Previous articles introduced the reader to the America's Great Outdoors Initiative by the Obama administration in 2010. Multiple federal agencies were tasked with implementing this initiative through interagency coordination. One section of the initiative was to "Build upon State, local, private, and tribal priorities for the conservation of land, water, wildlife...creating corridors and connectivity across these outdoor spaces...and determine how the Federal Government can best advance those priorities through public private partnerships and locally supported conservation strategies." What this initiative really did is put United Nation (UN) non-governmental organizations (NGO) in charge. Federal agencies created twenty two large landscape conservation cooperatives (LCC) across the United States. The Great Northern LCC (GNLCC) was discussed in previous articles and how it is affecting southeast Idaho, specifically Island Park, but the GNLCC also extends into central and northern Idaho. The Great Basin (GBLCC) takes the rest, covering southern Idaho as well as parts of Oregon, Nevada, Utah, and even into California. As they see it, there are no jurisdictional boundaries between states because wildlife doesn't live within boundaries. And wildlife overrules humans. Aside from federal agencies colluding between themselves, they have given power to initiatives such as the Heart of the Rockies (HOTR), Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y), and High Divide (HD) to do the work for them. All of them are connected to UN NGOs such as The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and International Union For Conservation Of Nature (IUCN). The map below shows the targeted areas in central and north Idaho by the HD and Cabinet-Purcell Mountain Corridor (CPMC), a Y2Y initiative. In north Idaho the GNLCC is focusing on connectivity in the Clearwater area using the 2012 Forest Service Planning Rule. The Cabinet-Purcell Mountain Corridor (CPMC) will be used as a transboundary link connecting wildlife between British Columbia and Idaho. Y2Y has formed a collaborative conservation framework for the CPMC region and together they want wildlife to move freely across all jurisdictional boundaries. These folks don't accept the concept of sovereignty and are working aggressively to "secure private lands". Here is the amount of land being pursued in northern Idaho. But the GNLCC doesn't limit it to wildlife, it also includes "ecological connectivity". Ecological captures everything. The GBLCC seems to like working with everyone except Idaho, including California, Arizona, Texas, and others. Working with all of these folks, not you, the GBLCC created a Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Strategic Plan (S-TEK). Priority topics include adaptation to changes in water availability and ecosystem structure and function. Basically this plan prepares them in deciding what they are going to do to those who live in southern Idaho, and you can bet your booties that it includes land conservation, including wetlands and riparian areas. For the cattle ranchers, look out. The grand plan for you is figuring out how grazing affects sage-grouse, the effects of spring grazing, and the pièces de résistance is possibly halting all grazing for four years just to see what happens.
The Idaho Cattle Association expressed some consternation about the federal land management agencies’ plans to manage sage grouse habitat. Along with the removal of junipers this has been the plan all along. Hmm, let's see what will happen if we damage the land by changing it, and when it becomes damaged, then we can justify restoring it. Of course, after restoring it then it must be protected and conserved so it won't be damaged again. Scientific management is the excuse being used to control land use because technocrats don't think anyone else knows how except them. Why, the GBLCC even has their hands in connectivity, including for the pygmy rabbit. This story goes far beyond what has been written. Just understand, these LCCs have nothing better to do than create ways in which to justify taking over land for environmental and wildlife purposes, pushing Idahoans out while banning access or use, dictating how the land can be used, all in order to conserve it for people who have not even been born. There is no federal law that gives any one of these groups authority to do what they are doing but these same vicious groups are actively lobbying for such laws, and are already deeply embedded with Idaho agencies. They are not American in their thinking, they don't believe in how our Republic was designed to operate, they only believe in their own ideology. Wake up Idaho, all of you. This covert agenda will eventually win if action is not taken to oppose it.
1 Comment
Melissa
8/8/2017 02:14:35 am
I live in California and your landscape initiatives are only the beginning. Behind the scenes are advocates of federal grant money, Biological diversity groups, sustainable Green Buildings all being sales pitched on a municipal level. No cost, no new Taxes, nothing to lose legislation and Promise Federal Grant money for city improvements like bike lanes, drafting EIR reports, solar plants, and a code enforcement Department on steroids (we now have 3 code enforcement officers in a Mojave desert town of under 10,000. Who break the law in their anal condemnation bullying if your grass is more than 1" thick. (California is in a Drought ) most lawns are bare dirt. This is code breaking but put off until 2018 city elections from water restrictions and no lawn watering at all. for most residents NOT all. They use these anal broken codes to continue to harass and fine residents outside of city limits literally enforcing restrictions on people forcing them to remove everything from yards that isn't the house and it better be a house if its a trailer, modular home, vegetable garden, carport, wood fencing, propane tank, landscaping dirt. All cost you in fines and court dates. then the water and trash services go up 20%, new 1 cents taxes are somehow passed state level by voters who want all city services no matter the cost. And Recycling and Code enforcement on steroids and then the Pro Agenda 21 candidates start running for local office all over the state might be elected in 2 small towns in 1 state (not illegal) because no other candidate was running they win by default appoint someone sit in for them in their absence (2 places at once) collect 2 city paychecks and pensions once their term is up they do it again in far away county elections after signing all this new legislation that is parallel to Agenda 21 takeover conspiracy theories of 10-15 years ago. that everyone laughed at. It is now a great political tool and agenda 21 underhanded manifestation that is regulating peoples property rights until easements and condemnation can step in and strip property owners before the county tax default sale or the foreclosure sale and the mortgage company takes possession. All over California Agenda 21 hasn't taken the bankrupt counties small towns of 10,000 or less because they plan to get rid of these holdouts and move us all into super sustainable cities to live like cockroaches on top of each other in our own waste. Cattle pollute the earth and destroy river banks and mountains, What constitutional rights of the American People? Feds ownership privledges over our Public lands. Lack of money and manpower BLMS excuse while TAKING more lands or rights to private properties away from the owner occupants. Like the bundys. Don't look at state legislation for Agenda 21 watch closely local and county enforcement and codes and regulations tradeoff for a free bike lane and land grabs by solar companies.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|