Pretty much everything in the Bible provides guidance on how to live one's life. In the never ending movement to usurp control over all aspects of life, the United Nations (UN) is now working on capturing control over religious institutions.
Most large religious institutions have adopted the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). This includes the Catholic Church, although its stance on abortion is still questionable; Episcopal Church; Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS); United Methodists, although there is a faction of those congregations who are refusing to comply; Presbyterian Church; and the Lutheran Church. It might be surprising to know that even Islam has adopted the SDG. For the Baptists, the American Baptist Association and American Baptist Churches USA don't specifically mention anything about the SDG. However, the Baptist World Alliance is a UN recognized non-governmental organization (NGO) which obligates them to carry out UN goals. The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism supports the SDG, and the World Jewish Congress is also a UN recognized NGO. The UN itself has created several organizations for the purposes of hijacking God's word. Among them are the UN Parliament of World's Religions and Faith for Earth Coalition. It also has an Interagency Task Force on Religion and Sustainable Development with its Multi-faith Advisory Council. Actalliance, a global faith-based coalition, and devout SDG follower, has a pretty impressive list of religious members. As a UN recognized NGO, the World Council of Churches captures quite an array of faiths to spread SDGs that includes the Disciples of Christ, American Baptist Churches, Methodist, Lutheran, and Presbyterian faiths. Not all faiths are followers of the Bible, however, most others have some form of guidance that is followed. The beauty of our Republic is the freedom to exercise one's own religion. Because America was founded on the principles of Christianity, it is worth taking a look at how those principles are being altered. Throughout the Bible there are chapters giving guidance on how to live a Christian life. It is the Ten Commandments that everyone should have imprinted on their hearts, especially Commandment #1, "You shall have no other Gods before Me". This is the Commandment the UN is in the process of trying to replace with itself and Mother Earth. In 2022, "dozens of religious leaders" came together from across the world, carrying not the Ten Commandments, but the Ten Principles for Climate Repentance. These principles are a mockery of the Ten Commandments. Religious leaders gathered at Sinai to receive those "Climate Justice Ten Commandments” as part of COP 27. Concurrent events were held around the world and repentance ceremonies continue to be held. Listen to these faith "leaders" twisting God's word at COP 27 here as it deteriorated into a discussion about economic injustices, the question of a "sustainable population" for the earth, how to lead younger generations away from God's word, and using an app rather than a Bible to lead one's life. The Presbyterian church even has a wallet sized card that can be carried to remember one's duty to the SDG. The UN goal is to bring all religious faiths together and help them work together on these replacement principles. Helping to guide faith institutions is its booklet on Faith Actions, and its book, Faith for Earth: A Call For Action. King Charles, a devout follower of the SDG, is doing his diligence by bringing together faith leaders and lead them away from God's word. In honor of bringing faiths together the Abrahamic Family House was created in Abu Dhabi, where a mosque, church and synagogue sit on a piece of ground facing each other. There are often stark differences between faiths and their teachings. However, the common thread being use to bring them together are the SDG, the new Bible and its teachings, and the UN is using that as an advantage to remove God and His word to bring itself and Mother Earth to the top. Religions for Peace is another organization that brings religious institutions together and supports the SDG. Members include representatives from the Methodist faith, UN, Catholic, and LDS faith. Who needs the Bible or Ten Commandments when you have the SDGs? America doesn't have a mental health problem, it has a spiritual problem. It is no wonder membership to any faith is declining when you have those faith leaders turning their backs on God and His word, instead replacing it with a man-made version from Satan. Bible verses already provide the guidance on caring for the earth and ourselves, and how to bring peace in the world. Somehow, along with the other SDGs, SDG 16 is the new answer to peace. There will never be any peace when Satan has entered, and been accepted, by our churches. It might be worthwhile to discuss this with one's local church leaders and learn if the SDGs are being adopted. If not, then perhaps a discussion needs to ensue that Satan may be lurking to bring this evil into the church.
0 Comments
Through the education system, parental roles and rights have been incrementally diminished. Across America, parents are fighting to take that role back. However, in typical fashion, the ne'er do wells continue to create avenues for control over children.
The U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) just awarded United Way of Treasure Valley (UWTV) $6,486,447 to implement a "five-year Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS)" grant that will support "non-profits and other public or private organizations and institutions" to "expand community schools." In collaboration with "non-profits, health providers, private partners and other agencies" the intent is "to coordinate and deliver services like health care, mental health and nutrition services, afterschool and summer programming and high-quality early learning programs." The total "expected funding" will be $45,945,645 that will "serve" 20,000 Idaho students, about $2,300 per student. What isn't being disclosed is that this vaguely defined purpose to "deliver" health and mental health care is part of a larger program to continue undermining parental rights and authority. This delivery service system, called School Based Health Centers (SBHC), has been ravaging America for several years. And now, in the Treasure Valley, this United Nations (UN) partnered non-profit, UWTV, will have its hands on the kids. United Way was founded in 1887 by religious leaders. Along the way it lost its foundation by joining in partnership with the UN in 1975. United Way has since adopted the 17 sustainable development goals (SDG). That is how embedded it is with the UN. No longer is it about a school nurse tending to boo-boos or calling a parent to come pick up their child. SBHC are intended to supplant the parental provider choice by providing a full scope of services, a literal health clinic in the school, that can include health checkups, labs, medication, counseling, vaccinations, ongoing care for chronic health conditions, dental and eye exams, and sexual reproductive services. As a UN non-governmental organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics supports these clinics. It also adds to the financial strain in Medicaid. UWTV also collects data, not only on children, but also on that child's family. This information can also be shared with its partners that includes the government, hospitals, educational institutions. and corporations, some of which are Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) and World Economic Forum (WEF) members. Although not yet in Idaho, the School-Based Health Alliance (SBHA) is one such group aiming for children, complete with corporate and government partners, and data collection. This organization might find an opportunity to expand its reach through UWTV. There is one SBHC in Marsing. More information on SBHC can be found here, and starting at the 5" mark, this video provides more details on what these centers do with information about parental consent. Stand for Health Freedom also has more information. Health and education are very much a part of the UN SDG 3 and 4. For the UN and WEF, health is attached to the success of the worker bee, and just like education, it means snatching a child's health status as a critical component of meeting its future workforce needs. Oh yes, Idaho children can be directly connected to the UN and WEF. What better parents can you ask for? Children's Health Defense posted an interview between James Corbett and Meryl Nass with an update on the ever evolving World Health Organization pandemic treaty. It continues to have frightening aspects to it. There are also links to the information discussed in the video underneath the video.
Another point that Dr. Nass raised was a graphic created by one of her followers that really helps condense the chaos that is being created in different areas for justification of a new system to be brought in. The graphic can also be viewed on her substack account. Apparently Senate President Pro Tem Chuck Winder tighty-whities are in a wad.
Senator Glenneda Zuiderveld wrote a post that clearly, and accurately, revealed the truth about the sad state of affairs in our government by exposing the relationships of some government officials to the corporate world. There isn't one iota of misrepresentation in what she wrote. In response, Mr. Winder has chosen to remove her as vice chair of the Health and Welfare Committee, claiming she was attacking people, defaming them, and was degrading and disrespectful to them. How does stating the truth defame anyone? Even a court of law would uphold her statements as being nothing more than factual. He even included in his comments the possibility of future threats towards her. It is no secret the deep ties that the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) has with elected officials and the legislative decisions being influenced based on those relationships. Mr. Winder was probably lucky that Sen. Zuiderveld didn't go farther in exposing how all of this is tied to the more global agendas, his tighty-whities might no longer have remained white. Instead, his idea of being a responsible and ethical elected official is to punish those who address the truth and point fingers at other groups, just a mere tactic of distraction. He has previously called these groups a "threat" to democracy, clearly not understanding we are a Republic. Mr. Winder needs to quit projecting his own fears onto others, and abusing his role over them. By removing Sen. Zuiderveld as vice chair, Mr. Winder has basically committed the same sin he has laid upon his accused by degrading, defaming, and being disrespectful to a member of the Senate body. Maybe the truth is that Sen. Zuiderveld was getting a little too close to home by not exposing his own involvements with outside groups that are supported by huge global corporations, making decisions, along with all his other legislative minions, that are not representative of constituents but with other countries and states. Or maybe he is too threatened in knowing he may get exposed for his activities that enmesh the government with corporations, advancing crony capitalism. Who pays for these trips? Mr. Winder's corporate buddies? Or the taxpayer? Yes, Mr. Winder should be scared and his retaliatory actions are indicative of just that. He fails to see his responsibility as an elected official to represent the people, and is more than guilty of the same offenses that were brought to light by Sen. Zuiderveld. Maybe it would be helpful for him to have a come to Jesus moment where all of his transgressions are confessed, maybe that would turn the legislature around to a body that represents the people, not the corporate world. One confession should be that he, himself, is an IACT pet as an endorsed candidate. and that his voting record shows his loyalty to IACI (pg 22). IACI tracking elected officials is not any different from any other group that he points fingers at. Mr. Winder has clearly made himself look like a fool. His actions are retaliatory and he doesn't understand that he is acting like nothing more than a schoolyard bully standing up for his friends. By doing so he has validated the very issue brought up by Sen. Zuiderveld. Winder should exit his position and be voted out of office by his constituents as he is nothing more than a hypocritical leader. The United Nations (UN) released its "Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of the United States of America" on November 3, 2023. It is a scathing report on the United States. These are some highlights on the issues the UN thinks America has done correctly and areas that America needs to improve. All of them relate to the sustainable development goals.
The CCPR stands for the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, however the "International" language is left out of the title. It is from this document that the UN is making its accusations that the U.S. has not met its obligations. Essentially, the U.S. is no longer honoring the Bill of Rights, but instead is honoring an international document. Positive 1. "he Respect for Marriage Act, Executive Orders 14075 “Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals”, and 13988 “Preventing and combating discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation”. There are a few others, but the majority is negative. Principal matters of concern and recommendations "The Committee remains concerned at the lack of measures to effectively incorporate the Covenant in the domestic legal order." "The State party should take all measures necessary to ensure that all rights protected under the Covenant are incorporated and given full effect in its domestic legal order at the federal, state, local and territorial levels." What this is saying is that the federal government has not forced these policies into states. National human rights institution "...the State party should establish an independent national human rights institution in accordance with the Paris Principles as a matter of priority, with a mandate to ensure implementation of the Covenant and monitor compliance with its provisions at the federal, state, local and territorial levels." Again, force states to adopt this and ignore the Bill of Rights. Hate crimes and hate speech Essentially, this section has dictates that the U.S. should "prevent and publicly condemn hate speech, particularly those by politicians and high-level officials"; "provide effective training to law enforcement officials, judges and prosecutors to investigate hate crimes"; and "Investigate hate crimes thoroughly, ensure that perpetrators are prosecuted and, if convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions, and provide access to victims and their families to full reparation." Racial profiling 13.b "Investigate and prosecute all allegations of racial profiling and provide effective remedies to the victims"; d. "Train federal, state, local and territorial law enforcement officials on ethnic and cultural awareness and the unacceptability of racial profiling". Discrimination on the basis of nationality Calling Proclamation 9645 of 24 September 2017 a "Muslim ban" when it was primarily about prohibiting the entry of terrorists into the U.S., the UN lauded Proclamation 10141 that ended it. Gender equality Here the UN is again telling the United States to amend its Constitution, "The State party should redouble its efforts to guarantee protection against sex and gender-based discrimination in its Constitution". Violence against women "The State party should intensify its efforts to prevent, combat and eradicate all forms of violence against women and girls, including domestic violence and sexual violence" The UN should probably look at its own agency and its violent and sexual acts against women. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity Again, the UN doesn't understand how the Republic of the United States works, thinking that the government has dictatorial power over the states. "The State party should adopt all measures necessary to ensure that state laws that discriminate against persons based on their sexual orientation and gender identity are repealed". Maternal mortality, voluntary termination of pregnancy and sexual and reproductive rights "the State party should take all the necessary measures at the federal, state, local and territorial levels to ensure that women and girls do not have to resort to unsafe abortions that may endanger their lives and health. The State party should, in particular: (a) Provide...access to abortion for women and girls throughout its territory; (b) Put an end to the criminalization of abortion...and consider harmonizing its legal and policy framework with the World Health Organization’s Abortion Care Guidelines; (d) Remove existing barriers impeding access to abortion care, including inter-state travel restrictions (e) Continue its efforts to guarantee and expand access to medication abortion" Gun violence "...the State Party" should strengthen...its legislative and policy measures requiring background checks for all...ammunitions acquisition and transfer...; banning...restricting access to firearms...under domestic violence restraining orders...repealing immunities for any entity operating in the firearms industry". These mandates essentially strip 2nd Amendment rights. Criminalization of homelessness "Abolish laws and policies criminalizing homelessness"; "Intensify efforts to find solutions for the homeless...including redirecting funding from criminal justice responses towards adequate housing and shelter programme". In other words, homeless can do whatever they want, break the law, and funding for our protection should be diverted to them. Freedom of expression Making a mockery of our 1st Amendment, the UN mimics it with the word "expression". However, the UN expects the U.S. to "Increase its efforts to ensure that state laws and school districts regulations on educational materials and books fully comply with article 19 of the Covenant." Article 19 states " 3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions..." So the UN wants early training on restrictions to free speech, or as it puts it, free "expression". Freedom of assembly Another mockery of our Bill of Rights, except they are including restrictions, "ensure that any restrictions, including administrative and criminal sanctions against individuals exercising that right, comply with the strict requirements of article 21 of the Covenant". Article 21 states, "No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." There is even a section on Voting rights. So there is a very quick summary. What is amazing is how much of this garbage is already in the works in the federal government, and stunning how much the U.S. has already, and continues to be influenced. When will we put an end to it? As the Israeli and Ukraine wars rage on, and protests by a minority receive inflated media attention, there is a more ominous story brewing that is not in the media spotlight.
BRICS is the acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South America. Goldman Sachs first used the term BRIC in its Global Economics Paper in 2001. Russia, India, and China leaders met informally at the G8 Outreach Summit in 2006, with foreign ministers from these countries meeting formally at the United Nations General Assembly later in 2006. The first BRIC Summit was held in Russia in 2009 with South Africa joining in 2010, changing the name to BRICS. Supposedly, these countries gathered primarily for the purposes of creating an easier trade system between their countries. What should one think, knowing that major dictators like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are part of a group leading an economic transformation opposite of the western world? These countries have a "shared commitment to restructure the global political, economic, and financial architecture to be fair, balanced and representative, resting on the important pillars of multilateralism and international law." The general feeling is that these "developing", or Global South countries have always been left behind from the developed countries in economic matters. As far as the World Economic forum (WEF) is concerned, this is fine as "America's dominance" will be over by 2030. Traditional G7 "developed" countries are comprised of the U.S., UK, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, and Canada. However, BRICS does perceive itself as a "mechanism to counter the global influence of the G7" and reduce the "dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance." The fact that this group is comprised of significantly different cultures and political ideology makes advancement a little difficult, and that pesky China poses a challenge. But as always with despots, the greed of money and more power can glue them together. Indeed, China is urging that "more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” Formidable advances have been made by this group, in 2020 "BRICS (31.4 per cent) overtook the G7 (30 per cent)" in GDP with China and India in the lead. Perhaps the new "Global South" will be the new dominant force for the new world order. Argentina, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will join BRICS in 2024 with other prospective members in the future. This "expansion signifies an important move in the attempt to reshape the global order into a multipolar world, with voices from the Global South at the center of the international agenda." With Saudi Arabia and the UAE, BRICS will have "more influence over global energy supplies" giving the group production "over 42 percent of global oil supplies and 37 percent of the world’s gas." In 2014 BRICS established its own bank, The New Development Bank, which expanded to include Bangladesh, UAE, and Egypt. Its focus is projects that support a full blown implementation of sustainable development goals (SDG). China is generally considered to be the leader of BRICS, is calling for more expansion, and urging "members to let more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” BRICS has also given consideration to developing its own currency, one way being similar to what the European Union did with the euro. Its existence has also contributed to the de-dollarization that has been occurring. There have also been talks about developing a digital currency. One could view this as a buildup of economic power rather than the traditional build up of armament and troops. With the addition of the other countries in 2024, BRICS will have almost half the world's population (47%), will produce a third of GDP (37%), and possess "the lion’s share of the world’s oil and gas reserves, as well as a huge endowment of other natural resources." How much possible economic damage could BRICS cause the rest of the world with these statistics? As usual, there are those who downplay the significance of BRICS, and there are multiple varying opinions from armchair experts. However, the United Nations (UN) is certainly in support of BRICS for a "multipolar" world "based on the UN Charter and international law." In the BRICS Declaration, it avows the "central role of the United Nations in the international system" (#13), and its full support of Agenda 2030 (#35). It also wants a reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, institutions that have been in place since WWII. In its most recent meeting, held in August, 2023, BRICS created its new Declaration II, with an overall, general, endorsement of the UN. The document itself sounds like a conglomerate of countries joining hands for Agenda 2030, the EU having already adopted it. The U.S. is surrounded by a world of sustainable development. Folks, this transformation of the world is really closer than you may think. What is the U.S. government response to BRICS? ""Participating in BRICS is a sovereign decision for member countries". Interestingly, the U.S. State Department reported "When it comes to the BRICS, we’re deeply engaged with its leading members." Engaged about what? With the U.S. pointing fingers at Iran as being a backer of terrorism, how will Iran fit into the BRICS Counterterrorism Working Group? Demands from this group are not limited to economic concerns. It also wants more representation in leadership positions through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), ""comprehensive reform” of the UN which Beijing regards as central to global governance", and increased representation by developing countries in the United Nations Security Council. One theory about BRICS is that it is part of an intentional collapse of the economic system in order to create a one world economic system, and bring in a digital system that would in turn force everyone into the digital world. What can Idaho do to thwart this threat? The simpleton solution seems to be the creation of its own economic power. Maybe create its own state bank, placing more emphasis on gold and silver as legal tender for a shield, investing more into Idaho resources that can be used to support the state, and reducing dependence on federal dollars. In other words, can Idaho stay out of the global economy as much as possible? After all, BRICS sees what they are doing as an economic protection from sanctions, why can't Idaho do the same by protecting itself from outside economic forces? In 2015, the world was forewarned about this by Christiana Figueres. "...we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years...". There are many economically savvy individuals in Idaho, some of whom have written about the way in which Idaho should shift its economic future. Those opinions would be welcome on this subject. A Constitutional Convention, or Con-Con, is found in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. There are basically two ways amendments can be made to the U.S. Constitution.
Alex Newman from the New American magazine has a short explanation of the fallacies behind the current effort to hold a Con-Con and some of the scheming tactics being used to promote it. Robert Brown from the John Birch Society provides a historical perspective of Article V and why the current pressure for a Con-Con is underway, and why it is a bad idea. It may be confusing to understand how a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) proposal in Montana, the Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area (MHCA), has anything to do with Idaho. Rule one, understand that federal agencies share the same ideological bed with non-governmental organizations (NGO). Rule two, they all share the same objectives and mission. And Rule three, not only is there government money, actually your tax dollar supporting them, millions of dollars are pouring in from other sources with the same dogma. So the map of the proposed MHCA area extends north to Deer Lodge, east to Ennis, not quite reaching Wyoming, and south to the Montana-Idaho boarder that captures the tip of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) controlled Centennial Mountain range. As the fact sheet suggests, the objective is to acquire land, 250,00 acres of conservation easements, for the purposes of protecting wildlife habitat, open space, connectivity, and wildlife migratory corridors, but not property rights. Think of corridors as roads for wildlife that lead them to the next habitat area. In the imaginary world of environmentalists this is called connectivity, in that the corridor, or road, leads, or "connects" wildlife, to the next habitat. Isn't that brilliant? Those same individuals also believe humans are nothing but car wrecks in the path of these animals, preventing them from getting to their next habitat. Thus, the need to take land and control it for wildlife and nature. There are a couple of mother ships for NGOs, the Center for Large Landscape Conservation (CLLC) which is international, and the Network for Landscape Conservation (NLC). NLC partners with CLLC, the USFWS along with several other federal agencies, and other supporters. Other partners to both outfits are NGOs such as Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y), Wildlands Network, and Wild Montana. NLC also partners with the Heart of the Rockies Initiative (HORI), which is a group of land trusts in Idaho and western states and Canada. In turn, HORI collaborates with a conservation partnership called the High Divide Collaborative (HDC). HDC partners with government agencies including the USFWS, CLLC, Centennial Valley Association (CVA), several land trusts, and other NGOs. HDC works on a defined area called the High Divide. As can be seen by this map of the High Divide, the proposed MHCA is swallowed along with Idaho land, the whole area ripe for control by HORI and HDC. However, this pales in comparison to the larger land objective held by HORI according to this map. Remembering all of these organizations isn't crucial. Just understand that it is one big syndicate family that is bound and determined to undermine land use and property rights, and leads all the way to the United Nations affiliated International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that includes the USFWS and other federal agencies, the CLLC, and Y2Y. In fact, the CLLC President Gary Tabor works with the IUCN. These groups consider land as a garden for them to design, which includes restrictions on use. One funder for this agenda is the Wilburforce Foundation which granted $75,000 to Wild Montana in 2023 for use in the Y2Y program in Wilburforce priority areas, one of which is in the MHCA. Other donations included $250,00 in 2022 and 2023 to HORI. The CVA is "friends" with several of these groups (last page) and has received donations from HORI. One larger funder is the Wyss Campaign for Nature which has donated to Y2Y and the Idaho Conservation League.
USFWS claims the plan is to "acquire up to a proposed 250,000 acres of conservation easements, with no fee title acquisition, within the proposed 5.7-million-acre Conservation Area boundary", using federal Land and Water Conservation Fund money. It even has a "realty team" for this purpose. The USFWS can then plop that land right into the hands of their HORI land trust buddies. According to CVA (pg 4), following scoping a Land Protection Plan may be developed. Somehow this all concludes with the ability to continue using and working the land. To the average eye it just looks like the government is buying up more land for its possession and control. The land owner is still stuck with the taxes, however, because the land can no longer be developed its worth may decrease with resulting lower taxes for the landowner, and in turn less revenue for the county in which it resides. Conservation easements do come with restrictions, in some instances there can be continued, but regulated, use. The point of all of this information is to alert Idahoans to the larger plan that many forces are working within government to meet international organizational objectives, and that the MHCA proposal is really about a much larger land area than what is revealed. This taking of land is a very incremental process and before you know it the frog is boiled to death. As can be seen, there are major bucks flowing into this agenda, and it also disregards sovereign state boundaries. Idahoans, don't be deceived, the MHCA is a major threat to Idaho and your active involvement in opposition to this proposal is needed. Send an email to the USFWS at [email protected] by November 27, 2023 and voice your opposition to this proposal. Alert your county commissioners to the operations of these NGOs and the government, use local land use plans to prohibit these actions, and educate others on the dangers of conservation easements. As conflicts continue to pop up around the world, the United States has vowed to take sides with the oppressed victims of the aggressors. Promising "no boots on the ground", many other types of assistance are given to these countries. Pretty much everyone has heard the old adage, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.
This stance is similar to the one taken by the U.S in 1940. In spite of watching the aggressive actions by the Nazi regime against neighboring countries, the position remained one of being neutral. However, assistance with providing weaponry was given to England, even pilots volunteered to help during the Battle of Britain. And the same was given to China. Meanwhile the aggressor marched on until eventually the U.S. was brought into the problem. Currently, the same stance seems to be in play, no boots on the ground in Ukraine, well, no troops that is. And although there are no troops in Israel at the moment, there is plenty of naval backup waiting to assist if needed. The U.S. has also been providing military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and for several years has fulfilled the same for Israel. Now both aggressive actions towards these countries are conducted by known adversaries of the U.S., Russia and Iran. But the same hostility was held by the Nazi leader, wanting to engage the U.S. in a war long before the Pearl Harbor attack. How long has Iran and Russia declared the same? And of course, there are always those wackos out there who think they know how to solved the problem, or at least opine their summary of the situation, with the media flaming all of it with its pundit rhetoric. Seems there are several similarities in these two scenarios, not getting involved other than providing aid and support. But how long will it take before the U.S. is eventually targeted to become involved? The current administration is already playing around with nuclear weapons in preparation for a potential conflict. And what connection does all of this have with the World Economic Forum? Let's see, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Benjamin Netanyahu seem to have some connections with the global organization, and Russia with Iran. And what is Newsome doing on his trip, taking strategic plans from Israel to China? Where is President Eisenhower when you need him? It seems the only way in which the U.S. and other countries were able to finally end WWII was by a devastating obliteration of Nazis in Germany and tragically, Japanese civilians. Given the enormity of this current war with the incremental involvement by other countries, and protests erupting across the world, even inappropriately by government folks, what can one do except sit back and watch? We have a corrupt government that is placing all of us in danger by conniving with the enemies in the world, and because these despots have become so powerful, maybe the time has come that all should prepare for their ultimate world destruction plan. At least that is how the previous one ended, and it seems we are now on the same path having embedded ourselves across the world as a result of WWII. One theory is that this is nothing more than a plan to disrupt the world so badly, at our expense, in order to justify a new governance system that the world will be begging for, called global governance, permanently placing all of us in a virtual prison, called the Great Reset, living a life of sustainable development. To some degree that is what happened after WWII with the creation of the United Nations, which can now be easily seen as a threat to our sovereignty through so many of its international rules and laws, in spite of the intent of it being a peace making body. Who knows. It just seems so much history is being repeated here. Despots never change. This scheme is nothing more than an illegal way to deprive Americans from using both private and public land, and using their money to enrich the corporate world. As part of this administration's agenda to implement the international 30x30 plan, that is, placing 30% of land into conservation by 2030, it only makes sense to weaponize federal agencies. In this particular case it is the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). One perfect place to execute this plan is in Montana, called the Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area. While this map shows the boundary map clearly within the Montana border, it isn't clear what that red boundary line extending into Idaho means, but it does capture Centennial Valley. First some background, but one almost needs some sort of economic background to get the gist of what is being done.
Globalists began looking at the environment as having "Natural Assets", meaning the environment could be used as justification for economic gain. a "key to sustainable development". Natural assets are defined as assets of the natural environment that consist of wild or produced biological assets, land, water, ecosystems, subsoil, and air. Basically anything in the environment. These assets are sometimes called "ecosystem services". Using climate change hysteria, globalists plotted the latest snow job called Nature Based Solutions (NBS). Since climate change allegedly destroys everything, NBS "are actions to protect, sustainably manage, or restore natural ecosystems", or natural assets, especially if those solutions address societal challenges such as water security and disaster risk reduction, while providing biodiversity benefits. Alas, since natural solutions receive little financing for preventing greenhouse gas emissions, globalists designed a new financial market that uses the environment for economic gain. The White House is on board with its National Strategy plan. Initial funding for this atrocity came out of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act which was really intended to fundamentally transform America towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). On page 112, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was allocated $1 billion for a "pre-disaster mitigation program" which of course will be used for nature based solutions, promising "monetary...benefits...economic growth, green jobs, increased property values and better public health", all hornswoggle. In this April, 2022 Executive Order 14072, Section 4, the administration announced its plan for nature based solutions, which was followed in November, 2022 by the White House Nature Based Solutions Resource Guide. Of course this idea didn't come from the people, it came out of the United Nations (UN) COP 27 as a way to fight "climate change" and increase resilience to life. Ah yes, this president's brilliance will lead to protection for all. And the World Economic Forum (WEF) is drooling over how much money corporations can suck from us with this sham they created. Heck, the White House has already put into place a "roadmap" to assist moneygrubbing schmuck globalists by "Unlocking funding for domestic and international projects, and encouraging Federal agencies to do more to prioritize nature-based solutions in funding decisions." For those who are morbidly curious, a full review of potential funding avenues can be found here. No matter which way you look at it, the cost will be borne by us serfs to the elite. The really tough part in understanding this is how profits are made. One thing for sure, it does involve restoration, protection, and conservation of nature. But money will be made now that new economic markets have been created. Natural Asset Companies (NAC) were created for this specific purpose, "to develop an asset class that converts the value of nature and the ecoservices designed to sustain it into financial capital." An NAC allows "investors to financially back services that directly benefit the planet". Intrinsic Exchange Groups (IEG) are a type of company "whose equity captures the value of natural assets and the ecosystem services they produce." IEG basically determines how much value will be assigned to nature. Wall Street is on board but Whitney Webb hit the nail on the head, "The ultimate goal of NACs is not sustainability or conservation – it is the financialization of nature, i.e. turning nature into a commodity that can be used to keep the current, corrupt Wall Street economy booming under the guise of protecting the environment and preventing its further degradation", her words validated by this author. It is nothing more than another form of Environment, Social Governance (ESG). This author does a fine job in explaining with one example how to make money from this scam when it comes to water. Buy property, create a mitigation bank (buy cheap land and restore it to some ecological state that's deemed to be functional), and investors come in. As he explains it, it is like building houses only you are building wetlands. It is no wonder the corporate saturated WEF supports NBS. The World Bank might have given NBS a more appropriate name in this video, "green infrastructure". Enough of the economic lesson, back to Montana. The American Stewards for Liberty wrote an article about this land grab by the feds, indicating that central Idaho will be involved in it. While the article describes the agenda to connect protected lands together in Montana, Idaho is in the crosshairs for the same expansion, that area being within the red box in the map. Private land will also be usurped in this scam whether voluntary or not and property owners will be forced to comply with restricted and controlled land use. Private property rights will go down the drain. The article also talks about NACs and describes hybrid areas as part of the plan. At the end of the article there is an excellent link that explains how this whole scheme is only about monetizing nature, and notes the same bewilderment, "no investment professional can explain how investors will make money", but rest assured, these scallywag globalists are figuring it out. Both the USFWS and Bureau of Land Management have conservation areas. However, according to the Department of Interior "national conservation areas are designated by Congress" (page CRS-8) and only by the Bureau of Land Management, not the USFWS. Is the USFWS using a slight of hand by leaving out "national" or mixing national in with other wording? Or is this really just another White House violation of the law? Public scoping on this action ends November 27, 2023. The American Stewards article has recommendations for action at the end. Although the deadline for amendments has passed, H.R. 4821, sponsored by Rep. Mike Simpson, has little chance of passing. Regardless, Idahoans should contact congressional representatives (especially Simpson) and state representatives, ask them what Idaho can do for protection against this 30x30 agenda, the proposed conservation area, and ban NAC activity. Perhaps everyone should consider putting together a bill for state reps to sponsor. Definitely send an email to the USFWS at [email protected] and let them know it appears they are proceeding without congressional approval, and if anything, this action requires an Environmental Impact Statement. There is so much more to be written on this as it does extend into every aspect of our lives. This isn't being done for the environment, it is about taking away land use through conservation easements and ruling over how people live. You did not bear the shame. You fought back. You gave the great, Forever tireless Sign of change, Sacrificing your glowing life For freedom, Justice, and honor. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|