Idahoans are pretty independent, not only in mind but in survival as well. The strength of these characteristics varies depending on where they live, rural or urban. Regardless, no Idahoan can escape the train that is coming down the track towards them. There are many primary issues being dumped on Idaho that are being fought, but more are to come. Just as Idaho faces these threats so do other states. It is time to start expanding preparations as this train gets closer.
By now everyone has probably heard about Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). If not, CBDC is just a digital form of currency but is different than cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin. In March, 2022, the White House issued an Executive Order, Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, which basically outlined how digital assets should be protected and advanced. Idaho passed HB 583 in 2022 which basically provided the same. CBCD is a digital asset. Unlike cryptocurrency which has no central control, CBDC will be managed through a single, government controlled central bank, with all other financial institutions collapsing. It would also move all financial transactions to online, there would be no further need for cash. Threats associated with this are unprecedented. Loss of privacy, tracking of how money is spent, cyber risks, and the biggest, the ability of the government or other entity having control over how money is spent and shutting that flow of money off if behavior is deemed inappropriate. The Federal Reserve is playing around with the idea of digital currency being used instead of cash, having launched a pilot program with World Economic Forum (WEF) global banks, but big brother government may be making the decision for them. Credit card companies are drooling at the opportunity to enslave you to them as well. Before this train hits, what can Idahoans do to really slow it in its tracks? Top of this list, don't comply. Catherine Austin Fitts is a former federal government official and investment banker. She has been following the CBDC narrative for some time and has some recommendations that each Idahoan can take to thwart, or at least make it more difficult to implement CBDC. For some it might be painful but not as painful if CBDC comes to pass. Easy to do is dropping all online financial activity and start using cash, stop paying bills online, and start using checks. Even Amazon takes checks. In 2021 HB 256 attempted to add a section that would require a seller to accept cash as a form of payment, it did not pass. Maybe this should be brought to the legislature again because of the CBDC threat. Boycott businesses that refuse to take cash. Do not use QR codes and toss out surveillance systems in your home such as Alexa and security cameras. Change out your WiFi for hard-wired internet and remove the internet on your smart phone. Vaccine passports are a stepping stone to a digital identity which is needed for CBDC. Governor Little "banned" vaccine passports in Idaho but only for state services. While there is currently an Idaho bill that supports this, it does not ban vaccine passports for everything and, "This section does not apply to any requirement imposed by the federal government". Contact your legislator for a bill that bans all vaccine passport requirements in the state, here is an example to get them started. Do not participate in biometric identification. Above all, do not comply. Drop the huge global banks for a local financial institution like a local bank or credit union. In addition, boycott the big box stores and products by supporting local businesses, using cash. Consider talking to your legislators about starting a state sovereign bank. The Bank of North Dakota is a good example, except it is entertaining the use of biometric identification. This keeps state money out of global financial institutions. Another topic for discussion is creating a state bullion depository. Legalizing gold and silver tender in Idaho is another consideration as other states have done. What could be better than Idaho only investing in companies that manufacture in Idaho? With a state bank, credit to Idaho entrepreneurs would be more easily obtained. Rather than bringing in WEF corporate monsters that suck our resources, doesn't supporting Idahoans in business make more sense? Building a network of bartering is an excellent way to exploit the expertise and skills of Idahoans. Networks of bartering could be easily set up in local communities. If not already doing so learn how to grow your own food, use it for bartering. In doing so, the need for Digital ID and CBDC lessens as Idahoans can meet their own needs through each other. Australia is probably the leading country being oppressed by these agendas. How a Digital ID system might be started is explained here. Clearly it will start with those who are already tied to the government through benefits such as senior citizens, the disabled, and those on welfare assistance. Canada is under the same threat by its WEF global leader Justin Trudeau but Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is courageous enough to stand up and say no. Nigeria is an example of how force is being used to implement control with CBDC in spite of their refusal to comply. In spite of this happening in other countries Idaho is just as much at risk. Waiting in the background is The Better Identity Coalition, which has created Digital ID blueprint policies for state government officials, so serfs can "take control" of our "identities and conduct their online business safely and securely". Alert your legislators about this organization and it being nothing more than a front group for WEF corporations. Its full report can be found here, and using driver's licenses as a target is one ploy for implementing Digital ID by this group. While awaiting this monster to arrive, it is actually already here. Governments and corporations are already forcing online use for financial and other transactions. At some point there will be no other option. Educate yourself, friends, family, and neighbors on CBDC. Enlist them to become part of the plan. Don't be fooled by the propaganda that a digital currency is safer, more inclusive, equitable, convenient, or more efficient. Take the time to read information about this and understand it. "If you have time to whine and complain about something then you have the time to do something about it." There are more suggestions and resources to learn about in Fitts article, plus she has a video if you would like a pep talk to get started. Alex Newman explains how rapidly CBDC is spreading. Conspiracy theories abound, but CBDC is clearly a coordinated plan across the world, by governments and corporations. Everyone should read the articles and watch the videos to learn more as CBDC is at the heart of the agenda to take final control over our lives. If Idahoans are vested in protecting Idaho and stopping the train, then we must do our part. It is time for everyone to take a step forward in doing something, even if it is just one item on this list. Above all, don't comply.
0 Comments
The new Education Freedom Bill, which has garnered a fair amount of support and opposition, has passed the Senate Education Committee with a do pass recommendation. S1038 would essentially create an Education Savings Account (ESA) of roughly $6,000 per child, giving the parent more options in choosing an educational setting for their child, K-12th grade.
Put aside the groups that are slinging arrows at each other as to whether or not to support or oppose this bill, as both sides are being backed by more powerful groups on their positions. Throwing mud at each other serves no purpose and obfuscates the need for Idahoans to understand the bill. The true reason this bill even emerged is because of the sorry state our school system has become. Public schools have become a factory of indoctrination on social issues, dismissing of parental rights, and how students are even educated is a serious question. For parents who have chosen to either home school or even put their children in private school, those public school issues are serious enough for them to protect their children by removing them. It is very understandable why both sides want to maintain control, parents over their children, schools and teachers over the education system. Basically the bill takes the money that was going to the school and instead keeps it aside, called an Education Savings Account (ESA), for a parent who wants to use it for an alternative education, such as home schooling or private school. The money is held by the state, and through a digital platform parents and educators who want to be part of the system can apply. Either through the Treasurers office or independent contractor, the state would send the money to the educator designated by the parent. If the private school doesn't provide a certain type of education, say for a special need, the parent can obtain that from a public school source and the state will designate the money to the public school to cover the cost. There is some legitimate concern about the way this proposed system is run. While the bill provides for frequent monitoring to ensure the money is being spent appropriately by the parent, and return of the money to the state when no longer used for a private education, this back-and-forth management does cause some concern about the logistics. There are also the privacy concerns and ongoing threats of cyber attacks. If a fraud case by the parent or educator does happen it will be assigned to the Attorney General office which brings the question of burdening that office. Certain curriculum subjects are required but it isn't clear how that will be monitored, or whose responsibility it will be. It was stated that the parent will be accountable for their children being taught whereas it was also pointed out the public school system has accountability systems in place to ensure the child is being educated properly. It seems both accountability stances have issues and problems. There is an upfront cost to start this program and as the program could potentially grow the legislature would allocate the money for it each year, but there would be a cap that could not be exceeded. Similar programs in other states were used as examples of how a program such as this could save money and improve education outcomes. However, if the program was to expand it would also mean an expansion of the government role to administer it. One of the biggest concerns about having the state run a program such as this is the potential intrusion of government regulations, especially by the federal government, this having occurred in other states. As long as federal money is not used for this program there would be no influence with federal regulations. However, while there are protections within the bill that prevent this from happening, the question does remain, what happens with it in the future with other legislators? The bill can certainly be amended by future legislators and once that door to the government is opened, neither parents who home school or private schools will be protected from it. This is a serious and legitimate concern as a driving force behind creating this type of program has been the strangling effect federal government regulations have on public schools. Given the tyrannical federal government we are currently under, there is no reason to believe that this could not happen. Families who home school their children have concerns that they too will be forced into government regulations just as Idaho governs charter schools. Right now there are about "142 private schools serving 17,897 students in Idaho" with "6% of all K-12 students" educated in these settings. 65% are religiously affiliated and with the repeal of the Blaine Amendment, the objections to tax dollars going to a religion based school will be negated, along with the money actually being provided to the parent and their choice in using it for the child's education and not to a school. But there is a more looming threat to spending these dollars on private schools. One of the top rated private schools in Idaho is an International Baccalaureate World School (IB), along with three others that are part of the Idaho Public Charter School Commission. International Baccalaureate schools originate out of the United Nations International School (UNIS) organization, teaching kids from age 3-19. Do Idahoans want their tax dollar going to a United Nations program? While concern was expressed about private schools being run by religious organizations, there should be more concern about the corporate world running in with a network of schools. Corporations have already scored high profits from public education through technology. Aside from the previously mentioned charter schools, there is the possibility of for profit corporations moving in to build schools as happened in Michigan. There are quite a few charter schools in Idaho but it isn't known how many are connected to any profit making machines. But the potential is there. As happened in Michigan, it might bring in more regulatory action by the state if it does occur. That is the last thing that should happen in Idaho and protecting private schools from profit making corporations should be addressed. But that raises the dilemma, can the state deny a private school's right to be funded and run by a large or global corporation? In fact, the WEF is already eyeballing private education for an investment opportunity. It wants more access to early education and it might just be easier with more private schools and cumbersome government schools out of the way. Perhaps seeing the burden early childhood education may place on the public school system, the way to go is to build the infrastructure for it through corporate influence. This is a real risk, especially if government funding will make it more available for families to use. There are no easy answers, both sides of the argument have reasonable concerns even though some of the arguments aren't fully accurate on either side. However, the real problem is not being addressed, nothing is being done about the way in which the public school system has been manipulated into a poorly functioning entity, and rather than fix it, other options are being sought. Millions of dollars are being poured into this education system which hasn't fixed anything, it is only getting worse. All Idahoans are bearing the expense of its failure. Rather than trying to escape this failed system and build another one, why not get the federal government out of it and build a public school system in which Idaho can be proud, based on what Idaho parents want their children to be taught? Then maybe, both sides can be relieved, it will be a real choice of options, whether to home school, use a private school, or continue on with public school. Many Idahoans are actively engaged in the fight against a world that is being deliberately transformed into one that will eventually be under the dictates of corporate technocrats. The current legislative session has brought forth some very significant bills to protect Idahoans from these attacks, such as the protection of children, protection of state assets from Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) models, averting the insane attitudes about gas stoves, and even presenting a declaration for the foundation of our government. What about the other Idahoans who are not engaged and are just sleeping?
President John F. Kennedy (JFK) spent time in England for six months in 1938. During that time, he observed the politics of England and its relationship with Nazi Germany. While his father, Joseph P. Kennedy, supported an appeasement stance, Kennedy took a broader look at the need to confront a tyrant. Based on this experience, he wrote his college thesis in 1940, Appeasement at Munich, later publishing it under the title, Why England Slept. The premise of his observations was England taking an appeasement stance rather than confronting the Nazi regime. England's failure to confront the enemy ended in a far more disastrous outcome. Much of the book is about measures that England took to avoid confrontation, such as its continued vacillation as to whether or not to build up its armament and air forces. The period of appeasement ended with the "Munich Crisis of 1938", when then Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain triumphantly returned home with a piece of paper, signed by Adolph Hitler, that allowed Germany to "annexe parts of Czechoslovakia", thus ensuring peace. England saw an inevitable war up to this point, but with the Munich agreement it was believed that the threat of war was removed. In his book, JFK noted this "sleeping year came to an end at Munich" with Hitler invading Poland within one year, starting WWII. It was during the year leading up to that invasion that England made the decision to build up its strength. Even Chamberlain understood that "weakness in armed strength means weakness in diplomacy". JFK also noted there was a general failure "to realize the strength and power of the German military machine." Idahoans are doing the same, failing to see the strength and power of corporations, especially as a cabal through the World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations. Those same cabals sit within Idaho through the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI). Following the 1940 Battle of Norway and occupation of Holland, there came the expunging of many political officials from England's government, and investment in the protection of England accelerated. "England was now awake", concluded JFK, "that leaders are responsible for their failures only in the governing sector and cannot be held responsible for the failure of a nation as a whole", noting the unfairness in blaming one individual for the problem. A leader is needed who can "look beyond the immediate situation and form some just estimate of changing conditions and eventualities in the future." That type of leadership is certainly not Governor Brad Little. He fails to look forward and understand how his engagements with the WEF and the corporate world through IACI are leading to the complete annihilation of Idaho, let alone America. His relationships, which he has now brought into the Executive Branch, are leading to even greater corporate influence and rights. JFK also concluded that democracy has weaknesses. When democracy competes with a system that cares nothing about peace or individual freedom, "it must learn to safeguard its institutions if it hopes to survive." Our American institutions are being destroyed by a tyrannical government that is lying in bed with the enemy. While our current enemy isn't using bombs for war, it is using the economy for absolute control. JFK continued, "For democracy and capitalism are institutions which are geared for a world at peace." WEF wants to destroy capitalism and have their own version of democracy. Not only do they fail to understand that America is a Republic and not a democracy, the word not even appearing in the Constitution, it is clear they mean democracy as something different. That makes it, and everything they do, our enemy. Winston Churchill tried to warn England of the Nazi threat as early as 1934, underscoring the threat of invasion. Images of carnage were used to frighten the public about the horrors of war and imprint them on children. Our enemy is using climate change and pandemics as threats bringing demise to the world in order to facilitate fear. Idaho has already been invaded and children have already been impacted. Klaus Schwab openly admits his intentions, "The Fourth Industrial Revolution will completely alter how we produce, how we consume, how we communicate and how we live. It will redefine the relationship between citizens and the state." If that statement does not send a chill down one's back and motivate them to take action there is not much more that can be said. Are Idahoans awake, or sleeping as the train wreck comes our way? Can legislators or local elected officials be expected to carry the full weight of fending off the enemy? How educated is the average Idahoan about the Great Reset? What are Idahoans doing to educate their families, neighbors, friends, youth, groups, and churches about the dangers of the Great Reset? Are Idahoans developing a relationship with their legislators and local officials, providing the support they need, and educating them with a thorough understanding of the enemy? What must Idahoans do to safeguard our institutions? Or like England, are many Idahoans just waiting to see what happens without doing anything, clinging to the principles of democracy for peace while storing up their food supplies and ammo? Will they take on the challenge of fighting for freedom before the digital ID and Central Bank Digital Currency attack comes, which will really be the final act that is needed for the global cabal to take control? Are Idahoans reading the vast amount of available information that explains this onslaught and sharing that information for discussion to create measures for protection? Other states share the conundrum. Wyoming has been taking steps to face the enemy, creating legislation that bans electric vehicles, or at least trying to protect their fossil fuel industry. Like Idaho, they too are fighting against the corrupt ESG invasion. Florida Governor DeSantis seems to be taking on several issues to protect his state. Tennessee is even more bold. HB0726 restores sovereignty by nullifying federal laws that exceed its enumerated powers. Idaho should do the same, now. Idahoans need to wake up and do more. As hard as it may seem, Idaho Legislative Services is there to help citizens create bills, and legislators can use the support, they need the expertise and skills of Idahoans to take this fight forward. These activities are the armament that needs to be built now, along with the expungement of elected officials who allow these atrocities to continue just as was done in England. Prepping with food and ammo is important, but is akin to the Brits using the underground for shelter while the bombs fell during the Blitz. They needed armament and air support to fight before the Blitz began. All of the agendas Idaho is fighting right now are the bombs. Idahoans need to use the Constitutional tools to fight. But it is not enough, so many more attacks are coming our way and we need to prepare for them, together. Right now, Idaho is in a defensive position. An offensive position is required and must come soon. It is time Idaho wakes up. Most experts who understand and write about the Great Reset are strongly urging a focus on strengthening local governments, self-sufficiency, and community. For those old enough to remember the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy held steadfast to the principles laid out in his book, he confronted the enemy rather than trying to work around the situation with appeasement hoping for peace. We no longer have that leadership and must now become the leaders and take control over Idaho's future. President Kennedy's words can be read starting on page 195. Mental health problems in youth were rarely heard of during the 1950's and 60's. There was no rash of suicides plaguing families, kids cutting on their bodies, or an abundance of psychiatric facilities. The development of different psychiatric medications began to explode in the late 1980's and 1990's. Since that time, with more medications being developed, and more psychiatric facilities being built, so has the case been made that more youth are mentally ill.
In Idaho there has been a growth of mental health services in juvenile corrections, schools and state government with Governor Little promising to pour more money into treatment. He even allocated more money for psychiatric facilities which has been used to expand facilities for youth. The Idaho Behavioral Health Council is helping with the expansion of these facilities for youth as well. Historically, it was the development of psychotropic medication that led to the release of so many individuals locked up in psychiatric facilities and improved quality of life in the 1950's and 60's, so why are we going backwards? Why is putting children in facilities, away from their families, a priority? The federal government's involvement in the mental health system has vacillated over the years, but is now looking at mental health care as an "investment", investment being the key word here. Only one thing comes to mind, "If you build it, they will come". To engage youth and parents in the mental health scheme, the federal government created Youth.gov. What is interesting about this site is the "13 federal departments and 12 federal agencies" that "collaborate" with the private sector and non-profits to promote its programs. Since when did the federal government become the parent to your child? Youth mental health can be deemed a social problem in which aggressive efforts are underway to identify as many youth as possible in need of some form of treatment. Forms of treatment may include medication, therapy, community based services, crisis care, residential care, and of course hospitalization that can then be transferred into other areas of their life. Once deemed mentally ill it can become very difficult escaping the system. Perhaps the most important issue to understand here is that this field of medicine has become a marketplace for profits. Much like the Covid-19 episode earned billions of dollars for corporations, such is the same methodology here. The formula is very simple. By creating, perpetuating, or amplifying a problem, corporations then advance the solutions to fix it, for profit. Just like Covid-19 "threats" continue to be thrown in our face, these social problems will never be fixed by anything they do, all become a never ending profit making scheme for the corporations. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its corporate partners recognize this and are ready to galvanize the needed social innovations to address the problem by building future markets and designing new products and services. Much like what is seen with Covid-19, new markets and products were catalysts for major profits. Or climate change and the investments in green energy that will reap profits for corporations. Rather than the forest service practicing good forest management that reduces fire risks, too much money can be made to let them burn, another scam to promote climate change as the problem, there is no reason for an end to it. As seen by the "pandemic", pharmaceutical companies and hospitals were also provided a huge profit by the government, as Covid-19 continues to be declared an ongoing threat. Called social impact investing, as part of the Environment Social Governance (ESG) model, investments are made based on a positive social return, a concept supported by the (OECD). A youth identified with a mental illness creates a demand for more medications, hospitals, mental health clinics, and providers, all of which make wonderful social investment opportunities. As they age the mental health support is continued for a more productive workforce. The ball just keeps on rolling with mental health markets predicted to have continued growth. While on the surface it is twisted into a need for a happier and healthier society, and workforce, it is really a market for profit, an abuse of our healthcare system, and most tragically an abuse of children and parental rights. Social impact investing is explained in more depth in this article. "Social impact investments are a type of investment that channels funds to organizations that are tackling social issues. The expectation is to gain financial returns but also have a positive impact on these matters." Once again, (ESG) plays a role in how investments are made. Some investment highlights include focusing on primary areas like health care and education, two targeted areas used to identify mental health issues in youth. Investment platforms offer opportunities for investing in mental health including venture capital funding. The more devastating aspect of this, as it was with Covid-19, is that treatment is determined by corporate protocols for profit rather than by qualified, and more likely ethical professionals. Dictates will come from corporate heads who know nothing about mental health and who are instead looking at profit margins, and the burden on society will expand as more are placed into the government system. Which corporations will benefit from the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act or the Restoring Hope for Mental Health and Well-Being Act of 2022? Governor Little will most likely be standing in line waiting for his allotment. Yes, business will be good for Idaho mental health clinics, hospitals, and providers at the expense of children. Merck and Pfizer, both devoted to ESG, are a couple of pharmaceutical companies that make social impact investments for a positive return. Focus Investment Banking even points out there is a growing interest in behavioral health with increasing investment opportunities. To keep that investment return, new targets have to be identified and they must never become well. The WEF also has what is called a social impact bond market. Investments can be made in a social issue and if the target outcome is achieved and creates a positive return for the investor, profits continue for the social problem. These bonds also involve a public-private partnership (P3), a mixing of government into healthcare, which only contributes to corporate influence. State legislators are also a target for this scam. Alison McDowell is a researcher who is very familiar with the current agendas. While the full video is worth watching, at the 19:05" mark she touches on the social impact investing concept and how those social problems will never be solved because "no global market is going to eliminate the source of its profit". Problems are perpetuated to keep the flow of capital coming in. So the hunt is on to find children with a mental illness, supports are put into place that will connect them to the needed treatment, and their life becomes a pawn in a much greater plot for corporate greed. The WEF already has a Global Framework For Youth Mental Health that Health & Human Services can follow. This article is not intended to offend or negate anyone, whether young, old, or as a parent, who has benefited from any mental health treatment, dissuade any parent from seeking treatment for their child, or suggest that there aren't any children in need of mental health treatment. Seeking treatment for a child is up to the parent, not at the direction of institutions that are systemically searching for and participating in this endeavor. It is merely to alert parents to the government, along with corporate and market investors, expanding their search in identifying youth with a mental illness and the red flags that are raised concerning their intentions. There is money to be made and the hunt is on for future capital for "decades to come". It is also an insult and disparaging to those who truly need treatment, with corporate predators that only seek prey they can exploit for hidden purposes. Guard your children closely, don't let them fall prey to the education or health systems that want to take hold of them. As the parent you know your child, listen to your instincts about what they need and what is harming them. According to the Free Dictionary the term "Don't color outside the lines" means "To think or act in a way that does not conform to set rules. Likened to the way a child might color outside the lines of a coloring book."
What do those lines provide, why are they there? Those lines provide structure that creates some form of a picture making it easily recognizable. If a child were to ignore the rule to stay inside the lines, would the end result be an unrecognizable blob of color that represents nothing and is only understood by the child? What if there were no lines in which to stay inside? There is a reason for lines, not just for the basics of a child learning to color. Lines provide structure, boundaries that produce an end result that everyone can understand. It does not take away any creativity, within those lines there can be imaginary use of colors, or designs, but within those lines everyone still knows what picture is represented. This is much like our Founding Fathers. Many had a deep religious faith that guided their boundaries in life just as Christianity provides boundaries, the Ten Commandments are pretty simple and clear. However, as most understand, it is not always easy to refrain from straying outside of those boundaries, and for those who do, life can get pretty messy. Everyone can relate to that. Christianity also has a foundation of a personal relationship with God. That relationship has nothing to do with anyone else, it is only between you and Him. The Founders recognized the importance of this personal and individual relationship and "recognized the benefit to society of a citizenry that was moral and committed to genuinely conform their behavior to the constraints of their convictions." Individualism exemplified that we are responsible for our own morals and behavior just as we are with God, sovereign and separate from everyone else, which might have been used for the basis of our government as well. Each federal branch is separate with clear boundaries on their duties and roles, just as each state, county, and city are sovereign from each other and separate. So boundaries help navigate life and provide for our structured government. Adhering to those boundaries preserves the structure. Messes occurred along the way but using the rule of law and the boundaries within government roles, problems were cleaned up, for instance adding Constitutional amendments that provided new boundaries on what is acceptable in our society. However, America no longer functions within any boundaries. As a result, by not coloring within these lines, everything has become messy. Unfortunately in the world there are still people, governments, and now corporations that are repulsed by the idea of individualism and sovereignty while encouraging youth in "breaking traditional rules". Boundaries and individualism are barriers to collective control over everyone. As part of collectivism, "consensus building" and capacity building were introduced in Agenda 21. Following suit, now, instead of following the rule of law and the Constitution that provides boundaries, the government gathers together at ritzy, all tax payer funded places for a good time, listening to corporate and other lobbyists, slapping each other on the back for reaching a "consensus" on what they will collectively do to their constituents, then go back home and brag about what they are doing "for" you. All of our government's original boundaries laid out by our Founders have flown out the door. Where is it found in any Constitution that allows about half of the governors in the U.S. getting together to make policy decisions that are then dumped on each individual state? The lines our Founders drew were for a reason, and it was not for compromising or reaching a consensus. It has always been the goal of the United Nations (UN) to force collectivism upon us by shredding boundaries. Agenda 21, also known as sustainable development (SD), laid the foundation for restructuring our government, creating more blurring or elimination of boundaries. President Clinton essentially destroyed our government structure by implementing his President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) that embedded all SD principles into our government in 1993. This council began the process of dragging in corporate heads for partnerships, non-governmental organizations (NGO), and Tribes that dismantled a representative government. These groups represent the obliterated boundary of elected representation. It was also around this time that boundaries in the education system were destroyed. The 3 R's of reading, writing, and arithmetic were taken off the table as essential for learning. Goal #10 of the PCSD centered on "teaching the concepts of SD". Education for Sustainability: An Agenda for Action report originated from the PCSD in 1996 which effectively removed parents as the authority on their child's education on page 54, instead turning it over to indoctrinated teachers, international and global players, UNESCO and other UN organizations, government agencies, NGOs, and corporations. This in spite of Supreme Court cases that upheld parents' rights and authority over their children. No parent was involved in the decision to revamp the education system or relinquish authority over their child. Instead, the steps were started for "...establishing necessary partnerships, as the foundation for a coordinated strategy for education for sustainability" with the "infusion of education for sustainability into formal and non-formal educational institutions.", found on page 57. Global education also became the focus on page 67 with the new electorate outlined on page 88. The mess that has been caused by this change in the structure of our education system has resulted in several generations of uneducated and indoctrinated individuals who now only react to issues rather than using any scrap of intelligence to think. Education has insidiously and systematically been used to dismantle the boundaries of not only our government structure but individual autonomy, it is now group think. Subtle classroom changes reinforced this, not only by removing individual desks that were sovereign to the student and using "community supplies", but also by eliminating individual work with group tables becoming the forum for discussions on collaboration and "consensus", with a grade assigned to the individual partly for the group work but also for group participation. Grades are given for agreeing, not thinking. Regionalism is another example of breaking jurisdictional boundaries, combining countries, states, counties, cities, and even legislatures. This particular methodology has destroyed our country's boundaries and has made everything a mess as representation no longer exists. These regional groups listen to what is fed to them, usually by NGOs, and corporations during their ritzy gatherings, contributing to the loss of constituent voices. Chaos is created in legislatures as legislators who stand for Constitutional boundaries are in conflict with those who have adopted the consensus decision by the groups in which they belong. Surely this division has to be a deliberate tactic by those who designed SD in order to breach more government boundaries, those abiding by Constitutional boundaries, the others by SD dictates. What used to be clearly understood as inalienable rights have now been stripped and renamed human rights with the UN dictating its own rules on what rights should be. The relationship is now between humans and the UN, not between humans and their Creator. Now indoctrinated Americans are demanding everything is a right, health care, education, employment, housing, and the list goes on. However, since these rights are man-made and all come out of the UN, there doesn't appear to be any exclusions in rights, until of course those man-made rights are revoked which creates temper tantrums. With no boundaries, everything becomes unrecognizable, what does America stand for? What is the picture being colored? Religious beliefs are also a UN target with Churches, or faith based organizations as the UN calls it, joining the cause, removing the boundaries taught within faith as well. Even though Agenda 21 was established 30 years ago this boundary erasure is being carried forward by Agenda 2030 and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Staying within the lines that were drawn by our Founders are no longer a consideration. The chipping away of the constraints of our Constitution was deliberately done to eliminate our sovereignty. Can't have collectivism if one is sovereign and independent. This is the new Constitution, "a living document", adopted in 1999. Because the constraints and boundaries of the Constitution are no longer followed everything is messy. With the integration of SD into our government 30 years ago, as SD issues have expanded, those issue are being forced into our lives. These expanded issues include LGBTI, same sex marriage, racism, human rights, vaccines and healthcare for all, migration, gender equality, mental health, sex reassignment, in fact every aspect of life is part of SD. Indoctrinated American citizens, the group think, who support these issues vote for representatives who also support them. No longer is it the voice of the governed, it is the voices of teachers, NGOs, professional organizations, youth, foundations, corporations, and the "federal government's role in advancing education for sustainability" (pg 76). We are fortunate that we are being told what will be done to us further down the road to either help us prepare to acquiesce or stop it to put boundaries back into place. Which is America doing? The structural changes from SD in our government continue to destabilize how we live. Every piece of nonsense seeping out of the government is based on SD, not constituent voices. Much of it can be blamed on the removal of Constitutional boundaries by W.J. Clinton but those who have participated in not restoring the boundaries are complicit as well. In the end, we will all be judged individually for our actions, not collectively. It isn’t woke, it is sustainable development. There is a reason why people don't color outside the lines. It just makes everything messy. ESG is the acronym for environment, social, and governance. It was created by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations (UN) initiative that integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) into business models with criteria. This is an ESG example. Tommy Salmons wrote an excellent article for The Libertarian Institute that provides an explanation of ESG and why it is a threat to every one of us. This utopian vision of how ESG will force proper corporate behavior will trickle down to everyone where punishments will come if one doesn't comply. Within the article is a nice graphic (published by the Ethics and Compliance Initiative) that shows examples of what is included in each ESG category. For any decision a corporation makes, that decision must pass muster in each of these areas. Buildings and products must be environmentally friendly, the workplace must be managed according to the social criteria, and the corporation must ensure the governance of their operation is squeaky clean.
This expectation for appropriate corporate behavior trickles down into a social credit system for us as explained by Dr. Vernon Coleman and as experienced by these Chinese protesters. During the 2022 Idaho legislative session, ESG was being scrutinized for its potential harm to Idahoans. No bill was passed but a House Concurrent Resolution was created but did not make it through the session for passage. Aye and Nay voting on this by legislators is listed. Many Idaho corporations practice ESG including Clearwater Paper, Potlatch, and Union Pacific to name a few. ESG is a threat to our liberty. It exemplifies how daily lives can be monitored and tracked through digital technology such as a smart phone, and how that data can be used to determine how one is allowed to live. This is an issue for everyone to become familiar with for the next legislative session, and support the legislature in keeping ESG out of Idaho. In a previous article the relationship between the Western States Center (WSC) and Jim Jones, founder of the Take Bake Idaho (TBI) group, was exposed. While the relationship between WSC members and other groups was touched upon, the extensive range of those relationships is disturbing. WSC is clearly part of a terrorist network of groups who are systematically targeting local governments for the purposes of radically changing how our Republic was originally intended to work. Terrorists operated differently in the late 1960's and 1970's through the use of violence. There is no distinction between these groups as far as being left or right wing, or based on race. They are just groups on violence. However, a new tactical approach has been adopted, changing to non-violence. Strategically, these groups are now using influence within government jurisdictions to spread division and transform the direction of that government. Such is the case of the Boise City Council. WSC has integrated itself into this local level of government to influence the direction of the city with specific political goals. Terrorism has been traditionally associated with violence, or "The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals." But what if a group chose to not use violence, instead using a non-violent form of terrorism to achieve its pursuit of political goals? Other issues such as financial can be used as a form of terrorism. Another WSC partner, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), not only inspires terrorism but is also historically linked to terrorism. While WSC makes the claim that white nationalists are threatening the foundation of democracy and "committed to seizing the power of the state", isn't WSC actually the one doing this by infiltrating governments in partnership with groups that are intent on dismantling our government foundation? Previously it was noted that Eric Ward, WSC Executive Director, is a member of several left wing organizations. Race Forward is connected to several other groups such as Government Alliance on Race & Equity (GARE) in which Idaho is a particular target for infiltration. As Chair of the Proteus Fund he is able to procure funding for social justice causes. This group has even wealthier partners to aid the effort, including the George Soros Open Society Foundations in which Mr. Ward has been a consultant. "Proteus has also developed strategies for persuading voters to tip the scale of public opinion in specific states and localities." Now this is being advanced in Boise through Mayor McLean. He was also previous Ford Foundation Program Officer, which has many causes that it funds, and includes influencing governments. Interestingly, as much rhetoric Mr. Ward spews about white nationalism, there is also black nationalism which he seems to ignore. Apparently, the FBI took some heat for "piecing a few incidents together to construct a movement" by black nationalists. Now isn't that what WSC is doing, taking a few isolated incidents of idiots spreading hate and blowing it way out of proportion and using it to justify bringing in its propaganda? Even the individual in recent New York subway attack has been identified as a black nationalist. Where is Mr. Ward speaking to this? In further emails obtained by Casey Whalen via a Boise City Council Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Boise has been identified by the WSC as a place to initiate its "pilot project" with the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), in which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has ties. WSC has also brought in two more operatives for this project, Ben Unger and Ethan Krow. Unger has an extensive background in politics and Krow works for Stuart Collective. Stuart Collective "specializes in working with diverse, progressive PACs, organizations, and individuals to create change on bold statewide campaigns and legislation that have the potential to create massively positive political change." Its mission is "to connect, advise, and mentor people and organizations serious about creating radically positive political change." Besides WSC other partners include the SPLC, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Portland Public Schools (PPS), Senate Democratic Leadership Fund (SDLF), and Kate Our Governor referring to Kate Brown. This organization is being brought in to influence campaigns and legislation and Senior Strategist Ethan Krow will lead the way. Ben Unger has an extensive political background as former Oregon legislator, lobbyist, and co-founder of The Lab Strategies which is a "campaign and advocacy consulting firm" in which WSC just happens to be a client. However, there is also a tie in with local left-wing extremist groups. In the August 2, 2019 email list is Michael Satz. He is a City Club of Boise board member, at which Jim Jones has spoken, and is also the founding executive director for Idaho Project 97. These two organizations endorse ideology that is the same as WSC and Jim Jones, such as opposition to the Idaho Freedom Foundation (IFF) and targeting legislators. The City Club of Boise also has corporate strength behind it that includes press manipulation through the Idaho Statesman, Idaho Public Television, and universities. Does Mayor McLean think Boise has such a white nationalism problem that it is necessary to spend tax dollars to bring in a huge network of left-wing extremist groups to address this nonexistent issue? Is that what she thinks of Boise citizens, as a bunch of bigoted, racist, white nationalists? On December 14, 2021 it was confirmed that Mayor McLean would be meeting with Ben Unger on December 17 to coordinate on this WSC/SPLC pilot project. In partnership with the WSC Boise Mayor McLean is bringing in a network of organizations whose sole purpose is influencing not only campaigns but elections as well, a clear undermining of how our government is operates through elected representation. Or is it that the majority of Boise voters want this type of progressive change? So here we have an organization that clearly has ties to other non-violent terrorist groups with a massive amount of funding behind them in order to infiltrate and influence political entities and persuade them to adopt and implement its specific political goals, while also using local left-wing extremist groups. That is how it is done now and the whole concept of representation is destroyed. None of these involved individuals or organizations hold any commitment to either the U.S. Constitution or the Idaho Constitution.
As noted in the previous article Jim Jones has been an active participant with WSC. Now why does Jones support organizations that are tied in with groups that function as underground terrorists wanting to undermine our Republic? Should he be considered a terrorist as well, invested in undermining our system the same as the WSC? What are his motivations for this? Every one of these candidates should also be seen as participants in a terrorist network. If this all sounds like dramatization, take one moment to consider the objectives of these organizations. Terrorists or terrorist group has specific political goals. These groups want a democracy, mob rule, not a Republic. And they are winning. Face it, what other Idaho organizations are this well connected or have the amount of money and corporations backing them? Issues of white nationalism, candidate inadequacies, or right-wing extremist organizations are only fronts for the real goal of undermining our government. That is the goal. Representation no longer exists, it is now just a majority of ideological fools who dominate the legislature, local governments, along with the media to promote it. The majority of Idahoans do not support any of this ideology, or do they? Idahoans are seen as illiterate, country bumpkins who aren't capable of making intelligent decisions by these groups but can rather be led around by the muzzle and told what to do and how to think using psychological manipulation of shame and guilt. They all party together, slap each other on the back with adulation, and laugh at us. Until Idahoans start fighting back using constitutional foundations they will continue to win. Operatives deep within Idaho are bringing division and hate to our communities. The Western States Center (WSC) is a left-wing extremist organization that wants to "create a world...free from bigotry and fear". Eric K. Ward is the Executive Director of the WSC, Senior Fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), member of Political Research Associates, and Race Forward, His other exploits include Program Officer at the Ford Foundation, The Atlantic Philanthropies, what appears to be a now defunct left-wing organization called the Center for New Community, is an aspiring singer-songwriter to "advance inclusive democracy", and is involved with many other radical, and nefarious, organizations. Mr. Ward freely goes around making accusations, labeling others, and inciting hate, for which he receives a prize, while endeavoring to preserve, or construct, an "inclusive democracy", not understanding America is a Republic. This article identifies WSC as "an affiliate of the Southern Poverty Law Center" which "counts on WSC as a core program partner" and has been funded by several foundations with questionable motives. SPLC even has ties to the World Economic Forum. Several WSC board members also have ties to concerning organizations such as two with the SPLC, Chicago Abortion Fund, Center for New Community, and Basic Rights Oregon. In its 2019 990 tax form there are board members that served with the Ford Foundation, the Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights (IREHR), and one co-chair with the Astraea Lesbian Foundation For Justice. Two WSC members are already planted in Idaho and through groups. Beyond this, there is this eyebrow raising look at the creation of an Idaho group with similar agendas as the WSC. Take Back Idaho (TBI) is a committee formed in late 2021, and comprised of former Idaho Supreme Court Chief Justice Jim Jones, former Speaker of the House Bruce Newcomb, former Idaho Secretary of State Ben Ysursa, former Idaho Senator Bob Geddes, former Idaho Republican Party Executive Director Cheryl Miller, and a few others. TBI is "determined to take Idaho back from the grip of the IFF, its partner organizations, and their acolytes in the GOP legislative ranks." Hmmm. This TBI statement, "they will focus on educating Idahoans on how to identify and fight dangerous extremism and misinformation", will make TBI the laughingstock of the state by the end of this article. While examining these WSC and TBI similarities it is important to separate out one's own opinions and thoughts on the subject matter, instead focusing on the issue that TBI appears to be aligning with a radical and far left extremist organization with ties to even more radical groups. On February 26, 2022 both the WSC and TBI called for Janice McGeachin's resignation for her participation in the America First Political Action Conference (AFPAC), the WSC accusing her of embracing "white nationalism" and both labeling the AFPAC as a "White Nationalist Convention". This in spite of the WSC claim, "Western States Center is nonpartisan and does not support or oppose any candidate for elected public office" found at the bottom of the WSC page. Another target of both organizations is the Idaho Freedom Foundation (IFF). Jim Jones in particular has issues with the IFF. Again without regard to one's opinion about the IFF, it is alarming that both WSC in June, 2021 and TBI in December, 2021 released condemnation of this organization based on IFF concerns regarding Critical Race Theory being taught in the education system. However, in this Accuracy in Media video it is clear that haughty educators condone changing the name of what they are teaching in order to hide their deeds. Is this not the same as what the WSC and TBI are doing, conniving with each other behind the scenes? There is also the issue of Shahram Hadian. The affiliated WSC Southern Poverty Law Center has a particular disdain for him along with TBI leader Jim Jones. The similarities in these issues might not be good enough to warrant accusations that WSC and TBI are working together, perhaps further documentation is needed. Through a Freedom of Information Act request, Casey Whalen exposed these nefarious activities between the City of Boise and WSC. Individual names have been redacted for their protection, leaving the involved agency name, and with links to those agencies at the end of each email. Since 2019 the WSC has been in contact with Boise City Council staff that began with a rape case by four Tanzania refugees. During that time, a 2/21/19 email involving several agencies discussed strategies to manipulate media information. It was also noted that Jim Jones was in the process of writing a letter with Capital Group to discourage legislators from attending a 2/27/19 event with Shahram Hadian. With his name on the 2/26/19 email list, and several additional agencies, Jones was given praise for his column, We don't need Shahram Hadian's inflammatory anti-Muslim rhetoric. In an August 2, 2019 email with even more involved agencies, Mr. Jones was invited to attend a WSC conference, it is unknown whether he did. However, one can see by the agenda that the subject matter extended far beyond its claim of just confronting white nationalism. The list of speakers included the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), another WSC partner. The 12/26/21 email confirms that WSC made contact with the Boise Mayor and a document was provided as a tool for governments responding to political violence. It is important to focus strictly on the fact that a left-wing extremist organization is infiltrating a local government to impose its ideology upon the citizens, and the local government appears to buy into that idea. Out of approximately 230,510 citizens, this left-wing extremist organization is suggesting infested bigotry and hate exists throughout the Boise community. This is nothing more than a lie. WSC's created resource, Strengthening Local Government Against Bigoted and Anti-Democracy Movements, is for the purpose of infiltrating and influencing governments.
Claiming "bigoted and hateful groups have successfully targeted young-adults who are still developing their worldviews", it is really WSC and its minions who are targeting youth, having developed a toolkit to bring its distortions into classrooms. In fact, it was Eric Ward's wife, Jessica Acee, who co-authored the toolkit and has some alarming thoughts about education herself. First the adults are groomed, then children become the prey for indoctrination. How can adults be so obtuse? Historically tyrants have used the division of people into different classes, identifying one group as superior than another, to amass power. There seems to be a striking similarity with WSC actions, separating out those they label as white nationalists. This is a very ominous warning for those who choose to lie in bed with WSC. In spite of Rep. Rubel's claim that the legislature focused on "divisive social issues" this year, the truth is that via the WSC and its associated toady groups, they sow seeds of hate to breed division among families, friends, and neighbors. WSC is not fooling anyone. Its lack of transparency and deceit is well understood, These individuals are too cowardly to bring their lofty ideas to a community because they know the opposition they would face. Instead, they hide behind the skirts of government. WSC doesn't understand with their projection of anger, personal rage, and hate onto a community it is that hate which communities overwhelmingly reject. Many Idahoans are tired of these racist groups bringing their bigoted and hateful ideology into our state. Knowing that current and former elected officials are participating in this is an embarrassment and shameful. This information is a very light surface scratch on the deep pockets of hate being spread across our country, the money being poured into spreading that hate, and the decimation of our Republic. Representatives who focused on social issues did so rightly as Idaho is a primary target for these groups. Shame on you Jones, Geddes, Ysursa, Newcomb, and every person that supports TBI. Your group is engaged in a deep well of networks that are anti-American, intentionally dismantling our Republic, and are the ones bringing "dangerous extremism and misinformation" to our state. None of you represent Idaho citizens. Idahoans will continue to reject this ideology in spite of your advocating for more of this rhetoric. On Friday, March 4, 2022, the Idaho House narrowly passed House Bill 701, the Idaho Workforce Housing Fund, sponsored by Rep. Blanksma. Under this bill the legislature would allocate monies to a trust fund within the state treasury, which according to this article, would be administered by the Idaho Housing and Finance Association (IHFA). "IHFA would approve grants for nonprofit developers to create affordable housing units...". While Rep. Blanksma admonished the idea that America Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds would be used to fund this, she claimed this bill is "only a path" for funding in the future. Clearly the bill's Statement of Purpose and other sources identify $50 million will originate from ARPA. It appears that "path" can be jump started with ARPA funds, why else would it be in there? What this bill also does is set up a public-private partnership between the Idaho government and private developers, it just being filtered through another organization. This bill is intended to fill the "gap" for citizens who don't qualify for housing subsidies and yet don't earn enough money for "affordable housing'. After meeting with his cronies, Governor Little made the recommendation to use ARPA funding for these purposes, although how that ARPA money could be used had not been defined. Well, now it is. The January, 2022 U.S. Department of Treasury final rule is that ARPA money can be used for "Improvements to vacant and abandoned properties, including rehabilitation or maintenance, renovation, removal and remediation of environmental contaminants, demolition or deconstruction, greening/vacant lot cleanup & conversion to affordable housing." It also references funding can go to "households that qualify for the National Housing Trust Fund" (NHTF). This is another government run housing program that targets "building, rehabilitating, preserving, and operating rental housing for extremely low-income people." No doubt this is an expansion of government housing. This really isn't about workforce housing which is just a metaphor for affordable housing. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) defines workforce housing as those who have a "moderate income, 60-120%" Area Medium Income (AMI) that includes rentals and home ownership. This map identifies who in Idaho would qualify under the 60-120% AMI threshold. H701 provides that financial assistance is given to housing "developments that include a commitment on the part of a local government to match." To develop these housing projects local governments will have to pony up as well, a fancy description for redistributing wealth. 20% of those monies must be given to rural areas. The bill becomes void at the end of 2026. Is that time allotted for the sole purpose of getting more nefarious plans in place such as through the ULI mission for workforce housing? Erik Kingston is the Housing Resources Coordinator for the Idaho Housing and Finance Association (IHFA), the association assigned to administering HB701 funds. IHFA partners include Idaho Rural Partnership (IRP), the regional Western Community Assessment Network (WeCan), and several state agencies. Mr. Kingston is on the IRP Board of Directors and is a member of WeCan. As usual the federal government is the instigator of WeCan. Mr. Kingston has devotion to several housing objectives and considers housing a "human right" as declared by Article 25 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Rights. In his Housing Basics guide he supports housing cooperatives, community housing/land trusts, and using modular and 3D printed homes. Kudos to Mr. Kingston for trying to create solutions for those individuals who are unable to afford housing. But what he is really doing is recommending and supporting a more hidden agenda, and the source is from his multiple buddies. Behind the scenes these groups are actively using their collaborators to bring their housing initiatives forward. Collaborators include the University of Idaho (U of I), the IRP program, and the ULI.
Going back to the ULI, who cares what it thinks? ULI is a global non-governmental organization, with an Idaho chapter, that supports Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), including #11, affordable housing for all, and highlights real estate alignment with the SDGs. Several globalists have held webinars for the Idaho ULI chapter, including one who is Co-Chair of the Real Estate Governors of the World Economic Forum (WEF), Coen van Oostrom. Multiple ULI executives are members of the WEF including Patrick L. Phillips, Lynn Thurber, and Peter Baccile, One can reasonably assume that these individuals pass on their SDG and WEF visions to naive ULI listeners. This presenter is really choice, Solomon Greene, previously HUD’s principal adviser on the United Nations process for setting global sustainable development goals. Mr. Kingston's support of modular homes, 3D printed houses, and housing cooperatives all come from the WEF. In this WEF document, housing issues have already been solved and are now trickling down to Idaho via these partnerships and collaborations thanks to Governor Little and Rep. Blanksma. So yes, Rep. Blanksma, there is a direct trail back to the WEF and its objectives for "workforce housing", just another term to disguise a feel good agenda, and new government housing program. It is WEF ideology that is being passed on to Idaho groups for implementation, the typical way these operatives work. You are proposing to hand over millions of dollars to an organization with a resource coordinator who is leading the effort to bring together groups for meeting common globalist housing objectives. An apology is owed to every house member that challenged you with the truth. This type of public housing ploy, government money for housing, has been tried, and failed, before. It is also another example of how Governor Little uses his cronies to devise a spending scam that benefits them, and miraculously it flows through the legislature unlike some other bills for citizens that get stuck in the drawer. While you may be ok spending money that has already "saddled us with debt", most Idahoans do not ascribe to your money management thinking. What this money really does is benefit the looters that use it to advance ideology that Idahoans directly oppose. There are many unanswered questions about how this money would be allocated, and used, especially by non-profits which often hold the same ideologies as the globalists. Regardless of how Rep. Blanksma chooses to perceive this ill-gotten idea, it is public housing because the money is coming from the government and historically that has not worked. Even the IHFA itself "functions as an agent for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development". The Senate most likely will be voting on this bill next week. Contact your legislator and let them know you are opposed to HB701. In 2019 the Idaho State Department of Education (ISDE) Superintendent of Public Instruction Sherri Ybarra planned to request a 2021 budget of $1.99 billion. $1 million of that money was to be used for the development and implementation of training for Idaho educators in social-emotional learning (SEL). That request went nowhere pretty fast. The Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (Casel) is one organization that pushes SEL, defining it as teaching children how to manage emotions, build relationships, and make decisions. This is broken down further into teaching self-awareness, self-management, responsible decision making, social awareness, and relationship skills as defined in its little "interactive CASEL wheel". Casel was the recommended program by an ISDE appointed group of state mental health workers and educators to "address youth mental and behavioral wellbeing." Because of opposition to SEL clear up into last year, references to SEL cannot even be found on the IDOE website. However, giving it a different label just might be the ticket, social-emotional "health". In the Idaho Content Standards, it is described as "Mental, Emotional, & Social Health" for building wellness, instruction on positive self-image and self-esteem, recognizing emotions, and socially appropriate responses. In later grades the standards add "emotional intelligence". The Idaho Department of Health & Welfare even has its own version of SEL, Social-Emotional Development. So again, even though there is opposition, the agenda just moves forward anyway with a few tweaks of some words. But from where does promotion of SEL originate? Like everything else, the World Economic Forum (WEF). In 2016, the WEF came up with Ten 21st-century skills every student needs, with a graphic for "life-long learning", a term most Idahoans have heard over and over. But it is this image that catches the eye. How many of these targeted learning strategies align with SEL in Idaho? Golly gee, where is there anything about teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic? In 2017, the WEF added "emotional intelligence", a distinct difference from intellect and personality, with "four core skills" in personal and social competence, and is just one of several other "intelligence's" it defines. The claim is made that "emotional intelligence is the foundation for a host of critical skills—it impacts most everything you do and say each day." Really? And from what twisted psychological source did the WEF research to create this? Or even Idaho in its standards?! When so much focus and emphasis is given to how one feels and behaves, especially for a kid, where is there time for learning, let alone executing, anything academically? According to the WEF, boosting emotional intelligence is "the strongest predictor of performance". Does that mean regardless of skills at a job it is more important to be liked, get along with everyone, collaborate, and compromise one's values? Oh yeah, how pliable will that employee be for manipulation? In its "New Vision for Education" booklet, the WEF really gets down to the nuts and bolts of what it is doing, "Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology".
On page 13 in the booklet, how to Embed SEL into foundational ed-tech products is discussed. Since most ed-tech products focused on academics, the WEF saw the "opportunity for developers that want to embed features that already work in SEL into other realms." One issue to also consider, these ed-tech developers who create these products are doing it for an "investment", to make money, and making money they are. As students are forced into more online education, exposure to this propaganda increases, and the WEF knows it. The only barrier it sees is lack of access to the internet which is why 5G installation is being promoted and funded so heavily, regardless of potential risks. One company the WEF identified as already embedding SEL into ed-tech products was the free online platform Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE). ThinkCERCA was another one. Do any Idaho schools use these products? According to the WEF, other technologies to help students develop social and emotional skills in the future include Wearable devices; Leading-edge apps; Virtual reality; Advanced analytics and machine learning; and Affective computing. All of these have the capability to track every student and ching, ching, ching for the corporations that create them. Is that why Idaho budgets are so laden with requests for education money, plus local levies and bonds? To bring this technology in that harms Idaho students? For the future of SEL, a section on page 14 describes "How global organizations shape the agenda". They sure got that right. United Nations organizations such as the OECD, UNESCO and the World Bank are shaping the education system right there with the WEF. The end of the video in the UNESCO link points out it is about "changing mindsets" and "challenging norms" and even has a "Building Kinder Brains" initiative using SEL. Yes, the intent is to manipulate children into its sick realm of fantasy. OECD takes credit for influencing global education reform through its tool PISA which Idaho uses (under International Assessments). The strategies for propaganda using ed-tech for SEL can be found on page 26 in the booklet. Students are being psychologically molded through SEL for the global corporate workforce just as academics have been manipulated for the same. The future global workforce is the only issue the WEF worries about when it comes to education. These control freaks have been working on this since at least 2015. Going back to Casel being the recommended program by the ISDE group, Casel is supported by the Wallace Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and several corporate entities. Many of the individuals involved in the Wallace Foundation have deep ties to the United Nations and World Economic Forum corporate members, research, markets. and globalization. Casel is a highly funded and deeply ideological program with no mission other than to manipulate Idaho children further into the globalization well and collectivism. There are many who believe SEL actually teaches Critical Race theory concepts. One more significant point in this issue, it is a prime example of how corporations rule over how and what kids learn. Corporations control the content in the technology, the education system buys and uses these products to teach the kids, and those products are often the only choice. The education system is at the mercy of corporate control over what kids learn. Corporate partner book publishers such as Pearson and tech corporations such as Microsoft control the education system with new scams for teachers to use and bring SEL propaganda into the classroom. A big No Thanks to the ISDE and Sherri Ybarra for trying to bring this trash into our education system. Quit promoting global ideology for Idaho classrooms. Is it no wonder that academic proficiency has dropped when a student is taught to constantly think about how they feel, or if they are being collaborative, compromising, or not hurting someone's feelings? It is time Ms. Yabarra is booted out of her position as ISDE Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is time to elect an Idahoan who returns the education system back to teaching children true academics, how to really think critically, and foster each child's independence in thinking. That is what the United States was founded on, individualism, not collectivism which is what SEL really teaches. For legislators, how is it possible for the majority to continue ignoring this documentation. Or is it because they themselves have been indoctrinated into this future world, and have been convinced to believe that manipulating a child psychologically is a good idea, let alone taking away a parent's responsibility for their children's health. By the looks of it, legislators who support this have themselves fallen into the manipulative tactics so well designed for children. The state is not the parent of the child but that is where Idahoans are being taken. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
May 2024
|