There are two very good videos that explain how cattle owners are being pursued to put them out of business here in the U.S. and in the Netherlands.
The first is The Attack on Farmers and Ranchers that No One is Talking About By Jim Mundorf. In this video he speaks to the “climate smart practices” being forced onto ranchers. In this video, it is explained how ranchers in the Netherlands are being forced out of business, their resolve to fight back. It also explains how this has nothing to do with the climate but is rather an agenda to take land. Start the video at the 10" mark. It isn't any surprise that nitrogen is on the World Economic Forum and United Nations list to control.
0 Comments
U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 10: Powers Prohibited of States
"No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation...." Treaty - "ratified agreement between two or more nations or sovereigns; a contract between two or more countries that is adhered to by the nations party to it; an international agreement between two or more states that is governed by international law." Alliance - "a group of countries, political parties, or people who have agreed to work together because of shared interests or aims". Confederation - "Union of sovereign states linked by treaties, whose common government does not directly exercise its sovereignty over their territory"; "a group of people, countries, organizations, etc., that are joined together in some activity or effort". Treason - "the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance..."; "the crime of doing something that harms your country or government..." Are Idaho state legislators and the governor himself engaging in acts that violate the U.S. Constitution even though the Idaho Oath of Office requires a vow to "support the Constitution of the United States"? It appears there is a very strong question as to certain elected officials being in violation of this oath by their activities. Let's hypothesize that is the case. Making this alliance possible through a statute, the Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER) is a "public-private nonprofit" that is comprised of several northwest states, including Idaho, and several Canadian Provinces. President Pro Tempore Sen. Winder serves on the Executive Committee; Gov. Brad Little, Senators Burtenshaw, Taylor, and Representatives Raybould, Green, and Shepherd serve on the Delegate Council, with Representatives Gannon and Wisniewski and Senators Lent and Semmelroth serving as Council alternates. There is also a Private Sector Council made up of corporations, some of which are global. PNWER has numerous working groups, and as a confederation, it works on issues that remove state sovereignty as "The gold standard of U.S.-Canada Relations". To further his alliances, Gov. Little is a member of the Western Governors Association (WGA) and its corporate sponsors. This is a group that promotes "collective action" policies, brought Agenda 2030 to Idaho, and extends its alliance through socialization with foreign countries, perhaps moving it from an alliance into a confederation. There is also the National Governors Association (NGA) in which Governor Little is a member. and its long list of global corporate partners. Its program areas are similar to Idaho issues. This group declares it improves "citizens' lives" on "matters of public policy and governance at the state, national and global levels." Working at a global level just shoved it to a confederation. Funding information for the NGA is elusive. Back in 2010 Idaho scarfed up $60,000 for dues, but saved $10,000 for skipping events. However, corporate partners can pay for "exclusive access to governors during meetings and conferences" plus other benefits (pg 15) that Idaho citizens are not allowed. Through its partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals ideology and agendas are offered through the NGA Center for Best Practices (a money making machine, funded by federal grants and private and corporate donations). Is this in itself not an act of treason? On a really frightening note, back in 2019 the NGA sponsored the U.S. China-Governors Collaboration Summit, an initiative created by Hillary, inviting China into local governments. Fortunately, the U.S. Department of State recognized this threat and it was put to a halt in 2020. However, this didn't stop Governor Otter from expanding "these healthy international relationships", or Governor Little from engaging with foreign countries. Even though Governor Little labeled this as an "agreement", does it qualify as a treaty without legislative approval? How can either be so obtuse? As no surprise, a 2019 Minzhi-Tsinghua study found Governor Little has a "friendly" attitude towards China (pg 31). Contained within the NGA is the Council of Governors (COG), created by the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in 2008, and through Executive Order 13528 in 2010, "to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards." Basically, COG destroys state sovereignty of being separate from the federal government, and yours truly, Governor Little, is a council member, appointed in September, 2023. Could this fall under an alliance or confederation? Or is this violation acceptable since it was created by the federal government? Democratic and federal influence seems to be the forefront of this collective alliance through a confederation (pg 4) and promoted with the Democratic president being host of the NGA 2023 winter meeting (20" mark), at which Governor Little was in attendance. In case a governor forgets, the NGA also has a refresher course on a governors' powers and authority. In spite of its kindergarten level Disagree Better initiative, looks like it may have dissidents in the ranks. Putting forward a good front that he is all in for his party, Governor Little also belongs to the Republican Governors Association (RGA), which lays claim that Republican leadership is a "contrast of what’s happening under Democrats’ leadership in DC". What a bunch of malarkey. Governor Little, along with the rest of RGA governors, maintains an alliance with the "bipartisan" NGA. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is an organization that brings state legislators together as an alliance voluntarily. The State Chair for Idaho is Rep. Sage Dixon who also serves on the Board of Directors, and on the Federalism and International Relations task force. ALEC has other task force groups and has worked on many issues, truly fitting the description of a confederation. Often through this group, bills are introduced to the legislature, heavily influenced by corporations. Although there is no reference to corporate involvement on its current website, archived websites indicate "ALEC provides a forum for the private sector to provide practical input on how state public policy decisions can impact jobs and the local economy". Its 2018 Strategic Plan did mention some private partners, and a goal to "increase the number of meetings with major donors and prospects (individuals, foundations and corporations)" (pg 18). These are the "policies", or acts, recommended for 2023. So this group writes up an act, or bill, seeking to have it passed by legislators. It may be a stretch to quantify this as a treaty, but it does have that smell. A written document from different political authorities between states for the purposes of ratification by states. Hmm.... There is also the National Conference of State Legislators (NCSL). Legislative leaders that belong to NCSL include Representatives Moyle, Blanksma, and Rubel, and Senators Winder, Anthon, and Wintrow. Its mission "is to advance the effectiveness, independence and integrity of legislatures and to foster interstate cooperation". Although not linked by a treaty, it seems the NCSL acts like a confederation that does not promote the exercise of sovereignty over one's own territory, instead having control over its committees by an Executive Committee. The NCSL encourages the use of contracts between states, or treaties which are forbidden by the Constitution. To influence decisions the NCSL has its own (allegedly non-partisan) list of policy influencers on different issues and policy direction. Who needs input from Idaho constituents when you have experts to fill the bill? The Council of State Governments (CSG) is another alliance which includes 13 western states via CSG West. CSG "provides state legislators and legislative staff with valuable relationship building and professional growth opportunities through a variety of member-driven, regionally focused programs and services", and "membership is automatic". On the Executive Committee are the same NCSL folks, Senators Winder, Wintrow, and Anthon, along with Representatives Moyle and Rubel, right there along with Canada, a foreign country. Does confederation come to mind? How convenient that Idaho legislative leaders belong to these groups. Now, involvement in this CSG West confederation isn't limited to those just mentioned. It also includes Senators Lent and Ward-Engelking on the Education Committee; Senators Hartgen, Guthrie, and Semmelroth on the Agriculture & Water Committee; Senator Burtenshaw on the Canada Relations Committee; Senators Lent, Just, Semmelroth, and Rabe on the Energy & Environment Committee; Senators Harris, Taylor, and VanOrden on the Health Committee; Senators Rabe and Wintrow as Co-Chairs on the Housing Committee; Senators Schroeder and Taylor on the River Governance Committee; Senators Bjerke and Wintrow on the Public Safety Committee; Senators Lakey and Ruchti in the Legislative Oversight Working Group; and lastly, Rep. Furniss on the Westrends Board. Lt. Governor Scott Bedke has his own little clique to be part of, the National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA) and its pack of corporate partners. It also has international missions with multiple countries and a host of resolutions to push upon return to the legislature. Not to be left out, both Bedke and President Pro Tempore Winder belong on the State Legislative Leaders Foundation (SLLF) Board of Directors. It is nauseating that this group thinks it has "respect for the institution of the state legislature, and a moral commitment to protecting the integrity of that institution", especially when the Advisory Council is nothing but global corporations and other affiliations. Gentlemen, enjoy your trip to Myrtle Beach, SC to cavort with your buddies this spring, the legislative session will be over just in time. Good grief, where does Governor Little and these legislators find time to govern Idaho? Seems like they are pretty busy flitting across the country to pal around with others and make plans for Idaho. It comes as no surprise that Idahoans are not listened to, and fed up. Other organizations are doing the work of legislators and those legislators adopt whatever bilge is handed to them. Why spend the time listening to Idahoans, it is easier to use what is made available to them. How about Idahoans make it simple for these folks. A select group of Idahoans, with expert knowledge on these same issues, can come together, provide "legislative oversight", and offer "suggestions to improve government accountability, transparency, and responsiveness" that the legislature so desperately seems to need, and provide far better solutions. Aren't the people supposed to have the power? Heck, maybe all of this is a stretch, surely legal minds would rip this hypothesis to shreds. There are limitations to the definition of treason, "ensure that the conduct itself demonstrated a defendant’s intention to betray the United States"; "defendant’s disloyal intent must be evident from the witnessed acts themselves"; "if there is no intent to betray, there is no treason.” "In other words, the Constitution requires both concrete action and an intent to betray the nation before a citizen can be convicted of treason." Clearly, one can assume that these elected officials have no intent to betray the United States, they most likely really believe they are doing good for Idaho and the country. Regardless, the concept of these regional groups, and those who are involved in them, is repugnant, betray our country and state for not following the Constitution, and betray the consent of the people. The harm to Idaho extends far beyond just their involvement with the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) Anyone who has read this far must be outraged. Isn't it apparent there is no government system anymore? It isn't about political parties, it is about the destruction of our Republic in which both parties participate. These bodies of alliances and confederations are destroying Idaho, and our country. Though not technically treason, it does demonstrate no loyalty to our country, and it does advance the corporate takeover of our government. Meanwhile, as other countries honor those who sacrificed their lives to resist tyranny annually, we sit on our keisters, not organizing our own resistance against these quislings. Through the education system, parental roles and rights have been incrementally diminished. Across America, parents are fighting to take that role back. However, in typical fashion, the ne'er do wells continue to create avenues for control over children.
The U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) just awarded United Way of Treasure Valley (UWTV) $6,486,447 to implement a "five-year Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS)" grant that will support "non-profits and other public or private organizations and institutions" to "expand community schools." In collaboration with "non-profits, health providers, private partners and other agencies" the intent is "to coordinate and deliver services like health care, mental health and nutrition services, afterschool and summer programming and high-quality early learning programs." The total "expected funding" will be $45,945,645 that will "serve" 20,000 Idaho students, about $2,300 per student. What isn't being disclosed is that this vaguely defined purpose to "deliver" health and mental health care is part of a larger program to continue undermining parental rights and authority. This delivery service system, called School Based Health Centers (SBHC), has been ravaging America for several years. And now, in the Treasure Valley, this United Nations (UN) partnered non-profit, UWTV, will have its hands on the kids. United Way was founded in 1887 by religious leaders. Along the way it lost its foundation by joining in partnership with the UN in 1975. United Way has since adopted the 17 sustainable development goals (SDG). That is how embedded it is with the UN. No longer is it about a school nurse tending to boo-boos or calling a parent to come pick up their child. SBHC are intended to supplant the parental provider choice by providing a full scope of services, a literal health clinic in the school, that can include health checkups, labs, medication, counseling, vaccinations, ongoing care for chronic health conditions, dental and eye exams, and sexual reproductive services. As a UN non-governmental organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics supports these clinics. It also adds to the financial strain in Medicaid. UWTV also collects data, not only on children, but also on that child's family. This information can also be shared with its partners that includes the government, hospitals, educational institutions. and corporations, some of which are Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry (IACI) and World Economic Forum (WEF) members. Although not yet in Idaho, the School-Based Health Alliance (SBHA) is one such group aiming for children, complete with corporate and government partners, and data collection. This organization might find an opportunity to expand its reach through UWTV. There is one SBHC in Marsing. More information on SBHC can be found here, and starting at the 5" mark, this video provides more details on what these centers do with information about parental consent. Stand for Health Freedom also has more information. Health and education are very much a part of the UN SDG 3 and 4. For the UN and WEF, health is attached to the success of the worker bee, and just like education, it means snatching a child's health status as a critical component of meeting its future workforce needs. Oh yes, Idaho children can be directly connected to the UN and WEF. What better parents can you ask for? As the Israeli and Ukraine wars rage on, and protests by a minority receive inflated media attention, there is a more ominous story brewing that is not in the media spotlight.
BRICS is the acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South America. Goldman Sachs first used the term BRIC in its Global Economics Paper in 2001. Russia, India, and China leaders met informally at the G8 Outreach Summit in 2006, with foreign ministers from these countries meeting formally at the United Nations General Assembly later in 2006. The first BRIC Summit was held in Russia in 2009 with South Africa joining in 2010, changing the name to BRICS. Supposedly, these countries gathered primarily for the purposes of creating an easier trade system between their countries. What should one think, knowing that major dictators like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are part of a group leading an economic transformation opposite of the western world? These countries have a "shared commitment to restructure the global political, economic, and financial architecture to be fair, balanced and representative, resting on the important pillars of multilateralism and international law." The general feeling is that these "developing", or Global South countries have always been left behind from the developed countries in economic matters. As far as the World Economic forum (WEF) is concerned, this is fine as "America's dominance" will be over by 2030. Traditional G7 "developed" countries are comprised of the U.S., UK, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, and Canada. However, BRICS does perceive itself as a "mechanism to counter the global influence of the G7" and reduce the "dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade and finance." The fact that this group is comprised of significantly different cultures and political ideology makes advancement a little difficult, and that pesky China poses a challenge. But as always with despots, the greed of money and more power can glue them together. Indeed, China is urging that "more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” Formidable advances have been made by this group, in 2020 "BRICS (31.4 per cent) overtook the G7 (30 per cent)" in GDP with China and India in the lead. Perhaps the new "Global South" will be the new dominant force for the new world order. Argentina, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will join BRICS in 2024 with other prospective members in the future. This "expansion signifies an important move in the attempt to reshape the global order into a multipolar world, with voices from the Global South at the center of the international agenda." With Saudi Arabia and the UAE, BRICS will have "more influence over global energy supplies" giving the group production "over 42 percent of global oil supplies and 37 percent of the world’s gas." In 2014 BRICS established its own bank, The New Development Bank, which expanded to include Bangladesh, UAE, and Egypt. Its focus is projects that support a full blown implementation of sustainable development goals (SDG). China is generally considered to be the leader of BRICS, is calling for more expansion, and urging "members to let more countries join...to make global governance more fair and reasonable.” BRICS has also given consideration to developing its own currency, one way being similar to what the European Union did with the euro. Its existence has also contributed to the de-dollarization that has been occurring. There have also been talks about developing a digital currency. One could view this as a buildup of economic power rather than the traditional build up of armament and troops. With the addition of the other countries in 2024, BRICS will have almost half the world's population (47%), will produce a third of GDP (37%), and possess "the lion’s share of the world’s oil and gas reserves, as well as a huge endowment of other natural resources." How much possible economic damage could BRICS cause the rest of the world with these statistics? As usual, there are those who downplay the significance of BRICS, and there are multiple varying opinions from armchair experts. However, the United Nations (UN) is certainly in support of BRICS for a "multipolar" world "based on the UN Charter and international law." In the BRICS Declaration, it avows the "central role of the United Nations in the international system" (#13), and its full support of Agenda 2030 (#35). It also wants a reform of the Bretton Woods institutions, institutions that have been in place since WWII. In its most recent meeting, held in August, 2023, BRICS created its new Declaration II, with an overall, general, endorsement of the UN. The document itself sounds like a conglomerate of countries joining hands for Agenda 2030, the EU having already adopted it. The U.S. is surrounded by a world of sustainable development. Folks, this transformation of the world is really closer than you may think. What is the U.S. government response to BRICS? ""Participating in BRICS is a sovereign decision for member countries". Interestingly, the U.S. State Department reported "When it comes to the BRICS, we’re deeply engaged with its leading members." Engaged about what? With the U.S. pointing fingers at Iran as being a backer of terrorism, how will Iran fit into the BRICS Counterterrorism Working Group? Demands from this group are not limited to economic concerns. It also wants more representation in leadership positions through the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), ""comprehensive reform” of the UN which Beijing regards as central to global governance", and increased representation by developing countries in the United Nations Security Council. One theory about BRICS is that it is part of an intentional collapse of the economic system in order to create a one world economic system, and bring in a digital system that would in turn force everyone into the digital world. What can Idaho do to thwart this threat? The simpleton solution seems to be the creation of its own economic power. Maybe create its own state bank, placing more emphasis on gold and silver as legal tender for a shield, investing more into Idaho resources that can be used to support the state, and reducing dependence on federal dollars. In other words, can Idaho stay out of the global economy as much as possible? After all, BRICS sees what they are doing as an economic protection from sanctions, why can't Idaho do the same by protecting itself from outside economic forces? In 2015, the world was forewarned about this by Christiana Figueres. "...we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years...". There are many economically savvy individuals in Idaho, some of whom have written about the way in which Idaho should shift its economic future. Those opinions would be welcome on this subject. A Constitutional Convention, or Con-Con, is found in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. There are basically two ways amendments can be made to the U.S. Constitution.
Alex Newman from the New American magazine has a short explanation of the fallacies behind the current effort to hold a Con-Con and some of the scheming tactics being used to promote it. Robert Brown from the John Birch Society provides a historical perspective of Article V and why the current pressure for a Con-Con is underway, and why it is a bad idea. It may be confusing to understand how a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) proposal in Montana, the Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area (MHCA), has anything to do with Idaho. Rule one, understand that federal agencies share the same ideological bed with non-governmental organizations (NGO). Rule two, they all share the same objectives and mission. And Rule three, not only is there government money, actually your tax dollar supporting them, millions of dollars are pouring in from other sources with the same dogma. So the map of the proposed MHCA area extends north to Deer Lodge, east to Ennis, not quite reaching Wyoming, and south to the Montana-Idaho boarder that captures the tip of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) controlled Centennial Mountain range. As the fact sheet suggests, the objective is to acquire land, 250,00 acres of conservation easements, for the purposes of protecting wildlife habitat, open space, connectivity, and wildlife migratory corridors, but not property rights. Think of corridors as roads for wildlife that lead them to the next habitat area. In the imaginary world of environmentalists this is called connectivity, in that the corridor, or road, leads, or "connects" wildlife, to the next habitat. Isn't that brilliant? Those same individuals also believe humans are nothing but car wrecks in the path of these animals, preventing them from getting to their next habitat. Thus, the need to take land and control it for wildlife and nature. There are a couple of mother ships for NGOs, the Center for Large Landscape Conservation (CLLC) which is international, and the Network for Landscape Conservation (NLC). NLC partners with CLLC, the USFWS along with several other federal agencies, and other supporters. Other partners to both outfits are NGOs such as Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y), Wildlands Network, and Wild Montana. NLC also partners with the Heart of the Rockies Initiative (HORI), which is a group of land trusts in Idaho and western states and Canada. In turn, HORI collaborates with a conservation partnership called the High Divide Collaborative (HDC). HDC partners with government agencies including the USFWS, CLLC, Centennial Valley Association (CVA), several land trusts, and other NGOs. HDC works on a defined area called the High Divide. As can be seen by this map of the High Divide, the proposed MHCA is swallowed along with Idaho land, the whole area ripe for control by HORI and HDC. However, this pales in comparison to the larger land objective held by HORI according to this map. Remembering all of these organizations isn't crucial. Just understand that it is one big syndicate family that is bound and determined to undermine land use and property rights, and leads all the way to the United Nations affiliated International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that includes the USFWS and other federal agencies, the CLLC, and Y2Y. In fact, the CLLC President Gary Tabor works with the IUCN. These groups consider land as a garden for them to design, which includes restrictions on use. One funder for this agenda is the Wilburforce Foundation which granted $75,000 to Wild Montana in 2023 for use in the Y2Y program in Wilburforce priority areas, one of which is in the MHCA. Other donations included $250,00 in 2022 and 2023 to HORI. The CVA is "friends" with several of these groups (last page) and has received donations from HORI. One larger funder is the Wyss Campaign for Nature which has donated to Y2Y and the Idaho Conservation League.
USFWS claims the plan is to "acquire up to a proposed 250,000 acres of conservation easements, with no fee title acquisition, within the proposed 5.7-million-acre Conservation Area boundary", using federal Land and Water Conservation Fund money. It even has a "realty team" for this purpose. The USFWS can then plop that land right into the hands of their HORI land trust buddies. According to CVA (pg 4), following scoping a Land Protection Plan may be developed. Somehow this all concludes with the ability to continue using and working the land. To the average eye it just looks like the government is buying up more land for its possession and control. The land owner is still stuck with the taxes, however, because the land can no longer be developed its worth may decrease with resulting lower taxes for the landowner, and in turn less revenue for the county in which it resides. Conservation easements do come with restrictions, in some instances there can be continued, but regulated, use. The point of all of this information is to alert Idahoans to the larger plan that many forces are working within government to meet international organizational objectives, and that the MHCA proposal is really about a much larger land area than what is revealed. This taking of land is a very incremental process and before you know it the frog is boiled to death. As can be seen, there are major bucks flowing into this agenda, and it also disregards sovereign state boundaries. Idahoans, don't be deceived, the MHCA is a major threat to Idaho and your active involvement in opposition to this proposal is needed. Send an email to the USFWS at [email protected] by November 27, 2023 and voice your opposition to this proposal. Alert your county commissioners to the operations of these NGOs and the government, use local land use plans to prohibit these actions, and educate others on the dangers of conservation easements. As conflicts continue to pop up around the world, the United States has vowed to take sides with the oppressed victims of the aggressors. Promising "no boots on the ground", many other types of assistance are given to these countries. Pretty much everyone has heard the old adage, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.
This stance is similar to the one taken by the U.S in 1940. In spite of watching the aggressive actions by the Nazi regime against neighboring countries, the position remained one of being neutral. However, assistance with providing weaponry was given to England, even pilots volunteered to help during the Battle of Britain. And the same was given to China. Meanwhile the aggressor marched on until eventually the U.S. was brought into the problem. Currently, the same stance seems to be in play, no boots on the ground in Ukraine, well, no troops that is. And although there are no troops in Israel at the moment, there is plenty of naval backup waiting to assist if needed. The U.S. has also been providing military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and for several years has fulfilled the same for Israel. Now both aggressive actions towards these countries are conducted by known adversaries of the U.S., Russia and Iran. But the same hostility was held by the Nazi leader, wanting to engage the U.S. in a war long before the Pearl Harbor attack. How long has Iran and Russia declared the same? And of course, there are always those wackos out there who think they know how to solved the problem, or at least opine their summary of the situation, with the media flaming all of it with its pundit rhetoric. Seems there are several similarities in these two scenarios, not getting involved other than providing aid and support. But how long will it take before the U.S. is eventually targeted to become involved? The current administration is already playing around with nuclear weapons in preparation for a potential conflict. And what connection does all of this have with the World Economic Forum? Let's see, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Benjamin Netanyahu seem to have some connections with the global organization, and Russia with Iran. And what is Newsome doing on his trip, taking strategic plans from Israel to China? Where is President Eisenhower when you need him? It seems the only way in which the U.S. and other countries were able to finally end WWII was by a devastating obliteration of Nazis in Germany and tragically, Japanese civilians. Given the enormity of this current war with the incremental involvement by other countries, and protests erupting across the world, even inappropriately by government folks, what can one do except sit back and watch? We have a corrupt government that is placing all of us in danger by conniving with the enemies in the world, and because these despots have become so powerful, maybe the time has come that all should prepare for their ultimate world destruction plan. At least that is how the previous one ended, and it seems we are now on the same path having embedded ourselves across the world as a result of WWII. One theory is that this is nothing more than a plan to disrupt the world so badly, at our expense, in order to justify a new governance system that the world will be begging for, called global governance, permanently placing all of us in a virtual prison, called the Great Reset, living a life of sustainable development. To some degree that is what happened after WWII with the creation of the United Nations, which can now be easily seen as a threat to our sovereignty through so many of its international rules and laws, in spite of the intent of it being a peace making body. Who knows. It just seems so much history is being repeated here. Despots never change. This scheme is nothing more than an illegal way to deprive Americans from using both private and public land, and using their money to enrich the corporate world. As part of this administration's agenda to implement the international 30x30 plan, that is, placing 30% of land into conservation by 2030, it only makes sense to weaponize federal agencies. In this particular case it is the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). One perfect place to execute this plan is in Montana, called the Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area. While this map shows the boundary map clearly within the Montana border, it isn't clear what that red boundary line extending into Idaho means, but it does capture Centennial Valley. First some background, but one almost needs some sort of economic background to get the gist of what is being done.
Globalists began looking at the environment as having "Natural Assets", meaning the environment could be used as justification for economic gain. a "key to sustainable development". Natural assets are defined as assets of the natural environment that consist of wild or produced biological assets, land, water, ecosystems, subsoil, and air. Basically anything in the environment. These assets are sometimes called "ecosystem services". Using climate change hysteria, globalists plotted the latest snow job called Nature Based Solutions (NBS). Since climate change allegedly destroys everything, NBS "are actions to protect, sustainably manage, or restore natural ecosystems", or natural assets, especially if those solutions address societal challenges such as water security and disaster risk reduction, while providing biodiversity benefits. Alas, since natural solutions receive little financing for preventing greenhouse gas emissions, globalists designed a new financial market that uses the environment for economic gain. The White House is on board with its National Strategy plan. Initial funding for this atrocity came out of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act which was really intended to fundamentally transform America towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). On page 112, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was allocated $1 billion for a "pre-disaster mitigation program" which of course will be used for nature based solutions, promising "monetary...benefits...economic growth, green jobs, increased property values and better public health", all hornswoggle. In this April, 2022 Executive Order 14072, Section 4, the administration announced its plan for nature based solutions, which was followed in November, 2022 by the White House Nature Based Solutions Resource Guide. Of course this idea didn't come from the people, it came out of the United Nations (UN) COP 27 as a way to fight "climate change" and increase resilience to life. Ah yes, this president's brilliance will lead to protection for all. And the World Economic Forum (WEF) is drooling over how much money corporations can suck from us with this sham they created. Heck, the White House has already put into place a "roadmap" to assist moneygrubbing schmuck globalists by "Unlocking funding for domestic and international projects, and encouraging Federal agencies to do more to prioritize nature-based solutions in funding decisions." For those who are morbidly curious, a full review of potential funding avenues can be found here. No matter which way you look at it, the cost will be borne by us serfs to the elite. The really tough part in understanding this is how profits are made. One thing for sure, it does involve restoration, protection, and conservation of nature. But money will be made now that new economic markets have been created. Natural Asset Companies (NAC) were created for this specific purpose, "to develop an asset class that converts the value of nature and the ecoservices designed to sustain it into financial capital." An NAC allows "investors to financially back services that directly benefit the planet". Intrinsic Exchange Groups (IEG) are a type of company "whose equity captures the value of natural assets and the ecosystem services they produce." IEG basically determines how much value will be assigned to nature. Wall Street is on board but Whitney Webb hit the nail on the head, "The ultimate goal of NACs is not sustainability or conservation – it is the financialization of nature, i.e. turning nature into a commodity that can be used to keep the current, corrupt Wall Street economy booming under the guise of protecting the environment and preventing its further degradation", her words validated by this author. It is nothing more than another form of Environment, Social Governance (ESG). This author does a fine job in explaining with one example how to make money from this scam when it comes to water. Buy property, create a mitigation bank (buy cheap land and restore it to some ecological state that's deemed to be functional), and investors come in. As he explains it, it is like building houses only you are building wetlands. It is no wonder the corporate saturated WEF supports NBS. The World Bank might have given NBS a more appropriate name in this video, "green infrastructure". Enough of the economic lesson, back to Montana. The American Stewards for Liberty wrote an article about this land grab by the feds, indicating that central Idaho will be involved in it. While the article describes the agenda to connect protected lands together in Montana, Idaho is in the crosshairs for the same expansion, that area being within the red box in the map. Private land will also be usurped in this scam whether voluntary or not and property owners will be forced to comply with restricted and controlled land use. Private property rights will go down the drain. The article also talks about NACs and describes hybrid areas as part of the plan. At the end of the article there is an excellent link that explains how this whole scheme is only about monetizing nature, and notes the same bewilderment, "no investment professional can explain how investors will make money", but rest assured, these scallywag globalists are figuring it out. Both the USFWS and Bureau of Land Management have conservation areas. However, according to the Department of Interior "national conservation areas are designated by Congress" (page CRS-8) and only by the Bureau of Land Management, not the USFWS. Is the USFWS using a slight of hand by leaving out "national" or mixing national in with other wording? Or is this really just another White House violation of the law? Public scoping on this action ends November 27, 2023. The American Stewards article has recommendations for action at the end. Although the deadline for amendments has passed, H.R. 4821, sponsored by Rep. Mike Simpson, has little chance of passing. Regardless, Idahoans should contact congressional representatives (especially Simpson) and state representatives, ask them what Idaho can do for protection against this 30x30 agenda, the proposed conservation area, and ban NAC activity. Perhaps everyone should consider putting together a bill for state reps to sponsor. Definitely send an email to the USFWS at [email protected] and let them know it appears they are proceeding without congressional approval, and if anything, this action requires an Environmental Impact Statement. There is so much more to be written on this as it does extend into every aspect of our lives. This isn't being done for the environment, it is about taking away land use through conservation easements and ruling over how people live. You did not bear the shame. You fought back. You gave the great, Forever tireless Sign of change, Sacrificing your glowing life For freedom, Justice, and honor. On September 28, 2023 the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 4665, The Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act. Both Rep. Fulcher, and surprisingly Rep. Simpson, voted yea. It now heads to the Senate so there is no guarantee it will survive there. While the whole appropriations bill itself is obscene with millions of dollars being sent to foreign countries, it does have some interesting inclusions. The full text of the bill can be found here. A short synopsis of the bill can be found here.
Some of those interesting inclusions: 1. Prohibits funds to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA); World Health Organization (WHO); Gender Equity and Equality Action Fund (GEEA); and terminates 18 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), UN Women, UN Montreal Protocol, UN Environment Fund, and World Economic Forum (WEF) programs. Why is the WEF funded by U.S. taxpayers?? 2. Section 7048 has some restrictions on using funding as it pertains to the UN. Prohibition of funds to the WHO is Section 7048(k). 3. Section 7049 withholds funds for the Arms Trade Treaty pending ratification by the Senate. Say what, ratification? 4. Section 7058(d) withholds funds to the Wuhan lab and for gain of function research. 5. Section 7061 withholds funding for several climate change funds. 6. Section 7070(c) holds funding for Executive Orders 7009, 34593, and 10825. (d) withholds funding for disinformation programs, and (e) withholds funds for sex change activities. 7. Section 9018(1-7) all address holding funding for several executive orders on climate change and refugee resettlement. For more on what this bill does read the synopsis. Will it pass the Senate? Or will it get bogged down in the current Congressional circus? If nothing else at least there is some indication that there is an effort to address some of the pressing problems that are on American minds. WWII was the last Constitutionally declared war by Congress with all multiple subsequent conflicts being decided by an unelected council. While many countries participated in the fight to end Nazism, it was the force of American men who supported those countries in ending the most tyrannical regime of the 20th century.
In 2022, it was estimated the only 167,284 of those veterans are still alive. But that does not account for the 16 million Americans who served during the war, and the estimated 420,000 who died. For all those sacrifices, including those who did not engage directly in combat, we must be reminded especially of those who took a bullet for us. How are Americans honoring their sacrifice? The saying goes, you'll never meet an atheist in a foxhole. Yet America has made sure that the very faith that carried these Americans through the war and at home has been wiped from its soul. And we are making sure children don't understand the role of faith in their lives. Education has been allowed to take control over children, ensuring the sacrifices made for them by Americans are never taught, instead, filling their heads with a fantasy world of equality, lack of want, forever peace, and transforming individual thought to one of collectivism and group think. What was a selfless society that gave and sacrificed for men who fought, we now have a world full of self-absorbed individuals demanding their entitlements, proclaiming their right to anything they want and how they behave, and falsely deserve while taking their selfies, with forced tolerance by others. Millions of foreigners are flooding America with zero intent for allegiance or loyalty to it, with little desire to understand the significance of its history, or appreciation for those who fought for it. How are those who took a bullet for us being honored? What sacrifices are being made to preserve what they fought for? What more can be done beyond a "Thank you for your service", annual days of remembrance and parades, or an occasional movie that depicts their sacrifices? Those Americans took a bullet for us protecting our country....and this is how we carry that responsibility, by not defending anything, but rather choosing to elect a senile man to act as as a totalitarian, letting non-American entities make decisions about how the world's future will look and how lives will be lived, and watching as unconstitutional federal agencies run amok. Instead, we choose to sit by and ruminate over stories meant only for distraction from the real destruction being carried out under the guise of constant predictions of doom and gloom, and being led by the nose with constantly changing false narratives. And who needs a government anymore, social engineering of a society and decision-making by science will work better for a socially just and equitable society. Under the ruse that all of this is being done for "future generations", in reality future children will not be allowed to decide their own future, it is being decided for them, right now. This is so opposite from those who fought to protect our freedom to choose. This is how we guard what was entrusted to us? Out of the many ways in which we could take our sovereignty back, both as individuals and a country, we refuse to do it. Is it because of fear? Choosing to lament about these conditions on social media instead of discussing actions and solutions...this is the sorry way in which to honor those who took a bullet for us. Maybe the United Nations, World Economic Forum, Mr. Global, and all the other corrupt groups are right. As society has descended into moral decay and separation from the Constitution while continuing to acquiesce, maybe there does need to be more control over humans with surveillance to ensure that everyone is behaving appropriately, or rather accepting their dictates of compliance. Access to goods should be controlled with a central bank digital currency to ensure that no one gets more than their fair share. Maybe population growth should be lowered and controlled so fewer deplorables are around. The assaults we are currently under might be greater than any America has faced before. Not only are we under siege by a world of corporations, groups that are systematically blurring our sovereign boundaries with regional decisions, but we are also under siege by a government that literally is as tyrannical as King George, and we know who is at the helm of this oligarchy with minions that are rolling out dictates they want, while violating laws that were written to protect our rights. Just as if it were a daily Pearl Harbor, the same assaults are being forced on us...every day, because we are not fighting to protect ourselves. Cities built with dense housing, renewable energy, electric vehicles, controlling appliances, increased government dependency, migration, more surveillance, loss of free speech and censorship, central bank digital currency instead of a dollar bill, government in bed with corporations, money being sucked out of every working individual to give to other countries and to those who contribute nothing...and the list of assaults is growing. And here we sit here, doing nothing, many times hiding behind those who have been willing to put their lives and livelihoods in front of those enemies. Why are so many unwilling to take the bullet, especially now before the real bullets begin to fly? The current status would probably be best described by these soldiers as a complete FUBAR. But this is the thanks we have chosen to give them. What will it take to awaken the sleeping giant again? |
Concerned Idahoans:This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through associated programs of Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Great Reset. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom! Categories
All
Archives
March 2024
|