At the conclusion of the United Nations Civil Society Conference, held August 26-28 in Salt Lake City, they have left us with words of wisdom, intentions, and their future threats upon us. As usual, there are select groups that are assigned the task to advance Agenda 2030.
Stakeholders - this really means all of their partnering non-governmental organizations (NGO), corporations, foundations, professional organizations, and others. In part they are tasked with:
Commit to actions that accelerate SDGs implementation.
The UN has double downed with the urgency of having only 11 years to deliver and "avoid the worst impacts of climate change". Where does the UN obtain their powers of clairvoyance? Looks like AOC can't add, she is giving us 12 years. It does make one wonder what is planned as a catalyst to ensure this all goes down in 11 years.
As to the type of action the UN is thrusting upon us, socialism, fascism, corporatism, technocracy, or communism, G. Edward Griffin provides an excellent explanation in this video. NGOs are becoming more verbose in their quest for collectivism and our operating as global citizens. This is good as it gives us a clearer picture on how we are being destroyed.
In its never ending United Nations (UN) quest to have control over healthcare in the world, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) has now embarked on a new agenda to address "vaccine hesitancy", their new term for those who are anti-vaccination. They are targeting parents whom they think fail to properly vaccinate their children.
Before going further on this subject, it is not the intent of this article to dissuade, or encourage, anyone from making a decision on whether to or not to vaccinate their children, or themselves. It is to encourage thoughtful consideration on being fully informed beyond what information the UN has decided you should know.
UNICEF opinions and strategies were discussed in June of this year at the Vaccine Summit Interviews conference that included several different panelists. The summit began with a third world child suffering from a case of measles, followed by applauding a young man who defied his mother's anti-vaccination wishes and chose to get vaccinated, making vaccinations a mission in his short life.
A couple of core themes throughout the summit was the public "disease of ignorancy", using social media for inaccurate information, and how "collectively" vaccinations were a global issue. UNICEF sees vaccinations as a step towards a much needed universal health care system and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
The use of celebrities was supported to promote vaccinations. More appalling was Jason Hirsch, head of Facebook's health policy team, who disclosed a new Facebook policy implemented in March. He revealed the policy strategies used to advance vaccinations by reducing information and sharing that is considered anti-vaccine, pulling anti-vaccine pages out of recommended pages, manipulating searches that would demote anti-vaccine information while placing pro vaccination policies at the top of search results, refusing advertising on anti-vaccinations, disabling fund raising tools on anti-vaccination pages that spread "misinformation", banning or removing pages that contained anti-vaccine information, and promoting "authoritative" pages on vaccinations to the top of searches, which includes UNICEF and the UN World Health Organization (WHO) as the authority. All of these strategies are intended to make sure only "accurate information" about vaccines were posted and inaccurate information was less accessible or removed. What other authoritative propaganda is the UN promoting besides vaccinations? Seems they have made other health issues their focus for propaganda.
Much emphasis was placed on gaining the "trust" of those who are vaccine hesitant, listening to them, and validating their concerns, all in an effort to properly educate them so they would chose to vaccinate. After all, the panel believes this affects us collectively. As a UNICEf partner, the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and its Foundation will also be promoting this vaccine agenda. Regarding vaccines, there are some truths they suppress.
While these panelists threw the term measles around, noting the recent increase in outbreaks, what they are not telling you is which type of measles. The MMR vaccine is for Measles/Mumps/Rubella. Measles and Rubella, known as German measles, are both caused by different viruses but with different symptoms and effects. Rubella can be especially devastating to a fetus early in a woman's pregnancy. It is never clarified which measles these folks talk about, just lumping them both together. Perhaps they don't want you to understand the difference. For those who contract either disease there is a lifelong natural immunity to both.
The Gardisil vaccination is for the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), given to individuals from age 9-45, for the purposes of preventing certain types of cancer. In 2011, there were a reported 26 deaths following the HPV4 Gardasil vaccination, in addition to other serious adverse events. According to the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), reported adverse events from the HPV4 vaccination included 152 deaths, 1,071 convulsions, with 6,401 having no adverse events. HPV9 is the vaccine given now, with only 13 deaths associated with it. When considering vaccinations, all information should be taken into account in order to make an informed decision, not just because the UN says so. Other adverse vaccine events can be searched on the site here, just click on the top link.
Moving over to more conspiracy oriented events with vaccines, it was alleged that birth control was included in tetanus vaccinations given to women in Kenya, 2014. An updated paper on this issue was published in 2017. While this paper is a long read, it is well worth the time as it provides a history behind WHO and UNICEF family planning antics, and U.S. involvement. Skipping to the conclusion, "Laboratory testing of the TT vaccine used in the WHO Kenya campaign 2013- 2015 showed that some of the vials contained a TT/βhCG conjugate consistent with the WHO’s goal to develop one or more anti-fertility vaccines to reduce the rate of population growth, especially in targeted LDCs such as Kenya." This is one other major factor that makes many "vaccine hesitant", the question of what other components might be included in vaccinations.
All Americans should put on their critical thinking hats when considering vaccinations. Yes, statistics show disease reduction with vaccinations, but the statistics also show adverse effects as well. As individuals, who are not part of a collective, group think, or herd mentality, Americans hold the right to make decisions as to whether or not to vaccinate. There is no shame in either decision. It would be appalling to our Founding Fathers to know that the government, with their despot partners, believe they have the authority and right to force every American to turn their child over, or themselves, for injection of a foreign substance into their bodies. UNICEF and WHO do not want you to know or even think about any potential consequence of vaccinations, and obviously believe they have to right to dish out propaganda about it.
While UNICEF and WHO claim their outreach on vaccines should be "culturally relevant", if these know it all, pompous elitists want to build trust with anyone, it is making available all information about vaccines, both the positive and negative, not suppressing it, and leaving it up to the individual to make the decision about whether or not they will choose to be vaccinated. Americans are not much for collectivism, and don't consider themselves living in a global community, but are rather intelligent individuals who make decisions for their own lives. With Facebook operating as a censorship and propaganda organization, perhaps everyone should consider MeWe as a social media platform.
Go to this link to watch the full UNICEF video on vaccinations, it is a little over one hour.
The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) is a non-profit educational foundation offering free online courses and seminars on economic principles. It's mission "...is to inspire, educate, and connect future leaders with the economic, ethical, and legal principles of a free society. These principles include individual liberty, free-market economics, entrepreneurship, private property, high moral character, and limited government".
Without going into more details, or listing negative assessments by counterparts, FEE has an interesting list of articles about the United Nations (UN). One that really captures the essence of the UN was from 1965, 54 years ago. It was understood even then how worthless, useless, and destructive the UN was for any utopian dream of keeping peace in the world. This article even goes through a timeline of how the UN has contributed to more disruption and chaos in the world. The article, Is the UN Really Necessary?, was written by William Henry Chamberlin, January 1, 1965.
Here we are, 54 years later, and this despot organization has grown exponentially into a massive conglomerate of evil with designs to govern the world. It found the most psychologically damaging ruse that causes us to snap to attention, fear. Elevating our anxiety about the pending doom of the earth from climate change, embedding that fear into our children, while having methodically created the only solution, control over our lives and the earth's resources. Mr. Chamberlin was correct in his assessment of the UN. The damage he identified after just 19 years of the UN's existence should have been ample warning for this institution to be abolished. But here we sit, allowing its evil to continue.
This West Is Our West is a website that provides information on relevant issues not only in western states but on issues that affect all of us. Two recent articles have pertinent information related to conservation easements and our broken education system.
The first article, Save the Cowboy, STOP American Prairie Reserve, gives a first hand account on conservation easements and how they devastate and kill communities. The American Prairie Reserve is an agenda by non-governmental organizations to take land for a bunch of animals, and the Bureau of Land Management is helping them do it. The the true purpose is taking as much land as possible away from Montanans.
The second article, Rescuing Our Children, is a video by Alex Newman that details how the United Nations has been behind the assault on our education system.
Reprinted with permission from This West Is Our West.
Hot off the press is a progress report on the implementation of the United Nations Agenda 2030, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Liu Zhenmin, UN Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, who is very difficult to understand, and Francesca Perucci, Chief, Statistical Services Branch, UN Statistics Division provide information on the report in this video. It is all based on the massive amount of data provided by "member" states, which includes the United States. That data is on every aspect of American lives.
Some highlights of the report include information on poverty levels, decoupling consumption from production, improving international cooperation for migration, vaccinations, childbirth and child mortality, mass species extinction, access to electricity, internet, renewable energy, water, and sanitation, "water scarcity", income and gender inequality, education, promotion of green development, and oh catastrophe, the acceleration of climate change that is endangering our health, all of these being "global problems" that need solutions as a "global agenda". Ms. Perucci guaranteed the purity of the data, no manipulation or corruption here folks. To succeed towards full implementation they recommend more "investment", meaning more money coming their way.
The most astounding question asked of the panel members is at the 55:57" mark and everyone should listen to it. A question was asked about the United States on SDG 13, that it isn't a matter of convincing the government, it is about "how to convince the people because it is the people that change the government". Did you read that? They know the United States is different, the people are the government. In response to asking what the "strategy" is to convince the people, Mr. Zhenmin replied, "The media could help, ask them to promote climate change". What rock is he living under? Every one of the issues discussed is thrown in our faces every day by the media. He then goes on to exalt the UN, its member states, the UN Secretary General himself whom he thinks is in charge, and he even has the gall to reference all of them as "we the people".
WE have the ability to stop this, if there is no "political will" then it must be "our" will. These people are committed to destroying us, we cannot let that happen, and they are getting more aggressive with their actions. We can continue to fight the symptoms of this UN disease, but until we fight the UN intrusion into our lives, we will continue to decline until our death.
The National Caucus of Environmental Legislators (NCEL) is a "nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment" for "advancing sound policy in the states...champions who can advocate on behalf of the environment, develop shared strategies, and educate their colleagues about coalition building and opposition tactics." Participation "is by invitation...regardless of political affiliation", and "does not lobby". Why would they need to lobby if they have legislative members to advance their objectives? After all, the NCEL "empowers state lawmakers to advance a pro-environment and conservation agenda." The NCEL is governed by a Board of Directors.
According to the NCEL website, the following Idaho legislators are members. Rep. Elaine Smith (D) Idaho Minority Caucus Chair; Rep. Ilana Rubel (D) Assistant Minority Leader; Rep. Mat Erpelding (D) House Minority Leader; Rep. Melissa Wintrow (D); Rep. Paulette Jordan (D) NACNCSL Chair of Energy, Environment, Transportation; Rep. Phylis King (D); Rep. Sally Toone (D); Rep. Sue Chew (D); Representative John McCrostie (D); and former Rep. Hy Kloc (D). On the Senate side is Sen. Maryanne Jordan (D) Senate Minority Caucus Chair and Sen. Michelle Stennett Senate Minority Leader. Not one of their legislative biographies mention their NCEL membership.
A few issues NCEL focuses on are Climate and Energy, Conservation, Environmental Health, and Environmental Justice. Part of the NCEL Conservation agenda includes wildlife corridors, land conservation, and support for public lands, with a special poll on what Idahoans think about conservation. NCEL policy options include "interagency coordination", support for "private land conservation" meaning conservation easements, rejecting "state land grabs" and to "establish state parks". Reference is also made for the need to double land conservation by 2030. There is also a link to the Center for Large Landscape Conservation: A Strategic Framework for Policy and Action report regarding wildlife corridors, however that link is broken but the report, written by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy can be found here. This report covers many aspects of large landscape conservation.
These legislators, Rep. Jordan, Rep. Wintrow, former Rep. John Gannon (D), Rep. King, Rep. Erpelding, and Rep. Rubel all signed a letter to President Trump in 2017 opposing his intent to reduce the size of national monuments.
Sen. Jordan, Sen. Stenett, Rep. Kloc, Rep. McCrostie, Rep. Chew, Rep. Erpelding, Rep. Jordan, Rep. King, Rep. Smith, Rep. Toone, Rep. Rubel, Rep. Wintrow, and former Sen. Cherie Buckner-Webb (D), now Assistant Senate Minority Leader, also signed a statement opposing President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Treaty in 2017.
This all begs the question as to who or what is leading this group of legislators, just how are their issues decided upon? Given the identified issues, it doesn't take much effort to find out.
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) "is the leading global environmental authority that sets the global environmental agenda, promotes the coherent implementation of the environmental dimension of sustainable development...and serves as an authoritative advocate for the global environment", providing leadership and partnership in caring for the environment. Their topics include climate change and energy, forests and ecosystems, environmental rights and governance, and of course implementation of the Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Among its many partners for implementation of these objectives, including the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is the NCEL. However, there is no mention of this partnership on the NCEL website.
So there you have it, UN influence over state polices through our NCEL Idaho legislators. Who are they really representing, the UN or their constitutents? Or perhaps their constituents elect them for the purposes of advancing UN objectives. Does either group know this is happening through their NCEL membership? Fortunately at this point, out of 105 legislators, it is a very small percentage. But, since part of their NCEL responsibility is to "educate their colleagues about coalition building and opposition tactics", how much influence will they have in bringing other legislators into their fold? Another reason to fully investigate all legislators for their activity, including what they hide from the public.
Non-governmental organizations (NGO) are celebrating the introduction of legislation for the "protection and restoration of certain native fish, wildlife, and plant species" on federal land called the Wildlife Corridors Conservation Act. Rep. Donald Beyer tried this before in 2016 and according to Govtrak this new bill only has a 3% chance of passing. The urgency came again following a 2018 United Nations report over mass extinction hysteria. Even though intended for federal land, the caveat includes funding conservation efforts on state and private land that encourages wildlife movement and creating a council to identify priority areas on "non-federal" lands. We all know that "council" would be NGO individuals.
Some states, such as Oregon, have passed corridor legislation, others are studying it. While NGOs hammer the federal government for this type of legislation, they are also targeting state legislators for integration of corridors and connectivity policies into state legislation. Idaho has an action plan as well, identifying areas throughout the state for corridors. But the true plans are laid out by the Craighead Institute, targeting land use plans such as comprehensive plans, local zoning and ordinances, even HOAs for inclusions of such conservation drivel.
The Western Landowners Alliance, based in New Mexico, has similar goals, advancing policies for connected landscapes. Executive Director, Lesli Allison, has started the campaign for convincing private land owners to conserve their "working lands" for migration. Translated it means designed, regulated, and restricted use.
Ms. Allison presented this powerpoint, called Intermingled Public and Private Lands, to the Western Governors Association (WGA) last year, describing her intentions with graphics. Below is the most striking graphic. As the graphic shows, the true agenda behind any corridor type is restricted and highly regulated use on all property types.
The "threats" Ms. Allison identifies in her powerpoint include development, roads, fences, livestock, and energy. Apparently she also thinks land owners are a threat as the process is "led by NGOs, government agencies". So much for her notion of working with private landowners on working lands. Ms. Allison isn't the only one looking at this "working lands" issue, the WGA held a "working lands" roundtable in April this year that included the Nature Conservancy and Bureau of Land Management, but no citizens. In spite of claims that landowners should be involved in the decisions, and listened to, it is really about deceiving them on the true agenda. The graphic shows the true intention.
If a corridor is declared on public land, the committed effort will then be plowing through private, municipal, and state land, extending the corridor from one protected area to another. Corridors, no matter what type, will have protections placed on them for banned or restricted use. As seen in the graphic, the purple shows how corridors provide "connectivity" between protected public land.
WARNING: It is critical that citizens fight any reference to corridors in local land use plans such as comprehensive plans, zoning, and ordinances. If inserted, that language will be a stepping stone for this land use restriction agenda. When it is time for comprehensive plan updates, be actively involved so this does not happen. Also, share this with your elected officials and private property owners with working lands so they understand what is happening.
Lastly, where is all of this coming from? Gary Tabor, Center for Large Landscape Conservation (CLLC) president, and Network for Landscape Conservation (NLC) Coordinating Committee member, is also the Specialist Group Leader for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Connectivity Conservation program, the purpose of which is to facilitate species conservation through protected areas. CLLC is also an IUCN member, just type in CLLC. Tabor is bringing IUCN ideology to a local level, through the NLC partnerships that include federal agencies, and it is generally understood that IUCN is a UN partner. Hello Agenda 2030.
Since information seems to mysteriously disappear off the internet once exposed, here is a copy of the powerpoint.
The Better World Campaign (BWC) was created in 1999 by Ted Turner as part of his historic $1 billion gift to support UN causes. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., this organization "works to foster a strong, effective relationship between the United States and the United Nations" by engaging "policymakers, the media, and the American public". Naturally, since the UN is all about corporatism to promote their ideology, businesses have financially benefited from the UN. Fortunately Idaho seems to be left off the list.
In addition to the BWC, Turner also created the United Nations Foundation with that billion. Since that money dried up in 2014, the UN had to find other dupes to fund them. Well, it turns out that was no problem. Governments around the world including the US, foundations, and corporations have picked up the tab without a word on how that money is spent.
The United Nations Association of the United States of America (UNAUSA) also supports UN activities and work with BWC. They are even involved in helping our youth to become global citizens. In Idaho, there are two chapters, one at Boise State University, and the other at Idaho State University. The UNAUSA works to promote the UN Sustainable Development Goals, indoctrinate the young through their programs, advance LGBTI rights, support illegal aliens, and in general force us into a global world under UN dictates.
It is a sad future for America.
In spite of the tin foil hat accusers that Agenda 21 doesn't exist, here is former Vice President Al Gore, and traitor to the United States, talking about it and how the world could now see themselves as a "single community of nations", "making up a global civilization". AKA signing our sovereignty away. In spite of his claims that the Senate holds responsibility for signing treaties, Agenda 21 was never signed by the Senate, yet it was implemented.
Agenda 21, known as Sustainable Development, was implemented by WJ Clinton in 1993 via his President's Council on Sustainable Development. Here he is talking about it.
Here is Nancy Pelosi promoting the adoption of Agenda 21.
Now 26 years later, we have been destroyed as a Republic, there is no longer a representative government, but rather an extension of our government by non-governmental organizations and the implementation of UN objectives, an oligarchy, funded by the wealthy. Until this is eliminated, we will continue on the downward path of globalization by the UN, and a complete loss of our freedom.
It is so nice to know what our future holds for us, instead of having to worry about it, the United Nations (UN) has it all figured out through their corporate partnerships.
The World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD) originally created the Vision 2050 document which can be downloaded here. Recently however, because of all the progress they have made in taking over the world, they had a "refresh", but they won't allow anyone to access it unless they are a member. To tantalize those of us who are of no importance, they did put out a brochure on the refresh. Below is an image of how the UN plans to govern the world that reflects their Vision 2050 refresh. Sit back, relax, you will be taken care of, compliments of the UN.
This website is non-partisan and is solely dedicated to removing the harmful controls placed on our state and nation through Agenda 21 and its associated programs. We invite all Idahoans to join us in this fight for freedom!