Ambassador For The United Nations
Multiple non-governmental organizations (NGO), also known as non-profits, promote United Nations (UN) goals and objectives and they have been very successful at it. Our whole society is infested with their ideology. But don't be fooled here in Idaho when a local innocent appearing non-profit presents itself as tho it is advocating for Idaho when it is really advocating for a foreign organization occupied by despots.
As the UN gets closer to the final slamming of the door on the U.S., there is an increased boldness by these groups and individuals proclaiming their true allegiance to the UN. Finally the truth. One such Idaho group, the Idaho Conservation League (ICL).
Rick Johnson, ICL Executive Director, in a May 19, 2016 speech, proudly announced to the audience "You are ambassadors of the wilderness for the United Nations." He lovingly describes his initial involvement with Washington, D.C. elites, meeting in rooms and sharing beers, ultimately devising ways in which Idahoans use of their own land would end as they created ways to take control away. Working for the UN NGO Sierra Club, he open admits becoming "skilled" with "bringing others along". Who? Certainly not Idahoans who want to keep their right to use their land instead of having it locked up in wilderness areas and other conservation gimmicks espoused by the UN, which he presumably learned from his UN buddies. It is highly unlikely that any Idahoan declared themselves as an ambassador to the UN.
In pursuing the Boulder White Clouds wilderness bill he recognized a "polarized" Congress. He failed to see that polarization as a result of his, and others, attempts to take Idahoans right to use their state land. Seeing "collaboration" as a solution, he also failed to understand that those collaborations did not include Idaho citizens. Regardless of understanding that the current President is not popular in Idaho he proceeded with pursuing a National Monument designation to manipulate signing of the Boulder-White Clouds wilderness bill, titled the Sawtooth National Recreation Area and Jerry Peak Wilderness Additions Act. His buddy, Rep. Mike Simpson, proudly watched the bill signing by a President who is not liked by Idahoans. How is that representing, supporting, or advocating for Idahoans? Claiming the wilderness is protected by "regular Idaho people", well, that is just dishonest. In reality, if you look for citizens who opposed this bill, all you can find are groups such as bikers, opposing it only because they didn't want a national monument designation. The ruse worked. At least Rep. Labrador got it right, “The truth is, the public will is against this bill.”
The ICL website states it is a "...conservation community working to keep Idaho the kind of special place you experienced as a child..." They are mistaken. Idaho children, prior to the UN taking over, experienced Idaho freely. Free to go into the forest and build huts, splash in springs and streams, ride snowmobiles through the trees, hunt for mushrooms, cut wood for a warm fire, camp in a favorite spot, shoot fireworks celebrating America, float a river, pick some watercress, wild strawberries, or huckleberries, ...FREE, without some person dictating where, what, when, or how they were to enjoy themselves. FREE, to roam and explore, maybe pick some flowers to make a bouquet. FREE, to enjoy and experience their state. Of all those children who were free to experience their forest, does this group see any lasting damage from it? NO. Out of this Board of Directors and staff group, how many of them are Idaho natives? How many are old enough to even remember experiencing Idaho freely? How many "experienced" Idaho as a child?
In a "longstanding partnership" with the the UN NGO Wilderness Society, they helped ICL celebrate robbing Idahoans of their right to use their own land with the Boulder White Clouds Wilderness designation. Joining hands with the UN NGO Nature Conservancy on Idaho projects, they were then rewarded by another UN NGO, the American Planning Association. This is not a demonstration of supporting and protecting Idahoans, it is promoting and supporting the UN and all the cronies that go with it. In just another display of true loyalty the ICL celebrates the UN Earth Day. Have they ever heard of the Fourth of July? Idaho is where their true loyalty should lie. Mike Simpson openly displays himself as a buddy to these traitors, even giving them money. Is there a law that says this is corrupt, a state representative giving donations to a lobby group?
For the future, the ICL plans to take more land away from Idahoans use, restrict your water use and forcing UN climate change into your life with corrupt renewable energy projects, prevent the mining of resources that belong to Idaho, mess with your right to hunt and fish, all the while engaging with their crony UN and corrupt legislators.
Thick as thieves, the UN and its NGOs, thick as thieves. ICL is not for Idaho or its citizens. They are in it for themselves, forcing their UN ideology onto us.
Right now there is a major concern that the United States southern borders are not being protected and that no effort is being made to stop the influx of illegal immigrants from countries such as Guatemala and Central America. No effort is being made to stop it. It is Agenda 21 at its finest.
It is well established that Agenda 21's goals are to erase borders of countries, create regional sections within each country, and have the United Nations (UN) as the governing body of the world.
The UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG) post 2015 agenda includes mass international migration. According to their site, "After 2015, efforts to achieve a world of prosperity, equity, freedom, dignity and peace will continue unabated." The current administration is a strong supporter of the UN and when the UN calls for an expansion of its's agenda this administration is not far behind.
The United Nations Media Global News outlines the importance of international migration as part of achieving MDGs. To quote the UN,
"Calling migration the UN’s “most ambitious task,” UNGA President John Ashe called on the international community’s collective responsibility to enhance migration as positive to development, as well as to protect the rights of migrants.
“Well-managed migration reduces poverty and contributes to development. Migration must receive its place in the post-2015 development agenda.” said Ashe. “Change is never simple.”
“Achieving universal goals for primary school enrollment, for example, might lead to national targets aimed explicitly at expanding access for migrant children, regardless of immigration status,” added Clark.
“We all know that migration is the fastest, most efficient way to help people escape poverty.
“We know that migration – in the broader sense, human mobility – is the vastly under-used engine for international development and economic growth.”
If there is any doubt that this dumping of illegal individuals into the US is a surprise this WND article will show that it is a deliberate action on the part of Mexico, Central American, and the US. Here is a video of a panel comprised of individuals from Mexico, Central America, and the United States discussing why there should be migration between these three countries. Our hero from the Iraq war, David Petraeus is even in on the game, here are his words on this video.
As long as Congress takes no action against the President and his refusal to address our lack of border security there will continue to be a unprecedented rise in the number of illegal immigrants into our country. And the sooner we will be under the total control of the UN.
Shame on the Idaho House
A bill was put forth by Rep. Paul Sheperd, Riggins, that would have restricted the unconstitutional mandates by the EPA. The Natural Resources and Conservation Committee killed it declaring that it was unconstitutional.
How can they be so dumb?
The United States Supreme Court has ruled on several occasions that a state cannot be compelled to adopt or implement any federal regulatory program. This very statement is taken from the Supreme Court decision on Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)
"...the Federal Government may not compel the States to implement, by legislation or executive action, federal regulatory programs."
Is the EPA not a federal regulatory program that is being used to decimate our rights at every level with their environmental cause? This is the largest regulatory program, bypassing Congress and those individuals who are there to represent us, being used to promote Agenda 21 and whatever effort needs to be taken to take a stand and tell them we are NOT going to be compelled to implement their regulations should be taken.
Take note that several candidates running for office in Idaho include opting out of the EPA on their platform.
The Heartland Institute wrote a short article that describes the many methods being used to take private property, has examples, and why.
The Heartland Institute has an article on Agenda 21, various methods that are being used to take control in the United States, and on topics covered in this site. It is encouraging that more Americans are becoming aware of this problem and why efforts need to be made to stop the influence of Agenda 21 and the United Nations in our lives. Take the time to learn more about Agenda 21 and share this information with everyone that you know.
Here are some other links at Heartland for more information.
If you have any doubt about Agenda 21's intent to globalize you may be interested to know that the United States Department of Education entered into a memorandum of understanding with Russia for that very purpose.
This article by the Independent Sentinel provides more specifics. Be sure to note the objective similarities to Common Core.
And here is the G8 summary.
In the 3/11/14 Trivia post on CVS Pharmacies the connection to the United Nations was made. But as a huge corporation they also reap the benefits of cronyism.
The 340B program was created to help lower outpatient drugs costs to eligible health care organizations/covered entities at significantly reduced prices.
Under BHO, through Obamacare, a provision was adopted to expand the 340B program. As a result, huge corporations have taken advantage to increase their profits and once again take advantage of us. CVS is one of those companies.
CVS takes advantage of the discounted drugs but then charges the full market cost to you and insurance companies. The difference is then put into their own coffers. Another example of how this works includes Duke University Hospital, with more specifics by the Washington Times.
Fortunately, the abuse of the 340B program is being scrutinized with little support by, no surprise, BHO.
Agenda 21 & Advertising to Indoctrinate
Take a moment to read the 10/15/13 post, Common Core, in either the Common Core or Corporatism categories. Briefly, it references how one of Agenda 21's goals is to use the media, advertising, and entertainment to indoctrinate us.
They are being more blatant about the use of this tactic now, except it isn't BHO, it is the United Nations of which he is more than willing to oblige. WND has an interesting article on this subject. And remember the movie, John Q.?
CVS Caremark Pharmacies
How would you feel if you went to the doctor and he/she reported to you that your pharmacy had notified him/her that you were not adhering to your medication regiment, that is, you were not taking your medications as prescribed? Intrusive?
CVS has taken it upon themselves to do just that. Is it UN connected? Absolutely. To start, here is a list of CVS pharmacies. Is your pharmacy listed? Like United Health Group being the largest world health insurance group, CVS is the largest pharmacy chain in the United States, they have been buying everyone out. Corporate control through the UN. They have also been involved in numerous lawsuits and other illegal activity as outlined by both links.
CVS is partially owned by UN business partner Goldman Sachs. Their accounting firm is none other than Ernst & Young, another UN business partner.
CVS used a study by none other than two UN NGOS, Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital to justify intrusive medication adherence monitoring. The goal of medication adherence is of course to reduce health care costs, because if you take your medication like you are suppose to then you won't get sick as much. Does this justify intruding into the relationship between a doctor and their patient? To the UN it does. CVS actually sends out letters to providers telling them the patient is not adhering to their medication prescription based on the patient picking up their refills on time. They even reference the World Health Organization, an arm of the UN.
Here is their Corporate Social Responsibility and commitment to "human rights" and diversity, as dictated by the UN.
CVS also belongs to the National League of Cities, a UN NGO. The National League of Cities has a prescription discount card just for you. Perfect way for the UN to track more information on you, even if you are taking your medication as prescribed. And if you have complex medical issues they have another place to get more detailed information about you, the specialty pharmacy services.
The bottom line is that this is another example by which the UN has taken hold of the United States with their goal of corporate governance and they continue to successfully gather data on each of us to use for social and behavior reform as outlined by Agenda 21.
This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through Agenda 21 and its associated programs. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom!