Accept as fact, or scoff as a conspiracy, this video by G. Edward Griffin, The United Nations: Peace Dove Unmasked, unveils the deceit behind the United Nations (UN). Having watched that video, now comes the United States Institute of Peace and its decision to join the UN in its peacekeeping mission held in 2016, centering around how to "protect civilians", called the Kigali Principles for peacekeeping. The actual discussion on the principles doesn't start until the 1'31" mark, prior to that is pretty uneventful. But even in the second half the principles aren't fully discussed. Prior to actually discussing principles, the panel spoke to the need to "certify" troops who participate, having clear rules of engagement, talking to people on the ground to get intelligence and protect them, and holding peacekeepers "accountable". Accountability was described as being a pledge by signatories (those countries who signed onto this) to hold their own troops accountable to protect civilians. Wow, that's really profound. Astonishingly, if a troop chooses to leave the mission, it is the UN that can dictate whether or not they can leave, and "retaliation" against the UN would not be allowed. What the heck does that mean? Principle 10 was supported by several panel members. That principle is to "identify" the threat prior to deployment so that force won't be needed and action can be taken to "mitigate" the threat. Hasn't this always been a part of warfare? Principle 18 centers around mobility and logistics support to help peacekeepers, after all there is a UN mission here, and it was reported the United States could be used for airlift support of peacekeepers. Principle 1 involved training and leadership. The UN also should be the one to come up with the code of conduct and provide training on sexual abuse. Concern was raised about intelligence gathering from civilians for fear they would see the troop involvement only for that sole purpose rather than protection and that it might "undermine institutions we are trying to build". There is always one joker in the group that slips up and announces what all of this is about. It's unclear if this decision has been maintained by the U.S., this is the only reference to it on their website. Resources on the principles can be found at the Global Centre For the Responsibility to Protect, and the principles are listed here. George Patton, where are you when we need you?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|