In a previous article, the plan to rebuild Gaza was revealed.  Those same players have now released an updated version and what they are doing should be understood as a warning to the world.  While the media was banned from entering the area due to the fighting, that ban continues to exist even though the fighting has essentially ended, making it very difficult to see how this Gaza and Middle East economic transformation is being executed.

This takeover of Gaza has been a Trump plan for many years.  An 2020 archived White House website revealed his true intentions which were disrupted when he did not get re-elected, but the 2020 Abraham Accords put it into motion.

In the new updated plan, called the Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration and Transformation, or "Great Trust" for short, the title alone defines the intentions for an economic transformation.  But it isn't limited to Gaza, it is intended for several countries in the region.  In true technocratic fashion, all control and decisions will be taken away from Gaza citizens, instead building the area on Sustainable Development Goals (pg 56) ideology. 

The plan states "It can start as a US-Israel bilateral agreement taking control from Israel to the US...", with funding based on tokenization.  The plan goes on to mention IMEC which stands for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor that was formally announced at the 2023 G20 meeting during Biden's reign.  IMEC is an initiative between India, the Middle East, and Europe that builds an infrastructure for transportation, communication, and trade which promotes economic development, and Gaza was needed for this initiative.  The G20 meeting was clearly intended to implement Agenda 2030 in the region.

The capture of Gaza, labeled in the Plan as an "Iranian outpost" and threat to IMEC, was needed for this economic corridor to "transform into a Mediterranean hub for manufacturing, trade, data, and tourism", and "access to markets...all supported by Israeli tech and GCC investments."  

As part of its "10 Mega Projects" an "Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone" and "Gaza Trump Riviera & Islands" would be developed.  "Gaza Planned Cities" will be "AI-powered" through an "ID-based digital system" and railway, pipelines, and fibers will connect regional hubs across IMEC.  

Initially, "30+%" of public Gazan land "will be leased to the Trust for 25-99 years" and a "blockchain registry for land and
tokenization" developed.  Gazans can exchange their private land for a token in the Trust then "redeem their tokens for ownership of rebuilt residences".  The Trust decides how those residences would be built.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), now shuttered, was intended to provide aid to Gazans as reconstruction took place.  Included in the plan are Voluntary Relocation Programs that outline how Gazans would be assisted in remaining in Gaza or in leaving the area, while saving $500 million "on every 1% relocating".  

Over the next 10 years an estimated "$185B in revenue" would be generated for industry and "increase value of Gaza to ~$324B" from nothing as it stands today.  This is a sad commentary on the destruction of Gaza land and its people, looking at it as a monetary accomplishment.

Gaza would serve as a major hub for IMEC, having high-speed rail and a freight corridor, a $3 billion/year tourism industry, and a hyperscale data center.  There is no mention of Gaza citizens participating in these decisions or providing input.  Rebuilding Gaza for this hub includes the infrastructure, security, and education with workforce development.  Public-private partnerships (PPP) will build medical facilities, broadband, rail infrastructure, and deep port construction while non-PPP will build tourism infrastructure, regional data centers for Cloud Service Providers, and advanced manufacturing facilities. 

The Trust will provide 100% investment in: UXO, debris removal, temporary housing, security, basic infrastructure, and workforce development.  President Trump initially committed $10 billion US dollars to the rebuilding of Gaza, but has now raised that amount to $17 billion, so far without congressional approval.  In spite of this, the plan is short of cash.  Caveats to reduce the needed money include increasing the number of Gazans leaving, increasing PPPs, using debt for financing, increasing international aid, and hastening the reconstruction timelines.   Building this corridor has already begun. 

While this whole plan is about making money, it is also about oil.  In 1971, President Nixon removed the gold standard and in doing so created the petrodollar.  Oil producing countries needed to keep U.S. dollars on hand for oil transactions and for other investments in the global economy, putting the U.S. dollar in demand.  Saudi Arabia, in return, also received military and political support.  However, Saudi has been slowly detaching itself from the dollar for several years.

There is belief currently underway that the petrodollar is ending.  Gulf countries no longer need to rely on it for energy transactions, even suggesting it is "de-dollarizing" the economy, that a new financial world is being created with a new financial market, along with a functioning parallel financial system.  The stablecoin will be the new petrodollar and the new method of payment.

Enter digital currency and the World Financial Liberty (WLFI) organization, co-founded by President Trump and sons, and its stablecoin USD1.  Not only has WLFI played a significant financial role with IMEC countries, it is taking steps to enter the tokenization of oil and other real world assets (RWA). 

Just before Trump's inauguration in January, 2025, Aryam Investment 1, backed by United Arab Emeritus (UAE) National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, bought a 49% stake in WLFI for $500 million, making Aryam Investment 1 the largest shareholder in WLFI.

Shortly after his inauguration, President Trump then granted the UAE access to 500,000 advanced AI chips annually which could not be obtained under Biden, and which could be used for two IMEC projects, artificial intelligence and data centers.  Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, tech and surveillance expert, and billionaire, was the chair of the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund at that time. 

In June, 2025, the UAE investment group, Aqua 1 Foundation, that accelerates blockchain financial systems and real world asset (RWA) tokenization, bought $100 million dollars of USD1 stablecoin.

Also in 2025, WLFI's USD1 stable coin was chosen as part of an Emirati-backed deal "to close MGX's $2 billion investment in Binance" which is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that operates across the world, and with a very checkered history.  WLFI also integrated blockchain technology across Pakistan though a deal with the Pakistan Crypto Council with some allegations towards President Trump.  Concern has been expressed about other WLFI deals that have not been fully disclosed. 

Recently, WLFI applied "to form a national trust bank" that would "place its USD1 stablecoin under direct federal supervision in a regulatory category".  It would also "allow WLFI to formally issue and hold its own dollar-pegged stablecoin...and...permit the company to offer services like holding digital assets for customers and converting stablecoins."  This adds another needed component towards building the new financial system.

The point is, WLFI is networking itself across the Middle East that easily fits into the digitally run Great Trust plan.  It has advanced far enough that oil and Iran now become factors in this scheme. 

While the Great Trust plan does not reference the energy sector, the Board of Peace does reference the New Gaza Energy and Digital Infrastructure in Jared Kushner's January, 2026, World Economic Forum Davos presentation on page 7.  There have also been hints of Iran joining the fray, which has maybe been the goal all along, not solely for the elimination of nuclear threats. 

IMEC will increase energy flows through the corridor with new routes for oil transports being considered.  However, strategically, the UAE already built an alternate oil route with its Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, and releasing it from the petrodollar, an advantage to IMEC member India.  Saudi Arabia has its own alternate route, Petroline.

Iran has been a thorn in the side for this Gaza plan, and as seen by these IMEC maps, control over the Strait of Hormuz is needed for the IMEC agenda.  The United Nations is even in on it and the World Economic Forum supports it.  Iran knows this is a threat and might be connected to the Fujairah bombing on May 5 and the bombing of the Saudi Arabia pipeline.

With the weakening petrodollar, and the deals that have been made with WLFI, the stablecoin financial sector is being built for also trading in the energy sector with stablecoins, fitting nicely into the Great Trust plan.

Solana is a global computer network that processes transactions and keeps a record of them, and in which USD1 is involved.  With the exit of the UAE  from OPEC, it is one more step to integrate the energy market into the overall IMEC financial and technocratic goals.

WLFI has already connected with Chainlink Data Services with a platform for the tokenization of oil.  Tokenizing oil has not yet reached full maturity as explained in this Chainlink article, but the efforts continue to be built and are expanding.  It is the "convergence of the industrial world and the digital economy" and "energy assets onchain will likely become a cornerstone of modern financial markets" just as the petrodollar was.  As a Co-Founder and LITRO Lead Architect, Baron Lamarre will be launching his tokenized oil in January, 2027.

Patrick Wood's article, Why Trump’s Takeover In Gaza Preceded The War In Iran, explains this betrayal.  "Trump and Kushner designed the diplomatic framework. Gulf sovereign wealth — hundreds of millions of Islamic investment capital — funds the financial infrastructure. World Liberty Financial’s USD1 stablecoin is the designated payment instrument. The Board of Peace is the governance vehicle. Each component was in place before the first bomb fell on Iran."  This article articulates the same as well, calling it "a corporatized trusteeship for capital, cloaked in the language of peace, progress, and partnership."  A similar perspective can be found here.

This scheme has been planned for a long time beginning with Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner drafting the Abraham Accords then profiting from Middle East deals where he has been part of a diplomatic envoy.  Meanwhile, the parallel financial system is being built by Trump and Witkoff sons, potentially overtaking the U.S. dollar financial system, a full blown Constitutional violation, and tokenizing all assets into a digital system.  This, and the technocratic agenda, are cloaked under the guise of an international organization that will bring peace.

Most horrific is that Gaza has been devastated for the sole purpose of building their technocratic vision of digital control over humans, with an education system designed to produce the workforce that will support their profits.  The Board of Peace Charter outlines how these technocrats will make all decisions through a corporate "technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee" governance structure, where no Gaza citizen will have a voice in any facet of their lives, even dictating the style (pg 86) of the building in which they will live.  This Board will never dissolve as suggested in Article 10.2., they will have too much power and control.

Some may perceive all of this information as nothing but an opinion, but the facts that support what is happening are there.  In one aspect, it is nothing more than one massive business and economic deal being negotiated by two private real estate developers who are clothed as an envoy to negotiate peace.  Others might perceive it as a geopolitical move with IMEC being an alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).  Regardless, the motives are clear for more power and control for technocratic dominance, and the technology and wealth are present to make it happen.

How much longer will the Constitution protect the United States from this world transformation in which it will eventually, and most likely, be forced to participate.

Most likely, few have wondered how Germany was able to build a war machine during the 1930's, especially when reparation payments from WWI broke its economy and sent millions into unemployment.  But the story is actually quite fascinating.  

Hitler, in cahoots with German's central bank president, Hjalmar Schacht, built a parallel fake currency to fund his army.  Schacht created a fake front company, Metallurgical Research Corporation that issued promissory notes, called a Mefo bill, which was tied to Germany's currency, the Reichsmark.  German armament companies would obtain these Mefo bills from the fake company then exchange them at any bank for Reichsmarks.  The bank then turned the bills over to Germany's central bank, the Reichsbank.

Since the Mefo bills were through a fake private company, the transactions were left off government balance sheets.  This allowed the government to run a larger deficit and hide the debt it was creating.  The scheme gave the Reich the ability to build credit under the central bank that funded the war, often with money that was stolen from Jewish citizens and businesses.  With this fake parallel currency, and in spite of the Treaty of Versailles banning it, the rearmament of Germany began.

Mefo bills were backed by nothing except a promise note, like what exists today with fiat money.  This was a fake economic system and a great way to hide the fact an army was being built.  

Understanding Mefo bills in Germany may help explain what is happening similarly right here in America with stablecoins, which are not issued as a currency by the government, but rather by the private sector.  There is also the parallel that these digital currencies are being used to build a parallel economic system, albeit not as secretly as the Mefo scam.  Perhaps the most perilous issue with stablecoins is they "must continually strengthen their "circulation value".  In other words, they must reduce users' incentive to redeem them for fiat currency."  

Great care has been taken by the Trump administration to create a "digital representation of value that is recorded on a distributed ledger, including cryptocurrencies, digital tokens, and stablecoins."  Unlike the Mefo bill that could be held in the hand, a stablecoin is something of value that can't be physically held, it is just on a digital ledger.  But it is a digital asset that can be used as an exchange for something else of value, a cute way that avoids saying it can be used as currency or money. 

Like the Mefo being tied to the fiat Reichsmark, most stablecoins are tied to the fiat U.S. dollar which is not backed by a physical commodity like gold or silver.  After approval, payment stablecoins are issued by private companies as tokens on a blockchain which also serves as the ledger for transactions, and, like the Mefo bill, are separate from the federal government balance sheet, even though pegged to the U.S. dollar.  A separate financial system is being built with this technology.

This "digital representation of value" was created in spite of Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 in the Constitution which states only Congress has the authority to coin money and regulate its value.  "...stablecoins are not officially legal tender".

In 2024, President Trump and Steve Witkoff, with their sons and others, founded World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a decentralized finance (DeFi) company.  After taking office, President Trump was then listed as a "co-Founder Emeritus".  A DeFi is a "financial system that uses blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies to enable direct transactions between individuals and businesses, often without the need for traditional intermediaries such as banks."  It is the parallel financial system being built separate from our traditional banking system, similar to the Mefo bill being a separate financial system.  There is also questionable transparency about all WLFI dealings and who is involved.  American Bitcoin is another Trump family crypto mining venture.

In March, 2025, WLFI launched its own stablecoin called USD1, "a fiat-backed stablecoin that holds a portion of its cash reserves in US government treasuries similar to that of USDC (a U.S. dollar backed stablecoin), and USDT (Tether)".  USD1 reserves are "held by the digital asset custodian, BitGo, with its reserves primarily held in short-term US government treasuries".

DeFI creates the digital interoperability for the WLFI stablecoin USD1.  Like other stablecoins, USD1 can be converted between digital assets and other currencies, including transactions across borders that can be used by foreign investors, in which WLFI has been engaged.  The World Economic Forum likes that idea.

Much like the MEFO bill that was issued instead of cash, the Stablecoin can be used "to increase the usage of the US dollar digitally as the world's reserve currency", and potentially create "trillions of dollars of demand for US Treasuries".  (At least this provides some acknowledgment it is an unconstitutional currency that is not issued by the federal government.)  The aim is to "cement US dollar's supremacy in a digital age", "help fund the federal government" and "lead a new era of "digital finance".  In this scheme, "conventional bank deposits" could be partially replaced or completely bypass the need for a bank account, using blockchain instead. 

The Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets offered some recommendations on digital currency uses, just as if it was legitimate, congressionally authorized, money needing regulation on its value.

Since the Mefo was backed by a fraudulent scheme, when it came time to pay up, the added debt it caused was exposed.  Stablecoins are not foolproof and even the USD1 is vulnerable to several risks.  Concern has been expressed about the effect these stablecoins could have on the economy given the amount of debt they hold.  Surprisingly, even the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), and others, warn against the fake use of Stablecoins, and in which can be frozen or used to block transactions just like the threat of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC), an activity in which WLFI has already been accused.

Perhaps the broader scheme is the intention to "transform the financial world” and "overtake banks" as revealed by Eric Trump.  As Patrick Wood noted in his article, Trump Family Is Jockeying To Replace The Dollar Globally As Their Wealth Soars, "World Liberty Financial is not just issuing a stablecoin — it is building a full-stack programmable financial infrastructure with Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization at its core."  This is validated in the embedded video where Zach Witkoff announces WLFI is exploring tokenizing other assets such as oil and timber.  And why not, the Trump family has allegedly accrued massive amounts of wealth from this venture while also taking losses.  This article re-emphasizes the threat, "Tokenization allows the creation of a new financial system."   

Tokenizing assets is just another World Economic Forum dream being fulfilled.  It is all part of the digital transformation that is underway, potentially leading to full control.  Just imagine that property deed as a token, the online infrastructure crashes, or is hacked leaving no way to prove ownership of that property.  Or maybe someone decides the owner's behavior is unacceptable and just flips a switch that blocks access just as was done by WLFT.  Rather than forcing compliance through CBDCs, it will be done by the private sector through tokenization.

Eric Trump complained about being cancelled and his stablecoin being "retribution".  Somebody better wake this kid up, digital currency on a blockchain can also be exploited just as his WLFI allegedly blocked one of its users.

As explained here by Patrick Wood, "Every asset tokenized can be frozen, taxed, transferred, or cancelled by whoever administers the protocol."  He continues to say that U.S. debt does not get paid with this scheme, "It gets restructured into a new architecture and hidden inside a technological layer most people will never examine, until it is too late to escape.​"

Heck, even Russia understands the value of creating its own Mefo style crypto twin for financial survival.  Russia has been working on a crypto currency for a few years and using it much like the way the Mefo bill was used, getting around economy killing sanctions, and potentially using it as a way "to hide its armament campaigns."

The G20, and others, are also working on forcing the world to transform into a digital economy.  Just as the World Economic Forum predicted, it is the Great Reset, forever changing everyone's way of life, forcing all into a digital world.  Once this full financial system is achieved, there will be no remnants of life as we know it today because this digital financial world will bring digital ID with it.  There will be no escape from surveillance once that happens, proof of digital ID will be demanded to engage in any life activity.  All of this is closer than anyone understands. 

Many years ago, following the initiation of Agenda 21 in 1992, many warned of its various threats, one being that it promoted the concept of "stack & pack" housing.  This type of housing need was based on the idea that it would protect the planet through less land use which could then be protected from human habitation.  Agenda 21, Chapter 7, Promoting Sustainable Human Settlement Development, outlined this change in housing and other needed transformations, which included having services within walking or biking distance, and use of mass transportation.  All of this would lessen the need for cars which would again, protect the environment. 

But as this 'protect the planet' narrative was slowly being rejected, the same propaganda players were behind the narrative shift.

Since Agenda 21, there has been more dense housing put into place across American cities and this housing agenda has only accelerated since 2015 with the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 11, Sustainable Cities & Communities.  But it goes much deeper than that with infiltration into local governments.

Back in 1993, W.J. Clinton gave the American Planning Association (APA) a multi-million dollar grant to "write a land use
legislative blueprint for every municipality in the US."  This blueprint, finished in 2002, was called "Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook with Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change".  

It must be remembered that the APA is a non-governmental organization (NGO) that is in consultative status with the United Nations (UN) and is in full cooperation with implementation of UN agendas.  UN ideology is taught to all APA members and most city planners are APA members.

On page 4-72, "affordable housing" is addressed with recommendations to prohibit communities from creating ordinances forbidding manufactured housing; direct localities to permit accessory apartments as a right in any single family zone; require localities to include a range of housing; and require all states and local governments modify housing and zoning ordinances to permit density.  Beginning on page 6-36, 2(g)(h), it goes on to dictate how a "Regional Comprehensive Plan" should be written, and include dense housing, affordability, and mass transportation to get people out of their cars.

So, for 24 years, indoctrinated APA city planner members have been integrating not only UN ideology into local governments, but the whole idea that there is a need for affordable housing.  The APA has been successfully indoctrinating state legislators to create legislation that usurps local government control over its own ordinances.   

Across America, this belief that there is an "affordable housing crisis" is nothing more than a narrative shift advocating for the same dense housing.  The underlying agenda for dense housing is the same, getting people stacked & packed with walking, biking, and mass transportation to services.  The 15 minute city and 20-Minute Suburb both eventually lead to a smart city which is intended to do nothing more than surveil every activity for control.  In order to accomplish this, zoning ordinances are being targeted, forcing density from single family dwellings to town homes, duplexes, multi-family, and accessory dwelling units.

Barack Hussein Obama, an Agenda 2030 devotee, began the initial attempt to dismantle zoning with his Fair Housing Act, using claims of racist discrimination in housing.  This also resulted in making housing equally available to low- income families so lower cost housing had to be built.  The National Affordable Housing Act, Section 101, "affirms the national goal that every American family be able to afford a decent home in a suitable environment."  This affirms the UN declaration that everyone has a right to housing.

Local governance over zoning laws across America, from Alabama, Idaho, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Arizona, Maine, Virginia, North Carolina, and Oklahoma, with Montana losing their fight against dense zoning, are being stripped of authority to develop and control their own laws.  This, in turn, strips citizen's rights to participate in decisions about their community and its growth.  And it is all coming straight out of the UN and its crony APA comrades.

Comprehensive Plans are being infested with this ideology, urban densification.  Small, rural towns are also a target for increased density.  All of America is a target for this hoax, and it is moving rapidly because so many are drinking the kool-aid.  However, there may be other hidden factors not being discussed.

One factor may be the glut of housing that investors buy up to use as rentals, which the government is attempting to address.  Another reason to be cautious about dense housing is that renting is more attractive, especially for younger generations.  They, too, have been led to believe that the responsibility of home ownership is something that should be rejected, preferring instead to adopt a sustainable lifestyle by living in a smaller space with no plans to have children, not having to mess with yard work or maintenance issues, and healthier living by walking to work.  Plus, it's cheaper and perhaps, even with the extra housing, it is still unaffordable and easier to continue living with family.  It comes down to a lifestyle choice, not an issue of housing.

Maybe the decision to not openly discuss these facts is deliberate.  It would counter the narrative for dense housing.  What a crafty way to build so much housing for "affordability" that won't be bought by those they claim can't afford it, but instead, in the end, be bought for more rental units and rental communities.  An affordability message is also a cunning way to continue changing the way in which we live while systematically dismantling our government while the government itself participates in dismantling it!!!  

Everyone needs to stop buying into the narratives because this whole shtick is one step closer to the dream of everyone owning nothing and still being happy. 

Patrick Wood, the foremost expert on Technocracy, has been monitoring the progress in the rebuilding of Gaza and President Trump's involvement.  

In his article, The Strange Case Of Trump's 'Board of Peace", he begins by exploring the constitutionality of the whole scenario, the actual funding mechanisms, and roles of involved individuals.  

There may be those who have some general recognition of terms like the United Nations (UN) Agenda 21 or 2030, the World Economic Forum (WEF), or perhaps even the Great Reset.  Sustainable Development Goals might be familiar language to others.  Some may even have a deeper knowledge of what these terms or organizations are about.  If not, this article is intended to provide a summary of each and how they have led the world to its current state.

In 1992, President G.H.W Bush signed Agenda 21 at Rio de Janeiro.  Agenda 21, also named as Sustainable Development (SD), was never formally signed by Congress, however in 1993, President Clinton created the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) via Executive Order 12852 which essentially integrated SD into all federal legislation.

Agenda 21 contains 40 chapters, covering topics such as cities, health, education, biodiversity, women & children, biotechnology, and protecting the land and oceans.  It is a very difficult and repetitive document to read, however there are easily missed themes in each.  Highlights that are easily missed include the reference to the use of technology, utilization of genetic resources, data collection, role of science, and economics.

When it comes to Agenda 21, the true purpose was "to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history", a nice follow-up to the UN Declaration of a New International Economic Order in 1974, and its "Programme of Action".  This will come up again in the technocracy discussion.

This agenda was signed by 178 countries thus creating a global agenda.

Once Agenda 21 was integrated into the federal government by 1999, and passed further down to states through legislation, President G.W. Bush began implementing some of the goals such as the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act which started data collection on students, and the Patriot Act that advanced surveillance on Americans.  President Obama tightened this grip on student data collection with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in 2015.  These type of laws commenced the beginning of data collection on youth as "future generations" of Americans, and which will also resurface in the technocracy discussion.  

Agenda 21 chapters were condensed into a more readable and easily understood version with the UN adoption of Agenda 2030 in 2015, along with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which included more specific goals and targets.  Agenda 2030 is explained in more depth here.

The United States adopted Agenda 2030 and has been "committed" to its implementation, at least up until 2025 when it was rejected.  However, this may be a sleight of hand as SD had already been deeply embedded into legislation while cities and states still operate under its goals, with continued student indoctrination.

So, from 1992 to 2015 the framework solidly integrated both SD agendas into laws, and education, that would build upon the data collection through surveillance systems.  A technological framework was all that was left to finish the job.  

Enter the World Economic Forum (WEF) with its vast global corporate partnerships in the fields of technology, healthcare, media, banking, energy, education, food, and many others.  A Search by Industry tab can be found on the bottom left side.  Corporations have their own organization to promote the SDGs while the UN has its own corporate partnerships for the same reasons.

In 2019. the UN and WEF signed a Strategic Partnership Framework for the 2030 Agenda.  Part of that framework was financing Agenda 2030 in specific areas, such as health, digital cooperation, and education.  However, as will be seen, this framework has extended into every facet of life.  That agreement is now seven years old and corporate profits, along with control, have continued to surge, along with corporate manipulation over the media, consumers, and society.

The next phase is the Great Reset, otherwise known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR).  The intent is changing "us", and creating a "different economic model", a massive scheme for global socialism through fascism delivered by technocracy.

Event 201 was a tabletop exercise on a pandemic scenario, held in October, 2019, just before the Covid-19 event.  Covid-19 was used to integrate several objectives into society such as increasing online activity (education, employment), collecting data on humans (40.2), shopping, and propelled Americans towards "technology for communication".  Increased use of technology, data collection, and economic shifts were all outlined in Agenda 21.  The role of science in SD, also highlighted in Agenda 21, could be seen with Dr. Fauci and his constant reference to "follow the science" that began the trend to reject all opposing science.  Thus began the trajectory that science overruled a representative government, another technocracy foundation.

The "new normal" was described by WEF founder Klaus Schwab.  In fact, within a short few months in 2020, he was able to write and publish a book on the pandemic, Covid 19: The Great Reset, describing all of the marvelous changes that were being laid upon the world, and what changes were yet to come in the "economic, societal, geopolitical, environmental and technological" sectors.  The book can be read here.

Just as the UN has its code names, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 for SD, WEF's code name is the Great Reset for its 4IR.  But again, both boil down to transforming the economy and achieving the SDGs.

4IR was forced upon the world by the Covid-19 event and what the world is experiencing right now, a transformation to technological and scientific dependence.  Some may perceive it as global socialism or fascism, and yes, those elements are present.  A shift to socialism is seen in the U.S. and both Agenda 21 and 2030 are based on collectivism themes.  And yes, there has been an increasing government shift in partnerships with the private sector, called public-private partnerships or P3 (30.7, 17.17), a form of fascism.  But this also came from the UN agendas, and WEF exponentially advances it.  Going back to the quote that SD was actually about transforming the economy, via the 4IR, capitalism is being challenged with a socialist economy through stakeholder capitalism.

The 4IR is driven by technology beginning with online activity that was accelerated with Covid-19.  Everything is changing over to the internet, the digital age, and digital activity powers the 4IR.  The digital economy, communication, ID, healthcare, employment, shopping, personal finances, education...these are just a few areas being overpowered by the digital age.  

Next is technology connecting all devices together, "connectivity", called the Internet of Things (IoT) that powers the 4IR.  All internet activity data can be shared between devices as seen today with smart phones, in-home appliances, cars, healthcare, shopping, and education, essentially all data conducted over the internet.  Over time the goal is to have the Internet of Everything (IoE).

Using the internet, data collection is the next 4IR objective.  From Agenda 21, down to the 4IR, it has all been about data collection.  With internet technology, this data collection has exploded.  However, what to do with all that data?

Data centers are the solution.  The aggressive push to build more of them is an indicator of just how much data has already been collected on everyone and every speck of life.  However, that massive amount of data is beyond what any human can sort through so analyzing it becomes a priority.  That can be achieved through artificial intelligence (AI) of course.  One may think that when Agenda 21 was created the idea of AI was non-existent.  Not so, AI was conceived during the 1930's, born in the 1950's, and is very relevant to technocracy.

AI is the unnamed element in Agenda 21 for data analysis throughout the chapters.  Data centers and AI will be used to control everything from the economy to how society lives.  AI agents are used to manipulate and determine how one shops; control education through online learning and AI created propaganda software that dictates what is learned along with student compliance data; personal finance and spending habits are already tracked through online banking with digital money; humans are used as lab rats to make AI better (pg 11); and AI advances genetic manipulation in food while having an "impact on nearly every aspect of the human experience." 

In probably what is the biggest violation of state rights in history, the White House is working on an AI framework that would prevent any state from designing its own laws for AI use.  

Though not named as technocracy, Agenda 21 contained the heart of it.   Data collection was covered in Chapter 40, the Scientific and Technological Community is described in Chapter 31, Science is promoted in Chapter 35, and corporate influence over transforming social systems is highlighted in Chapter 30.  Using technology, it is this corporate influence now being used to force economic and societal change as explained at the 44" mark in this Alex Newman video.

Just like a recipe is provided but without identifying the end result, all of these Agenda 21 chapters contain the recipe for the science of social engineering, technocracy.  By its own government, America is being devoured by technocracy via AI.

Agenda 21 did not provide the term  technocracy, but it is the management of a society by technical experts that is data driven.  The original technocracy movement began in the 1930's around the same time AI was conceived, but drifted away with WWII.  The foundation for the technocratic movement was a monetary system based on energy where energy certificates would be issued instead of money, and there would be technocratic control over all production and consumption, also highlighted in Agenda 21.  

With the advent of advanced technologies, Agenda 21 has come full circle and is being fully implemented via the 4IR by WEF.  The first technocracy experiment now begins in Gaza.  The plan for the war torn area is to create a region "governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee."  Gaza will be the technocratic city that is governed by full surveillance and data collection with technocrats and AI driving all decisions.  Iran may be on the table for the same (pg 3) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is getting ready for technocratic control.  All aspects of society, and government, will be controlled by this model, just as all areas of life were addressed in Agenda 21.

Many details are left out but the important factor is how little Agenda 21 was understood when introduced, and has now been generally forgotten.  But the current state of affairs was clearly born out of its words.  All facets of life are now bowing to control with technologies that execute Agenda 21 objectives, only to be accelerated at an unbelievable rate with the current administration.  As Patrick Wood explains, the process of tokenizing assets is already happening while Wall Street is doing the same.  

Whenever a new issue surfaces, think first of Agenda 21, what chapter covers that subject, and how technocracy plays a role implementing it.  Something as simple as the Save Act originates from Agenda 21 and 2030, especially meeting SDG 16.9, but it is really intended to move everyone one step closer to a digital ID. 

Patrick Wood is the leading expert on technocracy.  In this video he explains technocracy from a biblical perspective, in this video he explains technocracy and how it can be seen today, and here he discusses technocracy in more depth.  

Whether one needs to learn more about this, or is just being reminded, the original Agenda 21 has had more impact on the world than was realized.  Understanding it is in the final implementation stages should be an alarm to how close the world is to fall under technocratic control.

This is a World Economic Forum video from 2018, prior to the announcement of the Great Reset and its Fourth Industrial revolution.  These elitists talk about their plans for your future.

The Earth Brokers: Power, Politics and World Development is a book co-authored by Pratap Chatterjee and Matthias Finger, and written in 1994 just after the Rio Summit was held in 1992.  It was the "first critical analysis of the Earth Summit and its mission document Agenda 21". 

Unfortunately, most countries did not heed the warnings from these two authors who saw through the deceit of Agenda 21.  Below is an excerpt of pages 42-43 where they critically analyzed the biotechnology aspect of Agenda 21 and the rights to genetic resources.

"Indeed, the biodiversity convention is just one of many typical examples where the concern for exponential destruction of the world's biodiversity has been perverted into a preoccupation with new scientific and (bio- )techno-logical developments to boost economic growth. Or as Vandana Shiva puts it: 'It is ironical that a convention for the protection of biodiversity has been distorted into a convention to exploit it'.  Though this is not surprising, given the conceptual framework of the Brundtland Commission discussed earlier, it is nevertheless worth while identifying the three key arguments that cement this perversion: first, the convention gives 'nation -states the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their environmental policies', thus transforming biological diversity into a natural resource to be exploited and manipulated.  Then, the convention implicitly equates the diversity of life -animals and plants - to the diversity of genetic codes, for which read genetic resources. By doing so, diversity becomes something modern science can manipulate. Finally, the convention promotes biotechnology as being 'essential for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity'.

Not surprisingly, biotechnology, according to Agenda 21, is not only good for the conservation of biodiversity, but it is also good for improving agricultural production as it will 'increase the yield of major crops, livestock, and aquaculture species'.  The biotechnology industry is therefore beneficial to humanity in at least two ways, i.e. to conserve biodiversity on the one hand and to improve production on the other. Interestingly, as Third World Resurgence has pointed out, the thrust of the biodiversity convention - as well as that of chapter 16 of Agenda 21 dealing with biodiversity and biotechnology - is exactly the same as a document prepared by the biotechnology industry for UNCED. In it the International Biodiversity Forum says that genetically manipulated organisms are 'natural' while at the same time claiming that they are improvements upon nature due to 'increased efficiency'.  The document, like the convention, also says that (1) 'modern biotechnology will help maintain biodiversity and ensure genetic diversity', and that (2) 'biotechnology will ... [provide) extensive environmental benefits for sustainable growth'.

To recap, the main stake raised by the biodiversity convention is the issue of ownership and control over biological diversity.  In the case of the North,  and the USA in particular, the major concern was protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries, which get their raw material from forests. In the case of the South, the concern was mostly ensuring that governments and industries could continue to exploit their own natural resources. Obviously, the convention is a compromise with considerable advantages for the North.  Who spoke and speaks for the local communities who often sustain and depend on biodiversity for foods, medicine, and their way of life? Once the biodiversity convention had included the question of biotechnology - as demanded by the South - and which subsequently become a propaganda instrument for the biotechnology industry, the main debate between the North and the South was over patent rights, redistribution of profits from biotechnological production, access rights and control over genetic banks, as well as debates about the safety of biotechnology. Yet, amid these financial and political controversies the main issue was forgotten, namely the identification of the main causes of the destruction of biodiversity and the drawing up of action plans to address these causes."

Summarized, this book passage was about taking control over the genetic structure of every life organism, including humans that began with Agenda 21.  Throughout numerous chapters, the use of genetic resources was referenced, and in the case of the biodiversity convention, it clearly addressed the exploitation of genetic resources.  

The United Nations (UN) is relentless in its pursuit of genetic resources to reach the Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals (SDG), including the Global Biodiversity Framework (Target 13), and in the Biodiversity Agreement (Goal C). 

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has skin in this game as well with its reservoir of corporate cronies in the biotechnology and medical fields.  Its Earth BioGenome Project even describes itself as "Sequencing Life for the Future of Life".  Conveniently left out are details that humans are also a target of this genetic resource heist.

The larger question is if a human genetic code is edited or manipulated to change it, to whom does it then belong?  The Earth Brokers did address the issue of patent and access rights, and questioned who would have control over genetic material and banks.

The U.S Supreme Court actually gave a ruling on this in 2013.  "Naturally occurring human genes cannot be patented" but human DNA reconstructed in a laboratory can be patented.  So, any manipulation of human genes, whether it be for removing a disease or inserting genetically manipulated material into a vaccine, can be patented.

Ah yes, modified human genes are being patented and stored.  Indeed, from 1990 to 2003, the Human Genome Project generated the "first sequence of the human genome".  This site, OMIM, can provide human genetic information on diseases.  GenBank provides publicly available DNA sequences, some of which have a patent or copyright.  If the genetic code is desired on a health issue, this site will provide it.  

It should be apparent that these loons have no qualms about believing they can alter and create any life form, without any regard for morality.  This genetic violation has already been laid upon the world with genetically modified food and genetically engineered vaccines which are soon to be introduced into genetically modified food, shaping mankind's future.

However, much of this is being passed off as a benefit to mankind with the ability to end devastating diseases through the use of manipulated gene therapy.  While recognition of this technology and its use for the benefit of mankind is promoted, many questions still go unanswered.

Past Agenda 21 fears that included overtly taking over cities with stack & pack housing, control over land use, and placing women and children into a higher order, missed the primary point of controlling all life.  It was really about genetically controlling life covertly in all of its forms, and "tweak the DNA of almost any living being, from bacteria to people". even up to the intention of creating a new type of life form.  

How far can humanity let this go before it reaches a point of critical juncture where it cannot be reversed?  The Earth Brokers saw the threat but no one listened.  Who is willing to listen now?

Exodus 20:4-5: 4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.  5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.

Baby boomer is the assigned label given to those who were born post WWII, from around 1946 to 1964.  Basically, it is the generation born to the greatest generation, those born between 1900 and through the 1920's, a generation that held strong during a great depression and a world war.  Most boomers are now in ages ranging from their 80's to as young as 60. 

It was these children from the greatest generation that were taught the foundation of America, not only from their parents but from traditional institutions at the time, churches and education.  School days began with reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer which was subsequently forbidden in 1962, with softening of that restriction in 2022 under First Amendment rights.  Not surprisingly, church attendance has been in a steady decline since that time and basic academic skills continue to decline.

How many boomers could pass this 8th grade exam from 1912 let alone anyone younger.

Boomers understand and can easily see how the loss of faith in lives has contributed to the moral decay in society.  The crime rates, regardless of type, have risen dramatically since 1960.  In general, the overall behavior of Americans, regardless of criminal activity, has deteriorated, whether on an airplane, at a fast food counter, or even those who are supposed to be political leaders.  Boomers just shake their heads.

The greatest generation, because of their hardships through the struggles of a depression and the ravages of war, took great pride in their country and passed that loyalty onto their children.  They were given the brief opportunity to really understand the blessings of living in America.  But, perhaps at the same time, because of those hardships boomers also overindulged those children, thus robbing them of the experience of sacrifice.  WWII veterans saw the horrors of want as they traveled through other countries, the starvation and destitution, the shortage or overall absence of what is needed for daily life.  For their children they made sure it was a life of abundance.

A depression and war provided the opportunity for the greatest generation to learn how to problem solve.  Innovative solutions had to be created in order to survive both situations.  That opportunity didn't exist in the same way for the boomers, however by observation they were able to see how easily their parent could solve a problem.  Over time, basic home skills have been lost to others, whether commercially, or through advances in technology.  Solutions and skills were increasingly consumed by industries, and the government.  By the time the boomer had children the opportunities began to evaporate.

One role of churches in the boomer generation was to care for those in need within the community, which has now been taken over by the government or government funded non-profits that are often influenced by the United Nations (UN).  Boomers were the last to participate in church activities where they gave to those less fortunate, actually going into homes where they saw how much less other people had than them, an opportunity now forfeited by generations in learning how to appreciate their own life blessings.

Even the old and infirmed were cared for in the home, where children were exposed to the realities of aging and death.  However, the opportunity for learning from those who were wiser from life experiences was knowledge that could not be replaced.  But now, many are shuffled off to institutions and cared for by strangers who, while developing bonds with them, lack the deep connections as family.  This shift in societal norms has diminished life lessons for so many youth today.

Just the basics of learning about work with chores is a fading ritual.  Now, exercising discipline can be a dangerous venture for any parent with a barrage of backlash, but worse than that, children are using the art of anger to manipulate adults into getting what they want.  The so called experts are desperately trying to attach it to some sort of mental illness or genetic problem when the boomer would have handled the behavior with a stern verbal reprimand or swat on the butt.

Boomers are the last vestige of understanding the importance of the First Amendment, which is under increasing threat.  This right to free speech has deteriorated into a free-for-all with insults and hurling barbs at one another without ever expressing what one thinks about an issue, or even listen to an opposing viewpoint.  Post boomer generations have been indoctrinated to believe that defined language should be used and other language censored.  Yet, at the same time, the use of foul and inflammatory language has steadily increased with these First Amendment violations.  The ability to express a coherent thought seems to be another dying skill.

Raised with the belief that one should be respectful of others in the boomer generation, there is no respect for anyone who defies the expectation of tolerance.  Suddenly, it is okay to degrade another if forced tolerance is not accepted, while ironically there is no tolerance from the one who is forcing the tolerance.

Bad weather events were just part of life for a boomer, weather events having now become catastrophic global emergencies and threats ad nauseam that require urgent global action and cooperation that can only be solved by a global response to overhaul energy, the economy, and how one lives.  Younger generations have been taught to not deal with the occasional tough weather, having not learned those lessons from those who lived during the depression without air conditioning or easy access to heating during the winter. 

There are probably many other examples of how boomers may be the last to represent the true greatness of America.  While other countries pretend to be like America with their fake constitutions, the blood that was sacrificed for the U.S. Constitution is foreign to those countries.  Boomers still retain the belief in individualism and not collectivism as do those other countries and their devotion to institutions with ideological agendas that are the antithesis of any legitimate constitution.

As the boomer generation drifts off to inevitable death, so does societal death that comes from the lost gifts from that generation, only to be replaced by the inhumane role of technology, as explained by Matt Shumer in his article, Something Big Is Happening.  He wrote this article for his soon to retire father, to help him understand the perils of a world that is soon to come.

Yes, for boomers, they just shake their heads understanding what is being lost, not only as a human, but as a society.

Hear We Go Again was a lengthy article about the Convention of States (COS).  By the time the reader came to the end of it, there might have been some information exhaustion to really check out some of the links.  However, the most important information was in The Plot Thickens section.

Contained in that section was a link to a 2018 video by the Heritage Foundation, Hitting the Brakes on Overspending and Debt.  The Foundation invited Jan-Egbert Sturm, Chairman of the Swiss Debt Brake Group of Experts from Switzerland, to explain its Swiss Debt Brake system that keeps government spending and debt in check.  As noted in the prior article, Rep. Shirts used this language, debt brake, in his House State Affairs committee testimony on February 3.

The video begins with Mr. Sturm explaining how the debt brake system works in Switzerland, followed by a general discussion.  At the 28:48" mark, the question was asked of Barry W. Poulson, Emeritus Professor of Economics, University of Colorado, how this could be applied in our federal government.  His response was stunning.

Mr. Poulson replied that he and some colleagues applied the Swiss Debt Brake model to the U.S. over a two-decade period starting from 1992.  The details of how that worked was then explained.  However, he stated for it to work, $700 billion dollars in savings would have to be generated every year for two decades to get the debt ratio down, and that was 2018 numbers.  As he explains, entitlements would have to be part of those savings, but it would also have to include consideration for selling some "federal assets", "the $55 billion dollars in resources held on federal land", perhaps achieved by proposing a new "Homestead Act", meaning selling that land to the public. 

In order to acquire those billions, he went on to state "we" would have to "transfer resources, land and mineral resources, back to the states, privatize, devolution, let the states manage resources".  He then went on to explain how the TABOR act works in Colorado.  

Other discussion followed and at the 57:25" mark the question was asked about a balanced budget amendment, to which Mr. Poulson replied the effort must go to state legislators to begin enacting Article V for an amendment.  He then mentioned the Balanced Budget Amendment Taskforce and recognized David Biddulph in the audience who works with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).  An ALEC video on the balanced budget amendment can be watched in the aforementioned article.

Searching information on this Taskforce led to the Balanced Budget Now (BBN) 501(c)(3) based on Washington D.C..  According to Sourcewatch, the purpose of this group is "to educate state legislators, members of Congress and the general public regarding...potential solutions which include a Balanced Budget Amendment proposed by Congress or the states via convention." 

Loren Enns is listed as the BBN President and who is also the Heartland Institute Director of State Campaigns, BBA Task Force (BBATF), a 501c4.  Sourcewatch lists Idaho as a BBN target and Enns has been running the Idaho campaign to educate the public and legislature, appearing before the Senate Judiciary & Rules Committee in 2024 for the Balanced Budget Amendment resolution.

There is a 990 form for BBN, but not for BBATF, that lists "CSNDS.ORG" as the BBN website.  The website does identify itself as BBN, and along with Enns as the President, lists prior members of congress and governors on the Board of Directors, including Idaho's own Butch Otter.  On the website home page there is a box called The Path: Article V".  According to the box, Article V can be used as a "threat" to call a convention.  The "threat" language was echoed by Rep. Shirts in his testimony.

On the 990 form, BBN describes its mission: "TO ILLUMINATE THE AMERICAN MIND WITH THE KNOWLEDGE NECESSARY TO REOGNIZE (sic) THE THREAT POSED BY THE U. S. NATIONAL DEBT, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL SOLUTIONS OUR FOUNDING FATHERS MADE AVAILABLE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE."  Enns is listed as President, and former governors Mike Huckabee, Scott Walker, Gary Herbert, and Idaho's own Clement (Butch) Otter, as directors, along with some others. 

Sourcewatch lists Gov. Little on the Governors Debt Council Project in 2025.  Although the Council now comes up as a 404, it is in the archives.  The archives lists the Council as a project of the Fiscal Reform Coalition but information on this group  is limited except it being an educational non-profit and was revoked in 2023.  However, along with other governors in 2025, Gov. Little signed a letter to Congress that originally endorsed the BBN campaign, but was later changed to working with DOGE and the Trump administration on a balanced budget.

In the video, Mr. Poulson finishes up by saying "...we would combine this, we need a set of fiscal rules that links the balanced budget amendment in our Constitution with statutory rules like the Swiss Debt Break".  It isn't just about an amendment for a balanced budget; it is to decree how that would be done.  As in the Swiss model, there might also be a panel of "experts", rather than Congress, who would control the budget.  What a great way to eliminate representation and the ongoing bickering between parties, dismantle the Republic and move towards technocracy. 

Bearing in mind that this discussion took place in 2018, today, eight years later, its accomplishments are seen.  The Idaho House passed HCR 25 on February 6, it will now be up to the Senate for full passage.  The intent to use the resolution as a "threat" and include fiscal policy changes like a "debt brake" have been revealed by Rep. Shirts, the message originating from BBN.  State legislators who have been "educated" by outside forces may just be enough for full passage of HCR 25. 

While Mr. Poulson proclaimed they would gain their 28th state by the next year, 2019, it wasn't achieved until this year, referring strictly to a balanced budget amendment.  Meanwhile, COS claims 20 states have signed on for calling a convention with no clear indication if it is for a balanced budget or term limit amendment. 

Looks like BBN is fudging its numbers, Wyoming is out and New Hampshire's resolution did not pass.

If BBN is correct, only five more states are needed to make the "threat" of calling a convention to Congress, and six to force Congress to call a convention of the states. 

President Trump has touted the concept of Freedom Cities being built on federal public land.  The essence of these cities is the promotion of innovation in medicine, clean energy, and other technologies that are under corporate control with its own governance structures.  While he verbalizes these ambitions openly, he doesn't talk about what he is doing to accomplish it behind closed doors.  
 
Greenland has been Trump's focus for some time now, under the guise that it is needed for national security due to the threats from China and Russia, going so far as to even hint at the use of military force then retracting it.  He also denied that taking Greenland was for its rare earth minerals, "you have to go 25 feet (8 meters) down through ice to get it. It's not something that a lot of people are going to do, or want to do. No, this is security we're talking about".

Of course he can say that, his true ambitions to achieve that goal may be more clandestine.

Clear back in 2019 during Trump's first term in office, familiar names were scrutinizing Greenland for its resources, not as military strategic asset, but rather "a strategic asset in global competition with China."  In preparation to capture and utilize those resources, investments have already been made. 

Dryden Brown has a tech entrepreneur background along with philosophical, economic, and surfing influences, a history of rejection and failures, and disturbing prejudices.  He also served as a quantitative researcher and investor.  At age 23, he started a new venture for a city called Praxis, and by age 27 in 2023, he had raised $19 million dollars to build this city, potentially in the Mediterranean, which may now be defunct.  In 2024, Brown visited Greenland and offered to buy it for his project, but was rejected.

Praxis would be an epitome of a smart city with a 6G IoT connected infrastructure, self driving vehicles, augmented reality, and renewable energy.  Artificial intelligence would run everything with blockchain and a digital infrastructure.

Part of his motivation to build this city was concern "that Western Civilization will collapse unless we unite around a new cultural core and achieve technological supremacy".  This is Brown explaining his city.  Further insight into his thinking can be found in this video, which at times his thoughts are very difficult to follow, let alone understand.  Getting past his "like, yeah, you know, I don't know, like I mean" is difficult.  Nonetheless, Peter Thiel, along with other funders, joined Brown in pursuit of building this city in Greenland, having raised $525 million dollars thus far.  Most likely of no coincidence, Thiel has close relationships with both Vice President Vance and President Trump.

Brown believes "we need to replace income with capital assets" and "The solution is territorial acquisition and resource development" which "hold trillions in mineral wealth" in order "fund the AI transition".  In turn, this wealth will be given to citizens as a dividend for income, releasing them from Denmark dependency.

In alignment with Trump's economic zones for Freedom Cities, Brown calls Praxis an "acceleration" zone that is a "special economic" zone "with simplified regulations" that will "advance technology in fields like AI, biotech, and energy", similar to the purposes of Prospera, and "harmonizes the goals of technology with government."  These zones will advance the development of AI, energy, and biotechnology, in addition to cryopets.  Stated more succinctly, Praxis would also develop technologies for space launches and micro nuclear reactors.

Following several initial names such as internet city, and considered a Network Nation, the city is now referred to as a Digital Nation to "restore Western civilization".  One focus is housing "around strategic industries" such as Defense hubs, like those already proposed, and data centers.  With the correct shared values, one can apply for citizenship to Praxis.  Network Nations are connected by digital relationships rather than physical proximity and its sovereignty is "grounded in network technologies and digital infrastructures".

Right now "there are over 100k Praxians living in over 80 countries and 400 cities", or more depending on which site is used, anxiously waiting for the city to be built while the community is being built online.

So the first thing these delusional characters do is create a "Paxis World Congress", where they can declare their own brilliance in creating a better world and sign the Praxis Declaration of Ascent.  Naturally, Brown spoke at this event but it is a transcript only, probably because of the need for extensive editing, not "minimal editing", given his inability to put together an intelligible sentence.  

Understanding that "the beliefs and intentions of the people who control AI"..."will determine the destiny of every society where it is employed", and "explicitly encode society's values into software", Praxis is seen as "spearheading the plan for those determined to preserve the West’s spiritual center in an AI-dominated world" and "protecting Sovereign Intelligence". 

So why all the detail on this guy and his vision for a utopian city?

The huge red flag here is what relationship does Praxis have to Trump's "framework" agreement regarding Denmark.  If indeed an agreement is reached to place a military base in Greenland, what perfect set up Praxis would be to support that base, not only through AI and technology, but also infrastructure support that is separate from the current governance by Denmark, keeping Greenland sovereignty intact, and out of the fray from the U.S. government pursuing needed resources.  Praxis also falls in line with Trump's version of a Freedom City, another oligarch agenda.  Given Trump's push for cryptocurrency, especially since the framework announcement, it is also a natural fit for Praxis which would be run solely with crypto.  With Greenland's mineral resources, what better way to advance the objectives of Praxis for the development of emerging technologies, and U.S. military operations.

Nato chief Mark Rutte, claimed "mineral resources had not been discussed" during the meeting with Trump, and focus would be on Arctic security with an Arctic Sentry.  The issue of the U.S. Golden Dome was also discussed, which requires "next-generation technologies".  Efforts to fund this are already underway.  However, up to this point it has been unclear how that money would be spent.  With Praxis, and its ambitious goals with AI and energy, the resources needed to support the technologies for a Dome would mostly likely be the source for the money. 

Just like Gaza, by Trump's own admission, “Essentially, it’s a large real estate deal…".

It would make sense that Praxis could be included as part of a military base in Greenland, or adjacent to it, because Praxis engages with governments.  While some believe the Arctic isn't the most hospitable place for such adventures, there are some positives, and with the backing of the U.S. government, taxpayer money is always ready to be hijacked for such follies.

Patrick Wood and others address Greenland and the Praxis issue beginning at the 1':46" to 1'50" mark in this video, which seems to bring it a  step closer to the North America Technate as part of technocracy.  As Wood stated, Trump booted the UN, Agenda 21, renewables and a host of other scams in his World Economic Forum speech, officially launching technocracy. 

As the framework specifics are released it will be interesting to monitor Praxis, its progress towards becoming a city, and its relationship to what is developed for U.S. "national security".  With details converging so closely together at the same time, it does appear this is a premeditated conclusion.  A tech hub is set up with investors putting money into the resources and building the hub; veiled threats are retracted in order to obtain a piece of land that will require the afore mentioned resources to build more defense structures; the U.S. is "clean" of any involvement with the resources, loss of sovereignty, or investments; the oligarchs get richer, the President is praised for his leadership, and Americans are once more duped into believing the misrepresentation.  All is well.