President Trump made headlines when he abruptly announced the United States would "take over the Gaza strip" and "own it". After cleaning up the devastation, he proposed an "economic development" that would create the "riviera of the Middle East". During the announcement Israel Prime Minister Bebe Netanyahu gave President Trump credit for "having a different idea".
Hold the phone there, Bebe. That may not be the full story. This concept actually began with the Trump sanctioned Abraham Accords back in 2020. Besides the kumbaya tone reflective of the United Nations (UN) goal of peace and justice for all, also contained within that agreement was the statement, "We support science, art, medicine, and commerce to inspire humankind". Israel and Bahrain clarified this further with its declaration to "seek agreements in the coming weeks regarding investment, tourism, direct flights, security, telecommunications, technology, energy, healthcare, culture, the environment, and other areas of mutual benefit." Even better was the U.S., Israel, and Morocco declaration to "Promote a dynamic and innovative economic bilateral cooperation" and "Pursue cooperation on trade; finance and investment", among many other financial developments such as tourism. It should be no shock that Morocco is invested in Agenda 2030. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) agreement with Israel included the same areas, Finance and Investment, Innovation, Trade and Economic Relations, and Tourism, along with all the other issues mentioned in previous declarations. Interestingly, Sudan didn't seem as interested in this economic takeover, only supporting commerce, and instead just wanting peace. So, this economic transformation in the Middle East appears to have first started in 2020 with agreements between the countries, garnering "$1 billion in trade" by 2022 after its signing. However, Netanyahu hinted at an economic development scheme by Trump during an interview in 2018 at the World Economic Forum (WEF) starting at the 19:45" mark. Perhaps that is the beginning point of why Netanyahu gave President Trump the credit. Nevertheless, one has to keep in mind that Netanyahu is a contributor to WEF, a supporter of Agenda 2030, and has been involved in the development and advancement of the Great Reset. This, right along the side of WEF partner United Arab Emirate. Advancing to 2024, Netanyahu released "The Day After Hamas” in February, stipulating his "post-war plans to maintain military control over Gaza and install local officials to govern the region". No support for Palestinian sovereignty or unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state would be given, and it rejected “international dictates” regarding a permanent settlement with the Palestinians". Nor would he "allow the Palestinian Authority (PA) to return to govern Gaza" which supports his statements at WEF, that Palestine could govern itself but Israel would have military authority over the region. The document also called for “deradicalization” of religious, educational and welfare institutions". This is interesting because in 2023, the UAE made clear that they will not play any role in the rehabilitation of Gaza unless it is part of a framework aimed at an eventual "two-state solution." Although not yet confirmed by the Prime Minister's office, in May, 2024, its Gaza 2035 plan details were published in The Architect's Newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, Dezeen and other publications. According to Probe International, this Gaza 2035 concept was released by Bebe Netanyahu under U.S. pressure to develop a post war rebuilding and governance plan for Gaza, even though plans for developing the area into an economic region had been in the works for years. Probe International even recognized this plan "could catapult Gaza into a manufacturing center and international trading hub" and how "corporate interests...swoop in after wars and natural disasters". Fits nicely into the Accords and WEF objectives. Viewed primarily as an economic plan, Gaza 2035 involves three steps. During the first year in step one, Hamas-free zones would be maintained by Israel to enable humanitarian aid. Step two would extend over 5-10 years where a Marshall Plan would be implemented by the Arab coalition to oversee reconstruction. The Arab coalition is undefined but could it be the one for SDGs? Step three is the perception that by this time Gazans would be deradicalized and accept Israel as other Arab countries had through the Abraham Accords. The Arab coalition would hand power over to a local Gazan government, eventually transitioning to a self-government ruling both Gaza and the West Bank. Elements of this vision include an artificial island for a deep water port using the 30 million tons of rubble from bombed-out buildings; a desalination plant; a Palestinian film industry; a soccer stadium; and in pure sustainable fashion, it would be fueled by acres of solar plants in the Sinai desert along with offshore natural gas. President Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is eyeballing the potential development value in the Gaza waterfront property. Eventually, the plan also includes building an Egyptian–Israeli–Gaza or Gaza-Arish-Sderot Free Trade Zone, administered by an Israel, Egypt, and a Gaza Rehabilitation Authority (GRA)—a proposed Palestinian-run agency, with no plans for a Palestinian statehood. Part of this zone would include a "north-south rail service between Gaza and NEOM - the speculative $500 billion Saudi city", creating an opportunity for tech companies, electric vehicle manufacturing, and factories for connectivity to another economic zone. This Agenda 2030 city vision fits nicely into Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 plans. Hmmm, WEF partner NEOM is involved. What this really describes is a regional economic plan for continued development of global governance. If this scheme is successful, plans to do the same in Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon are mentioned, while others have a different perspective on the vision. What is ironic is Netanyahu stating it is "'worth listening carefully’ to Trump’s proposal for Gaza". This Gaza "proposal" was already in the works for several years and appears it has really been a negotiation for investments between these two men and other countries. All of this is borne out during a WEF 2022 panel discussion, The Future of the Abraham Accords, in which it centered around nothing but the improved trade and economics as a result of those Accords. All of this, after Trump adamantly declared the US would not dictate how others will live or govern themselves back in 2017, reiterating "we are not nation building again". In this video, Trump even states Gaza is a "real estate investment" with the U.S. being an "investor in that part of the world", including resettlement of Palestinians to other areas. Let that one sink in. In general, there is overall opposition to Gaza 2035 including rejection from the PA, and towards the Trump plan to "own Gaza" by those who have been driven from their home but have since returned. However, depending on how the press manipulates the information, some Gazans welcome the proposal that they are moved out of Gaza which has been proposed by Trump, while other Arab states reject the idea. Secretary of State Marco Rubio later clarified the President's statement to the displacement only being "temporary". One might speculate that talks between the President and Vladimir Putin will center around the idea of a similar trade zone concept, especially given both Ukraine and Russia’s involvement with WEF. This is all part of the now traditional agenda to cause destruction or use natural disasters for the sole purpose of rebuilding sustainably according to Agenda 2030 and 4th Industrial Revolution (4th IR) dictates. What a perfect setup, forever corporate profits over disasters. What some might call just a fluke, WEF connected individuals always seem to be behind the destructive event, then rising to the pedestal as heroes who solve the crisis with solutions that save the day. Whether a city or country, WEF has profit making plans to rebuild the world in its vision. Putting aside one's own bias, belief, or prejudices regarding the Israel and Palestinian problems, more focus should be targeted on the WEF with its globalist cronies and corporate syndicate. It is through this structure that lives are being manipulated for an end game of control. Israel, Gaza, Ukraine, and even Russia are just a few chess pieces currently being moved around for checkmate against humanity.
0 Comments
Most of the Agenda 21 framework has been built, Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) were just a compressed Agenda 21, and now major forces are behind the Great Reset Fourth Industrial Revolution (4thIR). Many of these agenda objectives have been achieved to demolish America, and the world for that matter, with only a few left for finalization.
Following is a look at a few objectives that are in progress for the final slaughter. Although not an advanced technology when Agenda 21 was revealed in 1992, artificial intelligence (AI) has now advanced to a level where it can be applied in more depth. It should be no surprise that DOGE is effectively eliminating jobs, an AI infrastructure will replace those jobs. Data collection is a primary Agenda 21 objective. Since 1992, many data collection systems have been created, collecting data through social media, smart phones, health records, financial transactions and technology products. Not only is data needed for surveillance, it is needed for eventual control through the technocratic state with AI analytics. Tracking movement will be accomplished with smart cars, Real ID, while city surveillance systems add that data to fusion centers. Data centers are being built to store that data for AI analysis with Stargate advancing that goal. Agenda 2030 objective 16.9 is legal identity for all. A digital ID is still needed on every person's smart phone. Already instituted for flying and travel in some states, the government is working on laws to enforce it. Bottom line, a digital ID will ensure full surveillance of every individual's activity whether it is travel, financial transactions, or purchases. Most likely everyone will eventually be forced into having a digital ID as it will be required for access to everything. There has been some struggles in getting 5G implemented given the resistance over potential harms. 5G is desperately needed for connectivity, or Internet of Things (IoT). All of the data collected has to be transmitted via the internet and for now 5G is the system capable of transmitting that large amount of data. As usual, there is minimization of 5G risks and potential for harm by those who want control. The financial sector is another objective needing control through central bank digital currency (CBDC) and blockchain. Although President Trump prohibited the use of CBDC by an Executive Order (EO), it does include support for blockchain and "digital representation of value that is recorded on a distributed ledger, including cryptocurrencies, digital tokens, and stablecoins", all of which are part of the 4thIR. Stablecoins have different risks depending on the type but converge well with AI. President Trump is advocating cryptocurrency and other digital assets. Catherine Austin Fitts explains how Trump's proposed Bitcoin adventures will be used to create a bailout for the national debt at the 1'15:45" mark in this video. The paper she references on her website, Bitcoin Bailout, can be found here. According to Ms. Fitts, this Bitcoin risk will affect you as well. Using Bitcoin as a land grab scheme is further explained here. This whole financial strategy by the Trump administration is very much a part of the "AI Control Structure". Given this might be difficult to understand for the economically challenged, a simple explanation can be found under the heading "The Transfering Wealth Scheme" in this post. Creating a digital currency system is needed for the control grid that will justify a cashless society, and Elon Musk is targeting some cash now. Hurricane Helene victims understand very well how being cashless forces dependency, especially on the government. But that is another goal, full government dependency. In this video Ms. Fitts provides an in-depth discussion on centralized control with digital money and the reset of the global financial system. She also raises some points on Elon Musk and how digital ID will be pushed for voting and immigration control. This is her website. Digitizing everything (pg 8) includes all Agenda 2030 goals, and the digital financial system framework is being built by President Trump. Perhaps the biggest threat for the finalization of Agenda 21 is transforming the economy and its call for public-private partnerships (P3), rather crony capitalism or corporatism. While there has been a general escalation of P3 actions by recent presidents, this president is taking it to a whole new level. President Trump announced that Howard Lutnick, Department of Commerce (DOC) nominee (with his own interests in Bitcoin), and Soros buddy Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, will establish a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). A SWF is a "state-owned investment fund comprised of money generated by the government..." and provides "a benefit for a country's economy and its citizens." Lutnick has already declared his desire to use U.S. natural assets as his own collateral and intent to add those assets to the federal "balance sheet". In his EO, President Trump lists those natural assets as ones "that can be invested" for "long term wealth". So foreign entities and global corporations will be given the opportunity to "invest" money in America's forests, minerals, land or other natural assets. Different types of natural asset investments include buying the resource. As Bessent stated, "We're going to monetize the asset side of the U.S. balance sheet for the American people", that is, convert America's natural assets into a price tag for the highest bidder. The establishment of an SWF is disconcerting and every American should be disheartened. It is literally turning our Republic into an investment firm, and as pointed out in the Investopedia article, "There can be a concern that SWFs have a political influence." The World Economic Forum describes an SWF as playing an "important role in global development" and a source to fund the Agenda 2030 SDGs with the use of "government pension funds (federal and state)", which Ms. Fitts alluded to in the videos. These funds can also be abused. This direction that Trump is taking America is a fulfillment of Agenda 21 through the 4thIR goal of public-private partnerships (P3), digitization, and ending capitalism. It is a mockery of citizen representation and possibly means a full obliteration of the Republic. None of what he is doing has involved Congress. All of these changes will require that every human being is connected to the internet and at some point it will become impossible to live without it as everything needed for life itself will not be accessible. Control over all food production, energy, and water use is underway. A digital public infrastructure (DPI) is being built right now, creating the web for eventual technocratic control and dictatorship over humanity. Actions that are clearly out of the Constitutional boundaries, allegedly for the benefit of society, will only lead to an eventual disaster. So, what's left for the final razing of America? Not much. With AI and the necessary infrastructure in place the concept of a Republic where Americans self-govern will be replaced with all-encompassing technology. What were some slowly evolving final touches have now been accelerated at warp speed. As Trump supporters cheer with excitement over many of his actions, the most destructive actions are being ignored. It is hard to know what to think about all of this, it almost feels like a bait and switch. Giving Americans so many of the actions they wanted while simultaneously engaging with the deep state that so many despise. Monetary experts are sounding the alarm. What is clear, Agenda 21 goals appear to be close to the end for completion. All of these individuals who chase after increased wealth and control should bear in mind: Timothy 1 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. The United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) are both full of dichotomies. Both advocate for the protection of natural resources such as forests, yet the very practices they promote, such as opposition to logging and thinning while preserving old growth are the very practices that promote forest destruction with wildfires. These destructive practices lead to the absurd justification that climate change is causing the problem.
Mass hysterical concern is broadcast over not having enough food for the future, but they are doing everything to end food production in order to bring in profit making endeavors for lab grown meat and insect production. While they also claim to promote and advance the protection and rights of women and girls, opposing mutilation of both, simultaneously they advocate for the mutilation of females with sexual reassignment, forever stripping them of their biological gifts. How about that protection for unborn girls WEF? Such is the case with the wildfires in California, a complex dichotomy hiding a vile purpose for rebuilding sustainably, compliments of the WEF. California governor, Gavin Newsom, is a WEF Young Global Leader graduate. Drunk on WEF ideologies, Newsom may be one WEF catalyst for destroying a city with fire, and in spite of all the criticism, he has executed his job well for WEF. Newsom, and even the WEF, were well aware increasing wildfire risks and difficulty in obtaining homeowner's insurance clear back in 2023. Making it easier for insurance companies to raise rates faster, which WEF spoke about in 2019, was Newsom's solution in 2024. Redistributing the cost burden for insurance coverage to other citizens was another Newsom WEF supported solution. No action was taken to address the real problem, fire prevention measures to reduce the risks, even though the responsibility for failure of land management policies is spread among many agencies and individuals. Coincidentally, an Allstate representative is a contributing member to WEF and State Farm is a WEF member. How convenient to have insurance companies as part of the cadre of conspirators. Perhaps one of the more suspicious actions Newsom took was pre-positioning 110 fire engines and hundreds of firefighters throughout Southern California on January 6, one day before the fire broke out. What was the incentive? While Newsom doesn't have enough money for fire prevention measures he does have plenty for opposing a president and cutting emissions. He lives in the future, just as WEF does, issuing an EO to cut regulations and streamline rebuilding "while enhancing wildfire resilience and safety" after the disaster. Too bad he wasn't thinking about that a few months ago. Doesn't matter, WEF has a plan he can follow to build a safer city after the fire. Karen Bass, Los Angeles Mayor, is no peach herself. Once considered a possible Biden running mate, she also served in Congress. It is her earlier history that is concerning. In 1973 she traveled to Cuba as part of the Venceremos Brigade, a coalition in support of Cuba. This group also engaged in spying activity, in which Bass became an alleged leader in California. She also involves Los Angles in the C40 organization with other nefarious partners, For her role in the fires, she cut $17.6 million from the LAFD in the 2024 budget, withheld assistance to victims, and failed to institute fire prevention measures. Although not a direct WEF participant, Ms. Bass promotes WEF agendas through her green year projects in infrastructure and jobs. Conserving 82 billion gallons of rainwater was put to good use by stashing it underground rather than storing it for future use in wildfires, no doubt in line with the WEF circular, reuse water plan. WEF recognized Ms. Bass in 2022 for becoming mayor of the "second-largest city" in the U.S., and for being an integral participant in the Citywide Adaptive Reuse ordinance which was also cheered by the WEF (pg 19). The wildfire will expedite the building and code changes for adaptive reuse. However, Ms. Bass is working with WEF in a more sinister way. Similar to the WEF Young Global Leaders is the Global Shapers program, led by Klaus Schwab. This program is made up of "hubs" spread across cities in the world, one of which is Los Angeles. Issues they work on include equity and protecting nature with WEF as a partner. The Shapers expand their efforts through Neighborhood Councils, coordinating with the City of Los Angeles, Department of Neighborhood Empowerment (EmpowerLA). Neighborhood Councils are funded by WEF and are "taxpayer-funded, hyperlocal governing bodies who advocate for their communities with LA City Hall on important issues like development, homelessness, and transportation policy." They also meet in Switzerland annually. Translated, these Councils are WEF and push WEF agendas. Karen Bass is actively involved with the Global Shapers front organization EmpowerLA, and even has a Board of Neighborhood Commissioners that set policies on Neighborhood Councils to "function as a catalyst for change". Not without conflict, these Councils reside within the areas of devastation. What a coincidence. WEF has a history of plans for rebuilding after disasters such as earthquakes, conflict, and pandemics, how much money can be made, and how debris can be used. It has been experimenting around with housing with its own schemes for the world to rebuild cities, with specific ways it should be done (pg 10-11). Yup, they got a one size fits all solution for the world. Perhaps the most sick and twisted historical WEF perspective is describing 9/11 as a "legacy" for creating smart cities, a perspective that probably overshadows all disasters, and viewed only as an opportunity for advancement of its agendas through devastating events. All of this may seem way off track from the devastation caused by the fires. But it is an important message that WEF has its tentacles deep within state and local governments. Both Newsom and Bass have deep involvement with WEF agendas and should be highly suspected to execute WEF's edicts on how to rebuild. Newsom announced his LA 2.0 plan without any understandable direction, then shifted to an LA Rises initiative to "rebuild and reimagine", using WEF language. Other than raking in money from the wealthy, it isn't clear just how that money would specifically be spent. WEF just keeps blaming the elusive climate change narrative, rather than address the actual causes of wildfires. Climate polices won't change as they are needed to continue the disasters in order to build the new utopian, Agenda 21 world. WEF loves disasters and crises for that reason, building the world they want. If a crisis doesn't exist, they will fabricate one. Thus, the dichotomy, destroy cities for the purpose of rebuilding them. Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass are good soldiers for WEF. He speaks to all of these issues in this video. Just as Covid-19 was used as justification to usher in the Great Reset, with vaccines, masks, and isolation rescuing everyone from the virus's carnage, it appears this election outcome may be doing the same. As America has been disintegrating over the last four years, attention is only being paid to Executive Orders (EO) that rescue Americans and the Constitution from the carnage. However, this rescue is the next step towards implementation of the Great Reset, also called the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4th IR).
President Trump's announcement of Stargate, an artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure project, is in the process of building its first data center in Texas, with plans to eventually build around ten throughout the United States. This endeavor actually began under former President Biden. These data centers "are needed for the development of AI projects in the US" and will "support the re-industrialization of the United States." That is a perfect fit for the 4th IR. Data centers require a massive amount of energy and will also use renewable energy to generate enough without affecting supplies to local areas. While a full exposure on what these AI projects will be wasn't provided, there are many instances of how the federal government uses AI, including the military. The only example provided was on health. As explained at the announcement, data will be collected from electronic health records and shared, not once mentioning whether or not consent would be obtained. According to Oracle co-founder, Larry Ellison, AI can assist with diagnosing disease such as cancer. This in turn could contribute to the development of mRNA vaccines, especially an mRNA cancer vaccine. This is a misguided statement as cancer vaccines are far from being fully researched. As one study states, "Despite the promise of AI-powered cancer vaccines, significant challenges remain". Apparently Ellison didn't get the memo on the dangers and harm caused by mRNA technology. Through its Stage-2 artificial general intelligence (AGI), these entrepreneurs seem perfectly okay with AI giving a physician a note telling them what to do for your treatment. Mr. Ellison's statement is a ruse for enticing enthusiasm and acceptance of this project. Also of concern is the continued massive funding for mRNA vaccines by President Trump. Or perhaps another medical "AI project" could assist the already established relationship between the Department of Defense and Big Tech companies to transform the healthcare system to one that is driven by AI. This project was created between World Economic Forum (WEF) partners Oracle, OpenAI, and Softbank. Even Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO and WEF contributor, admits to the dangers of AI itself and was even removed once as CEO because of concern over his "handling of artificial intelligence safety." Elon Musk has also expressed concern over Mr. Altman's questionable ethical behavior. As part of the Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Altman admitted AI is not good in "life-and-death situations", has limitations, and "we should not expect more than it can do." At the announcement, no mention was made about safety concerns with AI or governance over it, even though that work had begun which President Trump rescinded. In its place a new Executive Order (EO) was issued with undefined guidance from his previous term. In addition, other EO's include one to create an AI Action Plan, So concerning are the multiple dangers of AI, let alone the multiple dangers in healthcare, the WEF has formed an AI Governance Alliance, like they should be trusted with anything. But there is another area where this type of system is being implemented. Although the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is being touted as streamlining government by ridding it of waste and abuse, it is really about "modernizing Federal technology and software", and a reorganizing and modernization of the already existing United States Digital Service (USDS). USDS also began with healthcare back in the Obama days, managing such services as farmers, Medicare, Veterans affairs, and military members. DOGE will be its new name. The DOGE goal is to improve "government-wide software, network infrastructure, and information technology (IT) systems" and promote inter-operability between agencies while ensuring "data collection and synchronization." While AI is not specifically mentioned, job qualifications for USDS does include AI skills. There is no reason to believe that AI won't be used to sort through all this data for better efficiency. Using AI will downsize these areas of the government but not in the way we have been led to believe, and will most likely spread to other government agencies eventually. As a result of these functions being taken over by AI, job losses should be anticipated. With building out the AI infrastructure, everyone will eventually be sucked into this AI data pit and OpenAI has its blueprint ready to go. President Trump understands AI as a competitive race with China but may not realize he is taking us down the path of destruction by the WEF. It is clearly a path that is being decided for humanity, whether wanted or not. The quandary for President Trump is how can the United States step out of the path it is being forced into? If the rest of the world is on the AI path, how would it be possible to not follow, or even survive? It will take all countries to stand up and reject this 4th IR trajectory. The most devastating aspect of this project is that it is a dream come true for WEF by putting into place the very system that will drive the 4th IR, AI. Once in place, everything will be turned over to AI with surveillance, gathering of data on everyone, and eventual decision making over every human. Obviously, there are millions of Americans who are thrilled with the return of President Trump and he has taken immediate corrective action to get America back on the right path. However, he should be scrutinized as closely as any other person in that job. He has surrounded himself with technocrats who would like nothing better than to execute a technocracy in a 4th IR style, and Stargate highlights that technocracy with its AI infrastructure. Patrick Wood is the leading authority on technocracy. In his interview starting at the 14:08" mark, he talks with Alex Newman about concerns over technocracy being brought to the government by Elon Musk and others in DOGE through the use of AI, which is pretty much validated by the EOs. As Mr. Wood states, technocrats don't talk the same language which is why information on Stargate activities is unspecified, and why DOGE has been misrepresented. An example of how detached a technocratic world can be is through its substitution of human contact with a robot dog. Heed Mr. Wood's warning. President Trump addressed the WEF at the annual Davos meeting on January 23. He did not give any indication of supporting the WEF 4th IR agenda, and went so far as to criticize many of the Agenda 2030 actions that have been forced upon America. However, he did mention becoming the "world capital of artificial intelligence". Does he understand AI is the driving force behind the 4th IR, a Davos theme in 2024, and renamed the Collaboration for the Intelligent Age this year? Or is the Stargate project his way of participating in the 4th IR? Congress has been working on the AI issue, as well as some states. But it is critical that everyone becomes more involved with their elected officials before the dangers of AI have gone too far. Right now, with Stargate and DOGE, it doesn't appear there has been any representation on those decisions. Stargate is a threat to America and Americans but not engaging in AI is also a threat from the rest of the world. A comprehensive governance structure for America is needed before it goes any further as the 4th IR rapidly moves forward. A basic understanding of technocracy can be found here. Spread throughout Agenda 21 is the reference to genetics. At the time, little was understood about the meaning of this and the dark path being laid out for humans. But it is becoming more clear as we have become the guinea pigs for vaccinations and genetically altered food.
Patrick Wood wrote an excellent article about this, and is copied below. Huge Fail: Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights Six years after this UN Declaration was ratified, the field of NBIC (Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno) science exploded, and with it, the lust for Transhumanism was set on fire. NBIC was conceived by the National Science Foundation of the United States in a 2003 paper titled “Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance,” authored by Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge. Within a few short years, NBIC spread to every major university worldwide; private research facilities sprung up everywhere with foundation grants. Thereafter, science threw the UN’s Human Genome Declaration in the trash. According to Roco and Bainbridge, The phrase “convergent technologies” refers to the synergistic combination of four major “NBIC” (Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno) provinces of science and technology, each of which is currently progressing at a rapid rate: (a) nanoscience and nanotechnology; (b) biotechnology and biomedicine, including genetic engineering; (c) information technology, including advanced computing and communications; and, (d) cognitive science, including cognitive neuroscience. Further, they argued, “Accelerated scientific and social progress can be achieved by combining research methods and results across these provinces in duos, trios, and the full quartet.” Roco and Bainbridge were guided by “social progress” in addition to science: “The ability to control the genetics of humans, animals, and agricultural plants will greatly benefit human welfare.” This was a false premise. Who would choose the controllers? Who would define the benefits for human welfare? Would this give way to god-like powers over the whole human race? We found the answer seventeen years later in 2020 when Big Pharma unleashed its campaign to re-engineer the human genome, starting with synthetic mRNA. They used every deceptive means to hide the fact that humanity was on the chopping block, all the while paying false fealty to the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and Sustainable Development. They have denied all harm they caused to countless masses. They have abridged just about any human right that you can conceive. Whatever came of the Universal Declaration of the Human Genome and Human Rights? Article 4: The human genome in its natural state shall not give rise to financial gains. Article 5: In all cases, the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned shall be obtained. Article 8: Every individual shall have the right, according to international and national law, to just reparation for any damage sustained as a direct and determining result of an intervention affecting his or her genome. Well, the Declaration is still there for you read, but don’t ever think it will stop the self-appointed gods of neo-creation. They are the riders in the sky, masters of NBIC. We can thank Roco and Bainbridge for lighting the way: If the Cognitive Scientists can think it the Nano people can build it the Bio people can implement it, and the IT people can monitor and control it Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights Endorsed by General Assembly resolution 53/152 of 9 December 1998 The General Conference, Recalling that the Preamble of UNESCO’s Constitution refers to “the democratic principles of the dignity, equality and mutual respect of men”, rejects any “doctrine of the inequality of men and races”, stipulates “that the wide diffusion of culture, and the education of humanity for justice and liberty and peace are indispensable to the dignity of men and constitute a sacred duty which all the nations must fulfil in a spirit of mutual assistance and concern”, proclaims that “peace must be founded upon the intellectual and moral solidarity of mankind”, and states that the Organization seeks to advance “through the educational and scientific and cultural relations of the peoples of the world, the objectives of international peace and of the common welfare of mankind for which the United Nations Organization was established and which its Charter proclaims”, Solemnly recalling its attachment to the universal principles of human rights, affirmed in particular in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948 and in the two International United Nations Covenants on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and on Civil and Political Rights of l6 December 1966, in the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 9 December 1948, the United Nations International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 21 December 1965, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons of 20 December 1971, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons of 9 December 1975, the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women of 18 December 1979, the United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power of 29 November 1985, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989, the United Nations Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities of 20 December 1993, the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction of 16 December 1971, the UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education of 14 December 1960, the UNESCO Declaration of the Principles of International Cultural Co-operation of 4 November 1966, the UNESCO Recommendation on the Status of Scientific Researchers of 20 November 1974, the UNESCO Declaration on Race and Racial Prejudice of 27 November 1978, the ILO Convention (N° 111) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation of 25 June 1958 and the ILO Convention (N° 169) concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries of 27 June 1989, Bearing in mind, and without prejudice to, the international instruments which could have a bearing on the applications of genetics in the field of intellectual property, inter alia the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of 9 September 1886 and the UNESCO Universal Copyright Convention of 6 September 1952, as last revised in Paris on 24 July 1971, the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March 1883, as last revised at Stockholm on 14 July 1967, the Budapest Treaty of the WIPO on International Recognition of the Deposit of Micro-Organisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedures of 28 April 1977, and the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPs) annexed to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, which entered into force on 1 January 1995, Bearing in mind also the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity of 5 June 1992 and emphasizing in that connection that the recognition of the genetic diversity of humanity must not give rise to any interpretation of a social or political nature which could call into question “the inherent dignity and (…) the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”, in accordance with the Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Recalling 22 C/Resolution 13.1, 23 C/Resolution 13.1, 24 C/Resolution 13.1, 25 C/Resolutions 5.2 and 7.3, 27 C/Resolution 5.15 and 28 C/Resolutions 0.12, 2.1 and 2.2, urging UNESCO to promote and develop ethical studies, and the actions arising out of them, on the consequences of scientific and technological progress in the fields of biology and genetics, within the framework of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, Recognizing that research on the human genome and the resulting applications open up vast prospects for progress in improving the health of individuals and of humankind as a whole, but emphasizing that such research should fully respect human dignity, freedom and human rights, as well as the prohibition of all forms of discrimination based on genetic characteristics, Proclaims the principles that follow and adopts the present Declaration. A. Human dignity and the human genome Article 1 The human genome underlies the fundamental unity of all members of the human family, as well as the recognition of their inherent dignity and diversity. In a symbolic sense, it is the heritage of humanity. Article 2 (a) Everyone has a right to respect for their dignity and for their rights regardless of their genetic characteristics. b) That dignity makes it imperative not to reduce individuals to their genetic characteristics and to respect their uniqueness and diversity. Article 3 The human genome, which by its nature evolves, is subject to mutations. It contains potentialities that are expressed differently according to each individual’s natural and social environment including the individual’s state of health, living conditions, nutrition and education. Article 4 The human genome in its natural state shall not give rise to financial gains. B. Rights of the persons concerned Article 5 (a) Research, treatment or diagnosis affecting an individual’s genome shall be undertaken only after rigorous and prior assessment of the potential risks and benefits pertaining thereto and in accordance with any other requirement of national law. (b) In all cases, the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned shall be obtained. If the latter is not in a position to consent, consent or authorization shall be obtained in the manner prescribed by law, guided by the person’s best interest. (c) The right of each individual to decide whether or not to be informed of the results of genetic examination and the resulting consequences should be respected. (d) In the case of research, protocols shall, in addition, be submitted for prior review in accordance with relevant national and international research standards or guidelines. (e) If according to the law a person does not have the capacity to consent, research affecting his or her genome may only be carried out for his or her direct health benefit, subject to the authorization and the protective conditions prescribed by law. Research which does not have an expected direct health benefit may only be undertaken by way of exception, with the utmost restraint, exposing the person only to a minimal risk and minimal burden and if the research is intended to contribute to the health benefit of other persons in the same age category or with the same genetic condition, subject to the conditions prescribed by law, and provided such research is compatible with the protection of the individual’s human rights. Article 6 No one shall be subjected to discrimination based on genetic characteristics that is intended to infringe or has the effect of infringing human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity. Article 7 Genetic data associated with an identifiable person and stored or processed for the purposes of research or any other purpose must be held confidential in the conditions set by law. Article 8 Every individual shall have the right, according to international and national law, to just reparation for any damage sustained as a direct and determining result of an intervention affecting his or her genome. Article 9 In order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms, limitations to the principles of consent and confidentiality may only be prescribed by law, for compelling reasons within the bounds of public international law and the international law of human rights.C. Research on the human genome Article 10 No research or research applications concerning the human genome, in particular in the fields of biology, genetics and medicine, should prevail over respect for the human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity of individuals or, where applicable, of groups of people. Article 11 Practices which are contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, shall not be permitted. States and competent international organizations are invited to co-operate in identifying such practices and in taking, at national or international level, the measures necessary to ensure that the principles set out in this Declaration are respected. Article 12 (a) Benefits from advances in biology, genetics and medicine, concerning the human genome, shall be made available to all, with due regard for the dignity and human rights of each individual. (b) Freedom of research, which is necessary for the progress of knowledge, is part of freedom of thought. The applications of research, including applications in biology, genetics and medicine, concerning the human genome, shall seek to offer relief from suffering and improve the health of individuals and humankind as a whole. D. Conditions for the exercise of scientific activity Article 13 The responsibilities inherent in the activities of researchers, including meticulousness, caution, intellectual honesty and integrity in carrying out their research as well as in the presentation and utilization of their findings, should be the subject of particular attention in the framework of research on the human genome, because of its ethical and social implications. Public and private science policy-makers also have particular responsibilities in this respect. Article 14 States should take appropriate measures to foster the intellectual and material conditions favourable to freedom in the conduct of research on the human genome and to consider the ethical, legal, social and economic implications of such research, on the basis of the principles set out in this Declaration. Article 15 States should take appropriate steps to provide the framework for the free exercise of research on the human genome with due regard for the principles set out in this Declaration, in order to safeguard respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity and to protect public health. They should seek to ensure that research results are not used for non-peaceful purposes. Article 16 States should recognize the value of promoting, at various levels, as appropriate, the establishment of independent, multidisciplinary and pluralist ethics committees to assess the ethical, legal and social issues raised by research on the human genome and its application. E. Solidarity and international cooperation Article 17 States should respect and promote the practice of solidarity towards individuals, families and population groups who are particularly vulnerable to or affected by disease or disability of a genetic character. They should foster, inter alia , research on the identification, prevention and treatment of genetically based and genetically influenced diseases, in particular rare as well as endemic diseases which affect large numbers of the world’s population. Article 18 States should make every effort, with due and appropriate regard for the principles set out in this Declaration, to continue fostering the international dissemination of scientific knowledge concerning the human genome, human diversity and genetic research and, in that regard, to foster scientific and cultural co-operation, particularly between industrialized and developing countries. Article 19 (a) In the framework of international co-operation with developing countries, States should seek to encourage measures enabling: (b) Relevant international organizations should support and promote the initiatives taken by States for the above-mentioned purposes. F. Promotion of the principles set out in the Declaration Article 20 States should take appropriate measures to promote the principles set out in the Declaration, through education and relevant means, inter alia through the conduct of research and training in interdisciplinary fields and through the promotion of education in bioethics, at all levels, in particular for those responsible for science policies. Article 21 States should take appropriate measures to encourage other forms of research, training and information dissemination conducive to raising the awareness of society and all of its members of their responsibilities regarding the fundamental issues relating to the defence of human dignity which may be raised by research in biology, in genetics and in medicine, and its applications. They should also undertake to facilitate on this subject an open international discussion, ensuring the free expression of various sociocultural, religious and philosophical opinions. G. Implementation of the Declaration Article 22 States should make every effort to promote the principles set out in this Declaration and should, by means of all appropriate measures, promote their implementation. Article 23 States should take appropriate measures to promote, through education, training and information dissemination, respect for the above-mentioned principles and to foster their recognition and effective application. States should also encourage exchanges and networks among independent ethics committees, as they are established, to foster full collaboration. Article 24 The International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO should contribute to the dissemination of the principles set out in this Declaration and to the further examination of issues raised by their applications and by the evolution of the technologies in question. It should organize appropriate consultations with parties concerned, such as vulnerable groups. It should make recommendations, in accordance with UNESCO’s statutory procedures, addressed to the General Conference and give advice concerning the follow-up of this Declaration, in particular regarding the identification of practices that could be contrary to human dignity, such as germ-line interventions.Article 25 Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any state, group or person any claim to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the principles set out in this Declaration. "Woke" is a term that has developed over the last several years that doesn't seem to have one clear meaning. According to Elaine Richardson it originated from Black Culture, and first appeared around the 1960's to 1970s. Still others believe its use began in the early 1900's. According to Merriam-Webster, it is defined as being "aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues, especially issues of racial and social justice". One central theme to its meaning is its attachment to social justice.
Some examples or activities that are considered woke include celebrities that preach environmentalism while flying in private jets; equity and inclusion; changing names of sports teams or removing monuments; demanding diversity except in thought; attaching every issue to racism; advocating for open borders but living in gated communities; advocating for defunding the police then hiring private security; demanding pronoun use; silencing speakers on college campuses; promoting cancel culture as a means of social justice; and demanding tolerance of everyone except those who oppose certain behaviors or who have dissenting views. Sadly, this is just a short list of woke. Woke is also a part of the political realm, with Republicans, or the "right wing", pointing fingers at Democrats for its woke ideology, and the "left wing" pointing to the right as being oppressive and racist. The truth is, woke is nothing but a cadre of ideological agendas warmed over by the United Nations (UN) and promoted by the World Economic Forum (WEF). But the term woke is not used by the UN or WEF to define these ideologies, they are buried under the terms social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). With its massive partnerships and control over corporate media and entertainment, the term woke is being used as a disguise for the true UN and WEF agendas, much like sustainable development is used as a guise to hide the fact that is is really Agenda 21. WEF understands this power of the media and continues to work on shaping information fed to the masses. It also aids in generating blame and division that distracts from the truth. Some have written about this and how propaganda and manipulation by corporate interests have entered the public realm. The integration of "woke" into all facets of society really came from the WEF (pg 10). As DEI is now being dismantled, what will WEF come up with next to continue its advancement of this ideology, especially with it being removed from education? Surely, WEF will not give it up. The new methodology is already in the works, one of which is creating separate corporations that will filter DEI for them, and from which the corporation can then hire, no one the wiser. Another method is creating yet another group to work on the issue. By studying past difficulties and successes, it became clear that "upskilling" workers, rather educating them into DEI, would work (pg 38). Or you can have individuals just "self-identify" whatever it is they want others to know (Pepsico-pg 10), or just pay for the agenda. Perhaps the most ominous future direction, already in place with the environment, social governance model (ESG), is merging capitalism with socialism "to create a productive and inclusive economic and social model." One can't get more woke than that. WEF won't let woke go anywhere, it is here to stay, just hidden under a new canopy of lies. The next time an issue is being described as woke, just remember it is the UN and especially WEF spreading propaganda, not the right or left. Don't be distracted from the real perpetrators. They are the real enemy and need to be targeted as such. Both have been getting away with it for several years, and for several years everyone has been buying into it. Everyone buying into this narrative are the puppets being used to divide societies so a new societal order can be installed, one without any uniqueness or identity, just equity. Regardless of who came up with the saying, the one who shook the jar is the one that is guilty, and that would be the UN and WEF. They are the enemy. The following is an editorial by Diane Wheeler, an Idahoan who advocates for school choice, however has grave concerns about how that is done. Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document. Ms. Wheeler should be concerned. There is a high risk that government money delegated for education would have consequences for some form of regulatory control. In 2023, one such bill, the Freedom In Education Savings Accounts, was proposed, and defeated. As it turns out, concern over possible regulatory action with government money is very real.
The United Nations Education Scientific & Cultural Organization (UNESCO), like the UN itself, can't stand government not running everything. As the wave of parents who want to get their children out of government run indoctrination camps grows, this has not gone unnoticed by UNESCO. As always, there are always nefarious characters in the back rooms devising ways to get around what humans want. The decision was to call those dastardly beings who want other choices in education, "non-state actors" in education. It also "urges governments to see all institutions, students and teachers as part of a single system". Of course it does. This somehow protects "efficiency and innovation" and "transparency and integrity...to block vested interests." Of course government would never violate these principles. So, UNESCO is going to send in all of its non-governmental organization (NGO) warriors to lobby state legislators to reject a proposal for school choice that does not somehow tie it to the government. The teacher's unions, who also hate the idea of non-government schools, will be breathing down the necks of legislators, threatening no support during election years, and even withholding contributions, most likely. Ms. Wheeler has the right idea, make the affordability of school choice benign as a deduction for a dependent with no information on how that money is used to educate the child. In doing so there is no trail of government money that can be followed to enforce regulatory actions that have caused so much disruption in the current education system. With the UN now breathing down the neck of government it becomes even more important. James Corbett from the Corbett Report had an interesting interview with Eric Peters about how the current cars are designed to surveil, monitor, and track those who own one. As the United Nations and World Economic Forum clamp down on the use of cars, and come up with solutions that are being implemented in New York City (congestion pricing), it is important to keep in mind that control over and monitoring car use will be very much a part of owning a car. That is just more reflection on what the 4th Industrial Revolution is about, surveillance and control.
It is also interesting to note in the interview that the collusion between government and the car industry had a role in raising the profits of those corporations. That is the essence of the goal, corporate gain. The interview can be found here. Agenda 21, also called Sustainable Development (SD), was the United Nations (UN) action plan for the 21st century and signed by GHW Bush in 1992. WJ Clinton integrated SD into the federal government from the years 1993 to 1999. Although the Agenda 21 document is now 33 years old, it lives on but is just given other names.
Agenda 2030 is Agenda 21 with 17 broad ranged sustainable development goals (SDG) which have targets that identify more specific actions. Every Agenda 2030 goal and target can be found scattered throughout Agenda 21. Targets are further detailed into indicators which "measure progress on that target". The UN has been collecting data on indicators since the inception of Agenda 21, including data from the United States. Now with the Great Reset, which is also called the World Economic Forum's (WEF) Fourth Industrial Revolution (4th IR), and WEF's partnership with the UN, the full achievement of Agenda 21 is coming close to its final fulfillment. While much focus has been on the specifics and details of Agenda 21, the overall picture was easily missed. There are some clear themes that Agenda 21 is operating under. Agenda 21 Themes Even though now renamed as Agenda 2030 and the 4th IR, the same primary Agenda 21 themes are easily identifiable. These themes are present in each Agenda 21 chapter and can be found in Agenda 2030 and the 4th IR. Public Private Partnerships (P3 or PPP): As dictated by Agenda 21 (30.7), throughout the federal government P3's are actively being implemented. What initially appears to have begun as agreements for infrastructure development during the colonial period, have now become a full blown enmeshment of the two entities, escalating after Agenda 21. The UN sees this as necessary for the SDGs, and WEF strategically uses them to advance its corporate wealth and power. In the real world these partnerships destroy citizen representation, blur government and corporate powers, and have been considered a form of corporatocracy, corporatism, or crony capitalism. While Trump backed away from P3's during his first administration it remains to be seen what will happen this time around, especially given the amount of money being thrown his way already. Agenda 21 also changed the structure of government. No longer is citizen representation at the heart of our Republic, it has been reassigned to non-governmental organizations (NGO), corporations, academia, and unions, which the UN and WEF both continue to nurture. Technology: Each Agenda 21 chapter is replete with the use and advancement of technology to improve the world in all areas of life. Now, everyone lives a life drowning in technology. Technology is being used to gather more information on everyone, change how food is grown (14), and has even invaded the privacy of homes. With the advent and acceleration of artificial intelligence (AI) use in technology, the crowning glory of Agenda 21 is close to being achieved, ultimate control over humans. Because of advanced technology and AI, jobs will be changed to meet corporate needs, whether someone wants it or not. The UN loves it and is working to advance the use of technology and AI, just what Agenda 21 called for. Meanwhile, WEF founder, Klaus Schwab, is drooling over the prospects of this advancing technology and how it will "enhance human potential", now calling it "Collaboration for the Intelligent Age". Another form of technology addressed in Agenda 21 is biotechnology, and is being used as a weapon against life. From Agenda 21 (16.13(e,f)), both the UN and WEF continue to advance the creation of vaccines, whether harmful or not, and whether an individual wants them or not. Gene editing is a another type of biotechnology advocated for in Agenda 21. With the advent of CRISPR, the genetic altering technology, experimentation with changing genetic structures has now become a entertaining activity for the WEF, with others joining the party. Changing food, plants, and animal genetic structures (16.4), and manipulating DNA (16.1) were all called for in Agenda 21. Even the most minute detail from Agenda 21 (16.13(g)), mosquitoes, is being addressed. Mixing and matching medical technology with food has become a sick, genetic game. Data Collection: Technology serves the UN purpose for surveillance and data collection throughout Agenda 21 but is directly addressed in Chapter 40. Agenda 2030 advanced this with its SDG addendum on digital cooperation (pg 8), while at the same time continuing to collect data through its various organizations. Data is also necessary to the WEF and its Future Global Councils which are assigned the task of determining everyone's future based on data analysis. Protecting the Environment: Protecting the air, oceans, water, biological diversity, and ecosystems (13.8(c)) in Agenda 21 was actually a ruse to gain control over all natural resources by the government. The expansion of national monuments, wilderness areas, conservation areas, land mass, federal agendas, and removing land from productive use has achieved the true goal of controlling resources, not protecting anything. The UN is thrilled that its land grab is moving forward, and WEF is closely monitoring those resources, while the Agenda 21 goal of inventorying (35.7(a)) those resources is being implemented, much to the delight of the UN and WEF. Education: While there is one chapter on education in Agenda 21, education on SD is spread throughout all chapters and its intent to brainwash everyone. Not only was education hijacked by the federal government, it has been used as a vehicle to insert climate change propaganda and SD into the curriculum (pg 66). Through partnerships with global corporations, both the UN and WEF have succeeded in manipulating social change by deceit, influencing now what is several generations to accept SD as truth. Both the UN and WEF continue their assaults on education. Economy: Agenda 21 was never about saving the world or protecting the environment, it has always been about taking control of the economy, as clearly stated by the UN. Throughout its chapters the economy is referenced with economic implications being considered in each activity, all the while redistributing wealth (33). Stakeholder Capitalism and a Circular Economy are two economic concepts by the WEF, but as 2030 nears, the carbon markets are now entering the realm. Perhaps that will be the end game along with central bank digital currencies for final control. So, while years have passed since Agenda 21 was introduced, it is not dead, clearly continues to be executed, and is reaching its final stages of implementation thanks to the government and corporations. Massive control is already being executed over lives. Five years to 2030 and unless everyone is brave enough to stand up to the atrocity, most likely it will be a done deal. Former President Jimmy Carter died on December 29, 2024. Since then, the airwaves have been nothing but inundated with accolades about what a great president he was. Praise overflowed regarding the remarkable peace agreements he achieved when in truth those agreements were more complicated than effective and in which some later perceived as hypocritical. Eradicating disease, building houses, and his other post-presidency humanitarian work have also been commended.
The truth is, Carter undermined America and was essential to the globalization effort as a member of the Trilateral Commission and from which he brought other members into his administration. Since that time there has been a steady stream of Trilaterals in White House administrations including GHW Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and many others over the years. Today, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan have been members, The Commission also included corporate heads with connections to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and today includes the media, academia, and nongovernmental organizations in their membership. With globalization efforts, the Trilateral Commission also had a hand in creating a new international economic order which was also established by the United Nations (UN) in 1974. The UN declaration still resurfaces but now there is the WEF stakeholder capitalism to control the economy. Regardless of the UN and WEF relationships, the Trilateral Commission has its own economic plan, the Task Force on Global Capitalism in Transition, and it's insulting “Social Compact with the Next Generations”. Its report is nothing more than warmed over UN ideology and the title of the task force says it all, transition. While the Trilateral Commission itself is not a WEF member, many Commission members participate with the WEF. Carter was in on this economic transformation from the beginning as the Commission continues to work on destroying capitalism, and the world, today. As a UN non-government organization, the Commission is responsible for implementing UN objectives such as Agenda 21 and now Agenda 2030. There is zero reason to mourn the loss of this quisling. Carter was also a member of The Elders, a group of global leaders who align with the UN vision of utopia. The author of Agenda 21, Gro Harlem Brundtland, is also a member of this pathetic group of has-beens who can't let go of previous illusions of power. The failure to rescue the Iranian hostages in 1979, and the subsequent death of eight servicemen he sent to rescue them, was perceived by him and others as the primary cause of not being re-elected. Maybe Americans were just sick and tired of the damage he was doing to America and American lives, very similar to what has been happening over the last four years but is now being described as "simple decency" as a human. Although the issue of returning the Panama Canal to Panama had been negotiated for several years, it was Carter (while lying to Americans about it prior to the election in spite of vowing to never do so) and his globalist Trilateral comrades Kissinger, Vance, Brzezinski, and Sol Linowitz that desired it the most. Adding insult to these treaties was a $345 million deal to finance the transition to Panama control. Now a U.S. adversary is wielding concerning influence over the area. Thanks Jimmy. What Carter did to America as a whole was equally as bad as what he did to Americans. He was responsible for creating the unconstitutional Department of Education as a payback for votes. This extraordinary act of treason has robbed generations of young Americans from learning the truth about their nation, instead indoctrinating them in UN ideology, dumbing them down not only intellectually but spiritually as well, and grooming them for a global corporate workforce. It has destroyed so many generations that there is no denying how much damage has been done resulting in the urgent call to end this agency. Under Carter, Americans suffered with gas shortages, waiting in long lines for enough gas to get to work, and rationing. While .86 cents a gallon seems like a dream today, back in 1979 that was more than double the cost from what had been a fairly stable .30+/- cents per gallon for many years. Yet, he had the audacity to blame Americans for his failures. Mortgage rates rose from 9% in 1977 to almost 10.5% in 1978, finally hitting 12.9% in 1979. But it wasn't just mortgage interest rates that hurt Americans, small businesses also fell. Bank prime loan rates rose from 6.25% in 1977 to 15.30% by the end of 1979. Unable to secure a loan with these rates, or being unable to pay a loan back because of the excessive interest costs, many small businesses failed. All because of this traitor that Americans are now expected to mourn and honor. There are also those secret service agent reports that carrying his own luggage was for public show, his expectations that Americans should sacrifice more, and his eerily similar tactics on today's conservation efforts and renewable energy, which was a Trilateral Commission focus at the time to "transition away from a petroleum economy". For those old enough to remember those years, the misery of what he did still burns in the heart and mind, and the damage he did continues today. Why is the media being so biased about this man and not bringing the true, full picture to the masses? With the signing of the United Nations Digital Compact last year, a commitment was made to make information open and accessible, while ensuring freedom of expression and access to information (31.c). Oh yeah, the information on Carter is out there, open and accessible. But how would anyone know to ask about these issues if they had not lived during that time? The deceit isn't that information is being censored, it is the deliberate intent to downplay it, similar to how Google now buries information. The harm Carter caused to America and Americans has been downplayed and literally left out of the narrative. Yup, the Compact's intent "to promote information integrity, tolerance and respect" (34) is there with the accolades towards a former president. While it also swears to "address the challenge of misinformation and disinformation" (34) online, there is nothing in the Compact that addresses the manipulation of information that causes a distortion about an issue. For those who are too young to remember the Carter years, they are left with the impression that he was truly a great President, a humanitarian, and very deserving of all the honors he is being given now that he has passed. They would have no idea to ask about any of the realities of those days. The UN and its Digital Compact are barely at the beginning stages of just how deceitful it will be, and as it continues to move forward there will only be an increase in manipulation and distortion of information. As everyone continues to move away from books and towards online information there will be little information that can't be changed or manipulated, unlike a book that stays consistent. The distortion of facts has only just begun. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
November 2024
|