Rev. Danny Jones of the Northlake Baptist Church in Gainsville, Georgia, understands the destruction of our world that has progressively been implemented by evil. He gives a powerful sermon about this. Below is a shortened version of his sermon, to listen to the full sermon go here, starting at the 15" mark.
Alex Newman is a journalist, educator, author, consultant, contributor to WND (World Net Daily), an education writer for FreedomProject Media, foreign correspondent for The New American magazine, a contributor to the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief, and a multitude of other talents.
In this video he briefly discusses Agenda 21 and 2030 but then goes on to speak how the United Nations (UN) and these vile programs have contributed to the destruction of our education system. In Idaho the legislature is making efforts eliminate the Common Core standards. The deceit behind Common Core is exposed, individuals who have been involved, and the societal destruction that was integrated into Common Core is explained by Mr. Newman.
There are many Idahoans who understand this COVID19 "crisis" is not about a communicable disease, it is about destroying our economy. Governor Little is participating in this economic destruction unilaterally, without legislative involvement, instead using bureaucrats to make illogical and discriminatory decisions to close businesses. His declaration of what are essential versus non-essential workers is reminiscent of language that defined the workforce in Germany during WWII. It is the federal agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), that created this selection process. The health of the workforce is now guarded by the Centers For Disease Control (CDC). Offended by this comparison? We have a federal government that is defining an essential versus non-essential workforce based on which businesses can operate, and deciding who is fit enough to work. What is the difference? These decisions are all made behind the scenes for an economic death in our country.
Gov. Little is participating in this economic death for Idaho. On the Idaho government website Idaho Rebounds: Our Path to Prosperity, he outlines his "stages" of reopening businesses, another CDC directive. One link on Idaho Rebounds is Resources for Businesses, which provides links to the Small Business Administration "cash grant" programs. Talk to any small business owner and they will tell you this is a program that has severe "certification" requirements that are next to impossible in meeting. If not met the "grant" actually becomes a loan that will have to be repaid to the government.
On the business resources page is a link to RestoreYourEconomy.org. This is a front group for the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) and the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) Economic Development Research Partners program. These are front groups used by a tyrannical, out of control, federal government with international ties for a specific agenda to dismantle and destroy the United States economically.
EDA "investment policy" establishes a foundation for "regional economies" based on regional collaboration which is key to "global competitiveness" and "national economic goals". "Regions are the centers of competition in the new global economy" that facilitate "regional economic development". Essentially, they are capturing "local businesses" to integrate them into EDA's six regional offices. Through this program, there is a strong indication that the federal government is economically breaking up the United States. Indeed, Washington, Oregon, and California are already making plans to regionalize their economies.
IEDC is a non-profit based in Washington D.C., with members buried in all government levels. The mission, "Provide leadership and excellence in economic development for our communities, members, and partners." This is based, in part, on their terms of "Social responsibility...building healthy, just, and competitive communities", and "Diversity, tolerance, and equity". IEDC claims more than 5,000 members across the world but keeps member information hidden except for participation by multiple federal agencies, cities, counties, selected entities such as the Eastern Idaho Economic Development Council, and others.
The Economic Development Research Partners (EDRP) program belongs to IEDC, the purpose is providing economic developers with research that advances the economic development profession. A few choice benefits are "Integrating regional businesses into the global economy" and "Strengthening workforce systems". Members of this group are identified which includes the Idaho National Laboratory,
Restore Your Economy is about getting small businesses to join the federal and international agenda to regionalize U.S. economies. In 2008, IBM, a UN partner, was projecting what needed to be accomplished by 2020 in order to create a "globally integrated enterprise". The Restore Your Economy program captures the Mom & Pop businesses and sucks them into this federal, global, integrated economic agenda. EDA's "mission" is leading "the federal economic development agenda...preparing American regions for...success in the worldwide economy", managed and regularly updated by the IEDC. "IEDC's strategic directives includes..."globalization" and economic restructuring." Why is Gov. Little promoting and participating in this?
The UN Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) scrutinized ways in which to capture Mom & Pop businesses and recommended it should be done through government funding. This is being accomplished through the EDA. Three OECD recommendations include loan guarantees to fund small businesses, developing policies to stimulate lending, and establishing financial institutions designed to address the unique needs of small businesses. According to OECD "The success of small businesses is essential to the strength of regional and national economies."
This is why and how we are being economically destroyed, the ploy of using a virus to justify economic destruction in order to force small businesses into globalization. But the goal has always been to "change the economic development model". If it sounds dramatic just ask one of many Idahoans who are experts in how the economy works. They will tell you this is exactly what is happening, the economy is being nationalized, capitalism will die, and it is these despots who will be making all the decisions about the economy. how it will run, what the workforce will be, how you will be educated for that workforce, what you will earn, with all of this trickling down into monitoring you and what you are doing to comply.
Idahoans, this is the warning leading up to an economic Pearl Harbor. Don't wait for that Pearl Harbor moment. Governor Little is doing nothing to protect us, he is a part of it. The time to organize is now, it is time that Idahoans exercise their responsibility for self governance and demand that Idaho is removed from these economic disasters that have been planned for us. Governor Little has allowed the federal government into our state to change our economic system, how much more warning is needed to come together and take action to stop it? We elect representatives to represent us, no representation was allowed in any of these decisions by the Governor. When this economic Pearl Harbor hits, it quite possibly might be too late to ever reverse it. The economy is just one small piece of this whole picture, many other aspects are in play that supports the economic devastation. Be a sheep dog, don't let these wolves take over.
The Western Governors Association (WGA) Reimagining the Rural West (RRW) project is still marching on. Now, there is a new name to bury it under, Out West. Podcasts are being created to talk about their vision of what rural communities should look like, including Idaho. This is the "inaugural" PodBean of Out West with Governor Little sitting right there with the rest of them. Since that time in January, there have been three others.
The original instigator of RRW, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, is the guest speaker. He starts off by describing the opportunity to create rural communities that are safe, have "world class" education systems, and of course attract a workforce. Insultingly, he describes what he thinks is the way in which people think about rural areas changed, from "classic western movie ghost town" perceptions to "vibrant healthy" communities. Come on Mr. Burgum, really? Your "help" with "local decision makers" has not been sought, nor is it wanted, and those decision makers, properly called elected officials, have the responsibility to listen to constituents that elected them, not you. Forget your desire to bring in "smart infrastructure", it is well known that "the development of new climate smart infrastructure" is a United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), How this equates with lower property taxes is unbelievable.
Mr. Burgum is correct about the rural workforce issues, those workforces primarily devastated by the shutting down of the resource extraction industries. The plan for "broadband" connectivity to benefit various recreation activities is in the realm of "nuts". RRW is a plan that is about nothing more than creating a technocratic empire where all aspects of rural life are controlled. How this is surmised as a contribution to a lower cost of living is your delusion.
Promoting increased populations in rural areas is way off as well. Citizens choose to live in rural areas for a reason, and using your North Dakota example, that reason does not include a population growth of 1,500 to 15,000 for an increase in public service, hospitals, or more daycare. In your limited ability to understand, rural communities have high school activities that support their youth, and just because you think every activity should be included does not mean it is what a community wants. Inviting kids from other countries just for the purposes of diversity is another aspect that is the decision of a local community. Just how exactly does that contribute to a greater "quality of life"?
If there is a "divide" between rural and urban areas, it is because citizens have made the free choice to live different lifestyles. But you don't get that, do you Mr. Burgum. You want to sterilize rural life by pushing it to behave like an urban area. One truth expressed by Mr. Burgum, the intent is moving rural communities "beyond extraction based economies". Revealed in the WGA workshops, this agenda is forcing rural communities to green energy. As this UN video points out, moving to a technological world has the potential to displace those who do not follow, that is why RRW has such a drive to push rural communities towards urbanization and connectivity. The connectivity agenda is really about forcing the west into an Internet of Things (IoT) world. Thinking this connectivity world is one "that people will want to live in" is a fantasy. What makes Mr. Burgum and the WGA think rural citizens are not already in the world they want to live in, having no desire for anyone to come in and create one that others think they should live in?
Mr. Burgum's belief in "collaboration" to make all of this happen has just one flaw. This project was started without any collaboration with rural communities. The only collaboration seen here is with the federal government and their partnership with the UN to implement SDG.
The February Episode 2 PodBean can be found here; March Episode 3 here; and April Episode 4 here.
As discussed in the Event 201 pandemic game, removing "disinformation" was considered, especially on social media, while making sure only legitimate information was provided. It appears that particular solution might be in play regarding the COVID 19 "pandemic".
A video by Jerry Day, Is COVID-19 Even Real, was posted on You Tube and subsequently removed for "violating You Tube's Community Guidelines". The video concerned a Global Research article, Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19, which outlined how COVID 19 testing, as stated in the title, is not specific to that virus. Mr. Day went on to describe how our economic system is being devastated as a result of this "pandemic".
An outfit called Health Feedback posted their own article on the same day as the Global Research article, declaring Mr. Day's video and the article itself were both "inaccurate", citing "no data or information to support its claims" as one of the reasons. While it is true that the scientist who declared the COVID 19 testing as faulty chose to remain anonymous, why would the article's author choose to write about something so audacious?
The answer lies in the United Nations (UN) and its propaganda censorship activities. Health Feedback is a "worldwide network of scientists sorting fact from fiction in health and medical media coverage. Our goal is to help readers know which news to trust." Looking at the About link, the name changes from Health Feedback to Science Feedback. One of its partners, Credibility Coalition, also works on finding solutions to "disinformation".
It just so happens that Health Feedback is "a member of the WHO-led project Vaccine Safety Net (VSN)" with Science Feedback being the "parent organization" to Health Feedback. So it is only scientists from Science Feedback that have the expertise to determine what is legitimate or not, and somehow have the ability to remove, or perhaps influence removal of that information, on what they deem isn't true or accurate. The World Health Organization (WHO) VSN "is a global network of websites, established by the World Health Organization, that provides reliable information on vaccine safety." So WHO's solution to misinformation is to participate in censoring or countering any opposing information? Looks that way.
Why would anyone in their right mind trust any organization that threatens more "body bags" when challenged? If there was ever a clue as to how despotic this and other UN organizations are, give reason to question its motives and what really might be behind this "pandemic", it is in those words. What exactly does he mean?
ISD Global, in which the US Department of State is a partner, as well as the UN Development Programme (UNDP), came out with its own Disinformation Briefing report that frequently referenced those who are "right wing", "extreme right", promoting "conspiracy theories", with many other descriptions such as bigotry and racism, recommended "The best answer to disinformation on health issues is to flood the information space with evidence-based accurate information in digestible formats."
What all of these nitwits don't understand is that they themselves have posted the accurate and reliable information that validates their covert activities to manipulate the public and give reason as to why they shouldn't be trusted either.
Fortunately the video, Is COVID-19 Even Real, has been posted again on BitChute, everyone is encouraged to watch it and have the opportunity to decide for themselves.
Fingers are always being pointed to anyone who challenges the questionable information that pours from media outlets. Anything that does not conform to the narrative and selected messaging is automatically attributed to “conspiracy” theorists. But what do those accusers say when the conspiracy filth is pouring from their own mouths?
In October, 2019, corporations, governments, and university “players” gathered at an event called Event 201, to play a simulated pandemic exercise game, and discuss global policy solutions to address that pandemic. Bear in mind, this is two months prior to the alleged COVID-19 “pandemic”.
The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, UPS, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), corporate heads, and of course the United Nations (UN) were all part of this “expert” panel. Fortunately, they captured their game playing on videos so conspiracy theorists could relish in spreading conspiracies. Previous exercises on pandemic issues have been held including Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm. Perhaps enough game practice has occurred to give their solutions a trial run with COVID-19?
It just so happens the subject of the Event 201 scenario exercise was about a corona virus originating in Brazil, eventually spreading to the U.S., China, and other countries until it is out of control. Vaccine availability is not possible and an antiviral drug was found to help the sick but not limit disease spread. In this scenario, cases double every week with rising deaths, resulting in economic and social severity. Sound familiar? However, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum (WEF), and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were also involved in this exercise and deny any coincidence with the current outbreak. Of course they deny it. Clearly any reference to involvement would be only conspiracy trash. And how ironic that John Hopkins has a map tracking the COVID-19 outbreak.
In the first video, the Highlights Reel, a description of the corona virus spread is provided and a summary of identified issues. The hysteria of its spread and resulting deaths is addressed. Medical supplies must be distributed “globally” with corporations needing clarity on where the need is and “who” is making the decisions, the UN offered up as a centralized point. Travel advisories are issued to prevent disease spread with resulting economic effects. A global financial crisis occurs. Misinformation on the internet may need to be “shut down” and a decision on who should “control the information” is needed. How about the need for enforcement? The scenario foundation is laid for the “global community” to work out solutions.
Segment 1 - Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion. This video starts out with the “critical role of businesses and public-private partnerships” (P3). A “pandemic emergency board”, convened by the WEF, will provide recommendations on this “major global challenge”. As usual, climate change is one of the culprits behind this catastrophic pandemic, and the typical forecast of a major, doom and gloom event is coming with a need for “mitigation” and “collective preparedness”. The UN World Health Organization (WHO) provides its two cents worth describing the “health emergencies” and continued threats as a “new normal” through “asymptomatic” persons spreading disease. Such hysterics, but oh so close to what is occurring now.
At the 15:20” mark the emergency board discussion on recommendations begin with an update of the spread of the virus, called CAPS, being far more contagious with respiratory disease complications, albeit some experiencing only mild respiratory symptoms. A projected death rate of hundreds of millions over one to two years is straining health care systems. Discussion of an AIDS antiviral medication for treatment and respirator availability are identified problems. Sound familiar?
Distribution of resources includes discussion about a central decision making body, perhaps the UN World Bank as the financial loan center for centralized distribution “needs”, and the UN once again offered up as the centralized source. Central distribution of global stockpiles would interfere with hoarder behavior by being in charge of how supplies are allocated. Corporations must also “combat” “protectionism” “rhetoric”, as it does not align with operating for the “greater global good”. Through this segment and beyond is an annoying woman who continues coughing without clearly covering her mouth. Perhaps this emergency board should practice its own recommendations.
Segment 2 – Trade & Travel Discussion is the second emergency board meeting. The pandemic update includes a continued escalation in numbers with predictions of millions of cases and thousands of deaths. The stock market has now fallen while trade and travel are affected, social media is spreading rumors, movement of people is causing disease spread, and fever screens are being conducted. Has any of this happened with COVID-19?
Segment 3 – Finance Discussion, the third emergency board meeting. There is an economic “fallout’, the epidemic “grows”, millions of cases and deaths. The board recommends cooperation between corporate supply chains and governments, keeping the public informed of disease location, how steps in closing schools and staying home only marginally controls the spread, which in itself might bring more serious economic costs resulting in more serious harm than CAPS. Funding is needed to save jobs and industries, a “bailout’, especially those corporations directly related to the healthcare system. A need for research and development about this new corona virus and future vaccines is also discussed. Is this scenario getting warmer to current conditions?
Segment 4 - Communications Discussion and Epilogue. The final emergency board meeting continues with more disease spread and deaths. Because of the spread of disinformation Twitter and Facebook are deleting accounts. To ensure that only “accurate” information gets out one central authority, such as WHO, along with their buddy non-governmental organizations (NGO) should be used as a central repository for information, especially since the UN enjoys a level of trust throughout the world, and would protect against governments spreading disinformation, say for political purposes.
But then, if WHO were to challenge governments directly there is the issue of that pesky “sovereignty”, necessitating a “soft power of influence” by WHO. Because there is so much public distrust, the goal should be identifying how the government can “ensure” only reliable information gets to the public and prevent the spread of false information. Using employers and faith-based institutions could be used for the flow of accurate information. Also important is identifying false information for “purported” treatments that has caused harm to those who have used them.
Do you know it all’s ever stop and think why there is so much distrust when this conniving activity goes on?
The board identified more emphasis should be placed on the recovery numbers. Because of all those who are anti-vaccine, especially important is getting the correct information “out there” to ensure public trust, and incentivizing people to “manage” their behaviors. Perhaps there should be some level of “enforcement” against those who are spreading misinformation.
Segment 5 - Hotwash and Conclusion. This pandemic was “catastrophic”, however isolation and “social distancing” have helped interrupt the spread of disease. Prior planning by governments, NGOs, and private businesses is identified as being so important. And lastly, these individuals have routinely come together for a stronger “global governance”. These are their words you conspiracy theorists.The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly proposed seven recommendations, which in a nutshell is a partnership between international organizations, governments, and the private sector to control all potential aspects that could arise with a pandemic, a full achievement of Agenda 21 P3, stripping away all representation on which our Republic was founded.
The UN goal has always been to destroy capitalism, and efforts have been made to integrate this agenda into the stimulus bill. Is the economy being destroyed? Is COVID-19 being used for that purpose?
Continued focus on “life threats” by the UN is getting old. Life is not about ongoing threats that must be “mitigated”, managed, or having us constantly living in a state of preparation out of fear that something might happen. It is all psychological manipulation, causing fear and anxiety with the intent to influence behavior, and justify the removal of more freedoms. How effectively this is working is easily seen in younger generations.
Currently, COVID19 does not even come close in numbers compared to previous pandemics. The same hygienic precautions should be used as with all viruses, those most adversely affected are typically the elderly, those with medical conditions, or who are immunosuppressed. However now, given what “players” are discussing behind the scenes, could COVID-19 appear to be possibly used as a test case to see just how far behavior can be influenced, maybe just how many more freedoms can be destroyed, and promoting faith in government dependence?
Perhaps this isn’t a conspiracy as now some leaders are calling for a “global government” body to address the COVID-19 “crisis’. Has the federal government already relinquished some of our sovereignty by following some of the Event 201 recommendations? If so, how much further will we be taken down this road? Since the CDC has been a participant in these games, and the federal government is so reliant on the information the CDC releases, has that sovereignty already been eroded?
But, all of this is just conjured up information by conspiracy theorists, it is just “misinformation” which UN partner Google will combat, track people, with cell phones doing the same. It is the biggest implementation for surveillance and data gathering, a technocrats dream. Though enforcement was not fully discussed, it is certainly happening.
Regardless, everyone should start paying closer attention to what is really happening behind the scenes, and what is being done to us. This global governance agenda is moving forward rapidly. Watching the videos is recommended.
Technocracy may be an unfamiliar concept to many or not easily understood by those who are familiar with it, or even it's relationship to the United Nations (UN) 17 Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Both are one in the same. Essentially, under the ruse of the UN originated climate change catastrophe to come, in order to sustain earth for "future generations", we have been indoctrinated into believing steps must to be taken before earth is destroyed, by humans. To accomplish this, technocracy is used to achieve sustainability, or the SDGs. However, it is much more nefarious than just achieving sustainability.
Basically, technocracy is defined as the management of society by technical experts with decisions based on science. It is the use of science that will fix all societal problems and create the perfect world with no problems, while at the same time using only science that supports technocratic and sustainable objectives.
However, the end goal is not fixing problems, technocracy is used for the purposes of taking control over resource production and consumption, as UN Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres stated, "to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history." This consumption and production model is often called a resource based or green economy. The essence is resource production that does not harm the environment, then equally distributing those resources for consumption, keeping a balance between the two.
Sounds good, does it not? But, the underlying objective, through technocracy, science, and SDG, is having control over every aspect of life, including humans.
If still difficult to understand, agriculture and food production, as a vital resource for life, may be one of the best examples of how this is being accomplished. As noted in SDG 2, "Agriculture systems worldwide must become more productive and less wasteful. Sustainable agricultural practices and food systems, including both production and consumption, must be pursued from a holistic and integrated perspective."
Through UN business partnerships such as the Global Compact and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), and agriculture corporations, such as Monsanto, Cargill, Bayer, and Caterpillar, these corporations are tasked with SDG implementation. Using technology and science, corporate technocrats are taking control over food production, out of our hands.
John Deere, which manufactures farming equipment, is in on the sustainability game as well. Using artificial intelligence (AI) and 5G for internet of things (IOT) connectivity, the agricultural sector becomes fully automated, with the farmer only needing to sit by and watch it all work. Ah, how wonderful! Technocracy is truly solving world problems for sustainable development.
Again, there is a hidden objective by all this wonderful work. Here is where technocratic control over production, and us, comes into play.
In Nebraska, a farmer is fighting the exposed plan for control, "the right to repair their own farm equipment". This inability to repair their own farm equipment has resulted in a "steady shift in operational control from farmer to machine." This is the objective of technocracy, technocrats behind that machinery will control and have management over production, and society. While machinery repair is pompously seen as "all too complicated for farmers to be getting involved in" and claiming "the issue isn’t actually repair", the Association of Equipment Manufacturers states, "it’s agitators who insist on the right to modify the machines." Farmers are now "agitators". Even though purchased by the farmer, they only hold an "implied license" to run the machinery. This software is also used for data collection, justified as needing to feed the "10 billion people expected on Earth by 2050", a UN mantra.
This control over society is strictly run by corporate technocrats, a self perceived elitist group of experts, The ominous danger is their ability to monitor everything, from detecting when a farmer sits in equipment, to when that equipment is being monitored by the farmer. With a flip of a switch or a push of a button, all food production can be halted by technocrats by disabling the machinery or shutting down internet access. This act alone completely obliterates independence and freedom, forcing submission to an unknown entity. But that is what technocracy, the UN, and Agenda 2030 are about, control. Using the mask of climate change, utilizing sustainable development as the solution, a technocratic world is being implemented upon us.
Using technocracy, covering every sector of life in the SDG, the groundwork is being laid for the extermination of how we live, our freedom and independence, while taking control over resources. From housing, health care, energy, use of water, and others, data will be captured and monitored through 5G and IOT, determining resource production, how resources will be distributed for consumption, what we consume, and what we are doing in our daily lives. That is the reason for the advancement of 5G. For data collection and sharing, 5G connectivity is needed for monitoring everything, and everyone. Food production is an example of how that data will be gathered and monitored, most likely not a mistake as one of the first targeted areas. Potential for it being used for harm against humans now exists. We will be forced to acquiesce to technocratic demands as they gain control. It is critical for everyone to understand how technocracy works as it is a masterful plan for social engineering.
As forecast in this connectivity and IOT powerpoint by a Senior Fellow for Global Urban Development, exponential acceleration of technology will continue and societies will be shaken. From this agricultural example, it is easy to see how corporate entities have captured control with the use of technology, and the ability to shut production down. Farmers will have no choice but to submit to corporate technocrats. It is the same for everything, through electronic health records healthcare professionals could be forced out if certain medical practices are not followed like mandatory vaccinations, education will only be delivered through software curriculum created by a UN partner such as Microsoft or textbook publisher Pearson, or housing developments built to monitor water usage. Every aspect of life with be controlled by technocracy.
It is time for Americans to wake up to the now existing threat to our lives. Technocracy is the reality that will destroy us forever, placing us under a system that will forever dictate and control how we live. This is the real threat to humanity, not climate change, but a totalitarian state of technocracy delivered by corporations and the UN.
Immunizations continue to be at the forefront in federal government programs and in states that create legislation with mandates for vaccine compliance.
Each state has vaccination requirements for children entering kindergarten, including Idaho, with some states requiring more vaccines than others. While all school immunization laws grant vaccine exemptions for medical reasons, many states are now creating legislation that would remove exemptions for philosophical or religious reasons such as California, Mississippi, and West Virginia. While retaining the medical exemption, California now has a new law that any physician writing a medical exemption order must submit it to the state for final approval. This is a pretty scary concept, a state interfering in a patient-physician relationship.
Even though the Center for Disease Control (CDC) is allegedly a federal program, it created a strategic plan for global immunization, aligning with the UN World Health Organization (WHO) Immunization Agenda 2030, and the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) immunization programme, considering vaccinations as a "right". As a result of the strategic plan, CDC now has a computerized database for collecting information on who has been given immunizations. Although voluntary at this point, when will it become mandatory? Working with WHO and UNICEF, CDC is in the process of developing its second phase of the 2021–2030 global immunization plan. The ultimate WHO goal is to "immunize more people, from infants to seniors, with a greater range of vaccines" which is part of Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 3.8, Ensuring Healthy Lives and Promote Wellbeing For All at All Ages.
New York University research scholar and law professor Mary Holland confronted the UN about government immunization policies, reminding them of medical atrocities during the Holocaust that led to the Nuremberg Code which states, “voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” and "no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, (UNESCO), addressed medical rights by adopting the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights which states "any preventive…medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information." Ms. Holland received a standing ovation for her speech.
However, in spite of its rhetoric, it is well known that the UN is a despot organization that is using deception by manipulating the truth and dismissing an educated public.
Now, the UN, and our own government, has made citizens the target for not swallowing the immunization agenda, even assigning the insulting name anti-vaxxers to those who oppose vaccinations. Going even further, UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore states, “Misinformation about vaccines is as dangerous as a disease”, and "poses an imminent threat to public health”. At the same time the WHO Chief Scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, admitted that vaccines cause deaths for some patients, then immediately tossed out a more politically correct whitewashed version, uh, explanation. While Ms. Swaminathan dismisses a child's death from a vaccination as being "blown up by the media", that statement does nothing more than validate her cold indifference towards humans. The real truth is that these elitists are threatened by citizen intelligence.
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky provided some significant information, and just a phenomenal explanation about vaccinations in a speech to the Connecticut Legislature in 2019. His overview of vaccine ingredients and the effects on children without appropriate studies on those effects, the lack of studies on vaccine safety, and virus mutations that occur secondary to vaccinations should be watched by every person with concerns about vaccinations.
Ms. Swaminathan's statement about not having the necessary safety systems provides validation to Dr. Lawrence Palevsky's stating that no studies have been done on actual vaccine immunity or a cross comparison between the health of a vaccinated child versus one who is unvaccinated.
Research on the polio vaccine validates Dr. Palevsky's statement on virus mutation secondary to vaccination and causing vaccine-derived polio outbreaks. While it is often heard that polio is eradicated, that is not true. WHO researchers participated in a study that states, "In one out of every few million recipients, they (oral administration) cause polio paralysis. Immune-impaired individuals can become long-term shedders of the virus." The same is true in Pertussis "where vaccinated individuals can still transmit infection", Varicella, and Measles. In spite of virus shedding being a legitimate concern, even studied, those who understand its implications continue to be mocked.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at times attributed with "fearmongering and misinformation about vaccines", is an advocacy group regarding vaccine truths and public participation in decisions. This group has been monitoring the increase in state mandates on vaccinations, federal government threats to take control over vaccination laws, and the federal government prostituting a health issue for increased vaccination rates in states.
WHO, UNICEF, and the CDC should feel threatened by citizens who challenge their vaccine propaganda and refusal to just simply tell the truth. It has to be acknowledged that there has been much benefit with disease reduction from vaccines, but that does not negate the risks and adverse events that are associated with them, or justify the mass agenda that forces citizens to receive every vaccine created. As more truth about vaccines is made available it is no wonder vaccination refusal rates have increased. It is because of a more educated public, not ignorance as suggested. These pompous elitist technocrats, who truly believe they are the only ones who are intelligent enough to make decisions for the populace, better be careful. Their aggressive action forcing vaccinations may just backfire on them, with more opposition and rejection of vaccinations.
In spite of all the technological advances in healthcare that have brought improved health to many, over the years there has a been a steady decline in patient care because of those advances. No longer is healthcare an interaction of compassion between humans, but rather one as a cold dictatorship of technocratic science imposed upon another human being.
Prior to the expansion of health insurance, creation of antibiotics, and technological advances such as x-rays, treating illness was using science in the art of medicine and relationships between a physician, patient, and their family. Care was primarily provided by the family at the patient's home under the physicians guidance. Payment for these visits were often on a barter system and limited to the treatment provided. Home visits gave a physician the opportunity to evaluate the home, interactions between family members and their health status, and the family's ability to provide the needed care, while continuing those relationships. Needless to say, medical treatment could be considered archaic compared to today's standards. Or is it?
During this time hospitals also went through a transformative change. Public hospitals were often managed by various government entities or non-profit charities such as religious institutions. In the 1970's, corporations began buying hospitals, thus beginning the corporate business model for health care based on customer satisfaction and evidence based medicine, not the art of medicine. The government also began its regulatory intrusion into healthcare in 1965 when President Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law.
Thanks to our expanding technocratic world, the dynamic of physician patient relationships have transformed into a algorithmic and economic interaction, not between one human to another. The control individuals once had over their medical treatment has now been assigned to medical experts who willingly relinquish the use of their brains to a scientifically created data model, medical algorithm, and evidence based practices for treatment.
Prior to even scheduling an appointment, determination of payment is necessary, what insurance with a reminder of co-pay amounts expected at time of visit, or self pay, Once at the visit, one is greeted with the cheery hello as is expected by any efficient business model for customer service and client satisfaction, and a request for proper identification. A stack of papers is then handed over for further data gathering. Aside from medical history, or what the current problem may be, important questions needing answers include gun ownership, living arrangements, eating habits, exercise routines, and other social issues of the day.
Once finished, some basic measurements are gathered, weight, blood pressure, temperature, and oxygen level, all taken with technological equipment. No need for any human contact here, or even a question about how one is feeling. Finally, the wait to be seen is in a sterile and barren room for the individual who is identified as a provider. No longer is someone identified by their training level, but by a vague term that could mean any number of trained medical professionals, often with multiple initials behind their name signifying their credentialed importance as an expert.
The provider enters, giving a short hello and their name, then it is down to business with the computer. With eyes focused on entering data, the provider asks questions based on answers given in the stack of papers, stopping occasionally to get more detailed data. How many vegetables and fruits a day, the type of exercise and how often, where is the gun located, how are those family relations and are there any safety concerns in the family, how many alcoholic drinks are consumed along with the amount of coffee each day. When will the inquiry about the health issue that prompted the visit begin?
Upon filling in the computer blanks for the algorithmic requirements, a necessity for healthcare analytics, the provider begins an assessment, of sorts. Once the health problem that prompted this visit is explained, the provider determines this health issue will require ongoing contact, and makes it clear that it is necessary to become an established care patient, a slight bump up in reimbursement. The provider might also have some other thoughts going on, that is, keeping their own analytics intact in order to retain that client for life.
To the umbrage of the provider, the client defers on becoming an established patient, instead just wanting the one health issue resolved. Unacceptable. As explained by the provider, there is a gamut of potential health complications from this health issue that requires established care as defined with evidence-based care. The provider is the expert here, the expectation is that their algorithms and procedures are to be followed, and as an established care patient, follow-up appointments are needed to scrutinize adherence to those orders.
As part of this evidence-based care, the provider explains several tests are required for this health issue, and a preventive care plan be established that addresses the revamping of lifestyles such as eating more vegetables and fruits with less red meat, increasing exercise, getting up to date on those vaccines, and whatever else is necessary to improve quality of life. That is what the algorithm says, most assuredly part of value-based healthcare, which will reduce the need for more healthcare follow-up in the future, assist with living a normal, productive life as long as possible, and which in turn creates long term value. It is not necessary to ask this individual about their perception on their current quality of life, the algorithm will redefine it. An opportunity on how this visit is going far can be provided to the individual through the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM), part of the quality improvement business model.
Once it is clear to the provider that offers of established care are rejected, meeting algorithmic requirements for boosting reimbursement begins with donning gloves for a short perfunctory exam, layering another barrier of touch between humans, another insult to someone who just wants help, and whose dignity has now been maligned.
If all of this sounds implausible, it actually happened to a man who had enjoyed good health throughout his life, and prided himself on being independent. In spite of having insurance, he wanted to pay for his own treatment and have control over his care. The end result was that because of his not wanting to become an established patient, he was ushered out the door with no treatment provided, with a condition that left untreated could potentially cause more health problems. None of that mattered to the expert. Meeting the organizational requirements for data, following evidence based algorithms, and expectations that the subject of the visit follow the boxed algorithm were held as primary factors for any treatment.
This visit occurred at a corporate owned clinic and hospital, a corporation which has clearly adopted a medical technocracy philosophy and business model for health care. Interactions are now between machines and humans, with barriers that eliminate basic human to human touch and interaction. After all, the assumption is made that the person to be touched might have a transmittable disease. Such a simple gesture, yet so powerful. A simple touch was used in the past to assess skin or temperature, trembling or sensations of fear, or just provide comfort. No machine can accomplish this task. Through technocracy, humans are being reduced to nothing more than a commodity of value.
In this article, How Government Killed the Medical Profession, Jeffery A. Singer accurately describes the technocratic transformation of medical care to a robotic, algorithmic box. This is how medicine continues to be destroyed by technocracy, and why many physicians are being driven out of practice.
As for the man, after driving to a nearby rural, non-corporate, medical clinic he was able to receive the care he needed, at half the cost, and is now doing well. There were no irrelevant social questions, no flaunting of importance, or demands of compliance. However, the most profound aspect of his visit was the assistant using a manual blood pressure cuff to check his blood pressure while cradling his arm in hers, without gloves. That touch alone provided the needed comfort that everything would be alright.
Upcoming providers, whether physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioner, are being trained in these technocratic methods. The art of medicine, patient relationships, clinical decisions based on individual patients, and thinking outside of an algorithm are not taught. As technocracy continues its invasion into our healthcare so will human interactions be lost. It is the cold and scientific world of healthcare that science says must be done for good health and well-being.
Translated, Arbeit Macht Frei means, "Work Will Free You". It is the iconic sign at the entrance of Auschwitz and many other concentration camps during WWII. Many may not realize the sign was designed by the camp’s iron-worker and mounted by prisoners themselves, the letter "B" turned upside down in protest against the slogan. At some locations, concentration camp prisoners were used as forced, slave labor to meet the needs of the German armaments industry. Aside from turning the the American flag upside down, what else can Americans do to protest the takeover of our education system solely for serving industries?
In September, 2018, at the G20 summit, the United Nations (UN) held its first ministerial-level meeting on education, and affirming its commitment to SDG 4, "quality education" for all. It called for education that will keep pace with technological development, and the "need to educate and train people with the necessary skills for the future of work." U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos attended this summit. Ms. DeVos supported this education agenda, stating it closely aligns with President Trump's agenda by having education closely aligned with workforce skills and industry demands. This means specifically educating not only youth, but adults as well, based on industry workforce needs.
For some unknown reason, this document, G20 Education Ministers’ Declaration 2018, has been removed from many websites. It outlines the global education plan which Ms. DeVos signed. Some highlights include:
Under the G20 Ministerial Meeting section on the U.S. Department of Education website, Ms. DeVos expounded further about her support of the G20 Education Ministers agenda, and "adopting curricula that are highly responsive to...future employment trends."
There is also another document listed, G20 Joint Education & Labour and Employment Ministers’ Declaration 2018 Mendoza Joint Meeting, that basically reinforces the Declaration more strongly.
The United States educational system is officially under the United Nations, the plan is in effect and has been for years, our children are being taught for future workforce needs of industries. As long as our government continues full engagement with the UN, we will never be free from UN atrocities, it is the same lie as Arbeit Macht Frei.
This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through Agenda 21 and its associated programs. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom!