (a) Provide...access to abortion for women and girls throughout its territory; (b) Put an end to the criminalization of abortion...and consider harmonizing its legal and policy framework with the World Health Organization’s Abortion Care Guidelines; (d) Remove existing barriers impeding access to abortion care, including inter-state travel restrictions (e) Continue its efforts to guarantee and expand access to medication abortion" Gun violence "...the State Party" should strengthen...its legislative and policy measures requiring background checks for all...ammunitions acquisition and transfer...; banning...restricting access to firearms...under domestic violence restraining orders...repealing immunities for any entity operating in the firearms industry". These mandates essentially strip 2nd Amendment rights. Criminalization of homelessness "Abolish laws and policies criminalizing homelessness"; "Intensify efforts to find solutions for the homeless...including redirecting funding from criminal justice responses towards adequate housing and shelter programme". In other words, homeless can do whatever they want, break the law, and funding for our protection should be diverted to them. Freedom of expression Making a mockery of our 1st Amendment, the UN mimics it with the word "expression". However, the UN expects the U.S. to "Increase its efforts to ensure that state laws and school districts regulations on educational materials and books fully comply with article 19 of the Covenant." Article 19 states " 3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions..." So the UN wants early training on restrictions to free speech, or as it puts it, free "expression". Freedom of assembly Another mockery of our Bill of Rights, except they are including restrictions, "ensure that any restrictions, including administrative and criminal sanctions against individuals exercising that right, comply with the strict requirements of article 21 of the Covenant". Article 21 states, "No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." There is even a section on Voting rights. So there is a very quick summary. What is amazing is how much of this garbage is already in the works in the federal government, and stunning how much the U.S. has already, and continues to be influenced. When will we put an end to it? As the Israeli and Ukraine wars rage on, and protests by a minority receive inflated media attention, there is a more ominous story brewing that is not in the media spotlight.
BRICS is the acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South America. Goldman Sachs first used the term BRIC in its Global Economics Paper in 2001. Russia, India, and China leaders met informally at the G8 Outreach Summit in 2006, with foreign ministers from these countries meeting formally at the United Nations General Assembly later in 2006. The first BRIC Summit was held in Russia in 2009 with South Africa joining in 2010, changing the name to BRICS. Supposedly, these countries gathered primarily for the purposes of creating an easier trade system between their countries. What should one think, knowing that major dictators like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are part of a group leading an economic transformation opposite of the western world? These countries have a "shared commitment to restructure the global political, economic, and financial architecture to be fair, balanced and representative, resting on the important pillars of multilateralism and international law." The general feeling is that these "developing", or Global South countries have always been left behind from the developed countries in economic matters. As far as the World Economic forum (WEF) is concerned, this is fine as "America's dominance" will be over by 2030. Traditional G7 "developed" countries are comprised of the U.S., UK, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, and Canada. However, BRICS does perceive itself as a "mechanism to counter the global influence of the G7" and reduce the "dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance." The fact that this group is comprised of significantly different cultures and political ideology makes advancement a little difficult, and that pesky China poses a challenge. But as always with despots, the greed of money and more power can glue them together. Indeed, China is urging that "more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” Formidable advances have been made by this group, in 2020 "BRICS (31.4 per cent) overtook the G7 (30 per cent)" in GDP with China and India in the lead. Perhaps the new "Global South" will be the new dominant force for the new world order. Argentina, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will join BRICS in 2024 with other prospective members in the future. This "expansion signifies an important move in the attempt to reshape the global order into a multipolar world, with voices from the Global South at the center of the international agenda." With Saudi Arabia and the UAE, BRICS will have "more influence over global energy supplies" giving the group production "over 42 percent of global oil supplies and 37 percent of the world’s gas." In 2014 BRICS established its own bank, The New Development Bank, which expanded to include Bangladesh, UAE, and Egypt. Its focus is projects that support a full blown implementation of sustainable development goals (SDG). China is generally considered to be the leader of BRICS, is calling for more expansion, and urging "members to let more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” BRICS has also given consideration to developing its own currency, one way being similar to what the European Union did with the euro. Its existence has also contributed to the de-dollarization that has been occurring. There have also been talks about developing a digital currency. One could view this as a buildup of economic power rather than the traditional build up of armament and troops. With the addition of the other countries in 2024, BRICS will have almost half the world's population (47%), will produce a third of GDP (37%), and possess "the lion’s share of the world’s oil and gas reserves, as well as a huge endowment of other natural resources." How much possible economic damage could BRICS cause the rest of the world with these statistics? As usual, there are those who downplay the significance of BRICS, and there are multiple varying opinions from armchair experts. However, the United Nations (UN) is certainly in support of BRICS for a "multipolar" world "based on the UN Charter and international law." In the BRICS Declaration, it avows the "central role of the United Nations in the international system" (#13), and its full support of Agenda 2030 (#35). It also wants a reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, institutions that have been in place since WWII. In its most recent meeting, held in August, 2023, BRICS created its new Declaration II, with an overall, general, endorsement of the UN. The document itself sounds like a conglomerate of countries joining hands for Agenda 2030, the EU having already adopted it. The U.S. is surrounded by a world of sustainable development. Folks, this transformation of the world is really closer than you may think. What is the U.S. government response to BRICS? ""Participating in BRICS is a sovereign decision for member countries". Interestingly, the U.S. State Department reported "When it comes to the BRICS, we’re deeply engaged with its leading members." Engaged about what? With the U.S. pointing fingers at Iran as being a backer of terrorism, how will Iran fit into the BRICS Counterterrorism Working Group? Demands from this group are not limited to economic concerns. It also wants more representation in leadership positions through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), ""comprehensive reform” of the UN which Beijing regards as central to global governance", and increased representation by developing countries in the United Nations Security Council. One theory about BRICS is that it is part of an intentional collapse of the economic system in order to create a one world economic system, and bring in a digital system that would in turn force everyone into the digital world. What can Idaho do to thwart this threat? The simpleton solution seems to be the creation of its own economic power. Maybe create its own state bank, placing more emphasis on gold and silver as legal tender for a shield, investing more into Idaho resources that can be used to support the state, and reducing dependence on federal dollars. In other words, can Idaho stay out of the global economy as much as possible? After all, BRICS sees what they are doing as an economic protection from sanctions, why can't Idaho do the same by protecting itself from outside economic forces? In 2015, the world was forewarned about this by Christiana Figueres. "...we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years...". There are many economically savvy individuals in Idaho, some of whom have written about the way in which Idaho should shift its economic future. Those opinions would be welcome on this subject. A Constitutional Convention, or Con-Con, is found in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. There are basically two ways amendments can be made to the U.S. Constitution.
Alex Newman from the New American magazine has a short explanation of the fallacies behind the current effort to hold a Con-Con and some of the scheming tactics being used to promote it. Robert Brown from the John Birch Society provides a historical perspective of Article V and why the current pressure for a Con-Con is underway, and why it is a bad idea. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|