A couple of major announcements were made this month about two prominent government figures.  It was announced on November 4 that former Vice President Dick Cheney had died on November 3.  Two days later it was announced that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi planned to retire.

As the accolades pour in about Dick and Naney, for some Americans they are just two more treasonous characters that have denigrated the Constitution.  Many of these malicious characters have come and gone over the years, from both parties.  Dick and Nancy represent both.  Which party they came from doesn't matter much.  It is the systematic dismantling of our Constitution that tears at the heart for those who recognize its brilliance. 

Coming from men who understood the characteristics and cornerstones of tyranny, the Founders attempted to leave America with the instruments that would prevent such tyranny in the future.  However, both Dick and Nancy have left America with a Constitution that is hanging by threads, if at all, and relinquished representation of the people.

Upon the desires of Republican GHW Bush, in 1992 Democrat Nancy was able to pass a resolution that integrated Agenda 21 into the federal government, essentially putting the government under a framework that no longer functioned as representative of the people.  To hide this treason, it was covertly integrated into the government by Democrat Clinton under its other name Sustainable Development (SD). 

It took seven years but by 1999 the initial plan, called President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD), to disassemble our Republic’s foundation and build a new one was released.  Not included was representation by the people, but rather the shift to representation of corporations and non-governmental organizations among others over the seven year span.  Among many other offenses, Nancy's legacy should be remembered for the outright demolition of our Republic. 

This has effectively left citizens with only one role, electing which traitor they want in office next.  Throughout the document, Agenda 21 calls extensively for Public-Private-Partnerships (P3) with one chapter devoted to just that subject, and which is reiterated in Agenda 2030.  Because of Nancy and Agenda 21, we now have a kleptocracy as so eloquently pointed out in this article by John Whitehead.  Nancy has made her fair share of money over the years, among many others,

Republican Dick has his own contributions to the annihilation of the Republic, especially concerning freedom and liberty.  James Corbett provides a summary of Dick’s offenses in this video, The Dark Legacy of Dick Cheney.  Some of Dick's antics include skirting the draft, misleading Congress, dissolving portions of Constitutional leadership with his Continuity of Government (COG) plan, lying to get the U.S. into war, and using his government position to set up a P3 for his post-government job.  The links to the information Corbett discusses can be found here.

COG is a major dismantling of the Constitution by replacing who would govern in the event the President is not able to perform Constitutional duties.  First initiated during 9/11, COG continues to exist today, authorizing "the establishment of a temporary "shadow government".  In the event of another major catastrophe such as 9/11, the government has ensured its own survival that extends beyond the 1947 Presidential Succession Act with succession orders Now being required for each Cabinet official.

Mentioned as part of that "shadow government" is the 2012 Executive Order that "gives the President the authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, and seize all energy and transportation infrastructure within the United States"...and..."authorizes the U.S. Government to force its citizens to fulfill labor requirements for the purposes of national defense."  Hmm, starvation and forced labor, what does that sound like?  The other 2012 Executive Order gives "authority over private communication networks in emergency situations."  

To think we continue to live in a Republic by carrying on the traditions is a fallacy.  We no longer have a government that functions as it was originally created, and We The People no longer have control over it.  Until this reality is realized, more individuals like Dick and Nancy will continue to garner accolades with twisted versions of that they both actually did that ruined America.

You Tube link to Corbett video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtkN-k0JFa8

Catherine Austin Fitts, Alex Newman, and Andrew Bridgen discuss the dangers of Digital ID and the importance of rejecting it.

Forget smart phones, biometric data, or other forms of surveillance.  Jumping back to the Holocaust concept of applying a tattoo to prisoners at Auschwitz, today's demonic technocrats are actively reviving that barbaric practice.

Apparently, it is becoming too cumbersome to install cameras all over the place, it isn't guaranteed everyone will own a smart phone, and plastic cards can be damaged or lost.  A new form of surveillance and practical use system was needed.  Something embedded right in the host itself that can never be lost.  Rather than a chip, an electronic tattoo is far more reasonable.  A dream from nine years ago is now becoming a reality.

The concept of electronic tattoos includes a "subset of electronic skin that are designed to be worn directly on the skin, conforming to the body's contours and movements."  Or it could be a "wearable device with integrated sensors that attaches to the wearer’s skin and transmits data wirelessly."  Perhaps made to look like a tatto0, "receptors and microchips" for monitoring are used in place of ink.  Exploration in this new technology has been in development for some time.

However, now the innovations have proceeded to just invading the body.

Naturally, Bill Gates has a finger in this new idea.  Embedded into the body with smart ink, these tattoos are powered by nanotechnology which give access to the internet through interaction with devices.  Or, let's just create a way to  place other substances like a graphene biosensor on the body.  The Fourth Industrial Revolution goal has always been to fuse the digital, biological and physical worlds together.  

What better way to accomplish all-inclusive human connectivity to the internet, providing abundant surveillance, than with an object physically embedded in the body. 

Those in the tattoo business are well aware of this new technology.  Right now the focus is on sensors that will transmit health data, but some believe these tattoos will progress further by helping mobilize those who are bedridden or be a benefit in other health conditions.  However,  "electronic tattoos could serve as a non-invasive interface for controlling smart devices, such as smartphones, wearable tech, or prosthetics. The tattoos could communicate through touch or gesture recognition."  Research into what can be done with tattoo technology is ongoing.

The question that comes to mind is if the tattoo on the body can control access to the internet or other technology, would it be possible to reverse that and have that technology do the same to the tattoo host?  One just has to imagine what the potential danger is in this technology.  There doesn’t seem to be any end to the technocrat dream of control over humanity.

The mystery of how World Trade Center 7 collapsed was covered by Firefighters for 9-11 Truth: Calling Out Bravo 7.

This sequel video, Beyond Bravo 7, provides a more in depth exploration on who is really involved in global power.  It begins with propaganda that has continued since 9/11, and how that global power has attained so much control.  

In what might be the most thorough discussion on the historical sources of global collusion and power, this video exposes them all.

Themes in the video include discussions about media influence and its use in spreading propaganda, shaping opinions and behaviors beginning with Edward Bernays who is considered to be one of the first to formalize propaganda under the term public relations.  In the 1960's, the term conspiracy theory was used to discredit those who raised questions about propaganda, and how the media role actually expanded the use of propaganda.  It is no coincidence media outlets are World Economic Forum (WEF) partners.

How this propaganda has been used in the facilitation of war is also discussed and although the video is several years old, continued use of propaganda regarding Russia is concerning.  The role of oligarchs in war is explored, and in the government as well.  All of this type of activity continues today.

The requirements of globalism are listed.  One has to ponder just how many of those requirements are currently being met.  The discussion continues more in depth with the involvement of the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Bank of International Settlements (BIS).  Interestingly, in the BIS discussion, the creation of global technocrats was mentioned, then referencing the Club of Rome, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the Trilateral Commission.  Carroll Quigley's work on these globalist activities was also mentioned.

As a side note to the CFR, Trump's AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks, and Sec. of Treasury Scott Bessent are members of the CFR.  Notable prior members of the Trilateral Commission include Jimmy Carter, Anthony Blinken, George H.W. Bush, Ash Carter, Walter Mondale, and Cyrus Vance.  

Not mentioned was the Bilderberg group, however, science advisor to the President, Michael Kratsios, is a member.

A fascinating discussion about the history of banks and bankers from the Revolution to now follows, leading up to the creation of the Federal Reserve.  Bretton Woods is also discussed, why it ended, and how oil became a factor in economics.

G. Edward Griffin provides some insight in efforts towards collectivism and a global government for a "new world order".  "Corporate socialism" was also mentioned in an interview with Antony Sutton whose work with Patrick Wood revealed the intent to create this world order through technocracy.

The ending message is to seek the truth and become engaged.

                                      "Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light"

Time to start minding your P's & Q's folks.  First, we have the Internet of Things (IoT), then the Internet of Bodies (IoB), and of course Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) among others.  But now, it is time to learn about the monitoring of your behavior to manipulate and ensure you are falling in line with all the other networking and "connectivity" to the internet.

"Internet of Behavior (IoB) uses technologies like big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT) to analyze and interpret behavioral data."  The "convergence of Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has given rise to the Internet of Behaviors (IoB)".

IoB is also defined as consisting "of a combination of the Internet of Things, behavioral science, and data analytics, with the aim of collecting data relevant to individual behavior and thought patterns. This data then undergoes an analysis to discover insight about behavior, before using the insight for various purposes, such as improving marketing campaigns or medical monitoring for patients."  Out here in the real world this is called predatory, unethical, and manipulative activity.

Regardless of definitions, the whole idea behind IoB is "collecting each digital activity data of user and finally to use this information to influence behavior."  

IoB, not to be confused with the other IoB for Bodies, is a point of interest for corporations to discern how the employee can be exploited further for corporate benefit.  Areas for IoB snooping on employees includes work patterns, health, data access, and monitoring for external user abnormal behavior.   

Corporations can also use customer IoB in order to determine "how to influence behavior patterns" that will provide a "significant advantage over competitors" for profit.  Personalized marketing campaigns from collected data can potentially bring high returns on investments.

A behavior could be given its own address for tracking.  Sources for this data and tracking could include social media, IoT data through sensors and cameras, spending habits, user locations, interactions with customer support, and biometric data.  Better get that scowl off your face.  This data can then be integrated into other software.

But IoB can also be used to influence other behavior like driving too fast.  That data can be transmitted to a central system which can then generate a warning that tells the driver to slow down. 

The same "IoB systems that influence employee behavior can be used to impact purchasing behavior", or used by the government "to influence their constituents."  Other IoB areas include YouTube which uses "behavior data analytics to improve the user experience and recommend videos with greater accuracy".  Custom web pages can be created for individuals "based on their behavior".  Because of tracking customer locations, companies can send personal notifications when in the customer is in that location again.  Home isn't even safe with behavior tracking through Alexa, Google Home, and Siri.

With those wearable medical devices data is being gathered to measure response to treatments and spying on habits that affect health.  Better not indulge in that daily nightcap.  And that airport is tracking your behavior as well.

This IoB surveillance and spying in retail, health, and travel can also be found in entertainment, finance, and education.

According to the AI-Powered Tool, Gartner, "40% of the global population will be subject to at least one IoB program (whether government-run or commercial) and digitally tracked to influence their behavior" by 2025.  The thought is that these "IoB apps and systems will continue to proliferate, regardless of data privacy concerns."

All of this bill of goods is being sold as a positive to the oblivious with having a more personalized experience and  improved security.  Alarmingly, people are blindly embracing it.  

This gathering of personal data will lead up to the Internet of Intelligence (IoI) which "allows users to engage directly with intelligence capabilities. You just ask and it does things for you."  One just needs to input information on a problem they want solved, and poof, AI uses that and "extensive personal information" to create the solution.  AI agents and other tools are used for the answer.  So vast are these agents and collaborations with each other, a new "AI Society" is forming.

It is apparent that IoB, and massive surveillance systems, have already been forced onto everyone.  Without thinking about its implications, people have embraced technologies that have made it possible "to monitor, control and model human behavior".  Who can be contacted to have this surveillance and manipulation system extracted from your life?  It is technocratic control; there is no one to go to because the nefarious activities are silent and hidden behind devices.  Tossing the devices means stopping the surveillance, at least some of it.

IoB isn't just for influencing behavior, the goal is control over society with decisions made by algorithms and technocrats.  With IoI, there will be further loss of critical thinking by humans. 

It is difficult to find words that fully describe humans that are behind this advancing train wreck.  How could any human participate in a concept that clearly holds such dangers to mankind?  The mere fact that this technology is being integrated without any human permission is far more egregious than what any prior tyrant has laid upon the world, except that now there is not one tyrant, but many hidden ones.   

Knowing and understanding that this level of surveillance for manipulation is currently being executed should cause everyone to rise in objection.  One can live without this technology in their lives.  Ready to dump Facebook and get rid of that smart phone and its apps as a start?

What the heck is the Agentic State?  According to this "vision paper", created by the Tallinn Digital Summit 2025, "agentic AI will transform government and defines the contours of the Agentic State."

According to IBM, Agentic AI "consists of AI agents—machine learning models that mimic human decision-making to solve problems in real time. In a multiagent system, each agent performs a specific subtask required to reach the goal and their efforts are coordinated through AI orchestration."

What this means is that Artificial Intelligence agents (AI Agents) "can perceive complex situations, reason through problems, and take autonomous action within defined boundaries" across organizational boundaries.  The goal is having government function with AI Agents where data is used to make decisions.  This defines the Agentic State, a government run by programmed AI agents.

"GovTech, short for Government Technology, is defined as the application of technology to improve the delivery of government services, enhance government operations, and promote citizen engagement and participation in governance".  It also tracks developments in the federal government.  The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) covers the government's IT initiatives.

Simply put, GovTech, beloved by the World Bank and World Economic Forum (WEF), is the digital transformation of government, all government.

From this WEF report, the summary states that GovTech "offers solutions that streamline processes, reduce costs and rebuild public trust."  You betcha, the public will have full faith in a sterile, computer run, decision making, artificial government system where "participation in governance" is an illusion, or maybe delusion.  This "Future of Government" is explained in this WEF video.

WEF has GovTech centres across the world affecting many sectors as part of its Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (C4IR) network.  So sophisticated is GovTech, even in war torn Ukraine the "state" is literally in a smartphone (pg 21).  The Berlin Global Government Technology Centre released a whitepaper explaining this government transformation.

Now this hasn't been fully implemented in the United States yet, but AI is already being used, and implemented, in federal agencies.  The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) is promoting this transformation to AI for states.  Identifying who participates in your state can be found here, or involved state legislator here.  

This article provides an example of how AI will run cities.  Just imagine the Agentic AI making all the decisions.  But also, imagine how control over lives can be implemented.  Creating an “Anticipatory government … when it’s powered by AI and analytics can enable governments to not only predict undesirable activities, but also prevent them from occurring, from spotting fraud to combating the opioid epidemic", one has to ponder how much control over lives can be hijacked by an AI Agent.  It is in the hands of technocrats who decide how the AI and its algorithms are programmed.

So, you attend a protest, post an unflattering social media comment, send an email with complaints to the government, and a host of other negative perspectives about the government.  All of that data is captured by some AI agent and dumped into your little government file.  At what point will the AI Agent decide that your behavior is too negative and some consequences should be laid upon you?  It's all in how the Agent is programmed, by the government.  

While this action couldn't be described as a Chinese social credit system, it sure looks the same.  Maybe social control would be a better description.

Meanwhile, as future victims of this horror story in the U.S. remain fixated on the predetermined media stories that are nauseatingly reiterated every hour of the day, this unchecked government marches forward with its technologically run government.  It is being sold to the masses as a government that will serve the people more efficiently and "improve citizen engagement".  That is nothing but a bunch of bull cocky, but it is coming unless we the self-governed, make a conscience decision to exercise our duty to govern the government.

Alex Newman wrote an interesting article, UN Targets Homeschooling, where he describes how the United Nations has developed plans to make sure home educators are captured by the government.  Areas being targeted include what is taught, control over parental roles, diminishing religious themes, and promotion of international law while the Constitution is undermined.  

In another article, Education Tech Leading to Technocratic School Dystopia, Newman discusses how the "technology in education is leading to a technocratic, totalitarian model of schooling that will eventually force public, private, and home education into the control grid" in an interview with  School World Order author John Klyczek.

Across the nation the cost of electricity is rising.  Many understand the reason is the building of AI Centers which consume massive amounts of energy and water.

In this video, Vanessa Wingardh explains how the government is collaborating with big tech to build these centers and how citizens are paying for it.

Patrick Wood held another symposium, Omniwar Digital Attack on Humanity, hosted by Courtenay Turner.  Speakers included Patrick, David A. Hughes, Jacob Nordangard, and Daniel Broudy.  Each talk lasts approximately 45 minutes.

Patrick Wood began the discussion at the 7:35" mark.  He discussed how the end of the government as we know it is being witnessed in relation to the current Trump administration.  Identified as technocrats within the administration were Musk, Theil, Sacks, Andreessen, Kratsios, Lutnick. and Ellison.  Also mentioned was Curtis Yarvin and his influence over the technocrats.  His vision of "technocratic oversight" can be seen as occurring in the 20-point Gaza plan.

Subjects Wood discussed include data collection for artificial intelligence (AI) in the government, how Musk's task was hijacking government data for that purpose, creation of a private central bank digital currency concept through stable coins, changing from a debt based to asset based monetary system, and how movement is being made towards biometric data.

Starting at the 56:25" mark, Hughes discussion was interrupted by audio problems at the 1':25" mark but going to the 2'33:50" mark he continues.  He talks about the use of technology in the Ukraine war, addiction to technology and its harm to children, Chatbots, government being transformed by GovTech (lauded by the World Bank and World Economic Forum (WEF)) and Trump's participation in this transformation, how tech is used to manipulate people, the coming Agentic Government  and its use of AI Agents, how Tony Blair (who is being considered as a Chair in the technocratic Gaza 20-point plan) supports Digital ID, use of the Palantir Gotham platform for global decision making, and how the Internet of Things is already present in homes.    

Nordangard speaks to the spiritual and philosophical aspects of the Agentic state in government and philosophies of Alice Bailey and her Lucis Trust starting at the 1'30:15" mark, and how these influences were involved in the development of the current state of affairs.

Lastly, Broudy speaks to the convergence of man and machine starting at the 3'05:25" mark.  He talks about the propaganda being fed to the world, and how spiritual implications in the Bible are interwoven with the United Nations, WEF, and the Great Reset.  More frightening is how he explains these connections are aimed at changing humanity. 

A general discussion with all speakers starts at the 3’53:47” mark followed by answering questions from the listeners.  From this symposium, it becomes more clear how the world is being shifted to a technocratic state.