On June 25, 2020, a press conference was held by António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN), on the launch of the UN comprehensive response to COVID-19. It is stunning how the UN is taking full advantage of this "pandemic" to aggressively advance its agenda. Mr. Guterres thinks the world has "shared values" and that it is time to "reimagine" how the world functions, all in the goal of "global governance". It is no coincidence that same term is used by the Western Governors Association Reimagining the Rural West Initiative, that initiative is all about implementing the UN Agenda 2030 objectives and goals. We cannot let this happen.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) plays a major role in forcing the world into globalism. It is now using the COVID19 "crisis" as an excuse to accelerate this agenda. As the name itself suggests, it is about the economy.
With COVID19 it now has justification to proceed. This agenda is now named The Great Reset Initiative. There is a video that is alittle over an hour long that details what their players will do to us. In the video UN Secretary General António Guterres, mentions "reimagining" the world, which is probably where the Reimagining the Rural West term originated.
Here is a short version of highlights.
System Innovations (SI) is an online platform that tackles complex problems through systems science and technologies, changing the structure of a system rather than through individual parts. Some of these systems include agriculture, education, and transportation from "around the world". Members include individuals from many countries and large U.S. cities such as New York, Seattle, and San Francisco. This organization intends to "ReThink everything", including the social, health, financial, urban, security, energy, water, and even political systems of the world. COVID19 itself has even become an excuse to "ReThink" everything. No small coincidence there. Networking all of these systems and players together is the goal of SI.
While this organization claims it loves "detailed outcomes" that an "organization could control", its job "is not to control and specify everything, but more to create the conditions for the desired outcomes to emerge". What an oxymoron.
In general a systems approach is pretty abstract and complex. This organization's goal is to take all aspects of the world and network them together for the benefit of all. These hoaxers are talking about "networking" parts of the world together for a fully functional unit, implying that the world does not currently function as a unit. In their scheme, there is no separation of parts such as nations, resources, or individualism, since they are just insignificant parts of the whole. As Aristotle said “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”. Collectivism. What they are really talking about is globalism and how to manage it.
SI released a video, "Globalization", The Rise of Networks. Listening to the video itself is somewhat mesmerizing, distracting with mood music and some pretty spectacular photography, however it gives a clear picture of how a traditional free market economy is being transformed into a global digital economy that has no national boundaries.
While the reader is encouraged to watch the video to fully understand how globalism is being established and the ramifications for us, here is a summary of their mission.
It is about the economy. SI explains how the economy has been dominated by a capitalist free market system for decades. With industrialization and advanced transportation systems, the economy became more global over time. In the latter part of the 20th century, with the removal of trade barriers, creation of global supply chains, outsourcing, and enhanced communications through the internet, more global economic "connectivity" was enabled. This global economic connectivity over the last couple of decades has led to a single global economy exchange.
Through the internet, globalization has been taken to new levels. Exchanges of data across the internet has enabled "the sustained coordination of human activity", with digital platforms coordinating the economy and society. This is also defined as a digital model of globalization in which the UN is actively engaged for its Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
According to SI, a global organization is being formed with advanced technology and the "end game" for globalization is "coming into focus". Called the "decentralized web", economic activity will be decentralized, shifting operations to global based networks allowing a collection of computers to work as a single cloud computer. With this, and through the Internet of Things (IoT), the world can be quantified and markets can be built for any "resource that needs managing", including humans. The same solutions for any societal problems can be applied anywhere in the world, disrupting "the centuries old structures that carved up the planet into separate jurisdictions and societies".
In digital globalization, the internet is used to create network platforms that are managed by experts, or technocrats, comprised of individuals from corporations, education, research, engineering, financing, and other fields. Rather than relying on the expertise and wisdom of citizens, the world will be managed through these network platforms, with all "solutions" determined by technocrats. As seen in this SI video, ReThink Everything, all sectors of human activity are included and align with Agenda 2030 SDGs.
SI effectively summarized its globalization concept that will be accomplished through digital technology. While it is recommended that the full Globalization video is watched because it gives a more comprehensive understanding of how we are being forced into globalism, this is a shorter version that gives a basic view of how technology is being used to globalize our world. This explains why there is so much emphasis on data collection and why the CARES Act is funding the installation of 5G.
The Agenda 2030 SDG captures every aspect of life. These platforms will create networks that include technocrats from every walk in life. Sharing information on these platforms at a global scale, technocrats will provide solutions that meet the SDG goals. IoT is the mechanism that provides the collection and sharing of data, the "connectivity". Collected data can then be included on the platforms. National governments will only be used as patsy's, political buffoons who believe they are serving us best with expert decisions. Representation of the people will no longer exist as these technocrats will provide the solutions, which is currently happening with COVID19.
Using the SDG 3.b for vaccines as an example, vaccination data is shared with a state agency, which in turn shares it with the federal government such as with the Center for Disease Control (CDC). A network platform of medical and pharmaceutical technocrats can analyze this information along with other data and determine if the vaccine is effective, compliance rates and where those rates are low, which provider isn't complying with vaccine recommendations, and even which parent isn't vaccinating their child. Every aspect of vaccinations can be analyzed through the network platform. Once a vaccination problem is identified the healthcare technocrats will develop a solution. The economy benefits by producing and selling more vaccines.
Resource production and allocation is also very much at the center of this globalization. Technocrats in the network platforms for the agriculture sector will have the ability to monitor food production and quality, consumption, areas deficient in food sources, and how food allocations should be changed on a global level. Food overgrown in one area of the world and allocated to another part of the world can easily be decided by these technocrats. All control over food production and allocation will be taken out of the hands of nations, and humans. More sustainable agricultural practices and equitable distribution will contribute to economic development.
These are only two examples of how technocracy, the control of a society by technical experts or technocrats, will be implemented through digital globalization, which in turn meets the UN SDG objectives. Governments will adopt solutions created by these network platform technocrats. Digital technology gives technocrats the ability to gather and data, create solutions. and monitor the effectiveness of those solutions. This will not only globalize the world but it also removes all freedom, individualism, and national sovereignty. Humans become nothing more than their pawns in a technocratic world, meeting economic development needs.
Seven years ago a former Soviet KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov, talked about the stages of destroying a country. It appears the COVID19 "crisis" is the tool being used to create a "new normal" as described in Stage Three. When will Stage Four occur? Perhaps when technocrats have succeeded in laying their foundation with 5G.
Globalism is evil. It takes precious freedoms and individualism, creates a lifeless cubicle in which it is expected every human will live and behave the same, all for the purposes of serving the global elite. If there is ever a time that Americans need to come together, it is now, to save our Republic. There is little time left.
In 2018, then Department of Interior (DOI) Secretary, Ryan Zinke, issued Secretarial Order (SO) 3362 which, among other things, called for states to begin the process of identifying wildlife migration corridors "on federal lands" and "harmonize State fish and game management and Federal land management of big-game winter range and corridors."
Several states such as Wyoming and Oregon have moved forward with supporting this SO, Idaho has been fairly quiet, until now. It seems there has been some typical behind the scenes activity between the federal government and Idaho Fish & Game (IDFG). In April, 2019, the DOI sent a letter to IDFG Director, Ed Schriever, soliciting a second version of Idaho's Action Plan identifying priority migration corridors in Idaho while providing thousands of dollars for research and mapping. Even though SO 3362 specifically stated federal land, this letter makes no mention of it, even providing thousands of dollars for conservation on "private land".
Obviously, neither the IDFG Director, nor the DOI contact has any clue that IDFG is a state agency. Where does the DOI get off dictating how a state agency is managed? Did any of this go through the legislature for approval? Were Idaho citizens or their representatives ever advised of this DOI directive? No. However, as usual, the environmental groups, such as Center for Large Landscape Conservation were given the opportunity to provide their input.
So, what brilliant plan has IDFG developed to meet DOI demands? What was a "federal lands" issue has now become a "cross-jurisdictional conservation", private land owner "collaboration" effort "to inform land management and habitat conservation actions". At the same time, other DOI agencies must be brought in to "partner" with IDFG to improve "migration corridors on DOI-managed federal lands in a manner that recognizes state authority to conserve and manage big game species and respects private property rights." Are they out of their minds? Improve corridors on "DOI-managed" land with state authority on private lands? DOI land has nothing to do with private land let alone state authority over private land. How does a state "conserve" big game and respect private property rights on DOI land? In reality, this is a very clandestine maneuver to hide the fact that the DOI plans to create fake corridors on DOI land while knowing full well wildlife crosses over private property. That is the intention, sucking private property into their fake corridor.
What is not being divulged in this scheme is that this corridor scam is about land use regulations and restrictions and is part of their connectivity agenda. Once a corridor is established, a mandate will be issued to "protect" that corridor, everything in its path will be dramatically changed with local land use management authority diminished. The IDFG document itself even speaks to limiting wildlife disturbance (i.e. no recreation) and avoiding development.
In its October, 2019 V2.0 Action Plan, IDFG had no problem gathering input from "regulatory agencies (e.g., BLM, USFS, IDL, ITD, and IDWR)", and coordinating with the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). Nowhere to be found is any effort to talk with the legislature, local jurisdictional authority, or Idaho citizens about this DOI mandate. Maybe citizens just don't have the money to bribe IDFG like the DOI because it is already being taken as tax dollars for the DOI to use against them.
Page 8 in the document lists all priority corridor areas in red with no distinction of land ownership, in fact exceeding beyond federal land. Following that page is each targeted area in Idaho, described in detail. The identified migration routes extend across large areas of land, each with different ownership. Those potential migration corridor areas will require the type of land use restrictions mentioned previously. Federal land, protecting habitats, or identifying corridors has nothing to do with this. It is about redesigning all land to dictate where and what type of development can occur and requirements over how private property owners can use their land. It is the federal government behind this agenda and IDFG along with other state agencies being complicit with that agenda.
As we are being distracted by the many horrific issues that are tearing our nation apart, the federal government is continuing on its path of tyranny. Collaboration, consultation, and partnering were never written into our Constitution. Our government was designed through representation, starting at the most local level. That representation includes jurisdictional boundaries and specific enumerated powers of the federal government. It is the local counties that have authority over the land. The DOI is coming into our state with a fake corridor scam and successfully using IDFG to execute their intent to rule over land, including private property. While stated as voluntary participation at this point, it will eventually become a mandate. A Secretarial Order is not a law. There is no law that supports IDFG adhering to DOI demands.
Until everyone understands that the government, both at a federal and state level, has become a tyrannical machine this activity will not end. This is highlighted by Governor Little making unilateral decisions to shut our state down, how to spend millions of dollars, and using that money as a bribery to overlook his behavior by placating citizens with property tax relief. What a joke. Heads up Idaho, none of this tyranny will stop until we take necessary actions to stop it.
Rev. Danny Jones of the Northlake Baptist Church in Gainsville, Georgia, understands the destruction of our world that has progressively been implemented by evil. He gives a powerful sermon about this. Below is a shortened version of his sermon, to listen to the full sermon go here, starting at the 15" mark.
Alex Newman is a journalist, educator, author, consultant, contributor to WND (World Net Daily), an education writer for FreedomProject Media, foreign correspondent for The New American magazine, a contributor to the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief, and a multitude of other talents.
In this video he briefly discusses Agenda 21 and 2030 but then goes on to speak how the United Nations (UN) and these vile programs have contributed to the destruction of our education system. In Idaho the legislature is making efforts eliminate the Common Core standards. The deceit behind Common Core is exposed, individuals who have been involved, and the societal destruction that was integrated into Common Core is explained by Mr. Newman.
There are many Idahoans who understand this COVID19 "crisis" is not about a communicable disease, it is about destroying our economy. Governor Little is participating in this economic destruction unilaterally, without legislative involvement, instead using bureaucrats to make illogical and discriminatory decisions to close businesses. His declaration of what are essential versus non-essential workers is reminiscent of language that defined the workforce in Germany during WWII. It is the federal agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), that created this selection process. The health of the workforce is now guarded by the Centers For Disease Control (CDC). Offended by this comparison? We have a federal government that is defining an essential versus non-essential workforce based on which businesses can operate, and deciding who is fit enough to work. What is the difference? These decisions are all made behind the scenes for an economic death in our country.
Gov. Little is participating in this economic death for Idaho. On the Idaho government website Idaho Rebounds: Our Path to Prosperity, he outlines his "stages" of reopening businesses, another CDC directive. One link on Idaho Rebounds is Resources for Businesses, which provides links to the Small Business Administration "cash grant" programs. Talk to any small business owner and they will tell you this is a program that has severe "certification" requirements that are next to impossible in meeting. If not met the "grant" actually becomes a loan that will have to be repaid to the government.
On the business resources page is a link to RestoreYourEconomy.org. This is a front group for the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) and the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) Economic Development Research Partners program. These are front groups used by a tyrannical, out of control, federal government with international ties for a specific agenda to dismantle and destroy the United States economically.
EDA "investment policy" establishes a foundation for "regional economies" based on regional collaboration which is key to "global competitiveness" and "national economic goals". "Regions are the centers of competition in the new global economy" that facilitate "regional economic development". Essentially, they are capturing "local businesses" to integrate them into EDA's six regional offices. Through this program, there is a strong indication that the federal government is economically breaking up the United States. Indeed, Washington, Oregon, and California are already making plans to regionalize their economies.
IEDC is a non-profit based in Washington D.C., with members buried in all government levels. The mission, "Provide leadership and excellence in economic development for our communities, members, and partners." This is based, in part, on their terms of "Social responsibility...building healthy, just, and competitive communities", and "Diversity, tolerance, and equity". IEDC claims more than 5,000 members across the world but keeps member information hidden except for participation by multiple federal agencies, cities, counties, selected entities such as the Eastern Idaho Economic Development Council, and others.
The Economic Development Research Partners (EDRP) program belongs to IEDC, the purpose is providing economic developers with research that advances the economic development profession. A few choice benefits are "Integrating regional businesses into the global economy" and "Strengthening workforce systems". Members of this group are identified which includes the Idaho National Laboratory,
Restore Your Economy is about getting small businesses to join the federal and international agenda to regionalize U.S. economies. In 2008, IBM, a UN partner, was projecting what needed to be accomplished by 2020 in order to create a "globally integrated enterprise". The Restore Your Economy program captures the Mom & Pop businesses and sucks them into this federal, global, integrated economic agenda. EDA's "mission" is leading "the federal economic development agenda...preparing American regions for...success in the worldwide economy", managed and regularly updated by the IEDC. "IEDC's strategic directives includes..."globalization" and economic restructuring." Why is Gov. Little promoting and participating in this?
The UN Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) scrutinized ways in which to capture Mom & Pop businesses and recommended it should be done through government funding. This is being accomplished through the EDA. Three OECD recommendations include loan guarantees to fund small businesses, developing policies to stimulate lending, and establishing financial institutions designed to address the unique needs of small businesses. According to OECD "The success of small businesses is essential to the strength of regional and national economies."
This is why and how we are being economically destroyed, the ploy of using a virus to justify economic destruction in order to force small businesses into globalization. But the goal has always been to "change the economic development model". If it sounds dramatic just ask one of many Idahoans who are experts in how the economy works. They will tell you this is exactly what is happening, the economy is being nationalized, capitalism will die, and it is these despots who will be making all the decisions about the economy. how it will run, what the workforce will be, how you will be educated for that workforce, what you will earn, with all of this trickling down into monitoring you and what you are doing to comply.
Idahoans, this is the warning leading up to an economic Pearl Harbor. Don't wait for that Pearl Harbor moment. Governor Little is doing nothing to protect us, he is a part of it. The time to organize is now, it is time that Idahoans exercise their responsibility for self governance and demand that Idaho is removed from these economic disasters that have been planned for us. Governor Little has allowed the federal government into our state to change our economic system, how much more warning is needed to come together and take action to stop it? We elect representatives to represent us, no representation was allowed in any of these decisions by the Governor. When this economic Pearl Harbor hits, it quite possibly might be too late to ever reverse it. The economy is just one small piece of this whole picture, many other aspects are in play that supports the economic devastation. Be a sheep dog, don't let these wolves take over.
The Western Governors Association (WGA) Reimagining the Rural West (RRW) project is still marching on. Now, there is a new name to bury it under, Out West. Podcasts are being created to talk about their vision of what rural communities should look like, including Idaho. This is the "inaugural" PodBean of Out West with Governor Little sitting right there with the rest of them. Since that time in January, there have been three others.
The original instigator of RRW, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, is the guest speaker. He starts off by describing the opportunity to create rural communities that are safe, have "world class" education systems, and of course attract a workforce. Insultingly, he describes what he thinks is the way in which people think about rural areas changed, from "classic western movie ghost town" perceptions to "vibrant healthy" communities. Come on Mr. Burgum, really? Your "help" with "local decision makers" has not been sought, nor is it wanted, and those decision makers, properly called elected officials, have the responsibility to listen to constituents that elected them, not you. Forget your desire to bring in "smart infrastructure", it is well known that "the development of new climate smart infrastructure" is a United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), How this equates with lower property taxes is unbelievable.
Mr. Burgum is correct about the rural workforce issues, those workforces primarily devastated by the shutting down of the resource extraction industries. The plan for "broadband" connectivity to benefit various recreation activities is in the realm of "nuts". RRW is a plan that is about nothing more than creating a technocratic empire where all aspects of rural life are controlled. How this is surmised as a contribution to a lower cost of living is your delusion.
Promoting increased populations in rural areas is way off as well. Citizens choose to live in rural areas for a reason, and using your North Dakota example, that reason does not include a population growth of 1,500 to 15,000 for an increase in public service, hospitals, or more daycare. In your limited ability to understand, rural communities have high school activities that support their youth, and just because you think every activity should be included does not mean it is what a community wants. Inviting kids from other countries just for the purposes of diversity is another aspect that is the decision of a local community. Just how exactly does that contribute to a greater "quality of life"?
If there is a "divide" between rural and urban areas, it is because citizens have made the free choice to live different lifestyles. But you don't get that, do you Mr. Burgum. You want to sterilize rural life by pushing it to behave like an urban area. One truth expressed by Mr. Burgum, the intent is moving rural communities "beyond extraction based economies". Revealed in the WGA workshops, this agenda is forcing rural communities to green energy. As this UN video points out, moving to a technological world has the potential to displace those who do not follow, that is why RRW has such a drive to push rural communities towards urbanization and connectivity. The connectivity agenda is really about forcing the west into an Internet of Things (IoT) world. Thinking this connectivity world is one "that people will want to live in" is a fantasy. What makes Mr. Burgum and the WGA think rural citizens are not already in the world they want to live in, having no desire for anyone to come in and create one that others think they should live in?
Mr. Burgum's belief in "collaboration" to make all of this happen has just one flaw. This project was started without any collaboration with rural communities. The only collaboration seen here is with the federal government and their partnership with the UN to implement SDG.
The February Episode 2 PodBean can be found here; March Episode 3 here; and April Episode 4 here.
As discussed in the Event 201 pandemic game, removing "disinformation" was considered, especially on social media, while making sure only legitimate information was provided. It appears that particular solution might be in play regarding the COVID 19 "pandemic".
A video by Jerry Day, Is COVID-19 Even Real, was posted on You Tube and subsequently removed for "violating You Tube's Community Guidelines". The video concerned a Global Research article, Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19, which outlined how COVID 19 testing, as stated in the title, is not specific to that virus. Mr. Day went on to describe how our economic system is being devastated as a result of this "pandemic".
An outfit called Health Feedback posted their own article on the same day as the Global Research article, declaring Mr. Day's video and the article itself were both "inaccurate", citing "no data or information to support its claims" as one of the reasons. While it is true that the scientist who declared the COVID 19 testing as faulty chose to remain anonymous, why would the article's author choose to write about something so audacious?
The answer lies in the United Nations (UN) and its propaganda censorship activities. Health Feedback is a "worldwide network of scientists sorting fact from fiction in health and medical media coverage. Our goal is to help readers know which news to trust." Looking at the About link, the name changes from Health Feedback to Science Feedback. One of its partners, Credibility Coalition, also works on finding solutions to "disinformation".
It just so happens that Health Feedback is "a member of the WHO-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN)" with Science Feedback being the "parent organization" to Health Feedback. So it is only scientists from Science Feedback that have the expertise to determine what is legitimate or not, and somehow have the ability to remove, or perhaps influence removal of that information, on what they deem isn't true or accurate. The World Health Organization (WHO) VSN "is a global network of websites, established by the World Health Organization, that provides reliable information on vaccine safety." So WHO's solution to misinformation is to participate in censoring or countering any opposing information? Looks that way.
Why would anyone in their right mind trust any organization that threatens more "body bags" when challenged? If there was ever a clue as to how despotic this and other UN organizations are, give reason to question its motives and what really might be behind this "pandemic", it is in those words. What exactly does he mean?
ISD Global, in which the US Department of State is a partner, as well as the UN Development Programme (UNDP), came out with its own Disinformation Briefing report that frequently referenced those who are "right wing", "extreme right", promoting "conspiracy theories", with many other descriptions such as bigotry and racism, recommended "The best answer to disinformation on health issues is to flood the information space with evidence-based accurate information in digestible formats."
What all of these nitwits don't understand is that they themselves have posted the accurate and reliable information that validates their covert activities to manipulate the public and give reason as to why they shouldn't be trusted either.
Fortunately the video, Is COVID-19 Even Real, has been posted again on BitChute, everyone is encouraged to watch it and have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
Fingers are always being pointed to anyone who challenges the questionable information that pours from media outlets. Anything that does not conform to the narrative and selected messaging is automatically attributed to “conspiracy” theorists. But what do those accusers say when the conspiracy filth is pouring from their own mouths?
In October, 2019, corporations, governments, and university “players” gathered at an event called Event 201, to play a simulated pandemic exercise game, and discuss global policy solutions to address that pandemic. Bear in mind, this is two months prior to the alleged COVID-19 “pandemic”.
The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, UPS, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), corporate heads, and of course the United Nations (UN) were all part of this “expert” panel. Fortunately, they captured their game playing on videos so conspiracy theorists could relish in spreading conspiracies. Previous exercises on pandemic issues have been held including Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm. Perhaps enough game practice has occurred to give their solutions a trial run with COVID-19?
It just so happens the subject of the Event 201 scenario exercise was about a corona virus originating in Brazil, eventually spreading to the U.S., China, and other countries until it is out of control. Vaccine availability is not possible and an antiviral drug was found to help the sick but not limit disease spread. In this scenario, cases double every week with rising deaths, resulting in economic and social severity. Sound familiar? However, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum (WEF), and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were also involved in this exercise and deny any coincidence with the current outbreak. Of course they deny it. Clearly any reference to involvement would be only conspiracy trash. And how ironic that John Hopkins has a map tracking the COVID-19 outbreak.
In the first video, the Highlights Reel, a description of the corona virus spread is provided and a summary of identified issues. The hysteria of its spread and resulting deaths is addressed. Medical supplies must be distributed “globally” with corporations needing clarity on where the need is and “who” is making the decisions, the UN offered up as a centralized point. Travel advisories are issued to prevent disease spread with resulting economic effects. A global financial crisis occurs. Misinformation on the internet may need to be “shut down” and a decision on who should “control the information” is needed. How about the need for enforcement? The scenario foundation is laid for the “global community” to work out solutions.
Segment 1 - Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion. This video starts out with the “critical role of businesses and public-private partnerships” (P3). A “pandemic emergency board”, convened by the WEF, will provide recommendations on this “major global challenge”. As usual, climate change is one of the culprits behind this catastrophic pandemic, and the typical forecast of a major, doom and gloom event is coming with a need for “mitigation” and “collective preparedness”. The UN World Health Organization (WHO) provides its two cents worth describing the “health emergencies” and continued threats as a “new normal” through “asymptomatic” persons spreading disease. Such hysterics, but oh so close to what is occurring now.
At the 15:20” mark the emergency board discussion on recommendations begin with an update of the spread of the virus, called CAPS, being far more contagious with respiratory disease complications, albeit some experiencing only mild respiratory symptoms. A projected death rate of hundreds of millions over one to two years is straining health care systems. Discussion of an AIDS antiviral medication for treatment and respirator availability are identified problems. Sound familiar?
Distribution of resources includes discussion about a central decision making body, perhaps the UN World Bank as the financial loan center for centralized distribution “needs”, and the UN once again offered up as the centralized source. Central distribution of global stockpiles would interfere with hoarder behavior by being in charge of how supplies are allocated. Corporations must also “combat” “protectionism” “rhetoric”, as it does not align with operating for the “greater global good”. Through this segment and beyond is an annoying woman who continues coughing without clearly covering her mouth. Perhaps this emergency board should practice its own recommendations.
Segment 2 – Trade & Travel Discussion is the second emergency board meeting. The pandemic update includes a continued escalation in numbers with predictions of millions of cases and thousands of deaths. The stock market has now fallen while trade and travel are affected, social media is spreading rumors, movement of people is causing disease spread, and fever screens are being conducted. Has any of this happened with COVID-19?
Segment 3 – Finance Discussion, the third emergency board meeting. There is an economic “fallout’, the epidemic “grows”, millions of cases and deaths. The board recommends cooperation between corporate supply chains and governments, keeping the public informed of disease location, how steps in closing schools and staying home only marginally controls the spread, which in itself might bring more serious economic costs resulting in more serious harm than CAPS. Funding is needed to save jobs and industries, a “bailout’, especially those corporations directly related to the healthcare system. A need for research and development about this new corona virus and future vaccines is also discussed. Is this scenario getting warmer to current conditions?
Segment 4 - Communications Discussion and Epilogue. The final emergency board meeting continues with more disease spread and deaths. Because of the spread of disinformation Twitter and Facebook are deleting accounts. To ensure that only “accurate” information gets out one central authority, such as WHO, along with their buddy non-governmental organizations (NGO) should be used as a central repository for information, especially since the UN enjoys a level of trust throughout the world, and would protect against governments spreading disinformation, say for political purposes.
But then, if WHO were to challenge governments directly there is the issue of that pesky “sovereignty”, necessitating a “soft power of influence” by WHO. Because there is so much public distrust, the goal should be identifying how the government can “ensure” only reliable information gets to the public and prevent the spread of false information. Using employers and faith-based institutions could be used for the flow of accurate information. Also important is identifying false information for “purported” treatments that has caused harm to those who have used them.
Do you know it all’s ever stop and think why there is so much distrust when this conniving activity goes on?
The board identified more emphasis should be placed on the recovery numbers. Because of all those who are anti-vaccine, especially important is getting the correct information “out there” to ensure public trust, and incentivizing people to “manage” their behaviors. Perhaps there should be some level of “enforcement” against those who are spreading misinformation.
Segment 5 - Hotwash and Conclusion. This pandemic was “catastrophic”, however isolation and “social distancing” have helped interrupt the spread of disease. Prior planning by governments, NGOs, and private businesses is identified as being so important. And lastly, these individuals have routinely come together for a stronger “global governance”. These are their words you conspiracy theorists.The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly proposed seven recommendations, which in a nutshell is a partnership between international organizations, governments, and the private sector to control all potential aspects that could arise with a pandemic, a full achievement of Agenda 21 P3, stripping away all representation on which our Republic was founded.
The UN goal has always been to destroy capitalism, and efforts have been made to integrate this agenda into the stimulus bill. Is the economy being destroyed? Is COVID-19 being used for that purpose?
Continued focus on “life threats” by the UN is getting old. Life is not about ongoing threats that must be “mitigated”, managed, or having us constantly living in a state of preparation out of fear that something might happen. It is all psychological manipulation, causing fear and anxiety with the intent to influence behavior, and justify the removal of more freedoms. How effectively this is working is easily seen in younger generations.
Currently, COVID19 does not even come close in numbers compared to previous pandemics. The same hygienic precautions should be used as with all viruses, those most adversely affected are typically the elderly, those with medical conditions, or who are immunosuppressed. However now, given what “players” are discussing behind the scenes, could COVID-19 appear to be possibly used as a test case to see just how far behavior can be influenced, maybe just how many more freedoms can be destroyed, and promoting faith in government dependence?
Perhaps this isn’t a conspiracy as now some leaders are calling for a “global government” body to address the COVID-19 “crisis’. Has the federal government already relinquished some of our sovereignty by following some of the Event 201 recommendations? If so, how much further will we be taken down this road? Since the CDC has been a participant in these games, and the federal government is so reliant on the information the CDC releases, has that sovereignty already been eroded?
But, all of this is just conjured up information by conspiracy theorists, it is just “misinformation” which UN partner Google will combat, track people, with cell phones doing the same. It is the biggest implementation for surveillance and data gathering, a technocrats dream. Though enforcement was not fully discussed, it is certainly happening.
Regardless, everyone should start paying closer attention to what is really happening behind the scenes, and what is being done to us. This global governance agenda is moving forward rapidly. Watching the videos is recommended.
This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through Agenda 21 and its associated programs. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom!