Throughout all posts the United Nations (UN) has been explicitly clear about usurping land throughout the world in order to control not only the resources, but humans as well. Controlling how humans live and think, controlling how land and resources are used, and having global governance with laws and rights defined by the UN. Previous posts have explained how the United States Forest Service is being run by UN dictates with continued mandates to lock up more forest through national monuments, wilderness areas, and forbidden use. The use of Tribes to remove land and resources from Americans is clearly outlined with their exploding partnerships to achieve these goals. Prior to the announcement of Agenda 2030 the UN has already sent their UN non-governmental organizations (NGO) out to convince local city and county officials to create city clusters for the benefit of the corporate world, which they proudly call "corporate governance". One federal agency making the news lately is the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Although the January seizure and occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Burns, Oregon by protesters was intended to highlight the BLM and its continued illegal confiscation of privately owned land, this BLM extortion was really not adequately exposed. The Department of Interior (DOI) is a federal government agency that is systematically destroying America. Here is a chart of departments managed by the DOI, the BLM being one, all of which are resource based. Because of complexities between government agencies, the BLM agenda will be broken down into overlapping issues of wilderness, desertification, ecosystems, and federal resource theft. Disputes over BLM land management occur because the BLM goal is eliminating private ranching, pushing ranchers off private property, preventing use by humans, stealing resources, and as in the case of forests, destroying BLM land via destructive land management policies. Wilderness According to the Idaho BLM site they control 12 million acres of land in Idaho, with 4,795,820 acres devoted to wilderness designation according to the Wilderness connect. BLM wilderness area is "an area of public lands that Congress has designated for BLM to manage as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System in accordance with the Wilderness Act of 1964." Here is a map of BLM wilderness in Idaho. For years there have been ongoing grazing and water right disputes between ranchers and the BLM. The UN, BLM, and other nefarious federal agencies believe grazing has been harmful to the land, which the BLM claims has lessened since they took control of it. Their solutions have been to reduce and restrict grazing, charge ranchers grazing fees, and use species protection for further restricted land use. Bullcocky, the purpose is to remove humans from their land and take over the resources. These restrictions and fees are the basis for the Bundy and Hammond ranch conflicts. For generations ranchers have used grazing to maintain land health, grazing can even be used to heal damaged land. Allan Savory, a noted ecologist, explains how grazing has restored neglected land in this video. Of course, he has his critics such as Idaho State University professor Dr. Ralph Maughan, who has probably never worked a piece of land in his life other than through a UN biased government agency. Allowed activity is defined by the BLM as activity on or near wilderness land through "Resource Management Plans". As an example, the Idaho BLM just approved the Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness and Wild & Scenic River Management plan. Among other requirements, through this plan the BLM dictates obsessive requirements for motorized vehicles, livestock grazing, hunting blinds, rock climbing, camping, recreation permits, visitor restrictions, trail use, and even bodily function requirements! The BLM is also obligated to "protect endangered species" such as the sage grouse. These restrictive practices are passed down from the Wilerness Act (WA) and Endangered Species Act (ESA), but the ruse is really to ban you from using the land. It is well understood that wilderness and other "protected" areas are a focus of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), a UN NGO and UNEP partner. As noted in previous posts, the Wilderness Act was written by Howard Zahniser, director of the Wilderness Society, a UN non-governmental organization (NGO). The IUCN identifies national monuments, conservation easements, and habitat reserves and protected areas. But their swath of land theft will continue to grow though other hoaxes. "In cooperation with UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre..." the United States Geological Survey (USGS) hands over information to the UN for data gathering and monitoring progress, for ..."inclusion into UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre's World Database for Protected Areas" and "World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA) Site Codes linking the multiple parcels of a single protected area in PAD-US and connecting them to the Global Community." Even the Idaho BLM is in the game using the IUCN Red List of threatened species to ban you from using Idaho land. Anticipate more species needing protection from you. Desertification will be the focus of Part 2.
1 Comment
Desertification
Desertification is a United Nations Educational, Scientific, Cultural Organization (UNESCO) fabricated word. Looking at a dictionary from the 1960's it is nowhere to be found. The closest is the word desert, defined as an uncultivated, barren region, largely treeless and sandy. One should be alarmed the UN has infested dictionaries with propaganda. As noted in the Savory video in Part 1, land not being used contributes to its destruction and it is the reintroduction of land use that brought its life back. As with forests, UN interference with responsibly managing forests has resulted in destruction. Why has desertification grown as an issue while the BLM has progressively restricted land use? Shouldn't this have lessened the problem? As a United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) partner, the Department of Interior (DOI) created the The Great Basin Restorative Initiative (GBRI). One selected site for restoration was the Owyhee Upland area, an area integrated with the sage-grouse conservation program. And for all the BLM's alleged protection in the GBRI, the 2015 Soda fire decimated almost 400 square miles of land. Once again, the reduction of grazing to protect some bird from the endangered species list led to land destruction with certain "desertification" unless the BLM jumps in and "restores" it. Thanks BLM, glad to know you are self generating job protection. Chapter 12 in Agenda 21 is devoted to the subject of desertification and "fragile ecosystems". "Combating desertification" should be a goal of national governments, identifying the BLM and USGS as just two participating federal agencies who took on the task. Established in 1994, the UNCCD became the force behind desertification, Congress signing the Desertification Treaty in 2000. According to UNCCD, over 30 percent of the land in the United States is affected by desertification. By the time the UN is finished destroying land in the U.S., there may be no land left, except for them. A few UNCCD thematic "priorities" include "...food security, water scarcity, biodiversity, forest", and of course "gender", whatever that means. The UNCCD is also very interested in renewable energy. Solar and wind are two forms of renewable energy and all of that land with desertification problems is needed for renewable energy production, but there cannot be humans in the way. Keep the renewable energy in mind. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is one offending agency implementing UNCCD, squandering U.S. dollars to other countries. The DOI also gives special mention to the UNCCD. One UNCCD objective is "...to become a global authority on scientific and technical knowledge in the fields of anti-desertification work (pg 8). The Global Policy Centre on Resilient Ecosystems and Desertification is a one stop shopping center for the DOI on policy recommendations. That is exactly what the federal government is doing, giving the UN full authority, on everything. In Part 3 Ecosystems will be discussed. Ecosystems
Desertification isn't enough however, ecosystems are also a a BLM issue, an agenda that will completely obliterate all land use. Again, the term is not found in a dictionary from the 1960's, but originally the BLM defined it as ecosystem management which "...recognizes that natural systems and processes must be sustained in order to meet the social and economic needs of future generations." Their goal was to "...to conserve, restore, and maintain ecological integrity, productivity and biological diversity of public lands." What it really means is there is potential harm to every insect, plant, water source, or animal species if humans are present. The only solution is to keep humans away. Using wetlands as an example, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is forging ahead to define any drop of water as needing protection. The BLM goes further, breaking down wetlands into riparian areas with "land management plans...provide protections for riparian areas including BLM’s no net loss of wetland/riparian habitat policy...to maintain, restore, and improve riparian areas to protect water quality, improve water retention and groundwater recharge, provide wildlife habitat, support biodiversity, and other goals." Now how are they going to accomplish this if humans are in the way? And why wouldn't the EPA and BLM forge ahead with these decisions, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural (UNESCO) thinks all wetlands are being destroyed while the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) thinks wetlands should be honored in a World Wetlands Day. UNEP believes wetlands are needed for the economy which makes sense as the UN goal is transforming us to a resource based, or green, economy. The UN Ramsar Strategic Plan 2016-2021 lists 4 goals: drivers of wetland degradation, conserving the Ramsar network, wise use of wetlands, and enhancing implementation, with 19 targets while contributinge to the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. As a partner with this convention, the United States is implementing these goals. In 2013 the UN NGO, Pacific Institute, wrote a report, Global Water Governance, about ecosystems and their conditions are "... likely to continue to decline unless action is taken to address acute threats and better manage freshwater resources." Water is what this about, all of these organizations want control of all water, and what better way than to encompass all water through ecosystems. The IUCN also has wetland recommendations for more conservation and preservation of wetlands. According to UNEP ecosystems can generate wealth and employment. Indeed, as the UN destroys land, there will be government jobs ready to fix it, and the wealth will come from taking resources that rightfully belong to states. Kootenai County has already fallen victim to this agenda under the Idaho Wetland Conservation Prioritization Plan - 2012 (NWPCP) with other Idaho targets identified. Going back to the sage grouse, the DOI patted itself on the back for preventing the grouse from being listed on the endangered species list via "...support of partners like the Audubon Society (UN NGO), we have been able to help ranchers implement conservation strategies that improve sagebrush ecosystems, reduce risks to sage-grouse and keep working lands for working." Oh yeah? How many of those birds were destroyed in the Soda fire along with their habitat because of your strategies? May the restrictions for human use end. But federal government ecosystem "protection" will most likely expand, "... all species throughout the entire range will be listed as threatened or endangered.", including private property. The BLM intent to expand its authority to take more land was found in 2010. As a UN NGO, IUCN is the creator of the Red List for ecosystems and endangered species. As a IUCN partner the DOI USFWS and other federal agencies follow these lists. Indeed, don't forget Agenda 2030. "Goal 15.9 By 2020, integrate ecosystem and biodiversity values into national and local planning..." and needing "... strong political commitment and national-level strategies...". Just 4 very short years to stop land and resource theft by the UN and federal government co-conspirators. Resource theft and conclusion in Part 4. Resource Theft
The Johannesburg Summit 2002 defines the U.S. responsibilities for land management. Program implementation includes, "internationally accepted principles for environmental management and governance"; "influence use of land...dealing with water and wildlife habitat"; "the ESA can constrain the use and development of private land"; "Government regulations, conservation easements, contracts, or other instruments that arise out of law, custom, and the operation of private markets serve to regulate both landowners' and society's rights to use land."; "The BLM and FS (Forest Service) are...mapping them using Geographic Information System"; "The BLM manages federal lands using multi-jurisdictional approaches to ensure that planning decisions are developed in concert with sustainable development concepts"; and "The U.S. Departments of State...and Interior...actively participated in activities to negotiate the International Convention to Combat Desertification". And the federal government, having actively implemented these objectives, have enough structure in place to easily and rapidly control all land within the next 5-10 years because nobody is stopping them. GIS deserves an explanation. It is the acronym for geographic information system which uses layers of geographic data to produce spatial analysis and derivative maps, while geospatial refers to the applications of geographic data. This means that every blade of grass, rock, water body, tree, elevation, city growth, or other land attribute and activity is captured, stored, manipulated, analyzed, and managed. This video is short and explains what can be mapped while this video frighteningly explains just how much detail GIS can capture. As noted in the previous Johannesburg Summit report, the BLM uses GIS. What they don't tell you is that GIS information is passed on to the UN. See number 4 on page 4. The federal government, part of the UN cartel, hands over our GIS information and other data to the UN. Going back to the Part 2 note, "Keep the renewable energy in mind", what is the BLM goal taking land? Most BLM land is rich in resources. Remembering the UN wants control of not only people, but resources as well, then BLM involvement in resource use should be scrutinized. Renewable energy projects on BLM managed lands include wind, solar, oil, gas, coal, mining, helium, and geothermal projects. Renewable energy projects are complicated and the reader is encouraged to learn more about it. With the UN goal to take as much land away from us for its resources, while transforming us to a "green" economy, the BLM is assisting with this goal. The DOI is pretty open about its intent in using public land for renewable energy. Wind Starting with wind farms, here is the BLM map of Oregon listing renewable energy projects. At this point Idaho does not require utilities to generate a certain percentage of electricity from renewable sources as does Oregon. The BLM has contracted with Iberdrola. Why are wind projects being farmed out to foreign companies? Aren't there any wind developers in the United States? About 75, but bets are on each one of them is connected in some way to a foreign corporation or the UN. It makes sense that the BLM actively needs more land, free from humans, to develop these projects. The BLM has ballooned so much they need an outside source, Ameresco, to manage their finances. According to their website, the BLM "generated $75 billion in sales of goods and services throughout the American economy in fiscal year 2016." What are they, a business or a government agency that is suppose to manage land? While there is no requirement for wind farms in Idaho we do have some. Here is a dandy USGS interactive map that pinpoints where the farms are located with added information. Private land owners can contract with a wind developer and are paid to have the turbines placed on their property. One such farm is in American Falls. There are negative aspects to wind energy such as it being unreliable and very expensive. Solar Called "Solar Energy Zones" or SEZs, the BLM created the "Western Solar Plan" which contain these zones. Their first zone brought in "$5.8 million for the U.S. Treasury". Now cows and people just might cause interference in these zones. Idaho hasn't been sucked into this plan yet, but with the new aggressive ecosystem management requirements it probably won't take that long to force Idahoans off their land, as in the attempts with the Hammond case in Oregon, and the GIS mapping is already in progress. And what are the ranchers suppose to do when their grazing rights are taken from them and they can no longer afford to live there? Sell their land to the BLM for peanuts and move, and that is what is happening. Taking water and grazing rights, raising grazing fees, and seizing land with refuge and wilderness areas are just BLM ploys to force humans off the land, leaving it ripe for resource seizure. Restrictive ecosystem management will be the nail in the coffin, for everyone. At least Oregon Representative Walden understands. Now just who is the beneficiary, what company builds and manages these solar developments? Why one of them is Google, an UN business partner! Now Ivanpah, the outfit building this mess, is part of BrightSource, a global company and Clinton favorite, and has had some questionable history including nearing default on contracts, low energy production, and killing birds. $1.6 billion from the U.S. Energy Department, your tax dollar, was loaned to this outfit. Think Solyndra. But BrightSource has some good backing from other UN business partners like Morgan Stanley so the federal government was mindful in keeping more UN cronies in the loop. According to the BLM, "Distribution of revenue from renewable energy varies depending on the authority used.", but substantial money is made for the federal government from other energy projects. And plans have been started to site "...new transmission projects that would cross public, State and private lands." Has anybody notified the cows? Maybe dumping more of your tax dollar into the BLM will accelerate the takeover of land and resources, say 1.1 billion, that should hasten the job. Uranium One last resource to mention is uranium, which the BLM also wants, but it is a non-renewable form of energy used for nuclear production. Multiple federal agencies are involved with uranium mining as it is very profitable. Once again foreign companies are involved in reaping the profits such as Russia, again with a Clinton hand. This contributes to the "world economy" as do the foreign benefactors with solar and wind projects. Millions of dollars in tax credits and other federal gimmicks are given to companies for renewable energy. This money is being stripped out of America. It is no wonder America is dying. Oregon Energy LLC, a subsidiary of Austrailian company Energy Ventures Ltd, gave a presentation for uranium mining in Malheur County, starting the process in 2011. Page 4B of this USGS map shows "mineral resource potential" in Harney county, Oregon. That is how long they have been drooling over the amount of money they can reap for their coffers. This BLM energy map site shows maps for other Oregon projects on lands with "Federal Interest", Biomass Energy Projects and Non-Renewable Energy Projects. At this time there were none listed for Idaho, but there is little doubt it will come as the Western Governor's Association, of which Governor Otter is a member, is working on creating renewable energy zones with the Department of Energy. In 2014 the DOI was on the hunt for reclaiming and re-mediating uranium mines with multiple government (pg v) agencies involved. It was also noted that potential human risks indicate further restrictions on use may be required (pg 20). One more way to get you out of the way. Renewable Energy Credits This is where the story becomes more complicated, and corrupt. Renewable Energy Certificates (REC) are part of the scam, and it costs you more money. Companies are issued these credits for solar and wind energy production. Utilities are forced to pay higher rates for these credits and that monetary loss is passed on to you with higher rates. This subject is beyond the scope of this post but it is one more BLM method for land and resource theft, being in charge of transmission grid permitting. And those pesky cows and humans just keep getting in the way, better move them out of the way and off the land. A fellow Idahoan, Vicky Davis has written about RECs on her website, Technocratic Tyranny, The Renewable Racket, and how it started with Agenda 21. Conclusion Ok, now it makes sense. The ultimate UN goal is to move humans off land, take control of resources, and feed their crony partnerships. This can all be justified with saving the planet. Hopefully the reader now understands why the BLM is an enemy and how we are being forced away from the land they control. It is all about taking and controlling resources. Very simple. A memorandum giving the DOI and other federal agencies a directive to create regulations advancing this land and resource theft was issued 11/3/15, completely bypassing Congress. And why not, Agenda 2030 has put a renewed emphasis on protecting ecosystems, habitat, wetlands, and species in Goal 15 with increased financing and national and local implementation. Dear God, how long before Idahoans and Americans stand up for their Forefather's endeavors to give us the greatest Republic in the world? How much freedom and liberty must be stolen from us before we stand up and say it is ending now? Idaho, wake up, stand together in a mass protest against a foreign entity dictating our lives. It must be done now. In the December, 2015 archives there is a 3 part series on how the United Nations (UN) and federal government are using Tribes to take land, water, and other resources from American citizens. It only gets worse. Elaine Willman is a Native American activist for Native American rights and has written about how the federal government uses Tribes in her book, Going to Pieces...The Dismantling of the United States of America. There are two excellent interviews explaining how middle eastern countries are becoming more involved with American Tribes.
The first interview is with Patrick Wood and Attorney Larry Kogan. Mr. Kogan explains interactions that had taken place between Turkey and the Montana Flathead reservation which he discovered after he filed court documents on a case. The second interview is with Elaine Willman and John B. Wells. While the complete interview is well worth listening to, the issue of the middle east starts at the 52" mark. At the 32" mark she explains how the Tribes are sought after by not only the federal government, but also the UN and NGOs, for the implementation of Agenda 21. The pursuit is related to taking control of water, power, and property. These interviews are well worth the time and should waken you to the really severe danger we are in as Americans. Gauleiter - Gau - district leiter - leader District Leader Roland Gaul is an author of two books, The Battle of the Bulge, The Southern Flank, December 1944-January 1945; Volume I: The Germans, and The Battle of the Bulge, The Southern Flank, December 1944-1945; Volume II: The Americans. Written by this man, who not only lived through it but researched it from the German, American, and civilian perspectives, these books record a history of the second takeover of Luxembourg starting December 16, 1944. Luxembourg was under Nazi occupation from 1940 until September, 1944 when the Nazis were pushed out by the Americans. A short reprieve of freedom was enjoyed by Luxembourg citizens until December when Hitler made his last grand offensive, known as the Battle of the Bulge. Now what does this have to do with Agenda 21. Probably not much. However, what it does resemble is the methodology being used by the United Nations (UN) in advancing Agenda 21 such as environmentalism. The Nazi party was the first to pass environmental laws that are strikingly similar to the UN agenda such as protecting the natural environment, setting aside reserves, preventing air pollution, or treating animals more humanely. But in truth, WWII was probably one of the most environmentally destructive wars ever seen. This is what environmentalism is doing right now, destroying our forests, wasting water, and destroying agriculture. Frank Uekoetter wrote a book on this in 2006, The Green and the Brown: A History of Conservation in Nazi Germany. Another interesting comparison is the intent to purify the world with only Aryan heritage, ridding the world of all other non-pure races. Now the UN doesn't speak to this atrocity but it does focus heavily on what they perceive as the burgeoning population, which they say has not only destroyed the earth, but will need better management for the future. Populations are tracked by the UN very closely by demographics and trends in their UN Population Division. As for heritage, it is the UN's desire that we all consider ourselves a "global citizen" and have aggressively put this agenda in force over the years. There is your purity. While no direct implications can be made that it is the goal of the UN to eliminate humans, there are concerning activities that would suggest controlling it. Activities such as making sure every female has a right to "family planning", and all that it implies, would be one example. There is also the Catholic Church accusation that tetanus vaccinations given only to women by UN organizations were deliberately laced with birth control in Kenya, a revelation that is still a controversy. Aside from those few examples, Gaul probably wrote about it from a first hand perspective best starting with World War I.
"The status of neutrality was violated by Imperial Germany in World War I..." "Although no hostilities or armed conflicts took place during that time in Luxembourg, the Germans more or less imposed martial law status on the population, and individual rights and liberties were thus curtailed." Currently in America no hostilities or armed conflicts are taking place but our individual rights and liberties have been and continue to be curtailed. The ruse of Agenda 21, known as Sustainable Development, has been imposed on America, its own form of martial law with regulations that prohibit freedom. Gaul writes on: "When Hitler came to power, the majority of the Luxembourgers...became very much aware of the threatening danger of nazism (sic)." Multiple researchers and authors have written about Agenda 21 trying to warn Americans of its "threatening danger". Gaul writes about the initial days of occupation on May 10, 1940. "On May 10, 1940, when the Nazi German armies started the campaign in the West, they poured through Luxembourg in their rush against France." "...no armed resistance was initially opposed to the aggressor, who overran the small country in less than a day." "...the Grand-Duchy was integrated into the Third Reich and came under German jurisprudence." The United States federal government has integrated into the UN and has come under Sustainable Development jurisprudence, a system of laws created by the UN and supported by the federal government. And finally Gaul writes: "The name Luxembourg ceased to exist; from then on the country was called "Gau Moselland," (Mosel country district), which had at its head a high ranking Nazi official, the "Gauleiter," whose primary task was to 'Germanize' the Luxembourg population. German law was imposed, the use of the Luxembourg native language forbidden, French-sounding names were converted, and the Nazis started a vast campaign to indoctrinate and lure the Luxembourgers to come "Heim ins Reich" (home to the mother country) to make them believe that they were ethnic Germans." "...98% of the population vigorously expressed themselves against becoming German citizens, which drew a series of reprisals. People were beaten, harassed, and jailed..." Substituting some words, how would this look: The United States ceased to exist, from then on it was part of One World. Leading this quest were Regional Boards to help move the country towards globalization, interdependence, and global citizenry with the rest of the world. Sustainable Development law has been imposed. Higher education has indoctrinated young adults into thinking they are global citizens and to practice Sustainable Development, now our children will learn the same with Common Core. Offensive language is no longer allowed, we must be diverse and inclusive of all. Not complying with this will result in condemnation. And for the protesters at Harney county, their punishment was death and imprisonment. All because they resisted the federal government exceeding its Constitutional authority. Here are the Nazi Gauleiters. America and the UN have their own Gauleiters, some hidden, some right out in the open spewing their propaganda. The American Gauleiter is the federal government and those who support Sustainable Development. You have been warned. Congratulations to the city officials of these towns! They have successfully sold out their citizens to both Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
As previously posted, Coeur d'Alene has been invaded by the United Nations (UN) non-governmental organizations (NGO) to brainwash the city officials on the Utopian idea that the finest way to live is by cramming people into small living quarters above workplaces to save the environment, keep educational systems contained within that area to provide for corporate workforce needs, lovingly allocate humans equal share of living space and utilities, provide a unrealistic safe environment, eliminate distinctions between individuals as all will be equally treated, and allow use of a "green" space where they can go picnic. What a joke. Well, the movement is on in other Idaho cities. While Agenda 21, Chapter 7 entitled Human Settlements, covers the essence of cramming humans into dense cities living atop businesses with small green spaces used for their outdoor enjoyment while getting about by walking and biking or using mass transportation, Agenda 2030 takes it farther. Agenda 2030 includes the fascist concept of developing human capital. Now while there are several different definitions of fascism, it could be said that these cities fall into the definition of "A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition". In this case, the dictator being the UN with their UN corporate partnerships, public-private partnerships so overwhelmingly touted by our government at every level, and the violent suppression of the opposition as we have seen in cases around the northwest. Although Agenda 2030 claims there are 17 sustainable goals, #18 clearly states there are 169 associated "targets". Now Agenda 2030 doesn't specifically state clusters but it is clearly laid out in various goals. Clusters are regional developments with concentrations of related industries and where humans are crammed to serve the needs of the industries. In addition to the resources needed for everyday life the cluster also focuses on education programs that train future workers for servicing the local industry. Page 89 in this UN Global Sustainable Development Report defines one emerging theme for the 2010's as public private coordination and regional/cities cluster development while page 95 outlines the need for "...educational policies supporting industrial transformation and inclusive growth through training and capacity building (see Section 5.3.3) are critical to accommodating the rising demand for skilled labour." This is all part of the economic development scam, bringing various businesses to the cities and then servicing those businesses with a local workforce while at the same time creating a regional system of corporate control, aka fascism. That is just a basic overview so it is easier to see how the UN is leading these Idaho cities by the nose. The UN has infiltrated down to the most local governments via Agenda 21 which puts the necessary structure into place before Agenda 2030 was even formally adopted. Twin Falls Twin Falls adopted their plan, Twin Falls Vision 2030, in 2009. Going through this document residential cluster development is identified on page x and xx, describing it as a wide range of housing types and mixed use. Starting with pages of concern about population growth on 1-10, it leads to the justification for condensing Twin Falls citizens, right in line with Agenda 2030. On page 2-20 this plan outlines the need for high density housing with inclusion of local businesses located for citizens wanting a "unified environment". Did Twin Falls citizens request that? Page 2-26 describes clusters for "...more compact forms of residential growth...and cluster development...", but it is page 3-7 that provides a true graphic of cluster development. Cluster promotion continues from page 3-19 to 3-22 with a nice graphic on 3-18 that shows just how many more citizens will be crammed into a small space, that is, 220 lots on 1/8 acre versus the current 148 lots, that extra land available for having a picnic. Now the Twin Falls plan falls short in their education and finance development in relation to Agenda 2030, that is, putting those institutions inside the clusters. But as the city planners and UN NGOs are indoctrinated you will see it coming as a necessity to educate the citizens for future corporate workforce development within the cluster. Watch for updates to the plan that will be similar to McCall. However, Twin Falls did come up with a comprehensive plan update which permanently "...establishes a water service boundary that sets limits on land use and development until in-fill parcels are developed...". Twin Falls hired an out of state firm, Landmark Design, which is guided by the UN NGO, United States Green Building Council (USGBC) rating program SITES, to create the boundary and design the landscape. This rating program was created in part by the American Society of Landscape Architects, UN NGO. Landmark Design also promotes LEED, a USGBC certification for green buildings. So nice to know another Idaho city has engaged the UN into its city design. Meridian Now that Boise continues to actively transform into a human settlement, it is only natural that next door neighbor Meridian join the bandwagon. KTVB had a glowing report on the "mixed use" development proposal coming to Meridian with hopes of boosting the economy. The term mixed use basically means businesses on the ground floor with small apartments on top and walking to work with mass transportation available for other needs. There would be no need for anyone to live outside this small cluster on 300 acres. How many people can be crammed into that space? This Meridian plan was actually adopted in 2007. A view of this picturesque community can be found on page 3-2. Pg 3-5 identifies the land use areas as residential, mixed use, employment, and special areas. There is also a nice picture of low and medium density housing. Medium density is described as multi-family but it is nothing more than what used to be called a fourplex, that is four apartments in one building. This document claims there should be six dwellings per acre. On page 3-6 you have pictures of medium high density buildings which is nothing more than apartment buildings, not looking much different than the high density buildings on page 3-7. One very important item left out is that you will be paying a high price for rent as high density housing drives costs up. But more importantly, your wasted rental dollars will stop your gaining in personal wealth through private property investment, one huge UN goal being the elimination of private property as it is viewed as wealth (page 28 D. Land Preamble). Employment is covered on page 3-9 and describes this employment cluster in supporting more than 30,000 employees. Wow, that many people working on 300 acres, 100 humans per acre. Sounds a bit crowded. But not to fear, page 3-13 shows the happy serfs walking along a predefined path for their outdoor pleasure while 3-18 has the main routes of transportation for you to get around, and with complete streets on page 3-19 one will notice restricted car use. Second Agenda 21 goal, the loss of freedom of movement, there will be no way for you to escape this cluster freely with a vehicle, at least it will be much harder. This should be frightening for everyone. Without going into much further detail on what this plan offers, one has to stop and think how their whole lifestyle will be defined, and freedom taken. You will no longer have freedom to decide how you live, how much space you will live or play in, how you design your living space, where you can roam, what stores you will go to, or your freedom to go other places. All of it will be decided by the UN through continued filtering this indoctrination down via city planners and NGOs. Because this plan was created in 2007 the Agenda 2030 expansion isn't included. What is left out is the educational and financial institutions for workforce development. But as the plan goes forward this will be added and most likely there will be more UN NGO involvement as it was in Coeur d'Alene. If you live in Meridian, beware. McCall Perhaps this is the most devastating plan of the lot, deserving the most attention. Several nefarious individuals, some elected officials, and the UN NGO Chamber of Commerce, (pg 2) have colluded together making the whole Valley County a "region". Both Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 promote regional development which in turn creates a hidden body of individuals who make decisions about where and how you live, and who are not elected by citizens. This plan is called the Western Central Mountains, Idaho's Adventure Corridor, Economic Development Strategy. Why bother with this name, at least other cities were honest about naming their plans after Agenda 2030. To help the reader understand how this aligns with Agenda 2030, a summary of the plan's goals will follow with the relevant Agenda 2030 goal. The Agenda 2030 document can be referenced for more information. Also, all page numbers refer to the adobe page number rather than the plan page itself. Starting on page 8, the area has been renamed as a region (goal 9.1,11.a). rather than Valley County with unique individual towns. This plan focuses on six areas including jobs, housing, transportation, education/culture and recreation, health/well being, and regional communication (pg 20), all for "economic growth". Agenda 2030 9.1 Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all 11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning While the beginning of the plan goes into detail justifying the reason for its own self creation, the condensed version is used for purposes of this post. Also, Agenda 2030 refers often to developing countries. The United States is considered a developed country but the same agenda applies to us. Western Central Mountains Idaho's Adventure Corridor Economic Development Strategy Jobs (pg 62) This particular section focuses on forestry and mining, however employment is scattered throughout each section, called workforce development. One important issue to remember is that the goal is developing areas to serve corporate and industry needs, interchangeable terms, touting it as "economic development". There is a section on cluster development that warrants mentioning starting on page 36. This section discusses the "industrial" cluster and defines it as "...concentrations of related businesses...that arise out of various types of industries...advantages to industry clusters include their ability to...catalyze new business development; accelerate innovation and technology (goals 8.2, 8.3); and increase access to labor, financing, and support services. When a cluster forms in a rural area, it presents an opportunity to strengthen the regional economic base, sustain a skilled labor force (goal 8.5), and improve the quality of life." Forestry is one focus (goals 15.1, 15.2, 15.b), and is a major Idaho resource controlled by the UN (See August 2015 archives). This clearly spells out the intent of this plan, to develop clusters that will train the workforce for the industry or business that is brought in. Back on page 62 Jobs 1 & 5 encourage funding opportunities, promoting job creation, and promoting spin off industries (goal 8.3, 8.10, 9.3.). Agenda 2030 8.2 Achieve higher levels of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgrading and innovation, including through a focus on high-value added and labour-intensive sectors 8.3 Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation, and encourage the formalization and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services 8.5 ...achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people... 8.10 Strengthen the capacity of domestic financial institutions to encourage and expand access to banking, insurance and financial services for all 9.3 Increase the access of small-scale industrial and other enterprises...to financial services, including affordable credit, and their integration into value chains and markets 15.1 ...ensure the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, in particular forests...in line with obligations under international agreements 15.2 ...promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests... 15.b Mobilize significant resources from all sources and at all levels to finance sustainable forest management... Energy (pg 63) The intent here is to explore renewable energy sources for the economy and promote technological innovation (goal 7.a). Agenda 2030 7.a ...enhance international cooperation to facilitate access to clean energy research and technology, including renewable energy, energy efficiency and advanced and cleaner fossil-fuel technology, and promote investment in energy infrastructure and clean energy technology Leisure and Hospitality (pg 64) This is a second identified cluster on page 37, with subclusters for accommodations, visitor attractions, and cultural/educational entertainment. Leisure and hospitality is the synonym for Agenda 2030 tourism (goals 8.9, 12.b). The goal is having the area remain a tourism industry with year round employment on a regional scale, not to the enhancement of each individual community. Agenda 2030 8.9 By 2030, devise and implement policies to promote sustainable tourism that creates jobs and promotes local culture and products 12.b Develop and implement tools to monitor sustainable development impacts for sustainable tourism that creates jobs and promotes local culture and products Agriculture (pg 65-66) Enter the Valley County Economic Development Council (VCEDC). Did the citizens of Valley County elect these people? Well they have been busy "broadening" workforce development and have developed a "strategic plan" to network businesses and education, promote local food production (goal 2.3, 2.4), strengthen telecommunications (goal 9.c, 17.8), attract businesses (goal 8.3), promote affordable housing and transportation (goal 11.1, 11.2), and of course develop energy (goal 7). Bear in mind, if you have any concerns or complaints about any part of this plan, you are out of luck. They don't have to answer to you, you didn't elect them and they do not represent you. Regions and associated councils are created to undermine America's government structure, that is why the UN wants regional development. The Western Central Mountains plan will support secondary education in developing a curriculum for agricultural careers. Forget that family, who for generations, have passed their knowledge of farming to their children and grandchildren, and most likely know more than any teacher or professor whose knowledge comes out of a book. Getting back to Idaho's Adventure Corridor agriculture goal, the mission is to increase sales which "...could translate into many new jobs and provide the community with healthier food options."(goal 2.1, 2.3., 2.4), while using universities to teach farmers how to improve production (goal 2.a). Bet those farmers weren't aware they didn't know what they were doing for the last 100 years, even though they produced food. Why get universities involved? There are two reasons. Higher education has been hijacked by the UN, indoctrinating students for years on sustainable development, aka Agenda 21. Secondly, it is the UN's intent to make it impossible for local farmers to stay in business by burdening them with expensive requirements and regulations for "sustainable" food production. In turn, the farmer will be forced to leave his land and agribusinesses will take over. Agenda 2030 2.1 ...end hunger and ensure access by all people...to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round 2.3 ...double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers...family farmers...through secure and equal access to land, other productive resources and inputs, knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment 2.4 ...ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality 2.a Increase investment...in rural infrastructure...to enhance agricultural productive capacity... Health Services (pg 67) In spite of a fairly healthy population (pg 54-55), expanding health care services for job growth and better access is seen as a necessity, including the need for new technologies (goal 3.8, 3.c), and "housing" that "attracts" medical staff. Do medical professionals live in a different type of house? Another interesting goal, "Attract healthcare incubators to research and develop innovative medical technologies." What the heck is a healthcare incubator? It only makes sense, if you are going to have a strong workforce you need to keep them healthy for continued productivity. Agenda 2030 3.8 Achieve universal health coverage...access to quality essential health-care services... 3.c Substantially increase health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce... Workforce Education (pg 68) In spite of a well educated populace (pg 47-48), this plan calls for post-secondary accredited programs in the region because of the importance "...of human capital...". The more they educate you, the more productive you will be for them. It is rather stunning, this plan openly admits intent, "...realigning our secondary and postsecondary education with industry needs" and "curriculum alignment" (goal 4.3, 4.3). How brazen is this statement, "Linking industries with educators is critical to ensuring a competency-based education for current and future businesses." Do the people who create these plans ever read what they are doing? Do they not recognize how fascist, marxist, or communistic this looks? Reemphasized, "stronger partnerships must be forged among educators, industries and employers". They will decide your child's future. Why, even teaching sustainable forestry (goal 4.7, 15.2) is right out of Agenda 21, Chapter 11, while increasing professional health certifications meets Agenda 2030 (goal 3.c.). Your child's future will be determined by this plan through manipulation of the education system and corporate demands. Agenda 2030 3.c Substantially increase health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce... 4.1 ...ensure that all girls and boys complete free, equitable and quality primary and secondary education leading to relevant and effective learning outcomes 4.4 ...substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship 4.7 ...ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development 15.2 ...promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests and substantially increase afforestation and reforestation globally Housing, Transportation Infrastructure (pg 71-75) Once again we get to the housing (pg 40) and this plan is right in line with "diversified housing", but more striking is its notation that multifamily housing is needed for "serving workforce housing needs" with a specific mention to "workforce housing development" on page 42 (goal 11.1). Will there never be a family home again, will it all be nothing more than a place to house workers? What is this, a concentration camp in Germany? Beware, these units are small, they are only meant to accommodate a few people which in turn is a way to encourage smaller families. Indirect population reduction and control. Touting the creation of walking and biking pathways on page 44, it is reassuring to know residents are willing to take that mode of transportation getting to work during the winter months in the mountains. One quick note about Objective 1 - Promote commerce through improved regional connectivity (pg 75). In each of these plans there are references to transportation corridors which are major thoroughfares through the clusters. These are needed for transportation of goods and commerce from the industries (goal 11a) between the regions, and which will require better internet access through technology (pg 57), (goal 9.c, 17.7). Agenda 2030 9.c Significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet... 11.1 ...ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing... 11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, peri-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning 17.7 Promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies to developing countries on favourable terms, including on concessional and preferential terms, as mutually agreed Educational, Cultural, and Recreational Opportunities (pg 76-81) Even though Valley County, now known as West Central Mountains, currently has a "very educated population" (pg 47), the goal is now educating a workforce for the region with business partnerships (goal 4.2, 4.3, .4.4, 8.3, 8.5, 8.6). Businesses will be encouraged to develop "on-site prekindergarten school programs", then overwhelming kids with "dual enrollment" for high school students to obtain college credits getting them to work sooner, and have businesses develop internship programs exposing kids to their future work environment and expectations. How limited will the kid be, given only an opportunity for exposure to the industries in the cluster? Will they ever be given the chance to explore other options, or maybe even be free to think about it over the years before deciding what they want to do? What if a girl just wants to be a wife and mom, will that be allowed? For recreation the goal is expanding parks and "green space" with future jobs created through cultural promotion (goal 12.b). Agenda 2030 4.2 ...ensure that all girls and boys have access to quality early childhood development, care and pre-primary education... 4.3 ...ensure equal access for all women and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education, including university 4.4 ...substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship 8.3 Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation, and encourage the formalization and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services 8.5 ...achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people... 8.6 ...substantially reduce the proportion of youth not in employment, education or training 11.7 ...provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces... 12.b Develop and implement tools to monitor sustainable development impacts for sustainable tourism that creates jobs and promotes local culture and products Health and Wellbeing (pg 81-83) This aggressive regional plan calls for universal health care (goal 3.8), expanded health infrastructure, access to healthy food, and promoting healthy lifestyles. It defines a healthy lifestyle as "...a critical factor to economic growth as it improves life balance and work-force productivity" ..."starting at an early age". Therefore, it includes public private partnerships and expanding K-12 programs that focus on healthy living and exercise by connecting the program to recreation. It is clear that if they need a workforce, it is necessary to keep that workforce healthy for serving the industries. Agenda 2030 2.1 ...end hunger and ensure access by all people...to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round 3.8 Achieve universal health coverage...access to quality essential health-care services... 17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships Regional Communication (pg 84-85) If a county with individual towns is redefined into a region then transparency is needed to help in understanding that new identity. The plan includes transparency to, "obtain community buy-in" and promote their "regional identity". Sending out newsletters to the unsuspecting citizens with information that is fluffed with the glories of the changes to come and creating a website that nobody will look at should suffice for the deceit (9.c, 16.6, 16.10). And what better form of deceit than marketing the West Central Mountains as one destination even though it is likely the majority of Valley County citizens have no idea what is being done to them. Agenda 2030 9.c Significantly increase access to information and communications technology... 16.6 Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels 16.10 Ensure public access to information... Conclusion If there is any question or disagreement that this is connected to the UN, this UN Habitat document, Urban Patterns for a Green Economy - Leveraging Density, is practically verbatim with every plan. The most relevant chapter is titled Compact City from pages 28-67, going into exact detail with diagrams very similar to those shown in the above plans. It also mentions using city planners and the governments to design what should be termed "public housing projects" and not compact cities, and even clustering, "...green economic development can be encouraged through the clustering of industries..." on page 9. It is no coincidence that two of the most resource rich areas of Idaho have been targeted, Coeur d'Alene and McCall, since the UN has full control of forests and have successfully manipulated Tribes into thinking they are having their land rightfully returned to them. McCall, do you see the connection? Hey VECDC, are you ok with selling the Valley County residents out to the UN? Are any of you Americans, have you ever heard of the Constitution? Do any of you understand that you are engaging in an agenda from an entity outside of the U.S. government, that you are not representing those who elected you, and that you are subjecting Americans to an agenda by a foreign body of despots? McCall and the remaining Valley County cities are in grave danger with Twin Falls not far behind. Meridian has already been lost to the Boise movement. How many other Idaho cities have been taken over? Whichever town you live in find out. Let your elected officials know that these city designs are unacceptable and if they won't listen consider a recall election. Protect Idaho. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|