The Western Governors Association (WGA) Reimagining the Rural West (RRW) project is still marching on.  Now, there is a new name to bury it under, Out West.  Podcasts are being created to talk about their vision of what rural communities should look like, including Idaho.  This is the "inaugural" PodBean of Out West with Governor Little sitting right there with the rest of them.  Since that time in January, there have been three others.

The original instigator of RRW, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, is the guest speaker.  He starts off by describing the opportunity to create rural communities that are safe, have "world class" education systems, and of course attract a workforce.  Insultingly, he describes what he thinks is the way in which people think about rural areas changed, from "classic western movie ghost town" perceptions to "vibrant healthy" communities.  Come on Mr. Burgum, really?  Your "help" with "local decision makers" has not been sought, nor is it wanted, and those decision makers, properly called elected officials, have the responsibility to listen to constituents that elected them, not you.  Forget your desire to bring in "smart infrastructure", it is well known that "the development of new climate smart infrastructure" is a United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG),  How this equates with lower property taxes is unbelievable. 

Mr. Burgum is correct about the rural workforce issues, those workforces primarily devastated by the shutting down of the resource extraction industries.  The plan for "broadband" connectivity to benefit various recreation activities is in the realm of "nuts".  RRW is a plan that is about nothing more than creating a technocratic empire where all aspects of rural life are controlled.  How this is surmised  as a contribution to a lower cost of living is your delusion.

Promoting increased populations in rural areas is way off as well.  Citizens choose to live in rural areas for a reason, and using your North Dakota example, that reason does not include a population growth of 1,500 to 15,000 for an increase in public service, hospitals, or more daycare.  In your limited ability to understand, rural communities have high school activities that support their youth, and just because you think every activity should be included does not mean it is what a community wants.  Inviting kids from other countries just for the purposes of diversity is another aspect that is the decision of a local community.  Just how exactly does that contribute to a greater "quality of life"?

If there is a "divide" between rural and urban areas, it is because citizens have made the free choice to live different lifestyles.  But you don't get that, do you Mr. Burgum.  You want to sterilize rural life by pushing it to behave like an urban area.  One truth expressed by Mr. Burgum, the intent is moving rural communities "beyond extraction based economies".  Revealed in the WGA workshops, this agenda is forcing rural communities to green energy.  As this UN video points out, moving to a technological world has the potential to displace those who do not follow, that is why RRW has such a drive to push rural communities towards urbanization and connectivity.  The connectivity agenda is really about forcing the west into an Internet of Things (IoT) world.  Thinking this connectivity world is one "that people will want to live in" is a fantasy.  What makes Mr. Burgum and the WGA think rural citizens are not already in the world they want to live in, having no desire for anyone to come in and create one that others think they should live in?

Mr. Burgum's belief in "collaboration" to make all of this happen has just one flaw.  This project was started without any collaboration with rural communities.  The only collaboration seen here is with the federal government and their partnership with the UN to implement SDG.

The February Episode 2 PodBean can be found here; March Episode 3 here; and April Episode 4 here.

As discussed in the Event 201 pandemic game, removing "disinformation" was considered, especially on social media, while making sure only legitimate information was provided.  It appears that particular solution might be in play regarding the COVID 19 "pandemic".

A video by Jerry Day, Is COVID-19 Even Real, was posted on You Tube and subsequently removed for "violating You Tube's Community Guidelines".  The video concerned a Global Research article, Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19, which outlined how COVID 19 testing, as stated in the title, is not specific to that virus.  Mr. Day went on to describe how our economic system is being devastated as a result of this "pandemic". 

An outfit called Health Feedback posted their own article on the same day as the Global Research article, declaring Mr. Day's video and the article itself were both "inaccurate", citing "no data or information to support its claims" as one of the reasons.  While it is true that the scientist who declared the COVID 19 testing as faulty chose to remain anonymous, why would the article's author choose to write about something so audacious?

The answer lies in the United Nations (UN) and its propaganda censorship activities.  Health Feedback is a "worldwide network of scientists sorting fact from fiction in health and medical media coverage.  Our goal is to help readers know which news to trust."  Looking at the About link, the name changes from Health Feedback to Science Feedback.  One of its partners, Credibility Coalition, also works on finding solutions to "disinformation".

It just so happens that Health Feedback is "a member of the WHO-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN)" with Science Feedback being the "parent organization" to Health Feedback.  So it is only scientists from Science Feedback that have the expertise to determine what is legitimate or not, and somehow have the ability to remove, or perhaps influence removal of that information, on what they deem isn't true or accurate.  The World Health Organization (WHO) VSN "is a global network of websites, established by the World Health Organization, that provides reliable information on vaccine safety."  So WHO's solution to misinformation is to participate in censoring or countering any opposing information?  Looks that way. 

Why would anyone in their right mind trust any organization that threatens more "body bags" when challenged?  If there was ever a clue as to how despotic this and other UN organizations are, give reason to question its motives and what really might be behind this "pandemic", it is in those words.  What exactly does he mean?

ISD Global, in which the US Department of State is a partner, as well as the UN Development Programme (UNDP), came out with its own Disinformation Briefing report that frequently referenced those who are "right wing", "extreme right", promoting "conspiracy theories", with many other descriptions such as bigotry and racism, recommended "The best answer to disinformation on health issues is to flood the information space with evidence-based accurate information in digestible formats."

What all of these nitwits don't understand is that they themselves have posted the accurate and reliable information that validates their covert activities to manipulate the public and give reason as to why they shouldn't be trusted either. 

Fortunately the video, Is COVID-19 Even Real, has been posted again on BitChute, everyone is encouraged to watch it and have the opportunity to decide for themselves. 

Fingers are always being pointed to anyone who challenges the questionable information that pours from media outlets.  Anything that does not conform to the narrative and selected messaging is automatically attributed to “conspiracy” theorists.  But what do those accusers say when the conspiracy filth is pouring from their own mouths?
In October, 2019, corporations, governments, and university “players” gathered at an event called Event 201, to play a simulated pandemic exercise game, and discuss global policy solutions to address that pandemic.  Bear in mind, this is two months prior to the alleged COVID-19 “pandemic”.
The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, UPS, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), corporate heads, and of course the United Nations (UN) were all part of this “expert” panel.  Fortunately, they captured their game playing on videos so conspiracy theorists could relish in spreading conspiracies.  Previous exercises on pandemic issues have been held including Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm.  Perhaps enough game practice has occurred to give their solutions a trial run with COVID-19?
It just so happens the subject of the Event 201 scenario exercise was about a corona virus originating in Brazil, eventually spreading to the U.S., China, and other countries until it is out of control.  Vaccine availability is not possible and an antiviral drug was found to help the sick but not limit disease spread.  In this scenario, cases double every week with rising deaths, resulting in economic and social severity.  Sound familiar?  However, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum (WEF), and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were also involved in this exercise and deny any coincidence with the current outbreak.  Of course they deny it.  Clearly any reference to involvement would be only conspiracy trash.  And how ironic that John Hopkins has a map tracking the COVID-19 outbreak.
In the first video, the Highlights Reel, a description of the corona virus spread is provided and a summary of identified issues.  The hysteria of its spread and resulting deaths is addressed.  Medical supplies must be distributed “globally” with corporations needing clarity on where the need is and “who” is making the decisions, the UN offered up as a centralized point.  Travel advisories are issued to prevent disease spread with resulting economic effects.  A global financial crisis occurs.  Misinformation on the internet may need to be “shut down” and a decision on who should “control the information” is needed.  How about the need for enforcement?  The scenario foundation is laid for the “global community” to work out solutions.
Segment 1 - Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion.  This video starts out with the “critical role of businesses and public-private partnerships” (P3).  A “pandemic emergency board”, convened by the WEF, will provide recommendations on this “major global challenge”.  As usual, climate change is one of the culprits behind this catastrophic pandemic, and the typical forecast of a major, doom and gloom event is coming with a need for “mitigation” and “collective preparedness”.  The UN World Health Organization (WHO) provides its two cents worth describing the “health emergencies” and continued threats as a “new normal” through “asymptomatic” persons spreading disease.  Such hysterics, but oh so close to what is occurring now. 
At the 15:20” mark the emergency board discussion on recommendations begin with an update of the spread of the virus, called CAPS, being far more contagious with respiratory disease complications, albeit some experiencing only mild respiratory symptoms.  A projected death rate of hundreds of millions over one to two years is straining health care systems.  Discussion of an AIDS antiviral medication for treatment and respirator availability are identified problems.  Sound familiar?
Distribution of resources includes discussion about a central decision making body, perhaps the UN World Bank as the financial loan center for centralized distribution “needs”, and the UN once again offered up as the centralized source.  Central distribution of global stockpiles would interfere with hoarder behavior by being in charge of how supplies are allocated.  Corporations must also “combat” “protectionism” “rhetoric”, as it does not align with operating for the “greater global good”.  Through this segment and beyond is an annoying woman who continues coughing without clearly covering her mouth.  Perhaps this emergency board should practice its own recommendations.
Segment 2 – Trade & Travel Discussion is the second emergency board meeting.  The pandemic update includes a continued escalation in numbers with predictions of millions of cases and thousands of deaths.  The stock market has now fallen while trade and travel are affected, social media is spreading rumors, movement of people is causing disease spread, and fever screens are being conducted.  Has any of this happened with COVID-19?
Segment 3 – Finance Discussion, the third emergency board meeting.  There is an economic “fallout’, the epidemic “grows”, millions of cases and deaths. The board recommends cooperation between corporate supply chains and governments, keeping the public informed of disease location, how steps in closing schools and staying home only marginally controls the spread, which in itself might bring more serious economic costs resulting in more serious harm than CAPS.  Funding is needed to save jobs and industries, a “bailout’, especially those corporations directly related to the healthcare system.  A need for research and development about this new corona virus and future vaccines is also discussed.  Is this scenario getting warmer to current conditions?

Segment 4 - Communications Discussion and Epilogue.  The final emergency board meeting continues with more disease spread and deaths.  Because of the spread of disinformation Twitter and Facebook are deleting accounts.  To ensure that only “accurate” information gets out one central authority, such as WHO, along with their buddy non-governmental organizations (NGO) should be used as a central repository for information, especially since the UN enjoys a level of trust throughout the world, and would protect against governments spreading disinformation, say for political purposes. 

But then, if WHO were to challenge governments directly there is the issue of that pesky “sovereignty”, necessitating a “soft power of influence” by WHO.  Because there is so much public distrust, the goal should be identifying how the government can “ensure” only reliable information gets to the public and prevent the spread of false information.  Using employers and faith-based institutions could be used for the flow of accurate information.  Also important is identifying false information for “purported” treatments that has caused harm to those who have used them.

Do you know it all’s ever stop and think why there is so much distrust when this conniving activity goes on?

The board identified more emphasis should be placed on the recovery numbers.  Because of all those who are anti-vaccine, especially important is getting the correct information “out there” to ensure public trust, and incentivizing people to “manage” their behaviors.  Perhaps there should be some level of “enforcement” against those who are spreading misinformation.

Segment 5 - Hotwash and Conclusion.  This pandemic was “catastrophic”, however isolation and “social distancing” have helped interrupt the spread of disease.  Prior planning by governments, NGOs, and private businesses is identified as being so important.  And lastly, these individuals have routinely come together for a stronger “global governance”.  These are their words you conspiracy theorists.The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly proposed seven recommendations, which in a nutshell is a partnership between international organizations, governments, and the private sector to control all potential aspects that could arise with a pandemic, a full achievement of Agenda 21 P3, stripping away all representation on which our Republic was founded.

The UN goal has always been to destroy capitalism, and efforts have been made to integrate this agenda into the stimulus bill.  Is the economy being destroyed?  Is COVID-19 being used for that purpose?

Continued focus on “life threats” by the UN is getting old.  Life is not about ongoing threats that must be “mitigated”, managed, or having us constantly living in a state of preparation out of fear that something might happen.  It is all psychological manipulation, causing fear and anxiety with the intent to influence behavior, and justify the removal of more freedoms.  How effectively this is working is easily seen in younger generations.

Currently, COVID19 does not even come close in numbers compared to previous pandemics.  The same hygienic precautions should be used as with all viruses, those most adversely affected are typically the elderly, those with medical conditions, or who are immunosuppressed.  However now, given what “players” are discussing behind the scenes, could COVID-19 appear to be possibly used as a test case to see just how far behavior can be influenced, maybe just how many more freedoms can be destroyed, and promoting faith in government dependence?

Perhaps this isn’t a conspiracy as now some leaders are calling for a “global government” body to address the COVID-19 “crisis’.  Has the federal government already relinquished some of our sovereignty by following some of the Event 201 recommendations?  If so, how much further will we be taken down this road?  Since the CDC has been a participant in these games, and the federal government is so reliant on the information the CDC releases, has that sovereignty already been eroded? 

But, all of this is just conjured up information by conspiracy theorists, it is just “misinformation” which UN partner Google will combat, track people, with cell phones doing the same.  It is the biggest implementation for surveillance and data gathering, a technocrats dream.  Though enforcement was not fully discussed, it is certainly happening.

Regardless, everyone should start paying closer attention to what is really happening behind the scenes, and what is being done to us.  This global governance agenda is moving forward rapidly.  Watching the videos is recommended.