Knowing the federal government has admitted its commitment to the implementation of Agenda 2030, it becomes easier to recognize how Congress aligns with the dictates of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). H. R. 6572, Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023, introduced by a Republican, is legislation that promotes "the competitiveness of the United States related to the deployment, use, application, and competitiveness of blockchain technology or other distributed ledger technology." While Rep. Buschon tends to focus on supply chains as the need for blockchain technology, it really is just one stepping stone towards blockchain technology for everything, in which this article outlines the purpose of the bill more accurately. In fact, the bill text doesn't even really address supply chain issues. None the less, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has offered up a framework for blockchain implementation. What is repulsive in the legislative text is the involvement by non-governmental organizations, "private sector individuals and entities", while "incorporating" expertise from industry. It is also intended to support the "private sector, the public sector, and public-private partnerships." Good old corporatism, or what some may call fascism, or corporate fascism. Blockchain creates a permanent digital ledger of everything a person does in life in blocks that are connected to each other in a chain. Essentially, each block contains information on every aspect of a person's life. Financial transactions are the most common understanding of how blockchains work, documenting everything one earns, spends, and buys in perpetuity and are needed for the implementation of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). With blockchain, legal transactions and documents are stored forever. Health records can be stored for access by any medical provider or hospital. What medical and other blockchain information would be available to the government for those on public assistance, Social Security, Medicaid, or Medicare? The devastating aspect is that all of these digital records on a blockchain require a digital ID. Without one, the ability exists to lock someone out of life if they don't participate. The option of not complying will be termination of life as access to the necessities of life would be cut off. CBDC blockchains would take control over personal finances and local banking. The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) understands this, and the privacy concerns it would bring is recognized by the American Bankers Association (ABA), CBDCs "would move money away from banks and into accounts at the Federal Reserve". Putting blockchain legislation into effect advances the goal of CBDCs. The current White House has been pushing for a CBDC system, but Congress and others are working to stop it, and preventing the government from collecting personal financial information on everyone. Both the UN and WEF expect Digital Cooperation for advancement of the SDG. Not only does this include blockchain technology but Internet of Things, and Internet of Everything. In 2022, WEF held a panel discussion on digital cooperation. To demonstrate how out of touch these blankety-blanks are, Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins states at the 16" mark that the pandemic proved that even though locked down we can still be educated, receive healthcare, conduct financial transactions, and we don't have to move to get a job. At the 22:41" mark Microsoft President Brad Smith acknowledges they can "turn off the ability to keep people alive". Lastly, at the 26:31" mark Chinese politician Josephine Teo states it is the role of the government to step in on consumer pricing, and corporations should work with the government on regulations at the 29" mark. Do they even listen to what they are saying? Listen carefully, they are discussing the world they envision for others. What does this all have to do with blockchain? Well, blockchain is just another piece of the puzzle that will complete the transformation to an all surveilled digital life. Everyone would be forced into that life, and connected. It is part of reaching SDG #9, Build Resilient Infrastructure, Promote Inclusive and Sustainable Industrialization and Foster Innovation, Target 9.8. In spite of being touted as an ideal system, blockchain doesn't come without problems. such as slow response times, sucking up large amounts of energy, potential for hacking, required technology experts to manage it, and issues with interoperability, The White House is rapidly moving forward with this digital agenda, ensuring everyone has internet. In the last paragraph, the White House (while remaining "committed to the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda"), also commits to Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), another UN and WEF scheme. DPI networks all of these systems together through its three main components, digital identity, electronic payment, and data exchange systems. DPI is important because it accelerates SDG implementation. If the United States doesn't conform to what is happening around the rest of the world, will the United States become an isolated island of freedom?
0 Comments
Not enough has been written about or discussed, and that is the issue of technocracy which is the management of society by technical experts, or social engineering. Patrick Wood, the leading expert on technocracy, in in this video describes a historical review of how the Trilateral Commission has been a core of the movement towards the current technocratic state. Even though the video was made in 2013, it is easily seen how much farther we have moved towards a complete surveillance state for control. The World Health Organization (WHO) will be voting on the Pandemic "Agreement" (which was cleverly renamed as an agreement to avoid required Senate advise and consent if named a Treaty), and revision of the International Health Regulations (IHR) beginning May 27. For ease of reading, this is a shortened version of the agreement. Heck, some of the draconian measures were suggested by the United States.
Many experts are warning about the danger of both documents, especially to U.S. sovereignty. There is also suspicion that the revised IHR are only for the purpose of benefiting corporate profits. While the sham continues that the agreement, rather treaty, is something to which the United States must agree, page 25 Article 5 (1) states, "The Parties commit to promote a One Health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response that is coherent, comprehensive, integrated, coordinated and collaborative among relevant actors and sectors" including "...collaboration with WHO, WOAH, FAO, and UNEP, presently known as the quadripartite.” These two provisions, the WHO "One Health" approach, and quadripartite (the U.S. having only met with three of the organizations) have already been adopted and implemented through the U.S. Global Health Security Strategy (pgs 21, 28, 59). So, the claims that the treaty is watered down, or that it won't remove U.S. sovereignty doesn't matter as One Health has already been integrated into government policy including the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, USGS, EPA, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, and probably many others like the CDC. This short video explains One Health. Perhaps the World Economic Forum (WEF) has the easiest explanation, "any surveillance of new disease outbreaks must include humans, animals and planetary changes." That means intrusive and detailed surveillance of everything. As a result, calls for increased regulatory actions are being seen in the food industry with a more bloated government and corporations making a profit supplying the testing and monitoring equipment. When the time comes for any little outbreak there will be corporate profits from the testing, medications, and vaccines, just like what happened with Covid, along with controlling the narrative (pg 46 (c)(vi)). But it is expanded government intrusion and control that will be the most devastating. In fact, the One Health Commission (led by Americans) lays out all the life areas it will impact, and the sponsors of such rubbish include the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and a host of pharmaceutical companies. As noted by the Commission, Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) will play a "critical role" in One Health. Medical providers and hospitals screen everyone for SDOH, snooping into life areas that have nothing to do with your health complaint. This White House Executive Order is also preparing, without legislation, "to maintain United States competitiveness in the global bioeconomy (Sec 3 (h))". This whole infect and treat disease revolving door is its own little economic machine. More states are asserting state rights by opposing this pandemic treaty. Utah and Florida have passed legislation that would effectively prohibit any directives from WHO in their states, and Louisiana and Oklahoma have legislation waiting to be signed. It would behoove Idaho to do the same. Meanwhile, Idaho already endorsed the One Health approach through its One Health Consortium, and the University of Idaho. Representative Tina Lambert and Senator Tammy Nichols put forth HJM 7 this last legislative session, which addressed concerns regarding UN and WEF influence over Idaho, and called for a review of international agreements. It looks like it never made it out of committee. This needs to be brought back as legislation next year with the WHO included. Forty nine Congressional Senators, including Senators Crapo and Risch, signed a letter to the White House this month asking for withdrawal of support for these amendments, and if not, submit any pandemic related agreement to the Senate for advise and consent. Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador, along with 21 other Attorneys General, signed a letter opposing the treaty and IHR as well. The government will continue to be out of control with these pandemic scams. Contact these Senators and give them support. But also, contact your state representatives and strongly request them to initiate legislation that will prohibit any WHO, UN, and WEF directed activity in Idaho, providing the legislation from other states to them as a template. And in the end, if draconian WHO measures are forced through the federal government, refuse to comply. Listen to the enemy, they are telling everyone what they are doing. When will Americans come to face the reality that there is no longer a Republic? According to Semafor, Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is stepping down. He will "transition" a "non-executive chairman role", if the Swiss government approves.
While this should be good news, the most threatening information is that "the organization is “transforming from a convening platform to the leading global institution for public-private cooperation.” One perspective is that WEF will now become the center for governments to enmesh themselves with corporations, a global fascist state. As Catherine Austin Fitts states in this video, this is not a good thing and has concerns the WEF is gearing up for something. There is also some discussion on the upcoming WHO vote on the pandemic treaty. This news will be worth watching. For years, those who have researched Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 have tried to warn everyone about the dangers it poses. At least now it is being fully exposed as the truth. America has been financially drained for decades to implement these agendas, and will continue to be raped for attaining the goals listed in this White House Fact Sheet. It hasn't just been implemented across the world, it has also been implemented in America, "The United States is committed to the full implementation of 2030 Agenda and the SDGs, at home and abroad." And Americans have, and will continue to be paying for both. As the statement says, "full implementation", the complete fruition of these agendas is almost complete with the entire corporate backing of the World Economic Forum. Most likely the loss of America will be by 2030, if not earlier. The Constitution will no longer exist, instead being ruled by Global Governance. As the news focuses on the tantalizing story of former President Trump's hush money trial, the inflated minority antisemitic chaos across campuses which does not reflect the sentiments of 340 million people, and the latest gossip in entertainment, the evil doers continue their march in destroying one inner core of America that is hideously dismantling future representation of America.
The Boy Scouts of America was founded in 1910 by W. D. Boyce, having evolved from the organization in England. For decades this organization was a treasured representation of America, often attached to different religious organizations, building character and integrity in boys. However, over time it has evolved into a neutered group of kids just being taught a Godless altered ideology. Not surprisingly, many of these changes occurred following the adoption of Agenda 21 by George H.W. Bush in 1992. Joining in 1922, the Boy Scouts of America became a member of he World Organization of the Scout Movement (WOSM). The Boy Scouts of the United Nations was created in 1945 for UN diplomats and staff. By 1947, the United Nations (UN) got its hands on the Boy Scouts through WOSM, being granted UN non-government organization (NGO) status, and continues to work with the UN today. There are a bunch of other world groups, the International Department, World Scout Bureau, and World Scout Committee. The Boy Scout badge reflects Duty to God and Country, Duty to Others, and Duty to Self with symbols of American freedom. There is also A World Crest Emblem that all Boy Scouts of America wear "as a symbol of unity and world brotherhood." Changes in the Boy Scouts began in 1973 with the first attempt to have female scout leaders, resulting in a drop in membership. In was also in the 1970's that other changes were made to the program with removal of several outdoor badges and a de-emphasis of the term boy. In 1992, the organization was sued for discrimination, with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2000 that as a private organization it held the "First Amendment right to freedom of "expressive association", meaning an association's right to accept or decline membership based on certain criteria. By 2013 the decision was made to open the doors to all males. This discrimination dispute was ended by the BSA National Executive Board in 2015. Then in in 2017 the decision was made to open the doors to any individual regardless of biological sex, and also expanding to girls. By acknowledging this was no longer an organization for boys, the term boy was removed and the name was changed to Scouts BSA in 2019. It should be no surprise that claims of sexual abuse were rampant by 2020, resulting in bankruptcy of the organization. All of this destruction of what was once a remarkable organization has led to a complete stripping of its founding principles by now changing the name to "Scouting America", a "rebranding" that will go into effect in February, 2025, so there is still time to escape. This change was due to "low membership numbers" which the reason seems to escape understanding by those who caused the problem. It has not been the Boy Scouts for a very long time, it is a kids club, overtaken by UN ideology. Even the World Economic Forum recognizes this. For now, there is still a Boy Scouts of America website, and does reference the future name change as a "foremost youth program of character development and values-based leadership training". All of this has actually been symbolic neutering just as being done physically with children. Not that it hasn't been occurring already, the National Scout Organizations have big plans to educate scouts on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Scout activities used to be practiced through attachments to religious organizations but now that role has been removed and replaced with UN institutions. Scouting badges also reflect this indoctrination. No longer is there an American culture, instead being divided into different classes and groups, or really the heritage of the Constitution and the men who not only created it but also fought for it. There is also the Citizenship badges in Society, the Community, the Nation (which barely covers the Constitution), and in the World with devotion to the UN, along with Sustainability, all required to reach Eagle Scout rank. Clearly, this action is an advancement of Agenda 21 Chapter 24 and Sustainable Development Goal 5, which strip the distinction between male and female, making them nothing more than equal forms of an individual. That is the goal, to create a society of robotic forms that can continue to be manipulated into a world of conformity. Perhaps one could note that the only result of these changes, along with many other similar changes in society, has been the rise of children who are increasingly depressed, full of anxiety, suicidal with no sense of identity that extends into adulthood, and who struggle to find purpose. This travesty of abuse towards children is extended to the Girl Scouts. The solution is forming groups that bring back the original scouting values and principles, and forever eliminate what once was a cherished American organization. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
June 2024
|