In 2011 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to implement aspects of Agenda 21. The MOU was signed again in 2016 to implement Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. In September, 2021, the federal government once again acted unconstitutionally by signing the MOU again. Among the issues mentioned: transitioning to a green economy; federal laws referenced such as the Safe Drinking Water and Clean Air Acts; participation in joint regular meetings and collaboration; holding workshops to indoctrinate everyone; and even though it is "voluntary arrangement" it "is not legally binding". That is one truth to the document. It was signed by Michael S. Regan, EPA Administrator. What this MOU means is that Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals have been implemented into the United States since 2016 after having laid the foundation in 2011 with Agenda 21.
0 Comments
In 2019 the Idaho State Department of Education (ISDE) Superintendent of Public Instruction Sherri Ybarra planned to request a 2021 budget of $1.99 billion. $1 million of that money was to be used for the development and implementation of training for Idaho educators in social-emotional learning (SEL). That request went nowhere pretty fast. The Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (Casel) is one organization that pushes SEL, defining it as teaching children how to manage emotions, build relationships, and make decisions. This is broken down further into teaching self-awareness, self-management, responsible decision making, social awareness, and relationship skills as defined in its little "interactive CASEL wheel". Casel was the recommended program by an ISDE appointed group of state mental health workers and educators to "address youth mental and behavioral wellbeing." Because of opposition to SEL clear up into last year, references to SEL cannot even be found on the IDOE website. However, giving it a different label just might be the ticket, social-emotional "health". In the Idaho Content Standards, it is described as "Mental, Emotional, & Social Health" for building wellness, instruction on positive self-image and self-esteem, recognizing emotions, and socially appropriate responses. In later grades the standards add "emotional intelligence". The Idaho Department of Health & Welfare even has its own version of SEL, Social-Emotional Development. So again, even though there is opposition, the agenda just moves forward anyway with a few tweaks of some words. But from where does promotion of SEL originate? Like everything else, the World Economic Forum (WEF). In 2016, the WEF came up with Ten 21st-century skills every student needs, with a graphic for "life-long learning", a term most Idahoans have heard over and over. But it is this image that catches the eye. How many of these targeted learning strategies align with SEL in Idaho? Golly gee, where is there anything about teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic? In 2017, the WEF added "emotional intelligence", a distinct difference from intellect and personality, with "four core skills" in personal and social competence, and is just one of several other "intelligence's" it defines. The claim is made that "emotional intelligence is the foundation for a host of critical skills—it impacts most everything you do and say each day." Really? And from what twisted psychological source did the WEF research to create this? Or even Idaho in its standards?! When so much focus and emphasis is given to how one feels and behaves, especially for a kid, where is there time for learning, let alone executing, anything academically? According to the WEF, boosting emotional intelligence is "the strongest predictor of performance". Does that mean regardless of skills at a job it is more important to be liked, get along with everyone, collaborate, and compromise one's values? Oh yeah, how pliable will that employee be for manipulation? In its "New Vision for Education" booklet, the WEF really gets down to the nuts and bolts of what it is doing, "Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology".
On page 13 in the booklet, how to Embed SEL into foundational ed-tech products is discussed. Since most ed-tech products focused on academics, the WEF saw the "opportunity for developers that want to embed features that already work in SEL into other realms." One issue to also consider, these ed-tech developers who create these products are doing it for an "investment", to make money, and making money they are. As students are forced into more online education, exposure to this propaganda increases, and the WEF knows it. The only barrier it sees is lack of access to the internet which is why 5G installation is being promoted and funded so heavily, regardless of potential risks. One company the WEF identified as already embedding SEL into ed-tech products was the free online platform Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE). ThinkCERCA was another one. Do any Idaho schools use these products? According to the WEF, other technologies to help students develop social and emotional skills in the future include Wearable devices; Leading-edge apps; Virtual reality; Advanced analytics and machine learning; and Affective computing. All of these have the capability to track every student and ching, ching, ching for the corporations that create them. Is that why Idaho budgets are so laden with requests for education money, plus local levies and bonds? To bring this technology in that harms Idaho students? For the future of SEL, a section on page 14 describes "How global organizations shape the agenda". They sure got that right. United Nations organizations such as the OECD, UNESCO and the World Bank are shaping the education system right there with the WEF. The end of the video in the UNESCO link points out it is about "changing mindsets" and "challenging norms" and even has a "Building Kinder Brains" initiative using SEL. Yes, the intent is to manipulate children into its sick realm of fantasy. OECD takes credit for influencing global education reform through its tool PISA which Idaho uses (under International Assessments). The strategies for propaganda using ed-tech for SEL can be found on page 26 in the booklet. Students are being psychologically molded through SEL for the global corporate workforce just as academics have been manipulated for the same. The future global workforce is the only issue the WEF worries about when it comes to education. These control freaks have been working on this since at least 2015. Going back to Casel being the recommended program by the ISDE group, Casel is supported by the Wallace Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and several corporate entities. Many of the individuals involved in the Wallace Foundation have deep ties to the United Nations and World Economic Forum corporate members, research, markets. and globalization. Casel is a highly funded and deeply ideological program with no mission other than to manipulate Idaho children further into the globalization well and collectivism. There are many who believe SEL actually teaches Critical Race theory concepts. One more significant point in this issue, it is a prime example of how corporations rule over how and what kids learn. Corporations control the content in the technology, the education system buys and uses these products to teach the kids, and those products are often the only choice. The education system is at the mercy of corporate control over what kids learn. Corporate partner book publishers such as Pearson and tech corporations such as Microsoft control the education system with new scams for teachers to use and bring SEL propaganda into the classroom. A big No Thanks to the ISDE and Sherri Ybarra for trying to bring this trash into our education system. Quit promoting global ideology for Idaho classrooms. Is it no wonder that academic proficiency has dropped when a student is taught to constantly think about how they feel, or if they are being collaborative, compromising, or not hurting someone's feelings? It is time Ms. Yabarra is booted out of her position as ISDE Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is time to elect an Idahoan who returns the education system back to teaching children true academics, how to really think critically, and foster each child's independence in thinking. That is what the United States was founded on, individualism, not collectivism which is what SEL really teaches. For legislators, how is it possible for the majority to continue ignoring this documentation. Or is it because they themselves have been indoctrinated into this future world, and have been convinced to believe that manipulating a child psychologically is a good idea, let alone taking away a parent's responsibility for their children's health. By the looks of it, legislators who support this have themselves fallen into the manipulative tactics so well designed for children. The state is not the parent of the child but that is where Idahoans are being taken. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is holding its annual Davos meeting virtually this year and the United States is a participant. Specifically, the appointed Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, John Kerry, is the participant. He has already given a couple of pep talks. Here he discusses destroying the coal industry and going after methane, that means cows. The longer presentation on this subject, Accelerating and Scaling Up Climate Innovation, is here. The goal is to more rapidly advance us into green energy for their green economy. Kerry's second teaser is on Clean Energy Investment, taking your tax dollar and using against us by giving it to start up companies in renewable energy products, then forcing us to transition into using those products. This in turn will be used to make their new carbon market more profitable. This is part of the Navigating the Energy Transition discussion which has not been posted yet. the Transition Other session information can be found here.
The Idaho Board of Education adopted, has deeply promoted, and continues to fund Common Core ideology. Collecting data on children, literally imprisoning them in a classroom from a young age, and brainwashing teachers are just a few of the tactics how federal money is used for these purposes. Common Core is not about educating children, it is about indoctrinating them, and one trail to this ideology came from one man and the United Nations.
Robert Muller "was an international civil servant with the United Nations", rising to the rank of Assistant Secretary-General with a bunch of philosophical ideals about world government and world peace. Although born in Belgium he grew up as a French citizen. During WWII he lived under Nazi occupation, was part of the French Resistance, and was a refugee. As a result of these experiences he developed the solution for world peace using children and the education system, similar to many other tyrants. Known as the father of global education, Muller created the World Core Curriculum (WCC). Many of the issues he conjectured for peace can be found in Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) such as health, equity in standards of life, skills and employment, human settlements, corporations, and world organizations. A full copy of the WCC document could not be found but Joanne Dufour made an edited edition of Essays on Education by Robert Muller. It is no coincidence that Common Core has the same language as WCC. In the section, The Need For Global Education, Muller points to the many technological advances and the Industrial Revolution, which hints at the WEF 4th Industrial Revolution (4th IR). First on the list for discussion is humans living longer, resulting in population growth, the amount of resources it takes to support that growth which in turn places "pressures on the environment, on resources, the energy crisis, the food crisis, the urban crisis, and inflation". These issues are a focus of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the WEF. Muller also notes an increasing interdependence among societies forcing governments into "collective thinking" and "cooperative arrangements", a concept Governor Little embraces through his membership in the National Governors Association, and the way in which the federal government no longer operates as a Republic. According to Muller this is all the more reason for global education. Enter more government and its duty to educate children about the world they will live in, and informing them of actions by global organizations to solve the problems. He claims United States educators have seen the need for a "new education trend" and from what is seen about the education system now, his claim is true. Beginning in the section, A World Core Curriculum, Muller essentially wipes out any belief in God as the creator, instead it is the "universe that gives us an indication of what is expected of us". This in turn requires us to prepare for it with "the right institutions, people. values, guidelines, laws, philosophy, politics and ethics." Several subsections fall under the WCC section. One subsection is Our Planetary Home that is broken down into having data on every aspect of life on earth, and having knowledge that even reaches far down into genetics, which is covered in Agenda 21 and the WEF. Currently, a fulfillment of this forecast is being seen in the vaccines and gene therapy. Muller professes with "a new world morality and world ethics" teachers will be responsible for preparing responsible citizens, workers, geneticists, and world managers and caretakers. In his vision parents are out the door, and God. Having collected data on humans, the WCC subsection, The Human Family, relations between humanity and the planet that must be taught is explored. Without a speck of acknowledgement to the traditional family unit, it looks like he is defining the new family structure, teaching children their family relationship is not with humans but with the planet. Resource management and environmental protection are the new family traits and traditions to model. Has the education system not brought this to fruition with its many definitions of what a family is and each child now experiencing anxieties about the demise of the planet? Our Place In Time, another WCC subsection, promotes looking into the future by 20 years rather than living life in the present. As an example, this contrivance has clearly been advanced with all the vision 2030-50 comprehensive plans municipalities now use. What if a person in 1933 looked 20 years into the future, was there any way they could have predicted it correctly? Or how about currently, was there any way in 2000 anyone other than the perpetrators could have predicted this mess we are in now? That is how ludicrous it is to plan 20 years in advance. As proof positive, Muller referenced Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz whose predictions from 1689 have come true. Leibniz wanted data storage which we are now a victim of, and he developed the binary number system that is still being used today. Muller believed in preserving everything for the future, a concept we are now buried under. The lack and devastation of resources in his youth probably contributed to this belief as it did for our ancestors who lived during the depression. After trashing the concept of God in the beginning, there is also a WCC subsection, The Miracle Of Life". Now he defines an individual as the "alpha and omega". Four core curriculum concepts for this Miracle Of Life are needed for children: Good physical lives; Good mental lives; Good moral lives; and Good spiritual lives. Muller predicted, "A world core curriculum might seem utopian today; by the end of the year 2000 it will be a down-to-earth, daily reality in all the schools of the world". Indeed, has the education system not succeeded by integrating all of these "life" concepts into education? Alex Newman provides more background information on where Muller developed these concepts for children in this video, Targeting Children With Propaganda, and reveals the source for the rebuke of God. The document goes on to other propaganda such as utilizing United Nations resources, outlining human concerns, using international cooperation on WCC, utilizing United Nation agencies to help implement WCC, and teaching peace, love, and the right attitude. Most sickeningly however, Muller attributed this quote to an unidentified profit or visionary, ""Give me your children, and I will give you the world". It was Aristotle who said, "Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man.” But it was Marxist Vladimir Lenin who stated, "Give me just one generation of youth, and I'll transform the whole world.” That is a huge clue as to who and what Robert Muller really identifies with, along with his association in organizations such as the United Nations. For any human who has experienced the horrors of war, the scars that it creates can last forever. However, one has a choice on how those scars are dealt with. Clearly, this fool chose a destructive path for humanity to heal his scars and the United States has fallen into that well of destruction, sacrificing American children. More of his thoughts are provided in an interview at the end of the document, followed by his Cosmological Vision Of The Future, steps that must be taken to change the world to his vision, none of which are realistic, but many can now be viewed as part of American thinking. Muller finishes up with his rendition of Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream Speech", many of his dreams of which have come true. To assure his dreams are continued to fruition, the WEF has as one of its 40 Global Future Councils, the Global Future Council on the New Agenda for Education and Skills, that will interact together in achieving Muller's dreams. It is incomprehensible how the Idaho State Board of Education can ignore all the evidence that is documented about Common Core, its origins and alignment with a global agenda that does not teach children the academics needed for a promising life, but rather indoctrinates them into an array of ideologies. What would it take to help them understand why the current educations system is destructive to Idaho students? Most Idahoans have probably not been notified that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has added a new chapter in its "social contract" for a digital world. In this WEF "insight" report, Identity in a Digital World: A new chapter in the social contract, covered topics include Digital Identities in our daily lives, Five elements of ‘good’ identity, trends, opportunities, challenges, and public-private cooperation (corporatism). Interestingly, Mitchell Baker, Chairwoman of the Board, Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla Corporation was part of the Steering Group. Perhaps one of the biggest lies at the beginning is that "Good digital identities offer a reliable way for individuals to build trust in who they claim to be, to exercise their rights and freedoms, and/or demonstrate their eligibility to access services." The lie is right in the sentence itself, "eligibility to access services". Identified priorities for digital ID include "Creating metrics and accountability for good identity and Building new governance models for digital identity ecosystems". What the heck is a good identity? And who will be in charge of that governance? It is always gagging when the WEF references anything related to our Constitution. In this case, "The earliest definitions of the polis and citizen in...the US Constitution were all acts that defined the social contracts between people and institutions." No, it was an agreement between the government and its citizens, with rights to protect it from a too powerful government, and the duty to abolish it if it becomes tyrannical. How about abolishing the WEF, would that be in your new chapter of a social contract? The report correctly states, "This identity online is not simplya matter of a website login or online avatar – it is the sum total of the growing and evolving mass of information about us, our profiles and the history of our activities online...inferences based on this mass of information, which become new data points". Currently, our digital profiles on us include place of birth or biometrics, our names or government ID numbers, credit or medical histories, online purchasing, and behaviours (sic). Below is a graph of its vision for digital identity. The digital identity "ecosystem" includes the individual with a digital identity; devices which "may also need digital identities"; trust anchors or authoritative sources of identity proofing; controllers of identity data such as a government with the ability to control the identity data; operators of the identity system such as a third-party technology service provider; relying parties that allow or deny access to goods, services, or data; guardians who can act on behalf of the individual; and of course, regulators who "mandate" how to manage and use identities. Just turn your soul over to the WEF. This has already been implemented in Sweden, Pakistan, Kenya, India, different parts of Europe, and thanks to the United Nations (UN), upon refugees. Dominating and exploiting the most vulnerable has always been the UN method.
The report continues on providing guidelines on how to implement this tyranny. Although not mentioned, the vaccine passports are a formidable stepping stone to force everyone into this digital ID. That is why the mandatory vaccine is so important. At all costs this must be fought. The closest activity Idaho currently has to gene editing is potatoes and strawberries. However, Simplot previously obtained gene editing licensing rights in an agreement with DowDuPont. Just this year Simplot entered into another alliance with Plant Sciences Inc., a plant breeding company, for the same purposes. Technology for this gene editing in agriculture is the same as being used on humans. A video from 2015 has surfaced with Klaus Schwab talking about gene editing. He openly admits the 4th Industrial Revolution "changes you" with an impact "on your identity". It isn't possible to determine if this is a manipulated video or not, but the World Economic Forum (WEF) website certainly has no qualms about discussing gene editing, identifying it as part of its 4th Industrial Revolution, and it likely taking over biological evolution. Short for "Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats", CRISPR-Cas9 is a genome editing tool used for editing genes. It can remove, add, or alter sections of a DNA sequence for changing human characteristics or disease. This mechanism is also used in bacteria to change the DNA in viruses to disable them. Currently, the Covid vaccine is being described as a form of gene therapy which can involve replacing a gene, adding genes, or turning genes off. With the Covid vaccine, mRNA is the technique being used and is described as "the DNA for one gene, can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein.", in this case, instructing them to create a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for an immune response. Even the Bayer President admits that the Covid-19 vaccine is gene therapy. TALENs is another gene editing technology. According to the WEF, gene editing is "changing the world". CRISPR is not without risks, the editing tools can cut in the wrong spot with unknown consequences to the person. Along with this new technology there are "ethical" concerns, mostly centering around safety issues, but without any forethought on the evil of experimenting on human life.
Currently, two types of gene editing exist, "germline therapy and somatic therapy. Germline therapies change DNA in reproductive cells (like sperm and eggs). Changes to the DNA of reproductive cells are passed down from generation to generation. Somatic therapies, on the other hand, target non-reproductive cells, and changes made in these cells affect only the person who receives the gene therapy." So much for concern about ethics, the somatic therapy has been conducted on children. There are a couple of nice short videos in this WEF article. As stated in the Mammoth Biosciences video, this gene editing will expand to agriculture, food, environment, bioterrorism, and of course healthcare. But it is already being done in the agricultural and food sector. Jennifer Doudna, the narrator from Mammoth Biosciences, a WEF member, describes this revolution and the Mammoth website lead even states it's "Reading and writing the code of life." And it does raise the question, just who gets to decide on what will be written on the code of life? The one who controls the technology? Now the second video by Haoyi Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, People's Republic of China, is more detailed in how both Talens and CRISPR work and introduces another gene editing technique, Zinc Finger. More frightening is his discussion on how this gene editing has been experimented with by injecting it directly into a mouse embryo. He appropriately labels this as a "genetically modified animal" then moves his discussion about the ethical concerns for humans, giving an example of how it could work. There is active experimentation of the insertion of human DNA into a mouse. Both videos are worth listening to, and are short. According to another WEF article, From DIY editing to matchmaking by DNA: how human genomics is changing society, the business of human genomics is growing, some companies sell genetic information for research, and overlaps with other technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. As usual this new field of technology will bring massive profits to those who participate. The European Commission released a report in 2019 on the Social, Legal and Ethical aspects of Human Genomics. Among other issues it discusses who buys and sells genetic data, anonymity and ownership of the data, use of artificial intelligence, and regulation of the industry. Then there is that pesky issue of ethics which is discussed. MITRE is heavily involved in the Covid response, but it is also involved in CRISPR. And in the interest of an emphasis on enhancing public health for safety, effectiveness and ethics, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends gene editing. If there was ever a reason to reject gene editing it would be the WHO recommending it and a military non-profit experiementing with it. All of this is a scary arena that certain technocrats and corporations have decided to force us into. For some with devastating diseases it might be a blessing. However, given how the world is operating now, any trust that this technology will only be used for treating disease is unlikely. Corporatism is defined as "the organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction". This is probably the most accurate description of our current circumstances with the federal, and state government. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced its Small Business Innovation Research Pre-Solicitation to "give small businesses the opportunity to partner with DHS". Eleven topics for consideration were given including Artificial Intelligence (AI) Distress Alerts and Monitoring, Deployable countermeasures at protected perimeters and structures, Streamlined Airport Checkpoint Screening for Limited Mobility Passengers, and most curiously Mass Fatality Tracking System (MFTS). Apparently, DHS needs private sector help with technology for its "research and development initiatives". Covid is one of those areas. As it turns out DHS has already been busy with one business for providing the technology called In-Q-Tel Engagement, and includes the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In-Q-Tel (IQT) has three business efforts, IQT Emerge to support U.S. national security, IQT Labs to solve problems, and B.Next using biotechnology for national security threats of pandemics. Primarily it helps the federal government advance in the technological world, as well as globally. In the IQT portfolio there are pages and pages of corporations and businesses working with IQT, only enhancing the ability for us to be surveilled in every possible area and have data collected on us, both of which can then be easily used to control us. Or is that being paranoid?
Included in the IQT Executive team and Board of Trustees are several previous federal employees. IQT informs and advises "government partners with technical insights and resources" and advises "our portfolio companies on best practices to collaborate and provide a voice and platform to connect them with our government partners." The massive agenda to drive our Republic into corporatism marches forward. Some of the focus areas to help the government, and other businesses do the same, include digital intelligence, intelligent connectivity, data analytics, AI and machine learning, and IT platforms. All under the guise of "national security". But, the most frightening business efforts of IQT is its B.Next venture, converging the digital world with biology for "biodefense". IQT is "building a trusted network linking government, academia, society, and private sector innovators." There is a frightening video where B.Next describes how it is working with the government to save us from what sounds like ongoing pandemics that will require vaccinations forever. Its work also includes re-engineering plants; reading, writing, and editing DNA that will be a driving force of the global economy and contribute to national security; and developing and manufacturing new vaccines. There are also a series of podcasts on just Covid-19 alone. Mitigating these biological threats is a focus of IQT and it appears plans are underway for more threats and more vaccines. IQT is a formidable source for the federal government to expand its corporatism state, bringing in countless businesses to expand the surveillance state. Now it is understood how the Covid-19 "pandemic" is playing a role in advancing this state and why the vaccine mandate is so critical to the agenda. It just makes one ponder what exactly is in those vaccines and how they are being used on the masses in reality. As the World Economic Forum (WEF) and all of its technology partners move forward to force us into its 4th Industrial Revolution (4thIR), where everything is connected together by the Internet of Things (IoT), combining IoT with Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already in progress. The WEF has identified 4 key areas where AI and IoT are already being combined that "continues to transform the fundamental ways in which we live our lives and process data.", also being powered by "5G and Big Data." These areas are Wearables, Smart Home, Smart City, and Smart Industry. According to the article, connected devices "generate 1 billion GB of data" every day. Also mentioned is the amount of profits this agenda will generate for corporations.
As everyone uses any device to communicate, all the data is being collected and plugged into their algorithms for analysis and eventual control over us. This video is from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Group (WBG) October, 2020 annual meeting. The discussion title is "Inclusive Digital ID for a Resilient Recovery from Covid-19". Speaking is Mari Pangestu, World Bank Managing Director of Development Policy and Partnerships. Ms. Pangestu speaks to the ultimate intent to force everyone into a digital ID as a result of Covid-19 which has "emphasized the need for digital ID" and build an "digital economy". While the United States is not mentioned in this plot, it will be forced into it because there will be no way to participate in the economy without participating in it. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|