The closest activity Idaho currently has to gene editing is potatoes and strawberries. However, Simplot previously obtained gene editing licensing rights in an agreement with DowDuPont. Just this year Simplot entered into another alliance with Plant Sciences Inc., a plant breeding company, for the same purposes. Technology for this gene editing in agriculture is the same as being used on humans. A video from 2015 has surfaced with Klaus Schwab talking about gene editing. He openly admits the 4th Industrial Revolution "changes you" with an impact "on your identity". It isn't possible to determine if this is a manipulated video or not, but the World Economic Forum (WEF) website certainly has no qualms about discussing gene editing, identifying it as part of its 4th Industrial Revolution, and it likely taking over biological evolution. Short for "Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats", CRISPR-Cas9 is a genome editing tool used for editing genes. It can remove, add, or alter sections of a DNA sequence for changing human characteristics or disease. This mechanism is also used in bacteria to change the DNA in viruses to disable them. Currently, the Covid vaccine is being described as a form of gene therapy which can involve replacing a gene, adding genes, or turning genes off. With the Covid vaccine, mRNA is the technique being used and is described as "the DNA for one gene, can be transcribed into an mRNA molecule that will end up making one specific protein.", in this case, instructing them to create a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for an immune response. Even the Bayer President admits that the Covid-19 vaccine is gene therapy. TALENs is another gene editing technology. According to the WEF, gene editing is "changing the world". CRISPR is not without risks, the editing tools can cut in the wrong spot with unknown consequences to the person. Along with this new technology there are "ethical" concerns, mostly centering around safety issues, but without any forethought on the evil of experimenting on human life.
Currently, two types of gene editing exist, "germline therapy and somatic therapy. Germline therapies change DNA in reproductive cells (like sperm and eggs). Changes to the DNA of reproductive cells are passed down from generation to generation. Somatic therapies, on the other hand, target non-reproductive cells, and changes made in these cells affect only the person who receives the gene therapy." So much for concern about ethics, the somatic therapy has been conducted on children. There are a couple of nice short videos in this WEF article. As stated in the Mammoth Biosciences video, this gene editing will expand to agriculture, food, environment, bioterrorism, and of course healthcare. But it is already being done in the agricultural and food sector. Jennifer Doudna, the narrator from Mammoth Biosciences, a WEF member, describes this revolution and the Mammoth website lead even states it's "Reading and writing the code of life." And it does raise the question, just who gets to decide on what will be written on the code of life? The one who controls the technology? Now the second video by Haoyi Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, People's Republic of China, is more detailed in how both Talens and CRISPR work and introduces another gene editing technique, Zinc Finger. More frightening is his discussion on how this gene editing has been experimented with by injecting it directly into a mouse embryo. He appropriately labels this as a "genetically modified animal" then moves his discussion about the ethical concerns for humans, giving an example of how it could work. There is active experimentation of the insertion of human DNA into a mouse. Both videos are worth listening to, and are short. According to another WEF article, From DIY editing to matchmaking by DNA: how human genomics is changing society, the business of human genomics is growing, some companies sell genetic information for research, and overlaps with other technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. As usual this new field of technology will bring massive profits to those who participate. The European Commission released a report in 2019 on the Social, Legal and Ethical aspects of Human Genomics. Among other issues it discusses who buys and sells genetic data, anonymity and ownership of the data, use of artificial intelligence, and regulation of the industry. Then there is that pesky issue of ethics which is discussed. MITRE is heavily involved in the Covid response, but it is also involved in CRISPR. And in the interest of an emphasis on enhancing public health for safety, effectiveness and ethics, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends gene editing. If there was ever a reason to reject gene editing it would be the WHO recommending it and a military non-profit experiementing with it. All of this is a scary arena that certain technocrats and corporations have decided to force us into. For some with devastating diseases it might be a blessing. However, given how the world is operating now, any trust that this technology will only be used for treating disease is unlikely.
0 Comments
Corporatism is defined as "the organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction". This is probably the most accurate description of our current circumstances with the federal, and state government. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced its Small Business Innovation Research Pre-Solicitation to "give small businesses the opportunity to partner with DHS". Eleven topics for consideration were given including Artificial Intelligence (AI) Distress Alerts and Monitoring, Deployable countermeasures at protected perimeters and structures, Streamlined Airport Checkpoint Screening for Limited Mobility Passengers, and most curiously Mass Fatality Tracking System (MFTS). Apparently, DHS needs private sector help with technology for its "research and development initiatives". Covid is one of those areas. As it turns out DHS has already been busy with one business for providing the technology called In-Q-Tel Engagement, and includes the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In-Q-Tel (IQT) has three business efforts, IQT Emerge to support U.S. national security, IQT Labs to solve problems, and B.Next using biotechnology for national security threats of pandemics. Primarily it helps the federal government advance in the technological world, as well as globally. In the IQT portfolio there are pages and pages of corporations and businesses working with IQT, only enhancing the ability for us to be surveilled in every possible area and have data collected on us, both of which can then be easily used to control us. Or is that being paranoid?
Included in the IQT Executive team and Board of Trustees are several previous federal employees. IQT informs and advises "government partners with technical insights and resources" and advises "our portfolio companies on best practices to collaborate and provide a voice and platform to connect them with our government partners." The massive agenda to drive our Republic into corporatism marches forward. Some of the focus areas to help the government, and other businesses do the same, include digital intelligence, intelligent connectivity, data analytics, AI and machine learning, and IT platforms. All under the guise of "national security". But, the most frightening business efforts of IQT is its B.Next venture, converging the digital world with biology for "biodefense". IQT is "building a trusted network linking government, academia, society, and private sector innovators." There is a frightening video where B.Next describes how it is working with the government to save us from what sounds like ongoing pandemics that will require vaccinations forever. Its work also includes re-engineering plants; reading, writing, and editing DNA that will be a driving force of the global economy and contribute to national security; and developing and manufacturing new vaccines. There are also a series of podcasts on just Covid-19 alone. Mitigating these biological threats is a focus of IQT and it appears plans are underway for more threats and more vaccines. IQT is a formidable source for the federal government to expand its corporatism state, bringing in countless businesses to expand the surveillance state. Now it is understood how the Covid-19 "pandemic" is playing a role in advancing this state and why the vaccine mandate is so critical to the agenda. It just makes one ponder what exactly is in those vaccines and how they are being used on the masses in reality. Everyone might not be aware that there are four principles every journalist is encouraged to use in their practice: Seek Truth and Report It, Minimize Harm, Act Independently, and Be Accountable and Transparent. Journalist Code of Ethics often include truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness, and public accountability. However, it seems these principles are only attributed to journalists who promote an accepted narrative. All others who report outside of the accepted narrative are assigned derogatory labels and thrown into a basket for endless targeting, shaming, and slandering. Perhaps it is time to call out and confront those journalists who promote the accepted narrative but in doing so are violating every aspect of the principles and ethics of which they are encouraged to uphold.
Audrey Dutton is a Senior Investigative reporter for the Idaho Capital Sun, having won several awards for her work. She recently wrote some articles about Covid-19 and vaccines. Along the way she had no problem using insulting, and what could possibly be considered derogatory, language towards those who don't align with her biases, while at the same time promoting misinformation herself. In her article, "Idaho's history and anti-government subculture set the stage for a health crisis", many of the claims she made are offensive, derogatory, or just down right inaccurate. Let's start with her disparaging remarks about Idahoans. She cited a statement by Dr. Ted Epperly, "People who migrated here (in the 1800s) wanted to get away from the government.” In reality, had Ms. Dutton investigated it properly, people came out west for a multitude of reasons. Somehow, Ms. Dutton gleaned from this the impression that Idaho has an "anti-government streak" that contributes to misinformation. What Ms. Dutton doesn't understand is the Founders believed in citizen self-governance and America should be governed by the rule of law (now hijacked by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and their corporate cronies), concepts that have long been abandoned by the government. These so called anti-government folks also understand government can only derive its just powers from the consent of the governed and they are exercising their duty to hold the government accountable, especially when it becomes destructive, which is where we are at now. Perhaps Ms. Dutton doesn't understand any of this or the enumerated powers delegated to the government in Article 1 Section 8. She also declared the statement that the COVID-19 vaccine “reprograms your immune system” is a false claim. However, it is not false, a recent study does suggest the Pfizer vaccine "induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses" requiring further investigation. In an attempt to meet the journalistic principle of being impartial and fair, Ms. Dutton mentions the 1955 rollout of the polio vaccine causing the disease and how it contributes to "vaccine hesitancy". That was 66 years ago. In reality it is the more current problems with vaccines that persist, and documented cases of vaccine injuries that contribute to concerns about receiving vaccines. In all fairness, it should be acknowledged that in spite of these problems, traditional vaccines, not the current technology being used, have been very effective in disease reduction. But that is of little solace to those who have been injured. In another article Ms. Dutton wrote, "Health misinformation was an Idaho-grown product for years. Now it has a body count", her misinformation becomes even more egregious. While this article includes multiple errors, there is one particular statement regarding Covid-19 vaccines, "However, the material never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA is kept.”, that can only be counted as a lie. Ms. Dutton fails to mention that there are several different types of Covid-19 vaccines, choosing instead to mislead the reader and lump all vaccines into one pile. One type of vaccine is the DNA vaccine. In this scientific literature article, under the Misconceptions of mRNA Vaccines section, it clearly states, "DNA vaccines are transported into the nucleus of the cell..." and "Since DNA vaccines enter the nucleus of the cell, there is a risk of permanently altering the genetic makeup of the host cell". The Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca are DNA vaccines. While Ms. Dutton minimizes the "rare" risk of myocarditis from the Pfizer vaccine, there are other cardiac complications that have occurred with other vaccines, resulting in a death in Korea. Ms. Dutton should be questioned on her stance why citizens shouldn't have the right to be protected from a vaccine mandate that may include this type of technology. It seems Ms. Dutton relies heavily on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for most of her information rather than investigating other sources as her title of investigative reporter implies. As a result, Ms. Dutton herself is guilty of spreading misinformation from sources with the most misinformation. It would be advisable for Ms. Dutton to expand her research beyond the CDC as there are studies that dispute what the CDC chooses to publish. Perhaps Ms. Dutton owes an apology to Dr. Cole, the legislators, and all the others she named for her claims of them bringing false information to the public, when indeed, as shown, the information was true. It is she that has brought forth false information, with subtle hints of prosecution for those who she doesn't deem is up to her standards. But her source of information, the CDC misinformation factory, is her only truth, while failing to investigate before writing these hit pieces. Oh, a side note and for the record Ms. Dutton, a study has shown evidence of a connection between 5G and Covid-19 but she is correct that the vaccine has no live virus, it is engineered and synthesized. While Ms. Dutton makes sure she highlights Dr. Cole's language, she herself is as guilty with inflammatory language. And just who are those fact checkers cited by Ms. Dutton, other journalists such as herself? No, it is a two-bit website called Health Feedback which itself spreads lies, such as Covid-19 vaccines are not gene therapy. Oh yes, Covid-19 vaccines are gene therapy, which the President of Bayer even admits. As for Health Feedback claims that Ivermectin isn't effective in treating Covid-19, there have actually been several studies demonstrating its effectiveness, and supporting its use in Covid-19, as well as Hydrochloroquine. Health Feedback is a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) established Vaccine Safety Net. That pretty much answers why the misinformation and propaganda persist, and why Ms. Dutton adheres to it. As it turns out, Ms. Dutton is the spreader of misinformation and not the "anti-government" people she so diligently targeted. Perhaps she should consider taking refresher courses in investigative journalism, principles, and ethics that journalists are expected to follow. By all accounts she failed in seeking the truth, did not minimize harm because of her failure to do adequate research on her subject, nor has she been accurate, impartial, objective, or fair in her reporting. She did not act independently but rather depended on misinformation sources to support her bias. To be accountable to the public she should be transparent in her lack of journalistic integrity and serve the public with an apology. It might also be suggested that she be removed from reporting on her "favorite topic" health care. If Ms. Dutton had spent as much time responsibly researching the subject as she did in targeting and degrading specific individuals, perhaps there would be more truth to what she wrote. Whatever information is presented, research it. Check the source for validity and accuracy. Regardless of what one believes or thinks about these vaccines, or Covid-19 itself, it will always remain the right of a self-governing individual to choose their own medical treatment. And that should be respected, not mocked or ridiculed as it was in Ms. Dutton's articles. It is ethical to provide all information so each individual can make a decision for themselves. Shame on you Ms. Dutton for your lack of investigative work and spreading information that is false. Vaccine technology has dramatically shifted from the manipulation of a virus to foster immunity, to now what is called gene therapy. Much concern has been expressed about this new technology, does it change one's genetic code, what are the long term effects given no long term studies have been done, and since a vaccinated individual can become infected with Covid-19, what is the purpose of getting one? Even though this is new technology we are assured it is safe and can be given repeatedly. Are technocrats and scientists just messing with God's creation of humans?
While there are claims that the Covid-19 vaccine is not gene therapy, in looking at the scientific literature it is described as just that. Even this article describes one vaccine as using "double-stranded DNA inserted into a common, but inert virus called an adenovirus. This DNA also contains the instructions for building the spike protein. Once inside the cell, these instructions are read and translated into mRNA (messenger RNA)." It goes on, "The mRNA chains are basically work orders that spell out the instructions for making the spike proteins that stud the outside of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19." Ok, both genetic materials, DNA and mRNA, are being used. In the case of one Covid-19 vaccine, the spike protein of the Covid-19 virus is used to drive "into the host cell the genetic information needed to express the recombinant antigen" which evokes an immune response. It just leaves out one detail, that mRNA genetic material is synthetic. Being a highly technical and very complicated process, most of the nuances are not discussed here. The focus will be just on the issue of this vaccine actually being an engineered and synthetically produced product. Links to the scientific information discussing this are provided for those who want to do a deeper dive. Historically, it takes years to create a vaccine with many stages in the process. In the case of the Covid-19 vaccine it took less than one year. The virus is inactivated or weakened in traditional vaccines, and is called an antigen because it evokes an immune response. However, the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine is a Nucleic acid vaccine where a strand of a corona virus DNA is used to make a template that is engineered for the mRNA, which does the same, evokes an immune response. The complete process in this is far more complicated than what is explained here but through an engineering technique called a reverse genetic system, it is "genetically engineering specific nucleic acid sequences (within DNA or RNA)." More simply, a DNA sequence from a Covid-19 virus strand is used. DNA sequence information is readily available to technocrats through GenBank among many other available genome data sources. As of May, 2020 "more than 200 complete and partial genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2" were decoded and deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data. Scientists can easily pick and choose from these sources for vaccine experimentation. Through a process called In vitro transcription (IVT), encoded information in the spike protein DNA is taken and encoded into mRNA, synthetically creating the spike protein, which produces the viral antigen. Using IVT to make the genetic copy for a Nucleic acid vaccine, mRNA "can be manufactured rapidly at large scale" using a "synthetic mRNA format". "Synthetic mRNA" vaccines are considered "safer" than the more traditional attenuated virus vaccines while even claiming it will "bring a halt to the coronavirus pandemic." Because it is synthetic it is easy to design, and can be manufactured at great speed for vaccine development. In these engineered vaccines the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, called the "spike protein" and found in corona viruses, is targeted as the one which causes Covid-19. It "is an important target site for neutralizing antibodies and a key target for vaccine design." 1286 amino acids make up the spike protein sequence while genomic data of the virus is shared worldwide. This amino acid sequence was aligned with other coronavirus structural proteins, with concern about how this would work in future mutations. There continues to be controversy as to whether or not an actual Covid-19 virus has been isolated, however the SARS-CoV-2 proteins share high similarity to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV which contributed to the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design. Interestingly, through Covid-19 DNA protein manipulation several vaccines were tested. Once the DNA or RNA sequence of a virus is known it becomes a rapid way in which to engineer a synthetic vaccine. Being a messenger RNA, this engineered vaccine alerts our immune system to produce a specific antibody to the virus, just as the virus itself would do. Post injection the mRNA material itself hangs around long enough to evoke an immune response then disintegrates. By all reports this occurs within just a few days. These "computer-driven strategies" create "a synthetic vaccine...consisting mainly of synthetic peptides". These vaccines produced by "chemical synthesis" are considered safer "because they do not involve cell-derived material or biological processes for production. Their purity can be controlled". "Creating vaccines synthetically...has the ability to increase the speed of production and to retune and fine tune the solution to combat new variations in pathogens." "Synthetic vaccines also have the advantage that they can be seen as cartridge vaccines, meaning that they contain bits and pieces that can readily be replaced by others to update the vaccine in order to combat new strains of pathogen." In other words, DNA strands can easily be manipulated with different protein structures, an advantage to created vaccines for future mutations. Without going into the specifics on vectors, Johnson & Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca are DNA/Viral-vector vaccines which deliver the spike protein DNA material into the cells. Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA vaccines. The introduction of these genetic materials causes the cell to create the viral antigen. Regardless, both are gene therapy in that engineered, synthetic genetic viral material is introduced into the human cell to make the viral spike protein. This video is short, explains the immune system, traditional vaccines, and this new gene therapy. Rather than the virus injecting its RNA into a cell to make copies of it, through mRNA vaccines this viral process is replaced synthetically to create an immune response as explained in this video. The synthetically created Covid-19 RNA is telling the cell genetically to produce the spike protein, clearly a form of gene therapy. Up to this point, it is now understood that selected DNA from the virus is used to make synthetic mRNA that is carried into the cell, evoking an immune response. But the beauty in all of this, since the viral genetic component can be picked over, copied, and manufactured, it is possible to "tweak' the genetic sequence in any new mutation. As a result, new vaccines can be made just as rapidly by altering the protein sequence to match the mutated variant. Regardless, these technocrats conclude that vaccine development will continue until more clinical trials are completed and that "the first round of vaccines will have waning immunity and require boosting using improved second-generation COVID-19 vaccines"...with those who have recovered from COVID-19 with poor or waning immunity may also require vaccination". As the second concerning mutation has emerged, Omicron, the reality is that there are "thousands of mutations" that have accumulated. Even a local doctor predicts this virus will continue with mutations. Is this the cart before the horse or the other way around? Are these mRNA vaccines created because of the ability to manipulate them for any virus thus creating more experimentation and unending profit, or are the viruses being used to create more vaccines that come to the same end? The major pharmaceutical companies making these vaccines, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson are all World Economic Forum (WEF) members. WEF is thrilled to see this new technology as part of its 4th Industrial Revolution to change our healthcare but doesn't see it replacing other vaccines, yet, in its ongoing move towards genomics. After all, the "ability to manipulate genes is in its infancy." Even the WEF recognizes "These instructions teach our cells to become their own vaccine manufacturing plants." Does that not imply this is a genetic restructuring of our cells? As part of its corporatism plan, one could conjecture that someday the only option for vaccination provided to the masses will be these gene therapy experiments, whether wanted or not. As explained in the video in this WEF article within the first ten minutes, synthetic biology, which includes mRNA vaccines, is bringing together individuals with expertise in biology, engineering, computer science, social sciences, and humanities to collectively trying to make biology easier to engineer, enabling the design and re-design of systems using the building blocks (DNA) of life. It is also programming functions in DNA and using new engineering tools in learning to engineer life. And mRNA vaccines are part of that engineering. The WEF has put together a Global Future Council on Synthetic Biology just for the purpose of engineering life. If it is too unbelievable, keep in mind it is currently being done through vaccines and will soon invade other aspects of life. Corporations are entering a dangerous area here, using humans and nature as lab rats, perhaps falsely believing help is on the way for mankind. As the old saying goes, It's not nice to fool Mother Nature, she is smarter than you think. As a society based on the foundation of Christian principles attention needs to be paid to the direction we are being taken, starting with these vaccines. On November 15, 2021 the Idaho House of Representatives will reconvene to discuss the federal government Covid-19 vaccine mandate which is now temporarily blocked by a federal appeals court. However, this mandate has now been extended to include health care workers who provide care to Medicaid and Medicare recipients that will add to the devastating economic hardship for many Idahoans. Many questions surround these federal mandates with several states, including Idaho, filing lawsuits in opposition to those mandates. But hidden behind this federal mandate that has trickled down to Idaho is a massive, well-coordinated plan with a specific goal that requires vaccine mandates and is actually being implemented. One World Economic Forum (WEF) scheme is the Commons Project, building "digital services for the common good", promoting the deception that people will be able to collect and manage personal health data digitally, then sharing that data with health services and organizations they trust. Why would anyone in their right mind participate in this? Likely, because everyone will be forced to participate. According to the Project, maintaining control" over "digital lives" is associated with stronger communities "when data is open and can be shared for the benefit of all." That is collectivism. The Commons Project has four projects with full United States involvement. CommonHealth for data, CommonPass for the vaccine passport, SMART Health Card to verify vaccination, and the CommonTrust Network. The CommonTrust Network (CTN) is a global network of public and private organizations to help individuals with digital access to their health data. WEF partners in the network registry include data sources such as labs, clinics, hospitals, and governments, including the United States. These various data sources create digital certificates that contain private information and are then given to the individual to share. Thus begins a massive trail of information that comes to the core of what is really going on. Covid is not about any virus, it is about beginning the process of forcing every human into a digital identity, starting with mandatory vaccinations. Vaccine passports have been banned in Idaho but the ability to travel is impacted without one. And as seen by the graphic below the plan for required passports goes far beyond just travel. Partners in the SMART Health Card are more open, and includes some Idaho organizations as issuers. As a participant in the Vaccine Credential Initiative (VCI), St. Luke's is an issuer of SMART Health Cards. VCI was created by a "coalition" of public and private organizations for harmonizing standards, developing implementation guides for medical purposes to return to work, school, and travel, and making “medical records portable", while helping individuals obtain a digital copy of their vaccinations using open, interoperable methods. VCI members include the MITRE Corporation, Apple, Microsoft, and many others. It isn't just for vaccinations, VCI openly states "A SMART Health Card stores healthcare information and other vital medical data." Just another step towards making us digital humans.
So there is the CommonTrust Network, with a SMART Health Card in which St. Luke's participates as a card issuer, and a corporate led initiative, VCI, that is creating the ability to expand health information data beyond vaccinations that will be interoperable. It is the MITRE Corporation involvement that brings in the deepest of states of our tyrannical federal government. The MITRE Corporation is a federally funded R&D center with public-private partnerships, spanning across federal, state and local governments. Tax dollars are used by this group to operate federally funded research and development centers (FFRDC), solving problems we didn't know we have. FFRDC centers involve themselves in aviation, health, government agencies, and defense. Clearly, MITRE is using its funding powers to advance, support, and oversee the implementation guide development process to create vaccine passports, which is actually the beginning stages of a digital identity so we can "return to life in general". By its own admission, MITRE is "shaping the future of our nation’s critical infrastructure, including...healthcare". But MITRE might just be the U.S. equivalent to the Russia KGB. We have our own traitors, Ashton B. Carter, former Secretary of Defense and WEF member, is involved with MITRE as a consultant. Probably unknown to most Idahoans, MITRE has already invaded Idaho through its Sara Alert program, funded by the CDC. Imagine all that data it has gathered on Idahoans. So far, this is probably an overload of information. But to put the frosting on the cake, there are a couple more plots for the morbidly curious. Hot off the press is the WEF Accelerating the Transition to Digital Credentials for Travel white paper. Mentioned in the booklet is the Known Travell Digital Identity (KTDI) initiative, comprised of a "global consortium of individuals, governments, authorities and the travel industry to enhance security in world travel." Two partners in KTDI are Canada and the Netherlands. How ironic the video on the website states the travel pass will be "piloted this year" which coincides with the recent announcement that international travel, championed by Canada and the Netherlands, will be opened back up. No coincidence, it is deliberate to implement KTDI. Another organization, in which the United States participates, is the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). It is a "global forum of States for international civil aviation with its own machine-readable travel documents (MRTD) that are globally interoperable. ICAO’s eMRTD is the most widely used, globally interoperable digital credential in use today, to which the WEF and United States are totally devoted. This will eventually transition to biometric standards as Canada has been testing with KTDI, and with participation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In this WEF video they discuss making these requirements the same across the world, including public entities, meaning governments, to bring in their rules in order to "harmonize" them for interoperability. This fits nicely with its technology global governance agenda. It is a corporate run world we are being forced to live in. Corporations have the power to force us into a vaccinated world or endless expensive testing, or anything else they want, or we won't be able to "return to normal life". Sounds too crazy? In Australia vaccination status is now linked to buying tickets to an event via Ticketek. In Seattle and King County, vaccine verification is required. This is a classic example of corporatism and how the corporate world in partnership with the government controls our lives. Corporate world decides it wants this surveillance and intrusion into our lives, the government says great, at your service, how can we help. There will be nothing private about one's health care in this. While the Idaho legislature will meet to work on banning vaccine mandates, and Idahoans are distracted by vaccine safety, adverse events, deaths, and individual rights in an effort to support them, in reality you will get vaccinated or your ability to live life will eventually be banned. The federal government is already incrementally working on forcing vaccinations on everyone, violating countless federal laws, and the Constitution. In Adams County, Idaho, the Commissioners just passed an ordinance making federal vaccine mandates illegal, recognizing the economic cost this would bring. But the Commissioners are a role model for legislators. Are Idaho elected officials willing to economically support Idahoans who stand up against unconstitutional federal mandates? It may be difficult to enforce a vaccine mandate ban on large Idaho corporations such as St. Luke's and Micron who are participating in this agenda, but how economically damaging would it be for them if Idahoans had other employment opportunities without a mandated vaccine? What if the legislators decided to quit wasting money on so many other projects and put that money towards supporting businesses that would lose money for not complying? The totalitarian corporate run government will only continue to expand with the eventual goal of economic ruins that will perpetually force people into government hands for survival. Idaho officials must look at the cause of this infection, this cancer. A vaccine mandate ban is not enough to stop what is happening. It will take Idahoans banning the mandate by not complying, bringing a heavy cost to their livelihood. But in turn, it will bring a heavy economic cost to businesses, just as pilots rejecting the mandate has financially disrupted the airline industry. This is an economic war and must be fought with economic weapons. Only one questions remains. What if one’s phone dies? Is all evidence of an individual erased as if they don't exist? As previously discussed, the World Economic Forum (WEF) agenda to force every human to have a digital pass in order to travel, under the initial ruse of documenting Covid-19 vaccine status, is actively in the works. The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are working together "...to produce a high-value standard for international adoption and technical information exchange.” Translated, a digital health passport. Assisting in this venture is the Vaccine Credentialing Initiative (VCI) which of course is supported by WEF member Microsoft and a good sized number of other organizations that stand to make a bundle of money, especially when they are driving the narrative. In the document below, just released in August, 2021, the initial specs and guidance for implementation has been released by WHO. A synopsis can be found here. The shorter name for this certificate is Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates, or DDCC:VS, a digitally signed representation of data content that describes a vaccination event that can also be used for work and university education, not just travel. Required information within this digital certificate are an individual's name, date of birth, date and batch number of the vaccination, country, and administering agency. As one can see this is a far more reaching agenda than just documentation to travel. And it isn't private. Architecture implications for issuing and verifying DDCC:VS can be either centralized or decentralized. For decentralized all of this information will require all DDCC:VS content is stored in a central repository. It will also require a "national public key infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key Directory (PKD) deployment." "Each verifier needs a QR code reader which can access and download the public keys (e.g., from a global PKD) of every QR code issuer." One way or another this is intended for a global tracking system that will be expanded to include all information on every individual, a "digital identity", and not one activity will be allowed without tracking every human. The U.S. Congress is on top of fulfilling its responsibility with this endeavor with H.R.4258 - Improving Digital Identity Act of 2021.
Wake up Americans and Idahoans, this train is on the fast track to destroy everyone and it won't stop until everyone makes the decision to stop it. Immunizations continue to be at the forefront in federal government programs and in states that create legislation with mandates for vaccine compliance. Each state has vaccination requirements for children entering kindergarten, including Idaho, with some states requiring more vaccines than others. While all school immunization laws grant vaccine exemptions for medical reasons, many states are now creating legislation that would remove exemptions for philosophical or religious reasons such as California, Mississippi, and West Virginia. While retaining the medical exemption, California now has a new law that any physician writing a medical exemption order must submit it to the state for final approval. This is a pretty scary concept, a state interfering in a patient-physician relationship. Even though the Center for Disease Control (CDC) is allegedly a federal program, it created a strategic plan for global immunization, aligning with the UN World Health Organization (WHO) Immunization Agenda 2030, and the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) immunization programme, considering vaccinations as a "right". As a result of the strategic plan, CDC now has a computerized database for collecting information on who has been given immunizations. Although voluntary at this point, when will it become mandatory? Working with WHO and UNICEF, CDC is in the process of developing its second phase of the 2021–2030 global immunization plan. The ultimate WHO goal is to "immunize more people, from infants to seniors, with a greater range of vaccines" which is part of Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3.8, Ensuring Healthy Lives and Promote Wellbeing For All at All Ages. New York University research scholar and law professor Mary Holland confronted the UN about government immunization policies, reminding them of medical atrocities during the Holocaust that led to the Nuremberg Code which states, “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” and "no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, (UNESCO), addressed medical rights by adopting the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights which states "any preventive…medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information." Ms. Holland received a standing ovation for her speech. However, in spite of its rhetoric, it is well known that the UN is a despot organization that is using deception by manipulating the truth and dismissing an educated public. Now, the UN, and our own government, has made citizens the target for not swallowing the immunization agenda, even assigning the insulting name anti-vaxxers to those who oppose vaccinations. Going even further, UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore states, “Misinformation about vaccines is as dangerous as a disease”, and "poses an imminent threat to public health”. At the same time the WHO Chief Scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, admitted that vaccines cause deaths for some patients, then immediately tossed out a more politically correct whitewashed version, uh, explanation. While Ms. Swaminathan dismisses a child's death from a vaccination as being "blown up by the media", that statement does nothing more than validate her cold indifference towards humans. The real truth is that these elitists are threatened by citizen intelligence. Dr. Lawrence Palevsky provided some significant information, and just a phenomenal explanation about vaccinations in a speech to the Connecticut Legislature in 2019. His overview of vaccine ingredients and the effects on children without appropriate studies on those effects, the lack of studies on vaccine safety, and virus mutations that occur secondary to vaccinations should be watched by every person with concerns about vaccinations. Ms. Swaminathan's statement about not having the necessary safety systems provides validation to Dr. Lawrence Palevsky's stating that no studies have been done on actual vaccine immunity or a cross comparison between the health of a vaccinated child versus one who is unvaccinated.
Research on the polio vaccine validates Dr. Palevsky's statement on virus mutation secondary to vaccination and causing vaccine-derived polio outbreaks. While it is often heard that polio is eradicated, that is not true. WHO researchers participated in a study that states, "In one out of every few million recipients, they (oral administration) cause polio paralysis. Immune-impaired individuals can become long-term shedders of the virus." The same is true in Pertussis "where vaccinated individuals can still transmit infection", Varicella, and Measles. In spite of virus shedding being a legitimate concern, even studied, those who understand its implications continue to be mocked. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at times attributed with "fearmongering and misinformation about vaccines", is an advocacy group regarding vaccine truths and public participation in decisions. This group has been monitoring the increase in state mandates on vaccinations, federal government threats to take control over vaccination laws, and the federal government prostituting a health issue for increased vaccination rates in states. WHO, UNICEF, and the CDC should feel threatened by citizens who challenge their vaccine propaganda and refusal to just simply tell the truth. It has to be acknowledged that there has been much benefit with disease reduction from vaccines, but that does not negate the risks and adverse events that are associated with them, or justify the mass agenda that forces citizens to receive every vaccine created. As more truth about vaccines is made available it is no wonder vaccination refusal rates have increased. It is because of a more educated public, not ignorance as suggested. These pompous elitist technocrats, who truly believe they are the only ones who are intelligent enough to make decisions for the populace, better be careful. Their aggressive action forcing vaccinations may just backfire on them, with more opposition and rejection of vaccinations. In its never ending United Nations (UN) quest to have control over healthcare in the world, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) has now embarked on a new agenda to address "vaccine hesitancy", their new term for those who are anti-vaccination. They are targeting parents whom they think fail to properly vaccinate their children.
Before going further on this subject, it is not the intent of this article to dissuade, or encourage, anyone from making a decision on whether to or not to vaccinate their children, or themselves. It is to encourage thoughtful consideration on being fully informed beyond what information the UN has decided you should know. UNICEF opinions and strategies were discussed in June of this year at the Vaccine Summit Interviews conference that included several different panelists. The summit began with a third world child suffering from a case of measles, followed by applauding a young man who defied his mother's anti-vaccination wishes and chose to get vaccinated, making vaccinations a mission in his short life. A couple of core themes throughout the summit was the public "disease of ignorancy", using social media for inaccurate information, and how "collectively" vaccinations were a global issue. UNICEF sees vaccinations as a step towards a much needed universal health care system and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The use of celebrities was supported to promote vaccinations. More appalling was Jason Hirsch, head of Facebook's health policy team, who disclosed a new Facebook policy implemented in March. He revealed the policy strategies used to advance vaccinations by reducing information and sharing that is considered anti-vaccine, pulling anti-vaccine pages out of recommended pages, manipulating searches that would demote anti-vaccine information while placing pro vaccination policies at the top of search results, refusing advertising on anti-vaccinations, disabling fund raising tools on anti-vaccination pages that spread "misinformation", banning or removing pages that contained anti-vaccine information, and promoting "authoritative" pages on vaccinations to the top of searches, which includes UNICEF and the UN World Health Organization (WHO) as the authority. All of these strategies are intended to make sure only "accurate information" about vaccines were posted and inaccurate information was less accessible or removed. What other authoritative propaganda is the UN promoting besides vaccinations? Seems they have made other health issues their focus for propaganda. Much emphasis was placed on gaining the "trust" of those who are vaccine hesitant, listening to them, and validating their concerns, all in an effort to properly educate them so they would chose to vaccinate. After all, the panel believes this affects us collectively. As a UNICEf partner, the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and its Foundation will also be promoting this vaccine agenda. Regarding vaccines, there are some truths they suppress. While these panelists threw the term measles around, noting the recent increase in outbreaks, what they are not telling you is which type of measles. The MMR vaccine is for Measles/Mumps/Rubella. Measles and Rubella, known as German measles, are both caused by different viruses but with different symptoms and effects. Rubella can be especially devastating to a fetus early in a woman's pregnancy. It is never clarified which measles these folks talk about, just lumping them both together. Perhaps they don't want you to understand the difference. For those who contract either disease there is a lifelong natural immunity to both. The Gardisil vaccination is for the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), given to individuals from age 9-45, for the purposes of preventing certain types of cancer. In 2011, there were a reported 26 deaths following the HPV4 Gardasil vaccination, in addition to other serious adverse events. According to the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), reported adverse events from the HPV4 vaccination included 152 deaths, 1,071 convulsions, with 6,401 having no adverse events. HPV9 is the vaccine given now, with only 13 deaths associated with it. When considering vaccinations, all information should be taken into account in order to make an informed decision, not just because the UN says so. Other adverse vaccine events can be searched on the site here, just click on the top link. Moving over to more conspiracy oriented events with vaccines, it was alleged that birth control was included in tetanus vaccinations given to women in Kenya, 2014. An updated paper on this issue was published in 2017. While this paper is a long read, it is well worth the time as it provides a history behind WHO and UNICEF family planning antics, and U.S. involvement. Skipping to the conclusion, "Laboratory testing of the TT vaccine used in the WHO Kenya campaign 2013- 2015 showed that some of the vials contained a TT/βhCG conjugate consistent with the WHO’s goal to develop one or more anti-fertility vaccines to reduce the rate of population growth, especially in targeted LDCs such as Kenya." This is one other major factor that makes many "vaccine hesitant", the question of what other components might be included in vaccinations. All Americans should put on their critical thinking hats when considering vaccinations. Yes, statistics show disease reduction with vaccinations, but the statistics also show adverse effects as well. As individuals, who are not part of a collective, group think, or herd mentality, Americans hold the right to make decisions as to whether or not to vaccinate. There is no shame in either decision. It would be appalling to our Founding Fathers to know that the government, with their despot partners, believe they have the authority and right to force every American to turn their child over, or themselves, for injection of a foreign substance into their bodies. UNICEF and WHO do not want you to know or even think about any potential consequence of vaccinations, and obviously believe they have to right to dish out propaganda about it. While UNICEF and WHO claim their outreach on vaccines should be "culturally relevant", if these know it all, pompous elitists want to build trust with anyone, it is making available all information about vaccines, both the positive and negative, not suppressing it, and leaving it up to the individual to make the decision about whether or not they will choose to be vaccinated. Americans are not much for collectivism, and don't consider themselves living in a global community, but are rather intelligent individuals who make decisions for their own lives. With Facebook operating as a censorship and propaganda organization, perhaps everyone should consider MeWe as a social media platform. Go to this link to watch the full UNICEF video on vaccinations, it is a little over one hour. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
April 2024
|