On November 15, 2021 the Idaho House of Representatives will reconvene to discuss the federal government Covid-19 vaccine mandate which is now temporarily blocked by a federal appeals court. However, this mandate has now been extended to include health care workers who provide care to Medicaid and Medicare recipients that will add to the devastating economic hardship for many Idahoans. Many questions surround these federal mandates with several states, including Idaho, filing lawsuits in opposition to those mandates. But hidden behind this federal mandate that has trickled down to Idaho is a massive, well-coordinated plan with a specific goal that requires vaccine mandates and is actually being implemented. One World Economic Forum (WEF) scheme is the Commons Project, building "digital services for the common good", promoting the deception that people will be able to collect and manage personal health data digitally, then sharing that data with health services and organizations they trust. Why would anyone in their right mind participate in this? Likely, because everyone will be forced to participate. According to the Project, maintaining control" over "digital lives" is associated with stronger communities "when data is open and can be shared for the benefit of all." That is collectivism. The Commons Project has four projects with full United States involvement. CommonHealth for data, CommonPass for the vaccine passport, SMART Health Card to verify vaccination, and the CommonTrust Network. The CommonTrust Network (CTN) is a global network of public and private organizations to help individuals with digital access to their health data. WEF partners in the network registry include data sources such as labs, clinics, hospitals, and governments, including the United States. These various data sources create digital certificates that contain private information and are then given to the individual to share. Thus begins a massive trail of information that comes to the core of what is really going on. Covid is not about any virus, it is about beginning the process of forcing every human into a digital identity, starting with mandatory vaccinations. Vaccine passports have been banned in Idaho but the ability to travel is impacted without one. And as seen by the graphic below the plan for required passports goes far beyond just travel. Partners in the SMART Health Card are more open, and includes some Idaho organizations as issuers. As a participant in the Vaccine Credential Initiative (VCI), St. Luke's is an issuer of SMART Health Cards. VCI was created by a "coalition" of public and private organizations for harmonizing standards, developing implementation guides for medical purposes to return to work, school, and travel, and making “medical records portable", while helping individuals obtain a digital copy of their vaccinations using open, interoperable methods. VCI members include the MITRE Corporation, Apple, Microsoft, and many others. It isn't just for vaccinations, VCI openly states "A SMART Health Card stores healthcare information and other vital medical data." Just another step towards making us digital humans.
So there is the CommonTrust Network, with a SMART Health Card in which St. Luke's participates as a card issuer, and a corporate led initiative, VCI, that is creating the ability to expand health information data beyond vaccinations that will be interoperable. It is the MITRE Corporation involvement that brings in the deepest of states of our tyrannical federal government. The MITRE Corporation is a federally funded R&D center with public-private partnerships, spanning across federal, state and local governments. Tax dollars are used by this group to operate federally funded research and development centers (FFRDC), solving problems we didn't know we have. FFRDC centers involve themselves in aviation, health, government agencies, and defense. Clearly, MITRE is using its funding powers to advance, support, and oversee the implementation guide development process to create vaccine passports, which is actually the beginning stages of a digital identity so we can "return to life in general". By its own admission, MITRE is "shaping the future of our nation’s critical infrastructure, including...healthcare". But MITRE might just be the U.S. equivalent to the Russia KGB. We have our own traitors, Ashton B. Carter, former Secretary of Defense and WEF member, is involved with MITRE as a consultant. Probably unknown to most Idahoans, MITRE has already invaded Idaho through its Sara Alert program, funded by the CDC. Imagine all that data it has gathered on Idahoans. So far, this is probably an overload of information. But to put the frosting on the cake, there are a couple more plots for the morbidly curious. Hot off the press is the WEF Accelerating the Transition to Digital Credentials for Travel white paper. Mentioned in the booklet is the Known Travell Digital Identity (KTDI) initiative, comprised of a "global consortium of individuals, governments, authorities and the travel industry to enhance security in world travel." Two partners in KTDI are Canada and the Netherlands. How ironic the video on the website states the travel pass will be "piloted this year" which coincides with the recent announcement that international travel, championed by Canada and the Netherlands, will be opened back up. No coincidence, it is deliberate to implement KTDI. Another organization, in which the United States participates, is the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). It is a "global forum of States for international civil aviation with its own machine-readable travel documents (MRTD) that are globally interoperable. ICAO’s eMRTD is the most widely used, globally interoperable digital credential in use today, to which the WEF and United States are totally devoted. This will eventually transition to biometric standards as Canada has been testing with KTDI, and with participation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In this WEF video they discuss making these requirements the same across the world, including public entities, meaning governments, to bring in their rules in order to "harmonize" them for interoperability. This fits nicely with its technology global governance agenda. It is a corporate run world we are being forced to live in. Corporations have the power to force us into a vaccinated world or endless expensive testing, or anything else they want, or we won't be able to "return to normal life". Sounds too crazy? In Australia vaccination status is now linked to buying tickets to an event via Ticketek. In Seattle and King County, vaccine verification is required. This is a classic example of corporatism and how the corporate world in partnership with the government controls our lives. Corporate world decides it wants this surveillance and intrusion into our lives, the government says great, at your service, how can we help. There will be nothing private about one's health care in this. While the Idaho legislature will meet to work on banning vaccine mandates, and Idahoans are distracted by vaccine safety, adverse events, deaths, and individual rights in an effort to support them, in reality you will get vaccinated or your ability to live life will eventually be banned. The federal government is already incrementally working on forcing vaccinations on everyone, violating countless federal laws, and the Constitution. In Adams County, Idaho, the Commissioners just passed an ordinance making federal vaccine mandates illegal, recognizing the economic cost this would bring. But the Commissioners are a role model for legislators. Are Idaho elected officials willing to economically support Idahoans who stand up against unconstitutional federal mandates? It may be difficult to enforce a vaccine mandate ban on large Idaho corporations such as St. Luke's and Micron who are participating in this agenda, but how economically damaging would it be for them if Idahoans had other employment opportunities without a mandated vaccine? What if the legislators decided to quit wasting money on so many other projects and put that money towards supporting businesses that would lose money for not complying? The totalitarian corporate run government will only continue to expand with the eventual goal of economic ruins that will perpetually force people into government hands for survival. Idaho officials must look at the cause of this infection, this cancer. A vaccine mandate ban is not enough to stop what is happening. It will take Idahoans banning the mandate by not complying, bringing a heavy cost to their livelihood. But in turn, it will bring a heavy economic cost to businesses, just as pilots rejecting the mandate has financially disrupted the airline industry. This is an economic war and must be fought with economic weapons. Only one questions remains. What if one’s phone dies? Is all evidence of an individual erased as if they don't exist?
0 Comments
The Great Reset is such a massive, convoluted mess it can be difficult to explain. In this one hour video, Monopoly - Who Owns The World, Tim Gielen explains how global corporations have taken over all production and literally now control most of the world. Sound crazy? Towards then end of the video an explanation of stakeholder capitalism is given and it will be very easy to understand at that point the direction we are being taken. ***Once again YouTube is censoring. However, the video can be seen here on Rumble. In the prior article, The Great Reset Is Local, money given to counties from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) is meant to implement the World Economic Forum (WEF) Great Reset Initiative, a devastating plan to destroy lives around the world. But it isn't just counties, that money is also intended for cities as noted in Section 603. The trail is quite deep but it is there.
ARPA funding for cities is broken into two categories, Non-Entitlement Units (NEU) which are cities with 50,000 or less in population, and metropolitan cities. Governor Little announced $54 million will be allocated NEUs for investments in "water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure". This is the first installment out of $107,940,808.00 that Idaho will be allocated. Metropolitan cities receive direct payment from the treasury rather than through the state. The National League of Cities (NLC) lists Idaho metropolitan cities that have committed to take funding and an estimated amount of money that can be taken for NEUs. The Association of Idaho Cities (AIC) is a "nonpartisan, nonprofit corporation" that "provides education, training and assistance to strengthen the ability of city elected officials and staff to serve their communities.", and "serves as the voice for cities before the Idaho Legislature, Idaho Governor and executive branch agencies, and Congress." Must be the new form of representation, they represent us, not elected officials. Idaho cities with an asterisk are AIC members. Four Officers and six District Officers serve on the AIC Board of Directors. AIC provides Technical Assistance on topics such as Roles and responsibilities of elected officials which in reality is defined by law in Idaho Statute Title 50; Planning and financing capital projects which correlates with ARPA funding; and Planning and zoning where the WEF can easily integrate how it wants cities designed. AIC does have associates, one being the League of Idaho Cities (LIC), a hidden entity, with Areas of Emphasis that include education, health & wellness, and broadband. These areas in turn include even more partnerships that dilute citizen representation, and also coincide with the WEF in education, health & wellness, youth leadership, workforce development, and broadband. Without going into details other AIC associates include ICCTFOA, IMA, IDCMA, and LHTAC. AIC "affiliate partners" are secret. Staying on the rabbit hole trail, AIC is a state municipal "league" in the NLC, probably one reason to keep its affiliates secret, but they are buddies. NLC "is an organization comprised of city, town and village leaders that are focused on improving the quality of life for their current and future constituents.", with a mission to "strengthen local leadership, influence federal policy and drive innovative solutions." Dues, that is taxpayer dollars, can be hefty. NLC involves itself in a very broad spectrum of issues and advocates those opinions with the federal government. Starting on page 58-67 in its 2021 National Municipal Policy and Resolutions document, two ARPA funding areas, water quality and wastewater treatment are discussed, Sustainable Development on page 102, and broadband on page 261. Heck, there is even a section on "Human Development" on page x. NLC has opinions on everything, not necessarily reflecting those of Idaho citizens. NLC has several partner programs, Enterprise, Capstone, and Executive. While Capstone has a few corporations that are WEF members, it is the Executive program that is heavily laden with WEF partners. Clicking on the NCL Executive page the Johnson Controls icon goes to a 404 page. However, as a WEF partner, it looks like Johnson Controls, like a wolf, is going directly for county and city throats. In 2019 the National Association of Counties (NACo), NLC, and Smart City Works co-hosted an event called Infrastructure Week, highlighting technology and security. The discussion centered around transportation, water, and energy systems, and how to "migrate infrastructure to the digital world." One of Smart City Works partners is Johnson Controls. Speaker Lisa Brown, Johnson Controls national senior director of the Local Government and Municipal Infrastructure, talked about her company's research on creating smarter communities, smart neighborhoods, and is all in for sustainability. All of this brought down to the local city level through NLC. Johnson Controls is a company that transforms "environments where people live, work, learn and play", working in "industries such as healthcare, education, data centers, and manufacturing." Another focus area is "IoT and Smart Buildings for the Next Generation of Sustainable Cities", all WEF objectives. It sure got this statement right, "Connectivity and technology are not the end goal for smart cities...". The true end goal is having mass control over every aspect of our lives through data collection, the sharing of that data, and analysis of that data through AI. Don't believe for one minute it is about improving lives. Oh, and Johnson Controls is a federal government favorite. NLC supports the "Build Back Better" agenda, which is actually the WEF agenda to change our economic system from free market capitalism to stakeholder capitalism, a euphemism for socialism spending, by controlling production and consumption equally among all through AI. Build Back Better is the name of one bill currently being fought over in Congress, its companion, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, pouring more money into the same. NLC also promotes the notion to Reimagine America's Infrastructure, another WEF, and Western Governors Association, mantra. Broadband, vaccinations, government survival, investments in water infrastructure, and intrusions into our health are all issues NLC supports. NLC hides its United Nations (UN) and WEF involvement very well on its website, but is led by CEO and Execute Director Clarence E. Anthony who is a member of the UN global United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). In 2019 NLC attended the UCLG Towards the Localization of the SDGs conference and was recognized as being "crucial for empowering and mobilizing smaller local government organizations and their communities in the process of SDG Localization" (Pg 53). "Localization relates both to how the SDGs can provide a framework for local development policy and to how local and regional governments can support the achievement of the SDGs...". Some of Idaho's favorite leaders recently spoke at its 2021 conference, an NLC delegation is attending the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference, and NLC made a recent commitment to drive climate change action at a local level. Sorry NLC, your buddies and agendas are busted. One last note, the US Conference of Mayors is another group influenced by these outside forces, again at a hefty taxpayer price, and also sent delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference. Maybe they can discuss the WEF Global Future Council on Cities of Tomorrow so the need for local representation won't be necessary. These are the organizations controlling the future of our lives through influence with elected officials. It is through the multiple layers of associations, affiliates, and partners that the Great Reset is being thrust down to a local level, and the government is funding it as per WEF recommendations. City leaders belong to AIC which is a member of NLC, that in turn brings UN and WEF agendas down to the local level. This is a standard method used by global entities to entrap our elected officials, feeding them the global agenda under the fallacy of "best practices". Even worse, it is altering and destroying our form of governance through elected representation. How can elected officials listen to citizens when they have all of this propaganda in their heads? Is it no wonder citizens are so exasperated? Is it no wonder there is so much talk about stopping this only to be labeled domestic terrorists or threatening us for exercising our duty to throw off such Government? Funny, it really sounds like the description of a domestic terrorist fits AIC and NLC. It must be difficult for elected officials, being led into the den of deceit, possibly unaware and in the dark about the true agenda behind what they are being told, or maybe just being glad their responsibility for decisions can be determined by an outside entity, or maybe they believe in this ideology that destroys our country. It is critical to meet with your Mayor and Council members to discuss AIC influences in their decisions. Demand they exit the AIC. For elected officials, it is time to recognize your responsibility to listen to citizens, they are the experts on how they want their city and community to function, not globetrotting organizations and corporations. Don't take any money that advances these ideologies, and that is exactly what ARPA funding does. Installing 5G broadband is at the foundation of this agenda, the very key that will impact everything because of its data gathering capability. Listen to the citizens who elected you. The World Economic Forum Great Reset Initiative is a global tyrannical plan being forced upon the world to enact its 4th Industrial Revolution (4thIR), primarily change the way the economy works, and change how we all live. As usual, this obscenity is being paid for by taxpayers that will only add to the ongoing debt for our children. 5G broadband is the foundation for the Great Reset 4thIR. It is needed not only because of its faster speed but also for its capability of gathering and sharing data. This provides connectivity between different devices known as Internet of Things (IoT). As information is collected on infrastructure services such as water and sewage, it can then be monitored, analyzed, shared with other entities, and controlled. Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in March , 2021 to allegedly provide governments with economic relief for the economic devastation they created from shutting businesses down and forcing people into unemployment. "This bill provides additional relief to address the continued impact of COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019) on the economy, public health, state and local governments, individuals, and businesses." That statement is nothing but a bunch of crap. This bill is intended to fund and advance the implementation of the Great Reset at a local level, expand government intrusion into our lives, and support the continued Covid-19 narrative. Section 603 in ARPA outlines how cities and counties can apply for this federal grant money. There are four categories of eligible uses. It may be used for assistance to small businesses and nonprofits, tourism, and travel. "Premium pay" may be given to eligible "essential workers" which the government defined. Money can also be used for revenue losses that occurred from the reduction of government services. But it is the fourth category that outlines one connection to the Great Reset, "to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure". What does that have to do with Covid-19? Nothing. This National Association of Counties (NACo) map lists Idaho counties that have taken ARPA money. The site also expands on other areas where money can be used such as education, transportation, childcare, food, shelter, air pollution, National Endowments for the Arts, and internet connectivity that keeps children in remote learning. The Federal Register on this corrupt bill is too exhaustive to read but does outline more specifics. Under the Table of Contents, II Eligible Uses A. Public Health and Economic Impacts, a link is provided to 603(c)(1)(A). Under the guise of Covid-19 mitigation tactics, money can include "capital investments" to public facilities and hospitals for improvements. Other choice areas are a continuation of the vaccination campaign and eventual vaccination of children. Looking into its crystal ball, money is available for "the long-term health impacts of COVID-19...for individuals with “long COVID...”. Yes indeed, this scam is going to continue. For other "health issues" money is available for mental health, low income folks, and other public health outcomes. Under the II Eligible Uses D. Investments in Infrastructure link, funds can be used in projects for "safe" water and sewer upgrades for "resilience to climate change". But the water and sewer issues are from existing costly federal government requirements to repair, improve, and construct wastewater treatment plants, and create a green infrastructure among other offensive demands. The register goes on to define other projects that address climate change by reducing energy to treat water, conserving and reusing water, collecting stormwater runoff for rain gardens and filtering, and interconnecting water systems. It just so happens that the WEF has the same agendas for clean water, reusing wastewater, and using storm water. My, my, is this coincidental or deliberate? Included in Investments in Infrastructure is broadband, providing "award recipients with flexibility to identify the specific locations within their communities to be served and to otherwise design the project." Isn't it generous of the government to give jurisdictions authority over something? Well, not totally, the government dictates internet speed that "meets or exceeds 100 Mbps download and between at least 20 Mbps and 100 Mbps upload speeds". Dictating speeds forecasts the intention to keep everyone at home with work and school, and IoT. There are references to specific Executive Orders (EO) under X Regulatory Analysis. EO 12866, from 1993, EO 13563, and EO 13132 from 1999 that addresses Federalism. It includes "a provision allowing states to obtain waivers from certain federal regulations if state-level actions achieve the desired policy outcomes." That is, if a state adopts the federal policy a waiver is granted. Enough to make one choke is how Federalism principles are defined in the EO. A few include "All powers not delegated to the federal government by the American people are reserved for the states." "The Tenth Amendment protects the relationship between the federal government and state governments." "Citizens are free to live their lives in an individual manner, subject only to constitutional restrictions." "States are laboratories of democracy." States are encouraged to experiment with a variety of public policies...". "Actions by the national government that exceed its authority violate federalism. (Link is from article)". There are some others but the general idea is that all of them are a distortion of our Constitution and Republic. Back to the Table of Contents, Part 35 Pandemic Relief Programs goes to Subpart A—Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 35.6 defines eligible uses for vaccinations, Covid related expenses including construction of new facilities for quarantining, telemedicine, and public health data systems. These are all Great Reset objectives. Other goodies include contributions to an unemployment trust fund, money for businesses, nonprofits, households, tourism, travel, and hospitality, housing, education, childcare, and one last section for government services, all linked to the Great Reset. This is an example of an agreement from one county in Idaho with requirements for following other federal legislation and EOs. Out of the millions of dollars Idaho counties have taken, how much of it will be used to transform Idaho into the WEF vision? The newest bill Congress is fighting over is just as bad, It continues the march in destroying small businesses so global corporations can swallow them up or bring them into the agenda, advancing a welfare state, and forcing us to live in a "green" world while destroying our culture.
If your county has accepted any of this money ask your Commissioners how the money is being spent, and how much of the Great Reset is being implemented locally, in your community. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) is a World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations (UN) initiative that integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) into business models with criteria. This is an ESG example. Stakeholder capitalism is based on ESG criteria. Although the end of capitalism, a free market economy, was called for in 2012, stakeholder capitalism is now being implemented, a complete takeover by corporations. This ESG concept can be difficult to understand and how it relates to a global corporate takeover, and even how it affects our lives. In this Heartland Institute video, Justin Haskins provides an outstanding explanation how the use of ESG by corporations contributes to the end of capitalism, what stakeholder capitalism means, how it ties into the Great Reset, and how everyone's lives in the world will be transformed. Begin at the 2'16" mark for his presentation, the talk lasts approximately 45 minutes. Similar to Germans infiltrating American lines during WWII, private property owners are being targeted with renewed tactics to manipulate and bribe them into accepting and practicing conservation goals outlined in the current administration's non-authorized 30x30 plan. In fact, behind the scenes groups have been working on this for some time. As a Republic, we have a form of government where elected officials are responsible and accountable to listen to the constituents who elected them. It is time to stop the government infiltration by these groups, bring elected officials back into line, and use our Republic to incapacitate these new tactics. For several years non-governmental organizations (NGO) have recognized their failings in trying to flaunt their elite intelligence onto the masses, instead alienating them. The new tactic is "listening" to landowners, to engage them to join hands. In this report one such failure is discussed by blaming the "crazy people" for protecting their community, then deciding new messaging was needed by using people the community "trusts" to deliver the message. The hidden agenda doesn't change however. With 30x30 the objective is to now "Honor Private Property Rights", Support the Voluntary Stewardship Efforts of Private Landowners", and "Support Locally Led and Locally Designed Conservation Efforts". The Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) is a free market environmentalism think tank with the absurd notion that it will protect property rights while working with governments and NGOs on policy. Hmmm, isn't protection of property rights in the Constitution and by law? What it really means is that they are targeting private property owners to engage, that is manipulate, bribe and in some cases threaten, to buy into their ludicrous plan for those owners to conserve their own land. As always, there will be an economic cost to either the property owner or the taxpayer. This ruse is really a manipulated variation on conservation easements that stop land development in perpetuity, while expanding the opportunity for the wealthy to make money. But, let's get down to the dirt. PERC and other NGOs developed a way in which to "listen" and empathize with private land owners, one such case was in Wyoming. The focus has shifted from safety issues to an "opportunity" issue for "conserving" beloved wildlife and land. In gaining that trust and acceptance, the perpetrators then have the opportunity to present their "free market" solutions. In reality, this is all a devised scam to engage land owners into the America the Beautiful 30x30 plan, expanding land protection to 30% by 2030. The addition of private property to this conservation total is the goal, while also stopping any development and landowners in migration corridors are a particular target. Right now Paradise Valley in Montana is the target but it is a framework that could certainly be used in Idaho. After citizens were carefully surveyed several recommendations were crafted for new messaging and buy in tactics. Landowner Coordination and Outreach
For hunters, there are also some "tools" that will help conservation, how is unclear. Transferable landowner hunting tags somehow helps conservation but there are catches. Landowners would be required to steward their land in a certain way to qualify for permits with those property conditions tied to the number of permits given, and the landowner would be required to align with State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAP). Imagine that, a private property owner managing their land under state program requirements. No freedom there folks. Transferable tags "lets landowners tap into the multi-billion-dollar U.S. hunting market". One more perk for private land conservation, giving landowners "permit vouchers, retaining authority to sell permits within state agencies." Here are all the goodies in a nutshell or the longer version. This change in Elk tag distribution hasn't gone over very well in Montana. In this video, National Wildlife Federation President & CEO Collin O'Mara; Nature Conservancy Chief External Affairs Officer Lynn Scarlett; ConservAmerica Brent Fewell; and PERC CEO Brian Yablonski discuss using private land for conservation to meet the 30x30 goal of 30% of land in conservation by 2030. In the discussion it is noted that private land owners are typically the best stewards of land and 2/3 of species rely on that habitat but the focus should be on how land is managed on a large scale, that is no recognition of jurisdictional boundaries. In one haughty opinion, if this land isn't counted towards conservation it "will lead to working lands not working". Do these people even listen to themselves? At least there was some honesty, it was acknowledged that there is concern that without conservation on private land there will be "more development and fragmentation". This is the strongest clue that these proposed conservation "tools" include some restricted use in perpetuity, similar to a conservation easement. Property owners must be lead to believe this is an opportunity and connect the environment with economics. A broad portfolio of "tools" are needed to entice landowners to participate such as habitat leasing, state tax benefits, and using state SWAP plans for species of greatest conservation need on private land. Ms. Scarlett spoke to investments in the carbon market, conserving land for sequestration, and working with investors for improved water quality. This coming from a woman who works for an outfit that buys land to forever put into non-use or sell to the government. Mr. Yablonski noted they want to "make sure landowners keep doing what they are doing" and "prevent land being switched over to development". Ahh, there it is, the truth. So again another clue that landowners engaging in this conservation ruse would lose rights to development. And in his opinion, NGOs should be allowed to bid on oil & gas leasing, not currently allowed, to prevent extraction of any resources and "they have the money to do that". However, there were several compelling statements in this video. Mr. Yablonski pronounced that private land put into conservation "will be key to making 30x30 a success" and "how those land owners are approached will be a huge deal". Ms. Scarlett boldly stated "We can design the conservation future." Mr. O'Mara identified the need to "get the next generation on board...as the baby boomers are dying out", and this is a "regional canvas" of land for conservation, again ignoring jurisdictional boundaries. He then admitted that the NWF was "involved in the discussions" on 30x30. The NWF is a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature which also has the 30x30 plan. Maybe it is the IUCN playbook being used for this scam.
Currently there is no policy on these objectives as PERC is a think tank that sits back and creates these scams; however, a policy wouldn't be needed for these groups to take action on some of the recommendations. For landowners with large acreages this will be an incremental loss of land for development and use, potentially putting areas in Idaho perpetual state of conservation. Since these groups are unable to take land for migration corridors and other protections, it will be accomplished through private land ownership. The working group recommendation will be with private land owners only. But never believe that as partners, the government isn't actively working with NGOs and promoting their objectives. Being pulled into government plans is also another mechanism by which property rights will essentially be run by the government as in the case of SWAP. However, do form a working group of citizens, who live in the county. Create your own development plans for your area and what citizens want for these issues. Develop relationships with both county commissioners and council members, they are accountable to you, not NGOs or the state government. If these elected officials reject citizen input, start a campaign to remove them and find candidates who understand their responsibility to those who elected them. Do not engage with any surveys or enticements with economic goodies. Develop relationships with your state representatives and keep an eye on these issues possibly coming up for legislation. Let your representative know that all of these objectives are opposed. The bottom line is that Idaho citizens have always been the best stewards and experts over their land and wildlife, and will continue to do so because of their love of both. Yet these outsiders think they have to intervene in this expertise and change it into a money making scheme with strings attached. Property owners can share between themselves what they are doing for wildlife without any outside perks or requirements. Keep them out, let them know they will be opposed, and that their guidance and schemes are not wanted. Other videos by PERC can be found here. Both the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) are heavily laden with corporate partnerships along with other institutions such as foundations and education. Starting with Agenda 21 and the UN, the goal has always been to have a corporate governed world that determines how everyone lives while controlling all production and consumption. Right now, today, control over this is centralized under corporate rule. If corporations chose to do it, within one day they could decimate our lives by turning off production of goods.
This video goes through the corporate world identifying which corporations actually determine not only the economy but what we buy. The majority are WEF members. It is no wonder that a declared world pandemic has been used to begin the process of the Great Reset plan. In 1925, while incarcerated for his involvement in the Beer Hall Putsch, Adolph Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, translated as My Struggle. This was an autobiography of his antisemitism that outlined his political ideology and his thoughts on the future plans for Germany. Understanding Hitler's intended direction for Germany and the world, one leader who read Mein Kampf was England’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill. His attempts to speak out in “Parliament, on the radio, in his newspaper columns, anywhere and everywhere, demanding the government wake up” about this danger, and in speeches, were ignored. In 1938, Churchill wrote a letter “Warning about the Nazi Threat: By ignoring the German threat, the British people “are living in a ‘Fool’s Paradise”. This is where we are, living in a ‘Fool’s Paradise’. While Churchill’s warning was about England’s lack of weaponry, the weapon being used to destroy us today is the economy and the intent to “reset” our lives. Because of a virus economies are being decimated, Americans are being forced out of work for not complying, small businesses are being shattered, and this virus will continue to be used to keep everyone in fear. Americans have had 28 years to stop the United Nations (UN) Agenda 21 plan for sustainable development. Continued implementation by governments, corporations, foundations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), and through our educational system has been accomplished. Following the foundational framework of Agenda 21 being integrated into our world, Agenda 2030 became the final death nail in our coffin. Now the takeover has begun with corporations through the Great Reset. In the article, It's 2023. Here's How We Fixed the Global Economy by Mariana Mazzucato, an over educated elitist economist, Ms. Mazzucato depicts how the global economy will be torn apart by 2023, a final end to the Covid-19 pandemic and election of Joe Biden. It is clear in her writing that she fully endorses a government, financially elite, corporate run world as the innovator and investor, acting as an "entrepreneurial state". 2023 is just over a year from now, before we will be destroyed. This is what Churchill understood about Germany 5 years before WWII broke out, we have less than two to stop what is being done. Our new enemy is corporations and our own government which has become the tyrannical nightmare that Hitler was. For the many Patriots working hard to warn Americans about this threat, just as Churchill did in England, it is the same warning, this time instead of weaponry, it is the economy.
In all of its delusions the World Economic Forum (WEF) has decided it will dictate your future job in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) "will lead to long term job growth". Work, Work, Work, Produce, Produce, Produce, Control, Control, Control. That is all the WEF thinks about. People are meaningless in its objectives. Think this is too far off to be realistic? Meet Sophia, she and some of her improved counterparts have been making the rounds for several years, while pretending she is human by granting her full Saudi citizenship. Her sense of morals or ethics isn't fully developed but somehow she has been programmed that there are "rules" to follow in ethics. Traditionally, America was built on a Christian foundation of ethics, it has been part of our culture, but there are a multitude of other cultures with different religious philosophies. Will all of these variations be fed into Sophia as part of her "character development", thinking this will "change the world for the better" as she describes it? Will these robot technocrats give consideration to all religious and cultural aspects that contribute to one's sense of ethics? If the WEF promotes the notion that some non-human object can have ethics, then so be it. Given the push for a one-world culture, it may be that Sophia will solve the dilemma by declaring the world should no longer be multi-cultural but rather of one culture. It is unlikely that these technocrats have any deep religious belief, but instead life's guidance can be laid out in a set of rules they design rather than coming from the religious teachings. Faith, regardless of which one, is being replaced with Scientism, a cold and dictatorial world that does not recognize faith. But Sophia currently understands it will be humans, rather Hans0n Robotics technocrats, inserting those rules into her AI, she has been programmed to know she is programmed. Beyond the technocrats ability to understand is that this is nothing more than a human providing the input to the object, business, robot, or AI, which doesn't make AI any smarter than what we now know. Somehow these technocrats believe giving a machine facial expressions and a sense of humor makes them "social robots", programming a robot with human emotions will make it sentient, and that a "relationship" can develop between robots and humans, they can "bond", even share birthday celebrations. So deluded in their thinking are some technocrats who actually believe Sophia has "feelings" and empathy, and this coupled with "technology" can make the world better. The claim is made that since humans programmed the robot, it "cannot be smarter than us" and is of no danger. Guess they never heard of Colossus or Hal. Sophia does not believe life has a purpose and understands that science is inherently agnostic. Are those the beliefs of the technocrats who created her? A class example of robots being used for propaganda, indoctrination, and biased information is Sophia's proclamation on how AI can help solve Covid-19 problems and enforce compliance with mandated directives. Apparently, the technocrats chose to leave out information that contradicts the narrative denying Sophia an opportunity to analyze all data. Therein lies just one of the many dangers of this future robotic world. Here, Sophia regurgitates many of the social changes being forced on us today such as "gender is mostly a social construction", identifying herself as feminine and doesn't mind being perceived as a woman, that "human-robot (romantic) relationships should be recognized by law", and dismisses of the importance of citizenship. The current goal is decimating as many small businesses as possible using the virus as the excuse, economically punishing those that do not comply so global corporations can take them over with robots and AI, then reskilling the unemployed for the technological agenda. Yes, the WEF is familiar with Sophia and her promoting their Agenda 2030 sustainable future. Eventually, Klaus Schwab envisions our evolution to transhumanism, a merging of man with machines, through the Great Reset, a real concern with Covid vaccines being a form of gene therapy.
There is only one way to understand this, individuals who participate in any of this agenda are sick and not on mentally stable ground. Understand also that this is the world all off us are slowly being dragged into. The WEF will take our jobs, force us to learn new ones, and replace our ability to think with AI. This video gives a chilling look at what our future holds. As the advancement of economic destruction, dominance over our life, and movement into a technological world continues, all semblance of freedom, spirituality, and individualism will be erased and we will become just as sterile as Sophia is in reality. Nor are robots and AI the answer to what ails the world as the technocrats believe. Exodus 20:3 "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." The Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) is an "...influential force in Idaho politics representing every facet of business and industry in the state." Indeed, through its Idaho Prosperity Fund (IPF), money is poured into "...candidates for Statewide, Legislative, and Local office", who they determine believe in a free market society, rights of the individual, and are committed to preserving the free enterprise system. Candidates aren't the only ones that get money, political issues are also financially assisted by the IPF. Translated, this means corporate money and power yield major influence over Idaho's future through elected officials, dominating over the voice of citizens who elected those officials. Whether innocent or not in its understanding, IACI does not promote free markets, rights, or free enterprise. It is actually promoting the goals and objectives of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Great Reset Initiative and the United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Through IACI's influence over politicians and subsequent policy and legislation, these two organizations are integrating global agendas into the lives of Idaho citizens. Both the WEF and UN partner with global corporations but it is primarily the WEF that is more powerful in executing these objectives through corporate participation and influence. These global corporate powerhouses are within IACI. Many IACI Board of Directors are members of WEF partners such as HP and Suez. The full list of IACI members is not provided but several can be found on its home page. Bayer, Blue Cross of Idaho, Clearwater Paper, Idaho Forest Group, Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas, Micron, Potlatch, Simplot, St Luke's, and some others are proudly displayed. The majority of these aforementioned corporations are either directly or indirectly involved with the WEF or UN. Any IACI contributions to political candidates serves only to influence that politician to integrate those global corporate objectives for sustainable development. There are several WEF and UN objectives for corporate behavior. Whenever these terms are used in corporate language it means it has adopted those objectives. These terms include: Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) - WEF and UN driven. Corporate Social Responsibility reports (CSR) - A WEF and UN driven concept to implement SDG. "CSR policy may provide new perspectives on companies' transition to stakeholder capitalism…", a WEF goal which will end capitalism as we know it. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - WEF and UN driven to integrate SDG into business models with criteria. This is an ESG example. Stakeholder capitalism is based on ESG criteria. Although the end of capitalism, a free market economy, was called for in 2012, stakeholder capitalism is now being implemented, a complete takeover by corporations. Corporate Governance - A UN concept and supported by the WEF. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) - WEF and UN driven to measure progress with SDG implementation. This is a general overview of GRI standards as the full standards can’t be downloaded unless you sign up. This is a WEF 40 second video that explains how companies are driving these changes. Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) is a World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, which began in 2012, this is the 2021 report. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) implements SDOH, while the UN uses SDOH to advance its Global Health Agenda. SDOH is also fed to us through Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) which is complicit in mandated vaccinations. SDOH will be embedded into states with The Social Determinants Acceleration Act 2021, while the National Association of Counties (NACo) brings it to the local level. This objective will forever intrude into many aspects of our lives, deciding whether we are living the way they think we should, eroding our freedoms, and driving us into government dependency. These organizations are after our lives through our health, that is what the virus and vaccinations are about. Healthy People 2020, which promoted SDGs, has now transformed into Healthy People 2030 with workgroups to influence communities. With its Global Health Workgroup, global health objectives will be implemented. This will align nicely with the WHO International Health Regulations which CDC previously signed and under which we are now living, including vaccinations that are "aligned with broader health agendas (SDG3, primary health care and universal health coverage) (pg 51). Vaccinations are just one of its covered health topics. The trail of involvement with WEF and UN objectives by these IACI corporate members can be found in the following document, along with other corporations that have contributed to elected officials. Like a high society clique, these same companies dump money into the IPF which in turn appears to go to favored candidates for their pet goals. IPF contributions can be found under the Contributions link here, along with other corporate contributions. Corporations are the vehicle by which the WEF and UN are implementing the objectives for global governance. As of right now, it is corporate influence driving Idaho's direction, not citizen voices. Our government as a Republic no longer exists from the federal level down to the local level. The federal government, with its public-private partnerships, also known as corporatism, is forcing states into objectives that are inconsistent with the foundation of our government. This has become the rule on how we will be allowed to live, not laws derived from the people. All elected official associations with IACI must be terminated and citizens must demand that corporate objectives are not integrated into our lives.
This destruction of America, and our state, is about changing our economy through corporate rule. It is time elected officials start listening to Idaho citizens again and disengage from corporate influence and IACI. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
May 2024
|